Ideologies of globalization Flashcards
1
Q
Freeden’s Arguments:
A
- Current ideologies are fragmented, and uncertainty exists about whether ideology still exists.
- Freeden proposes two lines of inquiry to understand changing political belief systems:
- Questioning the implicit holism in the notion of an ideological family.
- Querying the dominant conventions of classifying ideologies.
- Freeden proposes two lines of inquiry to understand changing political belief systems:
2
Q
Freeden’s Recommendations:
A
- Discusses ‘globalism’ as a potential holistic contender but remains skeptical about its status as an ideology.
- Recommends thought-exercises to reclassify ideologies based on human behavior features.
3
Q
Virtues of Freeden’s Article:
A
- Reminds that political belief systems are ephemeral and require periodic reassessment.
- Challenges analysts to reconsider outdated classification systems.
- Calls for intellectual imagination through thought-exercises to redraw ideological boundaries.
4
Q
Critique of Freeden’s Assessment:
A
- Disagrees with Freeden’s view that it’s too early to pronounce on globalism as an ideology.
- Asserts that globalism is a coherent set of political ideas and the dominant belief system of our time.
5
Q
Definition of Globalization:
A
- Term ‘globalization’ refers to various processes, conditions, systems, forces, and ages.
- Globality signifies a future social condition with intense global interconnections, suggesting an indeterminate character of globalization.
6
Q
Globalization vs. Globalism:
A
- Globalization is a set of social processes changing the modern nation-state system.
- Globalism, a belief system emerging in the late 1980s, associates globalization with expanding ‘free’ markets.
7
Q
Evolution of Globalism:
A
- Decontested in public discourse in the late 1980s and 1990s.
- Associated with ‘free’ markets and promoted by globalists seeking a new global order.
- By the mid-1990s, large segments of the population, especially in the global North and South, accepted globalism’s core claims.
8
Q
Popular Support for Globalization:
A
- Despite demonstrations against ‘corporate globalization,’ a significant percentage globally believed globalization was positive for them and their families.
- Globalism’s strong discourse relies on the power of ‘common sense’ and widespread belief in its program’s objectivity.
9
Q
Analysis of Globalism:
A
- Proposed morphological analysis of globalism with a critical eye toward its ideological status.
10
Q
This summary captures the key points, including Freeden’s arguments, recommendations, the critique of globalism, and the distinction between globalization and globalism.
A
11
Q
II. Six core claims of globalism
Key Questions:
A
- When does a rising political belief system become an ‘ideological family’?
- Criteria and characteristics for upgrading a conceptual module to the status of an ‘ideology’ are explored.
12
Q
II. Six core claims of globalism
Challenges in Determining Emerging Belief Systems:
A
- Blurred ideological boundaries, ideational dependencies, historical continuities, conceptual overlap, and methodological differences make it difficult to determine emerging political belief systems
13
Q
II. Six core claims of globalism
Criteria for Ideological Status (Freeden’s View):
A
- Mature ideologies have unique features in distinct conceptual morphologies.
- They pattern ideologies with conceptual cores supporting adjacent and peripheral concepts.
- Criteria include uniqueness, morphological sophistication, context-bound responsiveness, and effective conceptual decontestation chains.
14
Q
Role of Decontestation:
A
- Decontestation is vital in forming thought systems, specifying meanings by arranging concepts in a pattern.
- Ideologies use decontestation to end contention over concepts and fashion collective decisions, serving both a semantic and political role.
15
Q
Ideological Claims and Mass Appeal:
A
- Ideological claims, forming effective decontestation chains, endow thought systems with specific meanings that benefit social groups.
- Mass appeal in the public realm enhances the political gravity of core claims, making the thought system more developed or ‘thicker.’
16
Q
Six Core Claims of Globalism:
A
- Globalism’s core claims are identified as authoritative semantic chains decontesting the master concept ‘globalization.’
- The political role of these claims involves absorbing, altering, and rearranging ideas from established ideologies.
- Such reconceptualization does not indicate ideological immaturity but is a common strategy for holistic contenders.
17
Q
Mature Ideological Status of Globalism:
A
- Globalism’s morphological uniqueness, sophistication, political responsiveness, and strong decontestation capabilities affirm its mature ideological status.
This summary covers the exploration of criteria for ideological status, the role of decontestation, ideological claims, and the mature ideological status of globalism based on Freeden’s criteria.
18
Q
Claim One: Globalization is about the liberalization and global integration of markets.
A
- Examination of influential advocates of globalism suggests ‘globalization’ and ‘market’ as twin core concepts.
- Globalism borrows from libertarian liberalism (‘neoliberalism’) and neoconservatism but is distinct.
- Uniqueness lies in the centrality of ‘globalization,’ the shift of ‘market’ to the conceptual core, and six original ideological claims (decontestation chains).
19
Q
Formation of Claim One:
A
- Claim One aims to establish an authoritative definition of globalization for public consumption.
- It interlocks ‘globalization’ and ‘market,’ linking them to ‘liberty’ and ‘integration.’
- Examples from Business Week and Thomas Friedman emphasize the triumph of markets over governments in globalization.
20
Q
Semantic Linkages:
A
- By linking ‘globalization’ and ‘market,’ globalists simplify the concept, presenting it primarily as an economic phenomenon.
- ‘Liberalization’ is portrayed as the liberation of markets from state control, viewed positively.
- ‘Integration’ is draped in the mantle of liberty, presented as a global imperative for advancing human freedom universally.
21
Q
Globalization as a Contingent Political Initiative:
A
- The semantic chain solidifies a contingent political initiative as a ‘fact,’ persuading the public that it represents an objective diagnosis of the ‘real world.’
- Questions arise about how a single economic strategy for all countries aligns with the purported spread of freedom, choice, and openness.
22
Q
Role of Language and Ideological Claim:
A
- The semantic chain enhances political power by shaping the world according to the ideological claim.
- Raises questions about whether the spread of market principles is a natural connection to globalization or a result of globalists’ control of language and political power.
This summary covers the formation of Claim One, its semantic linkages, and the role of language in shaping perceptions of globalization’s impact on markets.
23
Q
Claim Two: Globalization is inevitable and irreversible.
A
- Discourse on globalization is saturated with terms like ‘irresistible,’ ‘inevitable,’ ‘inexorable,’ and ‘irreversible.’
- Examples include statements by President Bill Clinton and FedEx CEO Frederick W. Smith.
24
Q
Decontestation through Determinist Language:
A
- The attempt to decontest globalization in determinist terms seems contradictory given criticisms of determinism in ideologies like neoliberalism and neoconservatism.
- The tension may be explained by unavoidable logical and cultural constraints inherent in political belief systems.
25
**Conservative Resonance and Illiberal Ideas:**
conservatism also involves belief in 'natural' origins of social order.
- Claim Two diverges from conservatism by asserting that the trajectory of 'providence' is accessible to human reason.
- Political reason: portraying globalization as a natural force makes it easier to convince people to adapt to market discipline, suppressing alternative discourses.
26
**Political Potency and Potential Payoff:**
- Presenting globalization as inevitable aligns seemingly incompatible concepts, potentially producing a significant political payoff.
- The alignment allows globalists to assert that public policy based on globalist ideas is above politics, ordained by nature.
27
**Criticism and Adaptation Post-9/11:**
- Claim Two faced criticism post-9/11, with some predicting the 'collapse of globalism.'
- The War on Terror allowed for semantic intermingling of military and economic inevitability.
- Globalism adapted to post-9/11 realities, demonstrating responsiveness to a broad range of political issues, meeting Freeden's second criterion for ideological maturity.
28
**Claim Three: Nobody is in charge of globalization.**
- Decontestation through the classical liberal concept of the 'self-regulating market.'
- Links 'globalization-market' with the idea of 'leaderlessness.'
- Implies that globalization is not controlled by any individual, government, or institution.
- Post-9/11, it became challenging to maintain this claim as the survival of globalization seemed dependent on the political leadership of the United States.
- The claim was replaced by a more aggressive pronouncement of global Anglo-American leadership, showcasing ideational flexibility.
29
**Claim Four: Globalization benefits everyone (... in the long run).**
- Addresses the normative question of whether globalization is a 'good' phenomenon.
- The idea of 'benefits for everyone' is linked to material terms like 'economic growth' and 'prosperity.'
- Also connected to the peripheral concept of 'progress' and the vision of establishing a global consumerist utopia.
- Examples from the 1996 G-7 Summit emphasize the positive aspects of globalization, including economic expansion and improved living standards.
- Globalists use the language of 'science' to support their claim, emphasizing 'hard evidence' even when empirical assessments conflict.
- Despite short-term challenges, globalists argue that the market will eventually correct global distribution patterns.
- Post-9/11, there was increased fervor in advocating for the benefits of globalization, emphasizing its ability to lift societies out of poverty.
30
**Claim Five: Globalization furthers the spread of democracy in the world.**
- **Decontestation Chain:**
- Links 'globalization' and 'market' to the adjacent concept of 'democracy.'
- Globalists treat freedom, free markets, free trade, and democracy as synonymous terms.
- Ties democracy to economic development and globalization's role in creating complex civil societies.
- Neoliberal argument emphasizes a limited, procedural definition of democracy, focusing on formal procedures like voting.
- Globalists are associated with promoting 'polyarchy,' a formal, low-intensity market democracy that insulates elected leaders from popular pressures.
- Globalists use a narrow, formal-procedural understanding of democracy to advance their economic restructuring project.
31
**Post-9/11 Evolution:**
- Claim Five became linked to the neoconservative security agenda of the Bush administration.
- Neoconservative emphasis on extending freedom, progress, and democracy to nations that lack them.
- Economic integration is sought through an American-led military drive for global democratization.
- The corporate scramble for Iraq post-war involved suggestions for radical economic treatment.
- Some globalists saw military operations in Iraq as essential for establishing political, economic, and social stability for democracy.
- Immediate translation of these globalist ideas into collective decisions, including significant economic policy changes in Iraq.
- Initiatives like the US–Middle East Free Trade Area (MEFTA) and the US–Middle East Partnership Initiative, linking economic development and democracy promotion.
32
**Claim Six: Globalization requires a global war on terror.**
**Decontestation Chain:**
-
- Combines economic globalization with militaristic and nationalistic ideas associated with the American-led global War on Terror.
- Possesses a paradoxical character as its significance depends on the status of global terror.
- Creates conceptual contradictions, undermining the 'self-regulating market,' the claim of historical 'inevitability,' and conflicting with the idea of liberty as absence of coercion.
- Globalists emphasize the necessity of a War on Terror for the spread of globalization, linking military engagement to achieving the desired global economic integration.
- Some commentators warn of a dangerous turn of globalism toward fascism due to this claim.
33
**Claim Six: Globalization requires a global war on terror.**
**Post-9/11 Evolution:**
-
- Claim Six became linked to the neoconservative security agenda post-9/11.
- The perceived U.S. unilaterism and belligerence after 9/11 raised concerns about the nationalist undertones conflicting with the universal spirit associated with globalization.
- The War on Terror became a central narrative, tying together economic and military strategies.
- The logic of this claim raises concerns about damaging the conceptual coherence of globalism.
34
**Claim Six: Globalization requires a global war on terror.**
**Critical Analysis:**
- The author points out the conceptual contradictions within Claim Six, highlighting potential risks to the coherence of globalism.
- The reliance on state coercion contradicts the idea of a self-regulating market.
- The militaristic vision conflicts with the common understanding of liberty.
- Nationalist undertones in the War on Terror contradict the cosmopolitan, universal spirit associated with globalization.
- The claim's significance depends on the presence or absence of global terror, making it contingent.
35
**Conclusion:**
- Claim Six demonstrates globalism's conceptual flexibility and political responsiveness.
- Its paradoxical nature, contingent significance, and conceptual contradictions raise questions about its potential impact on the ideological coherence of globalism.
- The article suggests a need for further scholarly collaboration, interdisciplinary research, and a critical posture toward emerging conceptual clusters.
- The concluding thought-exercise envisions a reclassification of ideologies based on contemporary relevance, acknowledging the fluid nature of political belief systems in the era of globalization.
