Ideologies of globalization Flashcards
Freeden’s Arguments:
- Current ideologies are fragmented, and uncertainty exists about whether ideology still exists.
- Freeden proposes two lines of inquiry to understand changing political belief systems:
- Questioning the implicit holism in the notion of an ideological family.
- Querying the dominant conventions of classifying ideologies.
- Freeden proposes two lines of inquiry to understand changing political belief systems:
Freeden’s Recommendations:
- Discusses ‘globalism’ as a potential holistic contender but remains skeptical about its status as an ideology.
- Recommends thought-exercises to reclassify ideologies based on human behavior features.
Virtues of Freeden’s Article:
- Reminds that political belief systems are ephemeral and require periodic reassessment.
- Challenges analysts to reconsider outdated classification systems.
- Calls for intellectual imagination through thought-exercises to redraw ideological boundaries.
Critique of Freeden’s Assessment:
- Disagrees with Freeden’s view that it’s too early to pronounce on globalism as an ideology.
- Asserts that globalism is a coherent set of political ideas and the dominant belief system of our time.
Definition of Globalization:
- Term ‘globalization’ refers to various processes, conditions, systems, forces, and ages.
- Globality signifies a future social condition with intense global interconnections, suggesting an indeterminate character of globalization.
Globalization vs. Globalism:
- Globalization is a set of social processes changing the modern nation-state system.
- Globalism, a belief system emerging in the late 1980s, associates globalization with expanding ‘free’ markets.
Evolution of Globalism:
- Decontested in public discourse in the late 1980s and 1990s.
- Associated with ‘free’ markets and promoted by globalists seeking a new global order.
- By the mid-1990s, large segments of the population, especially in the global North and South, accepted globalism’s core claims.
Popular Support for Globalization:
- Despite demonstrations against ‘corporate globalization,’ a significant percentage globally believed globalization was positive for them and their families.
- Globalism’s strong discourse relies on the power of ‘common sense’ and widespread belief in its program’s objectivity.
Analysis of Globalism:
- Proposed morphological analysis of globalism with a critical eye toward its ideological status.
This summary captures the key points, including Freeden’s arguments, recommendations, the critique of globalism, and the distinction between globalization and globalism.
II. Six core claims of globalism
Key Questions:
- When does a rising political belief system become an ‘ideological family’?
- Criteria and characteristics for upgrading a conceptual module to the status of an ‘ideology’ are explored.
II. Six core claims of globalism
Challenges in Determining Emerging Belief Systems:
- Blurred ideological boundaries, ideational dependencies, historical continuities, conceptual overlap, and methodological differences make it difficult to determine emerging political belief systems
II. Six core claims of globalism
Criteria for Ideological Status (Freeden’s View):
- Mature ideologies have unique features in distinct conceptual morphologies.
- They pattern ideologies with conceptual cores supporting adjacent and peripheral concepts.
- Criteria include uniqueness, morphological sophistication, context-bound responsiveness, and effective conceptual decontestation chains.
Role of Decontestation:
- Decontestation is vital in forming thought systems, specifying meanings by arranging concepts in a pattern.
- Ideologies use decontestation to end contention over concepts and fashion collective decisions, serving both a semantic and political role.
Ideological Claims and Mass Appeal:
- Ideological claims, forming effective decontestation chains, endow thought systems with specific meanings that benefit social groups.
- Mass appeal in the public realm enhances the political gravity of core claims, making the thought system more developed or ‘thicker.’