Imperial Anthropology – Week 9 Flashcards
1
Q
Key Themes:
A
- Origins
- Measuring men
- Darwin and the Apes
- Picturing “Savages”
2
Q
Studying “Others”:
A
- Anthropology grew out of natural history as a fusion of various modes of enquiry into “other” people (i.e. not Europeans)
- The study of Europeans was called history, sociology, economics etc..; “we” were not the subjects of anthropology
- Nevertheless, anthropology was founded on an assumption of universalism, we’re all human
- Tension with ethnology, which was the study of diversity
3
Q
Biblical (ethnological) tradition:
A
- Assumed Monogeny
- Literally “one race” (“genus”); hence monogenist, monogenism
- A literal reading of the Bible shows that all humans are one, species, descended ultimately from Adam and Eve
4
Q
“Developmental tradition”:
A
- Biblical story assumed that history/change = decay
- Grenco-Roman materialism made the opposite assumption
- People acquired new skills and qualities as they spread across the Earth encouraging new challenges. Hence the ascent from primitive brutality to civilisation.
5
Q
Histories of humanity:
A
- Despite their differences, the biblical (ethnological) and developmental (evolutionist) tradition were diachronic, i.e. they shared the assumption of change over time
- Physical anthropology (polygeny) was synchronic (i.e. people did not change over time)
6
Q
Samuel Morton (1799-1851):
A
- Philadelphia physician, who took over 1,000 skulls (mostly of Native Americans)
- Morton measured the skulls (craniometry) and used his measurements to provide scientific evidence to support polygenesis
7
Q
Polygeny:
A
- The Polygenic theory was first advanced by Isaac de La Peyrere, a French Protestant writer, in 1665, in a book called the pre-Adamites
- La Peyrere argued that there had been other humans outside the Garden of Eden, one of whom Cain married after murdering Abel
- Polygenetic theories were partly stimulated by the discovery of the New World; La Peyrere argued that its peoples were not descended from Adam
8
Q
Studying “others”:
A
• Historically, anthropology grew in response to European expansion; its job was to interpret and explain the “otherness” of the peoples Europeans encountered as they spread
9
Q
Travel:
A
- European expansion, trade and colonisation, increased demand for anthropolical data
- Also provided opportunities for anthropologists
10
Q
James Cowles Prichard (1786-1848)
A
- British naturalist, doctor and an evangelical Anglican (from a Quaker background)
- Used his knowledge of natural history to defend the literal truth of scripture, that humanity was all one family
- Researchers into the ‘Physical History of Man’ (1813) was one of several publications which aimed to prove Genesis correct
- Prichard was hugely influential in Britain
- 1839: spoke at the British Association “On the Extinction of Human Races”
- He predicted the extermination of most “savage” races and argued that: “it is of the greatest importance, in a philosophical point of view, to obtain much more extensive information on their physical/moral character”
11
Q
The London Ethnological Society:
A
- Grew out of the earlier Aborigines Protection Society. Dominated by monogenests, anti-slavery campaigners, and missionaries
- Shared philanthropic and scientific goals
12
Q
Not real Science?
A
- Some anthropologists rejected the work of the Ethnological societies as unscientific
- Rival anthropological societies were founded (in Paris 1859, and in London 1863)
- Dominated by polygenists: Pierre Paul Broca (1824-80) in France and James Hunt (1833-69) in UK
13
Q
Anthropological Society of London:
A
- Home of British polygenesis, which traced to Robert Knox whose ‘Races of Man’ (1850) argued for permanently distinct human types
- James Hunt (1833-69), one of his followers founded the Anthropological Society
- Membership dominated by medical doctors and army officers (40% stationed in the colonies, especially India), then scientists or academics, then clergymen.
- John Beddoe (1826-1911), a president of the Institute, recorded in his memoirs that the audience always responded warmly to a defence of British Imperialism
14
Q
Darwin and Evolution:
A
- Darwin goes public, first edition ‘On the Origin of Species’ published 1859
- Plausible argument for evolution = natural selection
- Darwin wrote almost nothing about human evolution
15
Q
Darwin and Race:
A
• Darwin came from an anti-Slavery family and was strongly opposed to slavery