Character Evidence Flashcards
Substantive Character Evidence
Offered to prove a fact at issue in the case:
-Character is essential element of claim or defense (rare)
-Defamation, Negligent Hiring or Entrustment, Child Custody, and Fraud
-All methods of proving character evidence allowed
-Propensity evidence (only allowed by a few exceptions)
-Inadmissible in civil cases
Character Evidence for Impeachment
Offered to attack a witness’s credibility
Methods of Proving Character Evidence
(1) Specific Acts Evidence
(2) Opinion Testimony (personal knowledge)
(3) Reputation Testimony (community)
Defendant’s Character in Criminal Case
Only a criminal defendant may initiate evidence of own good character
-CDW may testify in form opinion or reputation (as to pertinent trait)
Once door is opened, prosecutor may rebut with bad character evidence
-P can call its own witness to provide opinion or reputation testimony about CD’s bad character; OR
-P can cross-examine CD’s witness by asking whether they are aware of specific acts including any misconduct or prior arrests
-Differentiate from impeaching a witness with witness’s own arrests
(improper)
-No extrinsic evidence allowed
Victim’s Character in Criminal Case
A criminal defendant may introduce bad character evidence of a victim when he claims self-defense and argues the victim was the first aggressor
-In the form of reputation or opinion evidence
Prosecutor may rebut with reputation or opinion evidence of:
-victim’s good character for peacefulness; OR
-defendant’s bad character for violence
NOTE: a victim’s character might also be offered for a non-propensity purpose –> to prove the defendant’s state of mind when he acted reasonably in self defense
-specific act evidence allowed for non-propensity purposes
In a HOMICIDE case where the defendant pleads self-defense, any evidence (not just character) that the victim was the first aggressor opens the door for the prosecutor to introduce evidence of the victim’s peacefulness
Rape Shield Law
Evidence offered to prove the victim’s sexual behavior or disposition is inadmissible (civil or criminal case involving sexual misconduct)
Exceptions in criminal cases:
-To prove someone other than defendant is source of physical evidence (i.e., semen)
-Specific instances of sex between victim and defendant to prove consent
Exception in civil cases:
-Only when probative value substantially outweighs unfair prejudice (reverse 403 - favors exclusion of evidence)
Other Misconduct for Non-Character Purpose (MIMIC)
Evidence of a person’s other crimes, wrongs, or acts is inadmissible for propensity reasoning, but is admissible if independently relevant:
-Motive (i.e., burning a building to hide embezzlement)
-Intent (to show guilty knowledge or lack of good faith)
-Mistake (absence of)
-Identity (signature crimes or modus operandi)
-Common plan or scheme (committing one crime to prepare for another)
*MIMIC is not exhaustive - admissible for any purpose other than character-propensity reasoning, subject to 403 balancing
Standard: sufficient evidence to support a jury finding that D committed the other misconduct
In criminal cases, prosecutor must provide notice if he intends to offer this type of evidence at trial
Defendant’s Similar Misconduct in Sex-Crimes Cases
D’s “other acts” of sexual assault or child molestation are admissible in criminal or civil cases where D is accused of either
-Only situation where evidence of D’s specific acts is admissible to show propensity
-Offering party must disclose evidence to D 15 days before trial