II. Business Law-Government Regulation of Business Flashcards
II. Business Law-Government Regulation of Business
- Federal Securities Regulation
- Defining a Security
Which of the following transactions is subject to registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933?
- The public sale of stock of a trucking company regulated by the Interstate Commerce Commission.
- A public sale of municipal bonds issued by a city government.
- The issuance of stock by a publicly traded corporation to its existing shareholders because of a stock split.
- The public sale by a corporation of its negotiable ten-year notes.
- These sales of stock are regulated, but not by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and not under the 1933 Act. They are exempt.
- Because of states rights, local transactions are exempt under the 1933 Act. Municipal bonds are not registered with the SEC.
- Stock splits are not considered sales of securities and are exempt under the 1933 Act.
- The 1933 Act applies to sales of securities, including stocks, bonds and notes that are issued for periods over nine months.
correct
II. Business Law-Government Regulation of Business
- Federal Securities Regulation
- Defining a Security
Which of the following is least likely to be considered a security under the Securities Act of 1933?
- Stock options.
- Warrants.
- General partnership interests.
- Limited-partnership interests.
3.
When a person invests in an enterprise that is primarily managed by another, the investment will probably qualify as a security. In a general partnership, the partners themselves are in charge of management. Investments in such a venture are likely made only by the partner/managers themselves, and are unlikely to be classified as securities.
II. Business Law-Government Regulation of Business
- Federal Securities Regulation
- The Registration Process
III. Basic Legal Framework
- During the Prefiling Period—A company can neither offer to sell securities nor sell them.
- During the Waiting Period—A company may make oral offers and certain types of written offers but cannot sell the securities.
-
Elaboration—During the waiting period, oral offers are permitted along with certain specified types of written offers, most importantly:
- The preliminary or “red herring” prospectus, and
- The “tombstone” ad, a black-bordered advertisement usually placed in the Wall Street Journal that would contain only:
- The name of the issuer;
- The full title of the security and the amount being offered;
- A brief description of the company’s business;
- The price range of the security;
- The name of the managing underwriter;
- The contemplated date of the issuance; and
- A few other minor items.
- Both the red herring prospectus and the tombstone ad will contain cautionary words that they constitute neither offers to sell nor solicitations of offers to buy and that no binding contract can be entered into until after the registration statement becomes effective.
- During the Post-Effective Period—An issuer may both offer and sell the securities.
II. Business Law-Government Regulation of Business
- Federal Securities Regulation
- The Registration Process
Non-WKSI issuer World Corp. wants to make a public offering of its common stock. On May 10, World prepares and files a registration statement with the SEC.
On May 20, World places a “tombstone ad,” announcing that it was making a public offering.
On May 25, World issues a preliminary prospectus and the registration statement becomes effective on May 30.
On what date may World first make oral offers to sell the shares?
- May 10.
- May 20.
- May 25.
- May 30.
1.
As soon as a registration statement is filed, ORAL offers may be made, as well as limited written advertising. The 20-day waiting period that exists applies to when the securities may actually be SOLD. Unless the SEC speeds up the approval process, no sale can take place for 20 days after the filing.
II. Business Law-Government Regulation of Business
- Federal Securities Regulation
- The Registration Process
When a common stock offering requires registration under the Securities Act of 1933,
- The registration statement is automatically effective when filed with the SEC.
- The issuer would be acting unlawfully if it were to sell the common stock without providing the investor with a prospectus.
- The SEC will determine the investment value of the common stock before approving the offering.
- The issuer may make sales ten days after filing the registration statement.
2.
If a security is non-exempt and must register, then all investors must be given a prospectus. This is true even if the investor is accredited. If anyone is entitled to a prospectus, then everyone is entitled to a prospectus.
II. Business Law-Government Regulation of Business
- Federal Securities Regulation
- The Registration Process
Under the Securities Act of 1933, which of the following statements is (are) correct regarding the purpose of registration?
I. The purpose of registration is to allow the detection of management fraud and prevent a public offering of securities when management fraud is suspected.
II. The purpose of registration is to adequately and accurately disclose financial and other information upon which investors may determine the merits of securities.
- I only.
- II only.
- Both I and II.
- Neither I nor II.
2.
B is the best answer, because the primary purpose of registration is to enable investors to make an informed decision as to whether to invest in a public offering.
II. Business Law-Government Regulation of Business
- Federal Securities Regulation
- The Registration Process
Which of the following disclosures must be contained in a non-WKSI issuer’s securities-registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933?
- A list of all existing stockholders.
- The principal purposes for which the offering proceeds will be used.
- A copy of the corporation’s latest proxy solicitation statement.
- The names of all prospective accredited investors.
2.
The registration statement required for all non-exempt securities must contain the following:
- a description of the security,
- how the corporation will use the proceeds from the sale,
- a description of the registrant’s business and management, and
- a financial statement.
These disclosures are meant to assist investors in evaluating risk.
II. Business Law-Government Regulation of Business
- Federal Securities Regulation
- Exempt Transactions and Securities
B. Examples of Exempt Securities
- Bank and government securities
- Rationale—Securities issued by banks and by governmental units are heavily regulated by other state and federal laws, so SEC registration is unnecessary.
- Limitation—Public utilities’ securities are not exempt.
- Short-term notes
- Commercial notes are exempt if carrying maturity of less than nine months.
- Notes issued for investment purposes are not exempt.
- Charitable organizations’ securities
- Examples—nonprofit educational, religious, benevolent, or fraternal organizations
- Regulated savings and loans
- Federally regulated common carriers
- Receiver or trustees in bankruptcy (that issue securities with court approval)
- Insurance and annuity policies
- However, the stock issued by insurance companies is not exempt.
II. Business Law-Government Regulation of Business
- Federal Securities Regulation
- Exempt Transactions and Securities
Sloban Corporation wishes to raise a lot of money without filing a registration statement with the SEC. It is interested in knowing more about Rule 506 of Regulation D. Which of the following is true?
- Firms may raise up to $50 million in a 12-month period under Rule 506.
- General solicitation is never allowed under Rule 506.
- Investors’ resale of securities purchased under Rule 506 is restricted.
- Unlike under Rule 504, issuers need not file a Form D.
- Incorrect. There is no ceiling at all under Rule 506. Issuers may raise more than $50 million in a 12-month period.
- Incorrect. General solicitation is allowed under subsection (c) of Rule 506. All purchasers must be accredited investors or acting through purchaser representatives, however.
- Correct! Purchasers must hold until Rule 144 allows resale, which for most investors is six months.
- Incorrect. Rule 506 issuers, like Rule 504 issuers, must file a Form D within 15 days of beginning the offering.
II. Business Law-Government Regulation of Business
- Federal Securities Regulation
- Exempt Transactions and Securities
Noxious Corporation is located in Idaho and wishes to sell securities to Idaho residents without filing a registration statement. Noxious would like to know more about the difference between Rule 147 and Rule 147A. Which of the following is not the same under both rules?
- There is no limit on the amount of money that can be raised in a 12-month period.
- There is no requirement that specified information be disclosed to investors.
- All offerees must be reasonably believed to be Idaho residents.
- Resale to non-Idaho residents by investors will be restricted.
3.
Correct! This is the choice where the two rules differ. Only Rule 147 requires that all offerees be state residents. Rule 147A requires only that all purchasers be state residents.
II. Business Law-Government Regulation of Business
- Federal Securities Regulation
- Exempt Transactions and Securities
Dizzle Corporation is just starting out and has heard about Regulation Crowdfunding. The company’s officers wish to know which of the following is true about the regulation:
- The maximum amount that can be raised in a 12-month period is $5 million.
- General solicitation is allowed without qualification.
- There are limitations on how much individuals may invest in a 12-month period.
- There are no informational requirements for issuers.
- Incorrect. The maximum amount was originally $1 million (which is inflation adjusted upward every five years).
- Incorrect. General solicitation is allowed, but the issuer must sell through an intermediary, such as a funding portal.
- Correct! There are limitations on how much investors may put into crowdfunding ventures in a 12-month period. These are occasionally inflation-adjusted and vary with the amount of income the investor has.
- Incorrect. One of the major criticisms of Regulation Crowdfunding is that it has arguably burdensome financial disclosure requirements.
II. Business Law-Government Regulation of Business
- Federal Securities Regulation
- Exempt Transactions and Securities
Kamp is offering $10 million of its securities for sale. Under Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933:
- The securities may be debentures.
- Kamp must be a corporation.
- There must be more than 35 purchasers.
- The securities may be resold without restriction by any purchasers.
- Correct! The securities may be debentures. All these federal exemptions are available for offerings of either equity or debt securities.
- Incorrect. Kamp may be a corporation, but it need not be. LLCs, for example, may also utilize Reg D.
- Incorrect. There may be more than 35 purchasers (though no more than 35 non-accredited investors), but there is no requirement that there be more than 35.
- Incorrect. Rule 506 securities are restricted resale.
II. Business Law-Government Regulation of Business
- Federal Securities Regulation
- Purposes, Requirements and Provisions of the 1934 Act
III. Created SEC—This Act created the Securities and Exchange Commission to enforce all federal securities laws. Among other things, the SEC:
- Enforces the 1933 Act’s registration and anti-fraud provisions
- Enforces the 1934 Act’s continuous disclosure and anti-fraud provisions
- Registers and regulates broker-dealers
- Registers and regulates investment advisers
- Enforces rules regarding proxy solicitations and tender offers
- Enforces criminal provisions of the federal securities laws by investigating fraud and referring cases to the Department of Justice for prosecution.
II. Business Law-Government Regulation of Business
- Federal Securities Regulation
- Purposes, Requirements and Provisions of the 1934 Act
IV. Disclosure Requirements Under the 1934 Securities Exchange Act
- Who are reporting companies that must file disclosure documents regularly with the SEC?
- All companies who have listed securities on a national exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange or the Nasdaq Global Market.
- A company with (a) $10 million in assets, and (b) 2,000 shareholders or 500 shareholders who are not accredited investors. Note that such a company may later deregister under this provision if it falls below 300 shareholders, no matter how much it has in assets.
- A company that files a registration statement with the SEC under the 1933 Securities Act.
- Even companies that have not registered with the SEC if they have more than $10 million in assets and more than 2,000 shareholdersin a single class
- A company that made a registered public offering during the year
- OTC (over the counter) “Bulletin Board” companies
- Remember that under the JOBS Act of 2012, firms that declare themselves to be Emerging Growth Companies (EGCs) need not comply with these filings for five years after their initial public offering (or until they no longer comply with the EGC requirements)
II. Business Law-Government Regulation of Business
- Federal Securities Regulation
- Purposes, Requirements and Provisions of the 1934 Act
An accountant will be liable for damages under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 only if the plaintiff proves that
- The accountant was negligent.
- There was a material omission.
- The security involved was registered.
- The security was part of an original issuance.
2.
A plaintiff must generally show several things to win a Section 10(b) case. A CPA must have
(1) intentionally or recklessly
(2) made a misstatement of material fact or omitted a material fact
(3) that was relied upon by the defendant.
Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 govern material misstatements and omissions that are related to the sale of any security. To win a case against a CPA based on one of these theories, the plaintiff must show that
- (s)he relied on the misstatements; that
- the misstatements were material; and that
- the CPA knew of the misstatements (acted with scienter).
If GAAS has been followed, this probably indicates that a CPA will not be liable, but a CPA may lose a case like this even if GAAS has been followed, so long as all three elements can be shown.