Imperial Anthropology – Week 9 Flashcards

1
Q

Key Themes:

A
  1. Origins
  2. Measuring men
  3. Darwin and the Apes
  4. Picturing “Savages”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Studying “Others”:

A
  • Anthropology grew out of natural history as a fusion of various modes of enquiry into “other” people (i.e. not Europeans)
  • The study of Europeans was called history, sociology, economics etc..; “we” were not the subjects of anthropology
  • Nevertheless, anthropology was founded on an assumption of universalism, we’re all human
  • Tension with ethnology, which was the study of diversity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Biblical (ethnological) tradition:

A
  • Assumed Monogeny
  • Literally “one race” (“genus”); hence monogenist, monogenism
  • A literal reading of the Bible shows that all humans are one, species, descended ultimately from Adam and Eve
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

“Developmental tradition”:

A
  • Biblical story assumed that history/change = decay
  • Grenco-Roman materialism made the opposite assumption
  • People acquired new skills and qualities as they spread across the Earth encouraging new challenges. Hence the ascent from primitive brutality to civilisation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Histories of humanity:

A
  • Despite their differences, the biblical (ethnological) and developmental (evolutionist) tradition were diachronic, i.e. they shared the assumption of change over time
  • Physical anthropology (polygeny) was synchronic (i.e. people did not change over time)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Samuel Morton (1799-1851):

A
  • Philadelphia physician, who took over 1,000 skulls (mostly of Native Americans)
  • Morton measured the skulls (craniometry) and used his measurements to provide scientific evidence to support polygenesis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Polygeny:

A
  • The Polygenic theory was first advanced by Isaac de La Peyrere, a French Protestant writer, in 1665, in a book called the pre-Adamites
  • La Peyrere argued that there had been other humans outside the Garden of Eden, one of whom Cain married after murdering Abel
  • Polygenetic theories were partly stimulated by the discovery of the New World; La Peyrere argued that its peoples were not descended from Adam
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Studying “others”:

A

• Historically, anthropology grew in response to European expansion; its job was to interpret and explain the “otherness” of the peoples Europeans encountered as they spread

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Travel:

A
  • European expansion, trade and colonisation, increased demand for anthropolical data
  • Also provided opportunities for anthropologists
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

James Cowles Prichard (1786-1848)

A
  • British naturalist, doctor and an evangelical Anglican (from a Quaker background)
  • Used his knowledge of natural history to defend the literal truth of scripture, that humanity was all one family
  • Researchers into the ‘Physical History of Man’ (1813) was one of several publications which aimed to prove Genesis correct
  • Prichard was hugely influential in Britain
  • 1839: spoke at the British Association “On the Extinction of Human Races”
  • He predicted the extermination of most “savage” races and argued that: “it is of the greatest importance, in a philosophical point of view, to obtain much more extensive information on their physical/moral character”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The London Ethnological Society:

A
  • Grew out of the earlier Aborigines Protection Society. Dominated by monogenests, anti-slavery campaigners, and missionaries
  • Shared philanthropic and scientific goals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Not real Science?

A
  • Some anthropologists rejected the work of the Ethnological societies as unscientific
  • Rival anthropological societies were founded (in Paris 1859, and in London 1863)
  • Dominated by polygenists: Pierre Paul Broca (1824-80) in France and James Hunt (1833-69) in UK
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Anthropological Society of London:

A
  • Home of British polygenesis, which traced to Robert Knox whose ‘Races of Man’ (1850) argued for permanently distinct human types
  • James Hunt (1833-69), one of his followers founded the Anthropological Society
  • Membership dominated by medical doctors and army officers (40% stationed in the colonies, especially India), then scientists or academics, then clergymen.
  • John Beddoe (1826-1911), a president of the Institute, recorded in his memoirs that the audience always responded warmly to a defence of British Imperialism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Darwin and Evolution:

A
  • Darwin goes public, first edition ‘On the Origin of Species’ published 1859
  • Plausible argument for evolution = natural selection
  • Darwin wrote almost nothing about human evolution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Darwin and Race:

A

• Darwin came from an anti-Slavery family and was strongly opposed to slavery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Rejection of Darwin:

A

• Polygenists and physical anthropologists initially rejected Darwin’s ideas; too monogenist and too speculative

17
Q

Acceptance of Darwin:

A
  • Darwin’s ideas combined with important new fossil finds and the vastly expanded geological time scale, led to increasing interest in origins of humanity
  • Charles Lyell ‘The Antiquity of Man’ 1863
18
Q

Evolutionary Progress:

A

• Darwin’s theories were interpreted as a continuation of earlier traditions of “progressive development” (e.g. The Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation, 1844)

19
Q

Armchair Anthropology:

A
  • Edward Burnett Tylor (1832-1917) devised an evolution of religion sequence that ran from primitive animism through polytheism to monotheism
  • John Mclennan (1827-81) traced the evolution of marriage, from primitive promiscuity, through polyandry to monogamy
  • Lewis Henry Morgan (1818-81), USA, produced a more general scheme in which humanity progressed from “lower savagery” through three phases of “barbarism” up to civilisation
20
Q

Augustus Henry Lane Fox Pitt-Rivers (1826-1911)

A
  • President of the Anthropological Institute, who was a Lieutenant General in the Grenadier Guards
  • An urgent need for anthological studies because: “the manners and customs of uncivilised races are changing with a rapidity unprecedented in the world’s history and the continued existence of some of these races becoming a question of only a few years”
  • Britain was: “a nation which from its vast colonial possessions is placed more continuously in contact with savage races” and therefore has a special responsibility for collecting anthropological data
21
Q

The Anthropological Institute:

A
  • James Hunt died in 1869
  • In 1871, Thomas Huxley engineered a merger between the British Ethnological and Anthropological Societies
  • The new Anthropological Institute embodied “classical evolutionism”, a post-Darwinism synthesis of mono- and polygenist traditions
22
Q

Picturing the “savages”

Great Exhibition:

A
  • Crystal Palace, London 1851

* Crystal Palace, rebuilt in Sydenham, South London, after it closed in 1851

23
Q

Later Exhibitions:

A

• Success of the 1851 exhibition led to numerous imitations around the world

24
Q

Exhibiting people:

A
  • Live “savages” were a popular show in London and elsewhere in the nineteenth century
  • R.A. Cunningham’s “Boomerang Throwers”,
25
Q

Thomas Huxley:

A

• 1869: proposed to the colonial office: “The Formation of a systematic series of photographs of the various races of men comprehended within the British Empire”
• 1870: presented a new classification of human types to the Ethnological Society. Five Races:
1. Australoid
2. Negroid
3. Xanthochron
4. Melanchroi
5. Mangoloid
• Unlike earlier classifications, he used a variety of physical characters (skin colour, hair type, eye colour, and skill shape), not just skulls
• Did not rank his groups by intelligence or ability, nor did he provide an explicit evolutionary account of their descent. Concentrated on geographical distribution of peoples
• Descriptions were still racist. He noted that the Negro forehead revealed “a good deal of the feminine, or childlike character”
• Huxley’s paper represented a revival of Prichard’s work, in that emphasised variety and that the “types” included many intermediate gradations

26
Q

Huxley’s “photometric instructions”

A
  • Subjects photographed naked
  • Camera at fixed distance from subjects
  • Measuring scale included in the photograph
  • Two-full length photos, one-full frontal, the other in profile
  • In photographs of females, the position of the arm should be “so disposed as not to interfere with the contour of the breast which is very characteristic in some races