I. DICE & Social Cost of Carbon Flashcards

1
Q

Why Does Carbon Stock Matter?

A

Carbon accumulates so timing matters → The earlier you cut emissions the lower the total stock.

Therefore, pledging neutrality by 2060 but in the mean time still emitting results in insane damage from just the adjustment period.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

True or False? Cutting emissions today is as important as cutting emissions in 20 years.

A

True, because of the carbon stock

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why do we consider a marginal effect of carbon?

A

The social cost of one tonne of carbon is different if your carbon stock is zero or if its at today’s level.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Structure of the D.I.C.E Model

A

Climate, Economy, and Stock of Carbon Block.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Role of Climate Scientists in D.I.C.E

A

For a stock of GHG, here is the influence on the surface temperature change, precipitation, probability of extreme events, water resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Assumptions and Controversies w.r.t Abatement Technology

A

Lambda is abatement.

Assumes increasing efficiency at reducing emissions. Uncertain outcome that has never happened.

Assumes don’t have to sacrifice much future output to reduce emissions - flawed.

Moreover, tries to predict what emissions will be in 40 years. Hard!

Only abatement of emissions is considered - not abatement to deal with consequences (e.g sea walls)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Shortcomings of the Damage Equation

A

Not comprehensive enough

Damage to output is often only a function of temperature difference

Ought to depend on biodiversity, sea level rise, probability of extreme events etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Impact on SCC of Non-comprehensive Damage Function

A

Many mechanisms (other than temperature) not accounted for.

Therefore, SCC has lots of uncertainty and need richer models.

E.g: How biodiversity changes impact damage to output.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Shortcomings of Emission Measurement in D.I.C.E

A

Takes large industrial emissions and applies transformation rate.

Lacks: land emissions, deforestation and, agricultural activity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Emissions and Reservoirs

A

Emissions accumulate in 3 permeable reservoirs → atmosphere, lower ocean, upper ocean

We care about how emissions impact surface temperature and movement between reservoirs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Emissions and State Variables

A

Emissions don’t affect the state today, just state tomorrow

Emit today, different reservoirs, higher temp tomorrow, warms planet, impacts future consumption/production

Hence, we have to discount changes tomorrow to present → DISCOUNT RATE MATTERS!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How SCC Varies with Discounting and Models

A

SCC $$ declines a lot with larger discounting

Different models induce very different SSC → uncertainty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define Externalities

A

A technological externality is present when the production or consumption of a good affects the production possibilities of other firms or the utility of consumption of other consumers.

+ve & -ve externalities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define Social Cost of Carbon

A

Variation in welfare overall due to a marginal increase in GHG/carbon impulse.

If it’s $100/tonne, that’s the cost/value of one tonne of carbon in terms of consumption today.

Tells you where the tradeoff is.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Impact of Country Utility Functions on SCC

A

Must aggregate very different country situations to get aggregate welfare and uniform SCC.

Different welfare functions yield divergent SSCs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Does a Concave Welfare Function Make Sense?

A

Yes, for equality -> Helps aggregate situations of two different populations

Northern population that emits more and is less impacted and a southern population that doesn’t pollute as much but will face a lot of damage

17
Q

Numerator of the SCC Formula

A

Welfare Variation. Damage to welfare of one more ton of carbon.

18
Q

Denominator of the SCC Formula

A

Slope of the utility function. Puts welfare variation in terms of today’s consumption. Helps us get a $ value.

19
Q

Relevance of SCC for Abatement

A

The SCC decide whether you’re willing to engage in abatement or not.

Is your carbon arbitrage in financial terms.

Countries will purchase abatement if the cost is less than the negative effect.

Innovators should become more competitive through SCC because of this bar of carbon arbitrage.

But, again, SCC is different for different countries.

20
Q

Meaning if SCC > Consumption Today

A

Nothing besides you just borrow today and bring some future consumption into the present through borrowing to make this investment and change happen.

21
Q

Sources of Controversy with SCC

A

Just pacifying the preferences has huge impact on how much effort happens in the model and the trajectory you forecast. But, aggregating those very different situations is hard.

People will see the how much welfare they loose from damages and then calculate up to what point is it efficient for them to curb effort. Therefore, what determines the effort put in is the SCC.

Lot of uncertainty $100-$400

22
Q

Would a social planner make richer or poorer countries pay for the investment of climate change?

A

Easier for some countries to give up on consumption, so optimal social planner makes richer countries pay.

23
Q

SCC, Burden, and The Political Problem

A

The countries that pollute a lot are not the ones that will suffer more.

Place like Russia & Germany have negative SCC yet produce lots of emissions → They could benefit from warming.

Political problem: we don’t live in a world where everybody losses. You get much less of an impact in Russia than Brazil. Brazil would like to reduce emissions but other countries say why should I pay if I am less impacted?

Mismatch between social and private costs.

24
Q

Why Do Poorer Countries Suffer the Most?

A

South is much more extractive and in general have way more volatility → commodity dependence. Don’t have any buffer or other economic sector that is large enough to absorb those shocks.

In terms of human activity, combination of humidity and heat literally kills you

Shocks last longer. Recovery in the US is so fast - hurricane are goods for the economy since so much funds go to rebuilding and sometimes rebuilt better so sometimes see better impact. But, in developing countries, it can take years

25
Q

Why Must a Carbon Price/Tax Be Uniform Globally?

A

Unit of CO2 = Unit of CO2. Everybody should pay the same price.

But, we don’t have a global government that could impose that and reconcile Russia vs Brazil.

26
Q

True or False? Rich countries are likely to suffer higher capital losses from sea level rise?.

A

True.

Poor (hot) countries have larger SCC than rich (cold) countries

USA has a lot of costal land at risk. Some of it like Florida is highly industrialized with a lot of housing. So we have residential capital close to the sea.

27
Q

Would you expect rich countries to make efforts to curbing their consumption/production?

A

No, from their perspective SCC is very low or negative

Hence, no consumption loss associated so any reduction effort would be a pure loss

Won’t internalize their negative externalities fully.

Either must be disciplined enough to take whole world’s welfare into account or for a world government to enforce bindingly.