Immune System Flashcards

0
Q

What were the three stressors that segerstom and miller (2004) proposed?

A

Acute time limited stressor: 5-100 minutes tested under lab conditions

Brief naturalistic stressor: limited time everyday tested on exams

Chronic stressors: long periods tested on careers, unemployed, long term ill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

What is the immune system?

A

A complex network of components that provide the body’s defence system against infection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is naturalistic immunity?

A

The body’s first line of defence works within minutes or hours
Made up of white blood cells to attack and ingest pathogens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is specific immunity?

A

Within days it recognises invading pathogens and produces specific antibodies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the specific immunity split into?

A

Cellular: works within cell killer/helpher T cells

Humoral: works outside cell B cells produce anti-bodies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What can stress alter in the immune system?

A

From cellular to humoral

Suppression of immunity overall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was Cohen et al. 1993 study?

A

Life stress on the common cold
394 participants given questionnaires on: previous year, negative emotions and rated stress
3 scores into a stress index

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the findings of Cohen et al 1993 study?

A

82% became infected with the cold

It had a correlation with the stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Methological issues of Cohen et al 1993 study?

A

1- No measure of immune functioning

2- Measured health outcomes (clinical codes)

3- No cause and effect (no manipulation of the IV)

4- Didn’t know which elements are most important

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What study supports Cohen et al 1993 study?

A

Evans and edgerton 1991

Found cold developed of preceding days of stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the ethical issues of Cohen et al 1993 study?

A

1- Good health previously

2- Monitored constantly

3- Consistent debriefing

4- Science over distress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What Kiecolt-Glaser et al 1984 study?

A

75 medical student
NK cells tested one month before exams and during
Given a questionnaire on negative life events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What were the findings of Kiecolt-Glaser et al 1984 study?

A

NK cell mostly reduced in those with high life events

Brief naturalist immunity you are vulnerable to colds and it reduces immune functioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Methological issues of Kiecolt-Glaser 1984 study?

A

1- No illness outcome measured

2- No cause and effect

3- Non representative: generalised with caution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What studies supported Kiecolt-Glaser et al 1984?

A

Kiecolt-Glaser et al 1995: small wounds on Alzheimer’s careers too longer to heal

Kiecolt-Glaser et al 1991: also proved that careers had reduced immune functioning

Kiecolt-Glaser et al 1991: Divorce proceedings also had a negative effect on immunity

Malarkey et al 1994: Short term mayoral conflict reduced immunity in women more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were the ethical issues with Kiecolt-Glaser et al 1984 and 1995?

A

1- Natural

2- Consent debrief

3- Medical supervision essential

4- Small wounds: pain distress

5- Ethic committee have to approve

6- Scientific gain more than distress

16
Q

What was segerstom and miller 2004 meta-analysis?

A

293 studies
Acute limited stressor: up regulation of natural immunity

Brief naturalist stressor: no overall effects despite Kiecolt-Glaser et al study, evidence from a shift from cellular to Humoral

Chronic stressor: suppression effects consistent across age and gender

Non Specific life events: used SRRS no change however those over 55 reduction in NK cells in contrast to the life events

17
Q

What was Evans et al 1994 study?

A
  • students to give brief talks
  • measured the levels of an antibody (sigA) that coats the mucous membranes of the mouth, nose and lungs.
  • Following the talk the students had increased levels of this antibody
  • suggesting increased immunity.
18
Q

What was the conclusion overall of immunity?

A

Chronic stress means global suppression takes place
Shift in balance
No key difference in immunity with gender
Although malarkey et al 1994 and
Kiecolt-Glaser et al 1998 women reduced more than men in marital conflict