IA3 Loss Causation and Incident Investigation Flashcards

1
Q

Give the quantitative relationship between the type of accidents according the Birds accident triangle

A

For every,

  • 1 x Serious or Major accident e.g. fatality, there were,
  • 10 x Minor accidents reported e.g. first-aid injuries
  • 30 x Propery damage incidents reported
  • 600 x Non-injury/damage (near misses)​
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the meaning of the birds accident triangle?

A
  1. There is a relationship between the reported major accidents and reported less serious accidents/incidents.
  2. It proposes that if the number of minor accidents is reduced then there will be a corresponding fall in the number of serious accidents.
  3. Help to convince employees the importance of reporting H&S events.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

List the limitations of using Ratio studies

A
  1. Not every near-miss or minor incident can potentially lead to a major accident.
  2. Representative data is neccesary to accurately compare between organisations. Not all events may be recorded.
  3. When benchmarking, different loss event definitions will lead to different traingles (e.g. lost time injury versus 3 day absence injuries)
  4. When benchmarking, different H&S Culture between organisations.
  5. When benchmarking, different industries, with different types of risk.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

List theories/models of loss causation techniques

A
  1. Accident/Incident ratio studies e.g. Heinrich’s/Bird’s Accident Traingle
  2. Bird’s Domino theory (immediate, underlying and root causes)
  3. Bird’s Multi-causality theory
  4. Reason’s model of accident causation - Swiss Cheese Model (Active and Latent failures)
  5. The Bow Tie method (FTA, ETA)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain the Domino Theory

A
  • Heinrichs domino theory states that all accidents are a result of a chain reaction of events working much like a row of dominoes.
  • Heinrich suggested that the removal of one of the key metaphorical dominoes (such as an unsafe act or condition) will stop the chain reaction.
  • The model itself focused to heavily on blaming individuals for accidents/incidents
  • Updated by Bird &Loftus
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

List the components of the original Heinrich Domino theory

A
  1. domino 1: Ancestry and the worker’s social environment
  2. domino 2: The worker’s carelessness or personal faults
  3. domino 3: an unsafe act or a mechanical/physical hazard
  4. domino 4: the accident
  5. domino 5: injuries or loss
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

List the adjustments made by Bird & Loftus to Heinrich’s Domino theory

A
  1. The influence of management and managerial error.
  2. Loss could also be production losses, property damage or
    wastage of other assets, as well as injuries.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

List the components of the Bird&Loftus Domino theory (updated version)

A
  1. domino 1: Lack of Control-Management
  2. domino 2: Basic Causes-Origins (personal factors and a job factors)
  3. domino 3: Immediate Causes-Symptoms (unsafe acts and unsafe conditions)
  4. domino 4: Incident-Contact (an undesired event occurs.)
  5. domino 5: People – Property – Loss (result of the accident)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define latent failures and give examples

A
  • Latent failures are contributory factors that may lie dormant for days, weeks, or months until they contribute to the accident.
  • Latent failures are made by people whose tasks are removed in time and space from operational activities, eg designers, decision makers and managers.
  • Latent failures span the first three domains of failure in Reason’s model.
  • Examples: Poor design of plant and equipment; Ineffective training; Inadequate supervision; Ineffective communications; and uncertainties in roles and responsibilities.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define active failures and give examples

A
  • Active failures encompass the unsafe acts that can be directly linked to an accident.
  • Usually made by frontline people such as drivers, control room staff or machine operators.
  • Example: Human errors, mistakes and rule breaking. for example a train driver error e.g. ignoring the stop signal, causing a train crash
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

In the Swiss Cheese Model most accidents can be traced to one or more of four levels of failure, list these levels of failures

A
  1. Organisational influences (Latent Failure)
  2. Unsafe supervision (Latent Failure)
  3. Preconditions for unsafe acts (Latent Failure)
  4. The unsafe acts themselves (Active Failure)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Give a variety of behavioural root cause analysis techniques

A
  1. The 5 Whys method
  2. Applied Behavioural Analysis (ABA)
  3. Influence and Causal Factor Charting
  4. Fishbone or ‘Ishikawa’ Cause & Effect Diagrams.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

List the possible limitations of multi-causality theories in
accident investigation

A
  1. Complexity of the task (accidents often have multiple
    causes and require in-depth investigation).
  2. Specialist skills required

“Management commitment to H&S plays an important role here, quality of investigation process may depend on resources”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

List the formula for calculating frequency rate

A

Total number of accidents / total man-hours worked x 1 000 000

Over a year

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

List the formula for calculating Incidence rate

A

Total number of accidents / Average number of persons employed x 100,000

Over a period of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

List the formula for calculating Accident and Incident Severity Rate

A

Total number of days lost / Total number of man-hours worked in the period x 1000

17
Q

List the formats in which the data gathered on health and safety performance could be presented clearly in a company annual report

A
  1. Pie charts
  2. Histograms displaying accident statistics (e.g. bar charts)
  3. Line graphs (e.g. trends)
  4. Tabular numerical representations such as for example the number of risk assessments completed (e.g. tables on MS Excel)
  5. Textual representations with brief summaries of departmental initiatives and case studies.
18
Q

Define unsafe act

A

HUMAN performance which is contrary to accepted safe practice and which may lead to an accident.

19
Q

Define unsafe condition

A

PHYSICAL condition of :

  • the workplace,
  • work equipment
  • working environment, etc.

Which is considered unsafe and may lead to an accident.

20
Q

List the steps to take following an adverse event

A
  1. Emergency response
  2. Initial report
  3. initial assessment and investigations response
  4. The decision to investigate (based on potential and actual consequences, setting up the level of the investigation, taking in account personal qualities of the investigation team leader.
21
Q

List the steps to take on the investigation process

A
  1. Gathering of relevant information, asap, witnesses, inspections check, interview techniques.
  2. Analysis of information, identifying causation by a systematic approach, use FTA or similar. what and why it happened.
  3. Identify control measures, taking account of suitability, effectiveness, reasonable practicability.
  4. Produce action plan and implement, report, recommend, review and adjust if necessary.
22
Q

Why do we need to investigate loss events?

A
  1. To identify causality (immediate, underlying and root causes)
  2. To prevent recurrence
  3. To gather data for trend analysis
23
Q

List the factors influencing the level of investigation

A
  • Severity, both potential and actual
  • Actual severity, e.g. risk of compensation claim
  • Breach of legal requirements possibility
  • Expectation of reporting to the enforcement agency
  • Expectation of civil claims/criminal prosecution
  • Permit to work involvement, high risk activity involvement
24
Q

List the factors which should be taken in account when analysing the gathered information as evidence

A
  • Organisational factors, culture, peer group pressure, practices
  • Job factors, shift patterns, ergonomy, comfort, environment
  • Personal factors, drugs, alcohol, training, skills, attitude, experience
25
Q

List the benefits of investigating accidents

A
  • Prevention of future similar events
  • Employee morale improvement
  • Compliance to legislation
  • Safety culture improvement
  • Managerial skill improvement