Impact of WW2 Flashcards

1
Q

How did WW2 affect the Empire in India

A
  • Viceroy Lord Linlithgow declared war on India’s behalf without consulting Indian leaders – despite this many Indians (e.g. the princes and military officers) still contributed to the war effort e.g. 2.5m Indians volunteered to fight.
  • Mohammed Ali Jinnah, leader of the Muslim league, pledged to support Britain, hoping to win British support for a separate Muslim state of Pakistan.
  • However, some Indians opposed the war (Ghandhi, The Congress Party).
  • USA urge Churchill to grant freedom to India, Churchill agreed to send Sir Stafford Cripps to India to negotiate.
    -> Churchill reluctantly offered India
    independence after the war in return for support during it but Congress leaders, settling for nothing short of immediate full independent turned down the offer.
  • The ‘Quit India’ campaign started after Cripps visit to India.
  • In the last 2 years of the war, inflation grew and Bengal suffered a severe famine in 1943-4 which may have killed 3-4 million people -> increased doubts as to whether the raj could properly govern India.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain how some Indians opposed the war

A
  • Gandhi, a pacifist, opposed any support
  • Some Indian nationalists were prepared to work with Germany and Japan.
  • The Congress Party, now dominated by Nehru, refused support for the war effort unless India was first granted independence -> when this was refused Congress called on provincial governments to resign office which they did although many reluctantly.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the ‘Quit India’ campaign

A
  • The British authority arrested Congress leaders
    -> Congress rank and file supporters tried to dislodge the war effort by sabotaging railways, cutting telephone lines and attacking government buildings.
  • Troops and aircraft helped the police to quell the disturbances but several thousand Indians were killed and wounded and 100 000 were arrested.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How did WW2 affect the Empire in South East Asia

A
  • By 1942, Japan seized the major European imperial possessions in South East Asia.
  • Britain lost Singapore, the great new ‘invulnerable’ imperial base, in February 1942 – this was where Britain’s main military base was and its loss brought the largest surrender of British troops in history.
    ->132,000 British subjects were taken prisoner.
  • The Japanese seized Hong Kong, overran Malaya and Burma and by summer 1942 seemed poised to attack India.
  • An attempted Japanese invasion in 1944 was narrowly averted and thereafter the allied forces were able to roll back the Japanese conquests in the region.
  • The success of the Japanese ended the myth of ‘white invincibility’ and gave independence movements greater confidence.
  • 30 000 Indian troops had been captured by the Japanese in Singapore joined the Indian National Army which aimed to rid India and Asia of the British.
  • The INA, ledf from 1943 by Subhas Chandra Bose, fought against the British in Burma and elsewhere.
  • The Burma Independence Army, formed by Aung San under the guidance of Japan, also fought the British.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How did WW2 affect the Empire in North Africa and the Middle East

A
  • Britain desperate to preserve influence in Egypt and access to Suez and the oil in the Middle East.
  • Germans were only driven back by the Battle of El Alamein in November 1942 both the Egyptians and the Palestinians saw the opportunity for exploiting British weakness.
  • Egyptians and the Arabs felt resentful for how their countries had been treated by Britain during the war.
    -> Travel and contact and new expectations prompted new political activity.
  • In Iraq, there was an army rebellion against the British garrisons in May 1941 which was successful for a while.
    The Egyptians and the Arabs felt resentful for how their countries had been treated by Britain during the war
  • In Iraq, there was an army rebellion against the British garrisons in May 1941 which was successful for a while.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Summarise the position of Empire after WW2

A
  • In 1940 a bill was introduced in parliament to give grants to colonies for their ‘development and welfare’ – very little of the money was ever
    actually spent but it was a start.
    -> a precedent for a much more substantial Colonial Development and Welfare Act in 1945.
  • Britain was hard pressed at home -> lacked the means to defend distant imperial territories.
    -> prompted a deep re-examination of the imperial relationship and an urgent reappraisal of the importance of self-reliance as a national strategy.
  • Britain was hard pressed at home lacked the means to defend distant imperial territories prompted both a deep re-examination of the imperial relationship and an urgent reappraisal of the importance of self-reliance as a national strategy.
  • Independence movements had grown stronger, particularly in India and the Middle East.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was Britain’s economic position after WW2

A
  • destruction of houses, factories and shipping cost Britain nearly 1⁄4 of its wealth.
  • Most foreign assets had been sold to pay for wartime imports, significantly reducing the income from abroad.
  • Britain was in £3 500m of debt, £2 500m was owed to the colonies.
    -> Britain became dependent on the USA
    which ended Britain’s existence as an independent great power.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain how the 2 major powers USA and USSR influenced the Empire

A
  • expected that Britain would need to maintain a massive military presence in Europe in order to deter any Soviet threat.
  • The American alliance was vital to Britain both
    during the war against Japan, Italy and Germany and afterwards- in all probability -against Russia.
  • Life Magazine 1942: they are sure they are ‘not fighting to hold the Empire together’ (USA).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

explain how there were signs of strength and continuity after WW2

A
  • Even the dependencies -> those which Britain
    denied self-government to – proved loyal.
  • Despite declaring war on India’s behalf many
    Indians still contributed to the war effort.
  • The Muslim league pledged to support Britain.
  • Atlee’s government had no intention of
    abandoning the empire, e.g. Britain was especially determined to hold on to Malaya.
    -> Ministers recognised that without colonies, Britain would no longer be a great power.
    -> would threaten economic prosperity.
  • Dominions and colonies contributed 5m
    fighting men.
  • Hitler had expected the empire to crumble at the first nudge – the fact that it didn’t was a tribute to the resilience of Britain’s colonial methods.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

explain how there were signs of weakness/decline after WW2

A
  • Some Indians opposed the war, e.g. Gandhi was a pacifist.
  • The ‘Quit India’ campaign showed the extent of Nationalism in India.
  • By 1945, Britain owed India £1375m.
  • Britain could not compare in size and strength with the USA and the USSR.
  • Severe economic problems left Britain
    dependent on the anti-imperialist USA and
    meant that Britain’s strong economy which had held the empire together and gave benefit to the empire was gone.
  • The dominions turned to the US for support.
  • The anti-colonial outlook of the USA and the USSR was likely to increase the hopes of
    colonial people for independence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Summarise the ways Britain dealt with India during the inter-war period

A
  • Gov of India Act 1919
  • adopted a ‘twin track’ strategy.
  • Rowlatt Act 1919
  • Gandhi leads a non-violent, non-cooperation protest 1919-1922.
  • nationalism grew but negotiations on moves towards Dominion status at the Round Table Conferences in early 1930s failed.
  • gov of India Act 1935.
  • during 1930s, British increasingly favoured the policy of ‘divide and rule’.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the government of India Act 1919

A
  • Nationalist demands for self-government after WW1 had resulted in the Government of India Act 1919 which
    allowed a limited system of self-government for India based on the sharing of powers between Indian ministers and the British Viceroy.
  • This intended to satisfy the demands for greater Indian representation among the more moderate nationalists by
    presenting the reforms as a step towards full Dominion status for India.
  • The British were concerned that these reforms would strengthen nationalist aspirations.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what was the twin track strategy the British adopted in India

A
  • a combination of reforms and a clear signal that any resort by the nationalists to create mass resistance would be dealt with ruthlessly.
  • Rowlatt Act of 1919 is an example of this.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the Rowlatt Act 1919

A
  • an example of the twin track strategy.
  • gave the authorities harsh powers to arrest
    and imprison anyone who protested against British rule.
  • The Rowlatt Act proved counterproductive, producing much resistance and tragic results, including the
    Amritsar massacre.
    -> April 1919 where General Sir Reginald Dyer fired on demonstrators, killing 379 and injuring 1200.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what was the government of India act in 1935

A

increased the number of Indians eligible to vote and strengthened the
elected provincial assemblies.
- It granted autonomous government for the Indian provinces, with protected Muslim representation, but nationalist opinion still favoured complete Indian independence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain the development of Britain’s ‘divide and rule’ policy in India in the 1930s

A
  • favoured former policy of ‘divide and rule’, playing on the growing divisions in the nationalist movement.
  • The All India Muslim League, led by Muhammad Ali Jinnah wanted a separate Muslim state of Pakistan.
  • The Hindu Congress movement, led by Gandhi wanted a united Indian state.
    -> However, they were
    divided by those willing to share power with the British and those who suspected (correctly) that the British
    were trying to break up the Congress by ‘federalizing’ India into self-governing provinces.
  • Gandhi preached Hindu-Muslim unity, but the Muslims viewed him with suspicion.
  • The British favoured the Muslim league – they suggested that the divisions between Hindus and Muslims
    proved the necessity of continued British rule since the alternative was likely to be a bloody civil war famine.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

In what ways did Britain struggle to keep control of India during WW2

A
  • provincial governments resigned in 1939 in opposition to India’s entry to the war without consultation or concessions.
  • influence of civil-disobedience campaign by Gandhi in Oct 1940.
    -> ‘Quit India’.
  • emergence of INA raised anxiety.
  • British adopt adopt a policy of repression.
  • March 1942, Churchill sends Cripps.
  • Aug 1942 Gandhi and other Congress leaders launched ‘Quit India’ campaign.
    -> calling for Britain to leave entirely.
    -> Ghandhi arrested and spent the rest of the war in prison.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Explain the influence of the civil-disobedience campaign in India on Britian’s struggle to maintain control

A
  • civil-disobedience campaign inaugurated by Gandhi in October 1940 filled the prisons with 14 000 protesters in 6 months and later serious riots and disorders all over India killing 900.
    -> The ‘Quit India’
    movement was a massive emergency – the gravest threat to the Raj since the mutiny.
19
Q

Explain Britain’s policy of repression in India =

A
  • imprisoned congress leaders and placed the Congress under a ban.
    -> blatantly favoured the Muslim league.
    -> social and religious divides became toxic with hatred.
20
Q

Explain Churchill’s decision to send Cripps to India in March 1942

A
  • sent Cripps to promise India full Dominion status.
    -> this was not enough and talks broke down over Congress leaders’ insistence on a larger share of control over India’s war effort.
21
Q

Why did the labour government decide to withdraw from India in 1947

A
  • in 1945 decided it was no longer desirable or feasible to keep India and decided to grant independence as soon as possible.
  • feared if they tried to keep India there would be widespread violent resistance which would stretch military resources.
  • activities of the INA and the strength of nationalist feeling meant the Indian army might not be reliable British troops might have to be deployed which would be extremely expensive and unpopular with the public.
  • India no longer a great market for British cotton exports so the cost of keeping it outweighed the economic
    benefit.
22
Q

to what extent did Britain withdraw from India with honour and dignity

A
  • many commended the speed at which withdrawal occurred.
  • Given Hindu-Muslim antagonism there was little alternative to partition.
  • Pakistan and India both became Dominions within the Commonwealth.
  • If Britain waited it could have turned into a civil war.
  • Britain worked closely with nationalist leaders of Congress and Muslim League.
  • Britain wished to appease the wishes of the international community esp USA and UN.
23
Q

To what extent did Britain withdraw from India with LITTLE honour and dignity

A
  • Britain has used divide and rule tactics.
  • 10s of millions of people found that new
    boundaries had turned them into religious minorities.
  • Britain’s precipitate withdrawal probably
    contributed to the violence – ethnic cleansing
    on a huge scale - in which a million people died
    and 13m became refugees.
  • A Punjabi magistrate remarked ‘you have left
    India in the same condition of chaos as you
    found it’.
  • Pakistan and India refused to sign a defence
    agreement with Britain showing continued
    distrust and that Britain was no longer a great
    power.
  • Partition alienated Pakistan and India from
    Britain and entrenched enmity between the two
    new states.
24
Q

List the reasons why the British withdrew from Palestine

A
  • Migration
  • Violence
  • Economics / resources
  • Unable to compromise
  • Actions of the United Nations
25
Q

Explain how migration was a reason to why Britain withdrew from Palestine

A
  • Huge influxes of Jewish migrants after WW2 led to a deterioration in the Arab-Jewish relationships.
26
Q

Explain how violence was a reason to why the British withdrew from Palestine

A
  • There was an outbreak of Jewish terrorism and Britain struggled to police the violence.
    -> By early 1947, 100 000 British troops occupied Palestine at the annual cost of £40m but the British still struggled to maintain order.
  • Jewish terrorism strengthened Britain’s determination to oppose concessions to Jewish
    immigrants.
27
Q

Explain how economics/resources were a reason why Britain withdrew from Palestine

A
  • Britain had spent over £100m on governance since 1945 and over 330 British soldiers
    died fighting there.
  • The economic situation was particularly dire in February 1947 with bread rationing and
    fuel shortages in Britain - the economy could not maintain this level of commitment in Palestine.
28
Q

Explain how the British being unable to compromise with the Jews/Arabs was a reason why Britain withdrew from Palestine

A
  • aim was to find a compromise that would satisfy Jews and Arabs alike but this seemed an impossible goal.
  • The Jews wanted a separate Jewish state but the Arabs favoured a unitary state where they would dominate.
  • Bevin didn’t want to alienate the Arab world because he wanted access to the oil in the Middle East but Britain was also reliant on the USA - who sympathised with the Zionist
    cause.
  • Britain passed over responsibility to the UN and withdrew from Palestine.
29
Q

Explain how actions of the United Nations was a reason why Britain withdrew from Palestine

A
  • In September 1947, the UN stated that independence should be granted to Palestine as soon as possible and that Palestine should be partitioned with 55% in the Jewish state despite the Jews only being 1/3 of the population.
  • Britain so strongly disagreed with the UN’s plan, which alienated the Arabs, so it decided it would leave rather than implement the plan to try to extricate itself from the situation and
    appease both sides.
30
Q

Explain how British withdrawal from Palestine was successful

A
  • Britain left it for the international community to decide what to do in the area, meaning Britain did not take the important decision on the future of the state on its own.
  • Britain did not take either side in the conflict so it didn’t alienate either side.
    -> It managed to maintain its standing in the Middle East with the Arabs and with the US.
31
Q

Explain how British withdrawal from Palestine was unsuccessful

A
  • Leading up to withdrawal violence increased by the British army intervened less and less – simply allowing it to happen so they couldn’t be accused of being on either side.
  • Britain simply ‘washed its hands’ of the conflict by abdicating its responsibilities to the UN despite American pressure to stay and intensifying hostilities.
    -> There was little honour in the evacuation.
  • The administration was confused e.g. the army
    simultaneously evacuated troops and called for
    reinforcements.
32
Q

To what extent was Britain to blame for the problems in Palestine

A
  • Britain protected its own interests instead of preparing Palestine for independence.
  • Britain allowed the mass Jewish immigration into Palestine and promises were made to allow more.
  • Balfour Declaration – it didn’t consider the Arab population and made promised they couldn’t keep to the Jews.
  • Conflicting promises were made to the Arabs and Jews immigration.
33
Q

to what extent was Britain not blame for the problems in Palestine

A
  • President Truman demanded large-scale immigration and supported Zionism.
  • Jewish terrorism increased the tensions.
  • The Anglo-American Committee encouraged further immigration – this wasn’t just Britain.
  • Holocaust caused sympathy for Jews around the world.
34
Q

Explain the development of decolonisation in Burma

A
  • During WW2 Burmese the Anti-fascist Organisation (AFO) initially supported Japanese but switched sides.
  • restoration of the British governor after the war turned the AFO into a resistance force called the Anti-Fascist People’s Freedom League (AFPFL).
  • Violet resistance led by Aung San combined with lack go desire to keep Burma hastened withdrawal.
  • Talks in LDN in Jan 1947 agreed to elections for Constituent Assembly for April 1948.
  • AFPFL won a huge majority but warring factions within led to significant devisions culminating in the assassination of Aung San.
  • Independence was granted on 4th Jan 1948 with the Burmese rejecting the idea of joining the Commonwealth.
35
Q

List the reasons for withdrawal from Burma

A
  • Nationalsim
  • War
  • Economic problems
  • political developments
36
Q

Explain how nationalism was reason for British withdrawal from Burma

A
  • The Burmese hated British rule and there were several nationalist movements causing Britain
    problems.
  • By September 1946, there was a great deal of civil disobedience in Burma.
37
Q

Explain how war was a reason for British withdrawal from Burma

A
  • Many of the Burmese had collaborated with the Japanese to help take over Burma in 1942.
  • Britain failed to recognise it and still tried to reinstate control after the war.
38
Q

Explain how economic problems were a reason for Britain’s withdrawal from Burma

A
  • Britain could not afford to maintain control of Burma.
39
Q

Explain how political developments were a reason for Britain’s withdrawal from Burma

A
  • Attlee declared that his government was neither willing or able to send sufficient
    amounts of troops to Burma to secure British authority, mainly due to how Britain was losing the Indian army which was used to control Burma.
  • Dorman-Smith was replaced with the more liberal Hubert Rance.
40
Q

Explain how withdrawal from Burma was successful

A
  • Britain responded to civil disobedience by using more liberal policies in Burma and tried to reach a compromise.
  • In 1947, Britain worked closely with Aung San and reached the agreement on an elected Constituent Assembly.
41
Q

Explain how withdrawal from Burma was unsuccessful

A
  • Dorman-Smith delayed change in Burma which turned the AFO against Britain again after the war.
  • were forced to replace the governor due to mass civil disobedience.
    -> They were not in control was were losing power.
  • They were unable to have a controlled withdrawal – had to make a fast exist because of the breakdown in order.
  • Civil war broke out in Burma.
  • Burma declined to join the Commonwealth showing they didn’t leave on friendly terms.
42
Q

To what extent was Britain to blame for the problems

A
  • continued to delay change necessary to manage Burma and keep people happy e.g. 1947 separating Burma from India.
  • spent little money on support and funding for
    Burma.
    -> The capital, Rangoon, had only one public library which spent £10 a year on books.
  • British rule was ultimately oppressive for the Burmese.
  • Intrusive income tax was imposed.
    -> Local government encroached Burma’s sense of community.
43
Q

to what extent was Britain not to blame for the problems

A
  • Nationalist formed groups and stirred the agitation.
  • The AFO helped Japan invade.
  • civil war was started by the political groups in Burma itself.