Identification of Offenders Flashcards
EA2006 S46A-Caution required when relying on ID evidence
Where evidence of defendants involvement is based solely on evidence of ID and the defendant disputes this-the court must be cautious about convicting
EA2006 S126-Judge must warn jury
If a case against the defendant depends wholly or partly on visual or voice ID of defendant, the judge must warn the jury of a special need for caution when finding the defendant guilty
Health and Safety at Work Act 2015-Maximising Safety and Minimising Risk
Responsibility of all Police employees is to Maximise Safety and Minimise Risk at work. A key enabler is the application of TENR.
Definition of Visual identification Evidence is?
Means evidence that is: an assertion by a person, based wholly or partly on what that person saw, to the effect that a defendant was present at or near a place where an act constituting direct or circumstantial evidence of the commission of an offence was done at, or about, the time the act was done OR an account whether oral or written of an assertion of the kind described above. EA2006 S4
EA2006 S45-Admissibility of visual identification evidence
A formal identification procedure should be used to obtain visual identification evidence unless there is good reason not to. The reason must be presented to the court or the evidence may be excluded on grounds of fairness.
What are formal visual identification procedures?
Formal visual identification procedures include; ID parades and photo line ups.
What are the seven requirements for formal procedures?
- It occurs as soon as practicable after the offence is reported
- the suspect id compared to no fewer than 7 others, who are similar in appearance
- No indication is made to the person making the identification about who may be the suspect
- Person making ID is informed the suspect may or may not be in the procedure
- A written record of the procedure followed is sworn to be true and complete by the officer conducting the procedure
- A pictorial record of the procedure followed is sworn to be true and complete by the officer conducting the procedure
- The procedure complies with any relevant regulations
What are 6 good reasons for not following formal procedure?
- the suspect refuses to take part in a formal procedure and police do not already hold a photograph
- the suspect has a singular appearance
- the suspect has significantly changed their appearance after the offence occurred
- No officer could have reasonably anticipated that ID would be an issue at trial
- A ID of the suspect was made to an officer soon after the offence in the course of initial action
- An ID of the suspect was made to an officer after a chance ,eating between person making the ID and the suspect
If you do not follow a formal ID procedure you must?
Explain on the prosecution file why it was not possible
Give an example of inadmissible ID Evidence
Set ups are inadmissible- ID evidence from engineering a suspect into a certain place at a certain time is inadmissible
What are the rules for attendance at an ID parade?
- No person charged with an offence can be compelled to attend an ID parade. if they refuse to attend no comment can be made.
- Any person charged with an offence who attends an ID parade is entitled to have their lawyer present
- An accused must be advised of their rights in relation to ID Parades
Photo line ups and ID parades are similar in what way?
They are both equally valid formal identification procedures. if a suspect refuses one, they may be asked to participate in the other.
Who can conduct an ID parade?
It should be conducted by an employee with the position of Sergeant or Senior Sergeant. The O/C case can be present but must not take part
Define Voice identification evidence
means evidence that is an assertion by a person to the effect that a voice, whether heard first hand or through mechanical or electronic transmission or recording is the voice of the defendant or any other person connected to the commission of an offence
Is Voice Identification evidence admissible in court?
It is inadmissible, unless the prosecution can prove on the balance of probabilities that the circumstances giving rise to the ID were reliable