HTA - lecture 6 - quality of life (B) Flashcards
methods to estimate utility values from disease-specific questionnaires
- Valuing health states
VAS/TTO/SG using disease specific health states - Mapping
Predict EQ-5D* values based upon responses on the disease-specific measure
*or any other generic questionnaire
econometric modelling
Regression analysis:
Predict utility score (y) based on the levels of each dimension (x1, x2, xn)
y = β0+β1x1+β2x2+…+ βnxn
à Inconsistent results are possible
à More health states need to be valued
à But prediction errors are smaller
multi - attribute utility theory
- Determine the relative preference of each level within one dimension
- Determine the relative preference of each dimension
o What is most important for health? Mental? pain? - Combine these preferences in one model
o Estimate utility score for all possible health states
à Ensures consistent results; it is impossible to give a bad outcome a higher score than a less worse outcome
à Fewer health states need to be valued
à But larger prediction errors
à Requires structural independence between dimensions
generic
enables comparison across health conditions –> desirable for reimbursement decisions
disease specific
more specific questions for the disease of interest –> better able to measure quality of life –> assumption! needs to be tested
reliability
degree to which the measurement is free from measurement error
the extent to which a measure provides the same results on repeated measurements, assuming that the characteristics being measured do not change
validity
degree to which the instrument measures the construct(s) it purports to measure
responsiveness
ability of a measure to detect changes in health
content validity
Extent to which the content of the questionnaire is adequate for the specific disease
Which domains are most important for them: that is the question asked at patients in the study of sclerosis
Related to content, SF-6D is best
construct validity
The degree to which scores on an instrument are consistent with hypothesis
convergent validity
correlation with similar measures (for example other HRQOL instruments)
discriminant validity
differences between known groups (for example severity)
The degree to which scores on an instrument are consistent with hypothesis
feasibility
if someone does not fill in the whole questionnaire it is not valid as well. So you need to miss as little data as possible
floor effects
substantial group of patients reporting lowest possible score
ceiling effects
substantial group of patients reporting best possible score