Impeachment Flashcards

1
Q

Impeachment Evidence

A

Offered to attack a witness’s credibility (as opposed to substantive evidence offered to prove some fact at issue in the case)

Any party may impeach a witness, even their own witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Bolstering

A

A party is not permitted to bolster the testimony of their witness until the witness has been impeached (i.e., introducing a prior consistent statement)

Exceptions:
-Evidence that a witness made a timely complaint
-Prior statement of identification (i.e., identifying D as perpetrator of charge crime)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Impeachment Methods

A

Cross examination: eliciting facts from the witness that discredit their own testimony; or

Extrinsic evidence: calling other witnesses or introducing documents that prove the impeaching facts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Prior Inconsistent Statements

A

A party may show that the witness has, on another occasion, made statements inconsistent with their present testimony
-Impeaches a witness with facts that are specific to the current case
-By extrinsic evidence or cross-examination

Foundation for extrinsic evidence*:
Can be introduced to prove a prior inconsistent statement only if, at some point before or after introduction of extrinsic evidence:
-Witness is given an opportunity to explain or deny the statement
-Adverse party is given opportunity to examine witness about the statement

*Not applicable if prior inconsistent statement is an opposing party’s statement or when made by a hearsay declarant

A testifying witness’s prior inconsistent statement say also be admissible as substantive evidence when it was made under oath at a prior proceeding
-Admissible non-hearsay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Bias of Interest

A

A witness can be impeached by showing that he is biased or has an interest in the outcome of the case
-Shows witness has a motive to lie
-By extrinsic evidence or cross-examination
-Evidence that is otherwise admissible may be introduced if relevant to bias

Foundation for extrinsic evidence:
-Witness must first be asked about the facts that show bias or interest on cross-examination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sensory Deficiencies

A

A witness may be impeached by showing that their faculties were so impaired that it is doubtful that they could have perceived those facts
-By extrinsic evidence or cross examination
-No foundation requirement for extrinsic evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Contradictory Facts

A

A cross-examiner is allowed to question the witness to make him admit he lied or was mistaken about some fact testified to during direct
-If witness admits mistake, he is impeached
-If he sticks to the story, extrinsic evidence is permitted to prove contradictory fact unless the fact is collateral (not significantly relevant)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Opinion or Reputation Evidence for Witness’s Untruthfulness

A

A witness can be impeached with reputation or opinion evidence of their own bad character for UNTRUTHFULNESS
-Not specific acts of untruthfulness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Conviction of Crime

A

A witness may be impeached by proof of a conviction for certain crimes (ARREST OR INDICTMENT IS NOT SUFFICIENT; pending review irrelevant):
-Any crime involving dishonesty or false statement (no discretion to exclude)
-A felony not involving dishonesty (discretion depends on type of witness):
-Criminal Defendant Witness –> exclude when prosecution has not
shown that probative value outweighs prejudicial effect (favors
exclusion)
-All other witnesses –> exclude when probative value is substantially
outweighed by prejudicial effect (403 - favors admission)
-Crimes older than 10 years (later of conviction or release) are INADMISSIBLE unless extraordinary circumstances
-Reverse 403 test that strongly favors exclusion + written notice
-A pardoned conviction based on innocence or rehabilitation cannot be used to impeach
-Juvenile convictions are generally inadmissible

Prior conviction is introduced on cross-examination or by introducing a record of judgement extrinsic evidence - NO FOUNDATION REQUIRED)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Other Bad Acts Involving Untruthfulness

A

A witness may be impeached with an act of misconduct if the act is probative of untruthfulness (does not cover asking about arrests)
-On cross examination only, must be in good faith
-NO extrinsic evidence allowed
-i.e., lying on income tax statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Impeachment on Collateral Matter

A

A witness cannot be impeached on a collateral (not significant) matter by extrinsic evidence or by a prior inconsistent statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Impeachment of Hearsay Declarant

A

A hearsay declarant may be impeached by ANY impeachment method
-Does not need to be given the opportunity to explain or deny a prior inconsistent statement
-Includes hearsay that falls into exception or as a vicarious statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Rehabilitation

A

A witness who has been impeached may be rehabilitated by:
-Explaining or clarifying facts on redirect
-A witness’s bad character for truthfulness can be repaired by reputation or opinion testimony about the witness’s good character for truthfulness
-Prior consistent statements (two methods)*:
1. To rebut an implication a witness was lying or exaggerating because of a motive; or
2. To rebut an attack of faulty memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly