improving Accuracy Of EWT - cognitive interview Flashcards
what are the 4 techniques of cognitive interview
- context reinstatement
- report everything
- recall from changed perspective
- recall in reverse order
define context reinstatement
and why does it work
recreating environment
how they were feeling
mental consistency between actual incident and recreated
More details and more accurate
Define report everything and why does it work?
Report every detail, even if it seems irrelevant
May trigger other memories
Define recall from change per perspective and why does it work?
mentally re-create situation from other people’s perspective
Disrupt affect schemas have on our recall
Make think about what happened instead of what should happen
define recall in reverse order and why does it work?
Describe event in reverse order or in a different order
Prevents use of schemas and dishonesty
Much harder to produce and provide untruthful account if reversing
evaluation of cognitive interview
Research to support the effectiveness of the cognitive interview
showed participants police training videos of crime
48 hours later interviewed either using CI, standard or hypnosis
CI most accurate recall, then hypnosis then standard
More effective than standard police interview
evaluation of the cognitive interview
A combination of techniques works best
All four you singularly produced more info than standard
CR and RE combined produced better recall than any other
Shorten process and increase positive real life application to improve interviewing
evaluation of the cognitive interview
The cognitive interview is not always realistic and police practice
take more time so cost is greater
Take longer to build report and allow them to relax
Require a special training
Many don’t have the resources
Practical application of psychology restricted by economy
evaluation of cognitive interview
The cognitive interview creates an increase in inaccurate information
Found 81% increase in correct information
bought a 61% increase in incorrect info compared to the standard interview
Sacrifice quality of eyewitness testimony in favour of quantity of information
Need to treat with caution