Impact Of Human Rights Flashcards

1
Q

What are Human Rights?

A

Human rights are inalienable, universal, and interdependent rights and freedoms belonging to every person from birth until death.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is meant by human rights being ‘inalienable’?

A

Inalienable means that human rights cannot be taken away.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is meant by human rights being ‘universal’?

A

Universal means that human rights apply to everyone, regardless of nationality, ethnicity, or any other status.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does ‘interdependent’ mean in the context of human rights?

A

Interdependent means that various rights and freedoms work together to contribute to an individual’s dignity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What year was the Council of Europe founded?

A

The Council of Europe was founded in 1949.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who was responsible for drafting the European Convention on Human Rights?

A

The Council of Europe, led by Sir Winston Churchill, was responsible for drafting the European Convention on Human Rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When did the UK agree to the European Convention on Human Rights?

A

The UK agreed to the ECHR in 1950.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the status of the ECHR when the UK initially signed it?

A

At the time, the ECHR was only a moral obligation for the UK.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the significance of the case Sunday Times v UK (1979)?

A

It was concluded that there had been a breach of Article 10 of the ECHR, which guarantees freedom of expression.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are ‘residual freedoms’?

A

Residual freedoms mean that individuals can do anything they like unless there is a law against it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did the case of Malone v Metropolitan Police (1979) demonstrate?

A

The case demonstrated that there was no right to privacy under English law at the time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does the Human Rights Act 1998 do?

A

It incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law, imposing obligations on public bodies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Who does the Human Rights Act apply to?

A

The Human Rights Act only applies to public bodies in the UK.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What rights are protected under the Human Rights Act?

A

Rights such as the right to life and the right to privacy are protected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the significance of Section 2 of the Human Rights Act?

A

It requires UK courts to take into account any decisions from the European Court of Human Rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does Section 3 of the Human Rights Act require from judges?

A

Judges must interpret Acts of Parliament in a way that is compatible with human rights.

17
Q

What is a ‘Declaration of Incompatibility’?

A

It is issued under Section 4 when an Act cannot be interpreted in line with human rights.

18
Q

What is the leading case related to Section 3 of the Human Rights Act?

A

The leading case is R v A (2001), where the courts discussed the power of interpretation.

19
Q

What does Section 4 of the Human Rights Act allow judges to do?

A

If a law cannot be interpreted compatibly with the Convention, judges must apply the law as it stands and may issue a Declaration of Incompatibility.

20
Q

What was demonstrated in the Belmarsh case (2004)?

A

It showed that Parliament’s sovereignty is respected, as declarations are issued when laws are fundamentally incompatible with human rights.

21
Q

What is Section 7 of the Human Rights Act about?

A

It allows individuals to go to domestic courts to have their human rights upheld without needing to petition the European Court.

22
Q

What does Section 10 of the Human Rights Act allow for?

A

It allows ministers to issue an Order in Council to change offending legislation without it passing all parliamentary stages.

23
Q

What has changed in terms of ECHR applicability post-Human Rights Act?

A

Convention rights are now directly applicable under domestic law.

24
Q

What does Section 3 allow judges to do regarding the interpretation of laws?

A

It allows judges to interpret laws in light of Convention rights wherever possible.

25
What does the Human Rights Act establish regarding primary legislation?
It gives higher courts the power to issue declarations of incompatibility.
26
What is meant by the 'positive rights' under current Human Rights Law?
Positive rights are rights that require action from public authorities to uphold them.
27
What does 'Parliamentary Supremacy' mean in the context of the Human Rights Act?
It means that while the courts can issue declarations, Parliament retains the ultimate power to make laws.
28
Why can judges use a purposive approach under Section 3?
Judges can use a purposive approach to stretch the wording of laws to comply with human rights.
29
What did the courts conclude about judges’ powers under Section 3?
Judges can add words to legislation but cannot change fundamental parts of the law.
30
What is the impact of Section 2 on UK courts regarding ECHR precedents?
It has caused difficulties since UK judges may need to follow ECHR decisions that others do not.
31
What ensures the presumption that human rights apply to every Act of Parliament?
It is presumed by the courts that Parliament does not intend to abuse human rights.
32
What does the term 'fast track procedure' refer to in Section 10?
It refers to the process allowing ministers to amend laws without the usual legislative procedure, simplifying changes.
33
How has the Human Rights Act changed the individual petition process?
It has eliminated the need for individual petitions to the ECHR, allowing direct access to domestic courts.
34
What did the case of Leeds City Council v Price (2006) demonstrate?
It showed that UK courts can choose UK precedents over ECHR decisions if there is a conflict.
35
What challenge did the House of Lords highlight regarding Section 4?
The challenge is the limitation on judges altering fundamental laws that remove human rights.
36
What role does the Queen play in the 'fast track' process of the Human Rights Act?
The Queen's sign-off is required for ministers to change legislation through an Order in Council.
37
Why is it significant that human rights evolves with society?
It implies that the ECHR is considered a living instrument, adapting to contemporary conditions.
38
How does the Human Rights Act 1998 enhance rights compared to pre-Act protections?
It provides direct applicability and stronger enforcement of human rights within the UK legal system.
39
What does the term 'positive aspect' refer to in the context of Section 3?
It implies that judges are working under the presumption that Parliament intends to safeguard human rights.