Approaches in the study of Globalization summary Flashcards
Globalization Critiques Overview
- A diminishing number of scholars challenge existing views on globalization.
- Concerns about the imprecision, inaccuracy, and exaggeration in current globalization narratives.
- Term ‘globaloney’ coined by critics like Held and McGrew, Rosenberg, and Veseth.
Categories of Globalization Critiques:
-
Conceptual Precision Dispute:
- Some argue that globalization lacks precise analytical utility.
-
Limited Nature of Globalizing Processes:
- Emphasis on the world’s limited integration contrary to widespread belief.
- Assertion that the term ‘globalization’ inaccurately describes the true state of global affairs.
-
Dispute on the Novelty of the Process:
- Critics acknowledge moderate globalizing tendencies but dispute the novelty of globalization.
- Argues against viewing globalization as a recent phenomenon, highlighting a broader historical context.
Detailing the Three Critique Groups:
-
Conceptual Precision Critics:
- Dispute the usefulness of globalization as a precise analytical concept.
-
Limited Integration Critics:
- Stress on the world’s limited integration, challenging the accuracy of the term ‘globalization.’
-
Novelty Disputants:
- Argue against the recentness of globalization, advocating for a broader historical perspective.
This overview encapsulates the main points from the provided text on globalization critiques.
Rejectionist
Rejection of Globalization as Analytical Concept:
- Scholars dismissing globalization’s analytical utility criticize vague terms in academic discourse.
- Similar criticism extends to nationalism, deemed difficult to define due to its diverse manifestations (Calhoun, 1993).
- Susan Strange (1996) views globalization as a vacuous term, encompassing anything from the Internet to a hamburger.
- Linda Weiss (1998) deems globalization a “big idea resting on slim foundations.”
Rejectionist
1. Challenge and Empirical Examples:
- Scholars should provide concrete examples highlighting how ‘globalization’ can be analytically misleading.
- Warns extreme globalization proponents through empirically-based accounts.
- Robert Holton (1998) suggests abandoning broad theoretical analyses in favor of more specific, manageable approaches.
-
Complementary Approach:
- Proposes complementing the exploration of globalization as an objective process with interpretive studies of the ideological project of globalism.
- Identifies a need to evaluate ideological maneuvers of both proponents and opponents who infuse the term with values supporting their political agendas.
This summary outlines the rejection of globalization as an analytical concept, critiques of similar terms, and suggestions for improvement, including empirical examples and an emphasis on ideological examination.
Improvement Suggestions:
Skepticsm
Sceptics Emphasizing Limited Globalizing Processes:
- Key representatives: Wade (1996), Hirst, Thompson, and Bromley (2009), Rugman (2001).
- Hirst and Thompson (2009) argue that the world economy is not genuinely global but centered on Europe, eastern Asia, and North America.
- Majority of economic activity worldwide is still predominantly national, not global.
- Use of recent data on trade, foreign direct investment, and financial flows to caution against drawing global conclusions from increased economic interaction in advanced industrial countries.
- Assert that economic globalization, as conceived by extreme globalizers, is largely a myth.
- Doremus et al. (1998) and Zysman (1996) reach a similar conclusion.
Skepticsm
- Critique of Hirst–Thompson Thesis:
- Critics, including Held et al. (1999) and McGrew and Held (2007), argue that Hirst and Thompson set overly high standards for a fully globalized economy.
- Constructing an abstract model of a perfectly globalized economy polarizes the discussion, pressuring readers to fully embrace or entirely reject the concept of globalization.
- Criticism for countering neo-liberal economic determinism with a dose of Marxist economic determinism, assuming globalization is primarily an economic phenomenon.
- Hirst–Thompson thesis criticized for portraying culture, politics, and ideology as reflections of deeper economic processes despite acknowledging the multidimensional character of globalization.
- Shortcoming: Failure to acknowledge that economic relations are just one aspect of the complex, multilevel phenomenon of globalization.
Skepticsm
- Hirst–Thompson thesis highlights the disempowering political effects of exaggerated accounts of the ‘iron logic of economic globalization.’
- Political forces have used the thesis to advocate for national economic deregulation and reduction of welfare programs, benefiting neo-liberal interests.
Political Effects of Exaggerated Economic Globalization:
Skepticsm
Analytical Shortcomings of Hirst–Thompson Thesis:
- Overemphasis on economic determinism and setting high standards for a fully globalized economy.
- Failure to fully consider the multidimensional character of globalization, downplaying non-economic dimensions such as culture, politics, and ideology.
This summary captures the key points regarding the skepticism towards globalization, focusing on the limited nature of globalizing processes, the critique of the Hirst–Thompson thesis, and its potential political and analytical shortcomings.
Modifiers
Critique of Novelty in Globalization:
- Critics dispute the novelty of globalization, arguing that the label has been historically imprecise.
- Robert Gilpin (2000) notes globalizing tendencies but insists that many aspects are not novel, referencing data by Paul Krugman.
- Warning against ‘hyper-globalizers,’ Gilpin suggests that the post-war international economy restored globalization to pre-World War I levels.
Modifiers
- Pioneered by neo-Marxist scholars like Immanuel Wallerstein (1979) and Andre Gunder Frank (1998).
- Reject the use of ‘globalization’ exclusively for recent phenomena, asserting that globalizing tendencies have existed along the continuum of modernization for five centuries.
- Historical sensitivity: Acknowledge cross-regional transfers dating back to ancient empires.
- Weakness: Similar to Marxist economic determinism, emphasizing economic forces and subordinating culture and ideology.
World-System Theorists’ Perspective:
Modifiers
Qualitative Shift in Globalization:
- Recent studies by world-system scholars (Amin, 1996; Carroll et al., 1996; Robinson, 2004) acknowledge a quickened pace in the last few decades.
- Ash Amin (1997) suggests criticism of globalization as a new phenomenon often neglects qualitative shifts in social and political relations.
- Emergence of a complex network of international corporations, banks, and financial flows.
- Barry K. Gills (2002) and others focus on the interaction between dominant-class interests and cultural transnational practices.
- Leslie Sklair (2002) emphasizes the ‘culture-ideology of global consumerism.’
Modifiers
- All three groups contribute to academic approaches, urging careful and precise usage of the term.
- Reminder that some aspects of globalization may not be new and may not reach all corners of the earth.
- Critique tends to focus too narrowly on terminology, possibly dismissing the significance and extent of today’s globalizing tendencies.
- Clear inclination to conceptualize globalization mostly along economic lines, potentially overlooking its multidimensional character.
This summary encapsulates the main points related to the critique of the novelty of globalization, the perspective of world-system theorists, acknowledgment of a qualitative shift, and the contributions and criticisms of globalization critics.
Contributions and Criticisms of Globalization Critics:
Globalization as Economic Process
Historical Development and Economic Emphasis in Globalization Studies:
- Scholars emphasize the economic dimension of globalization, tracing its historical development.
- Notable accounts by Cohen (2006), Dicken (2001), Rodrik (2007), Sassen (1998), and Stiglit (2006).
Globalization as Economic Process
Evolution and International Institutions:
- Early writings detail the evolution of international markets and corporations, leading to global interdependence.
- Mention of institutions like the European Union, North American Free Trade Association, and regional trading blocs.
- Keohane (1984) provides a comprehensive treatment of economic globalization.
Globalization as Economic Process
Transformation in World Affairs:
- Scholars affirm globalization as an epochal transformation, signifying a quantum change in human affairs.
- Rapid development attributed to the increasing linkage of national economies through trade, financial flows, and foreign direct investment by multinational firms.
Globalization as Economic Process
Post-War World Economy and Bretton Woods System:
- Studies often embedded in historical narratives tracing post-war world economy to the 1944 Bretton Woods Conference.
- Bretton Woods system contributed to the ‘golden age of controlled capitalism.’
- State control over international capital movements facilitated full employment and expansion of the welfare state.
Globalization as Economic Process
Acceleration and Neo-Liberalism:
- Acceleration of global integration traced to the collapse of the Bretton Woods system in the early 1970s.
- Rise of ‘neo-liberalism’ in the 1980s, dominance following the collapse of command-type economies in Eastern Europe (1989–91).
Globalization as Economic Process
Key Aspects of Economic Globalization:
- Changing nature of the production process and liberalization/internationalization of financial transactions highlighted.
- Emergence of a transnational financial system considered a fundamental economic feature.
- Key components include deregulation of interest rates, removal of credit controls, and privatization of government-owned banks and financial institutions.
Globalization as Economic Process
Financial Globalization and Technological Advances:
- Financial globalization accelerated in the late 1980s with deregulation of capital and securities markets.
- Advances in data processing and information technology contributed to the explosive growth of tradable financial value.
- Satellite systems and fibre-optic cables facilitated Internet-based technologies, further accelerating financial liberalization.
Globalization as Economic Process
Global Rentiers and Speculators:
- Global rentiers and speculators earned significant incomes by exploiting weak financial and banking regulations.
- International capital flows capable of creating artificial boom-and-bust cycles, leading to economic crises (e.g., Southeast Asia crisis, Russia 1998, Brazil 1999, Argentina 2000–3, Global Financial Crisis 2008–9, and the European Debt Crisis).
Globalization as Economic Process
Changing Nature of Global Production:
- Rise of powerful transnational corporations (TNCs) with subsidiaries in multiple countries.
- TNCs, such as Wal-Mart, General Motors, Exxon-Mobil, Mitsubishi, and Siemens, part of the 200 largest TNCs, accounting for over half of the world’s industrial output.
- Global operations consolidated in a deregulated global labor market, enhancing both mobility and profitability.
- Over 70% of world trade is attributed to these TNCs.
- Outsourcing manufacturing jobs, cutting labor costs by dispersing economic production processes globally, considered a hallmark of economic globalization.
This summary encapsulates the key points related to the economic perspective on globalization, including historical development, the role of international institutions, the changing nature of global production, and the impact of financial globalization.
Globalization as Political Process
Introduction to Political Globalization:
- Economic perspectives on globalization are intertwined with political processes and institutions.
- Key questions revolve around the fate of the nation-state, the political causes behind global flows, and the challenge to national government control.
Globalization as Political Process
- Some scholars link political globalization to technological advances, portraying a borderless world driven by forces like the World Wide Web.
- Extreme technological determinists argue for the diminishing role of politics, with governments reduced to serving global capitalism.
Technological Determinism and Political Power: