H.L. > HSA > Flashcards
HSA Flashcards
Total number of sections in Hindu Succession act
30 section 31st section repealed
How many chapters are there in Hindu Succession act
Three chapters chapter 4 is repealed
Which section defines the definitions and interpretations
Section 3
Name of chapter 1
Preliminary
Name of chapter 2
Interstate succession Section 5 to 29
Divided in 3 parts
5 to 17 general provisions
18 to 28 general provisions relating to succession section 29 ‐ escheat
Chapter 3
testamentry succession
Section 30
Definition of agnate provided in
3 (1) a
Aliyasantana law
3 (1) b
3 (1) c
cognate
the expressions “custom” and “usage” signify
3 (1) d
3 (1) e
full blood“, “half blood” and “uterine blood“-
heir defined in
3 (1) f
3 (1) g
intestate
marumakkattayam law”
3 (1) h
Nambudri law”
3 (1) i
related” means related by legitimate kinship:
Provided in which section
3 (1) j
Sec 4
Overriding effect of Act.
Section 6
Devolution of interest in coparcenary property.
Devolution of interest in the property of a tarwad, tavazhi, kutumba, kavaru or illom.
Section 7
Section 8
General rules of succession in the case of males.
Order of succession among heirs in the Schedule.
Section 9
Distribution of property among heirs in Class I of the Schedule.
Section 10
- Distribution of property among heirs in Class I of the Schedule.
The property of an intestate shall be divided among the heirs in class I of the Schedule in accordance with the following rules:
Bare ActsLaw NotesLaw PDFs
To read 1 law content daily,
message LAW on WhatsApp: 9128523662
Full Law Study Material PDFs: ₹340
Law MCQ Tests: ₹1550
Both: ₹1325
HINDU SUCCESSION ACT, 1956
BY: WRITINGLAW IN: BARE ACTS, HINDU LAW
Hindu Succession Act
Hindu Succession Act, 1956
An Act to amend and codify the law relating to intestate succession among Hindus. Be it enacted by Parliament in the seventh year of the Republic of India as follows:-
Chapter I of Hindu Succession Act – Preliminary
1. Short title and extent.
2. Application of Act.
3. Definitions and interpretations.
4. Overriding effect of Act.
Chapter II of Hindu Succession Act – Intestate Succession
GENERAL
5. Act not to apply to certain properties.
6. Devolution of interest in coparcenary property.
7. Devolution of interest in the property of a tarwad, tavazhi, kutumba, kavaru or illom.
8. General rules of succession in the case of males.
9. Order of succession among heirs in the Schedule.
10. Distribution of property among heirs in Class I of the Schedule.
11. Distribution of property among heirs in class II of the Schedule.
12. Order of succession among agnates and cognates.
13. Computation of degrees.
14. Property of a female Hindu to be her absolute property.
15. General rules of succession in the case of female Hindus.
16. Order of succession and manner of distribution among heirs of a female Hindu.
17. Special provisions respecting persons governed by Marumakkattayam and Aliyasantana laws.
GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO SUCCESSION
18. Full blood preferred to half blood.
19. Mode of succession of two or more heirs.
20. Right of child in womb.
21. Presumption in cases of simultaneous deaths.
22. Preferential right to acquire property in certain cases.
23. Special provision respecting dwelling houses.
24. Certain widows remarrying may not inherit as widows.
25. Murderer disqualified.
26. Convert’s descendants disqualified.
27. Succession when heir disqualified.
28. Disease, defect, etc. not to disqualify.
ESCHEAT
29. Failure of heirs.
Chapter III of Hindu Succession Act – Testamentary Succession
30. Testamentary succession.
Chapter IV of Hindu Succession Act – Repeal
31. Repeals.
The Schedule of Hindu Succession Act
Chapter I of Hindu Succession Act – Preliminary
1. Short title and extent.
(1) This Act may be called the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.
Bare Act PDFs
(2) It extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir. (The words “except the State of Jammu and Kashmir” omitted by Act 34 of 2019, s. 95 and the Fifth Schedule (w.e.f. 31-10-2019).)
- Application of Act.
(1) This Act applies-
(a) to any person, who is a Hindu by religion in any of its forms or developments including a Virashaiva, a Lingayat or a follower of the Brahmo, Prarthana or Arya Samaj;
(b) to any person who is Buddhist, Jaina or Sikh by religion; and
(c) to any other person who is not a Muslim, Christian, Parsi or Jew by religion unless it is proved that any such person would not have been governed by the Hindu law or by any custom or usage as part of that law in respect of any of the matters dealt with herein if this Act had not been passed.
Explanation-
The following persons are Hindus, Buddhists, Jainas or Sikhs by religion, as the case may be-
(a) any child, legitimate or illegitimate, both of whose parents are Hindus, Buddhists, Jainas or Sikhs by religion;
(b) any child, legitimate or illegitimate, one of whose parents is a Hindu, Buddhist, Jaina or Sikh by religion and who is brought up as a member of the tribe, community, group or family to which such parent belongs or belonged;
(c) any person who is a convert or re-convert to the Hindu, Buddhist, Jaina or Sikh religion.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), nothing contained in this Act shall apply to the members of any Scheduled Tribe within the meaning of clause (25) of Article 366 of the Constitution unless the Central Government, by notification in the Official Gazette, otherwise directs.
(3) The expression “Hindu” in any portion of this Act shall be construed as if it included a person who, though not a Hindu by religion, is, nevertheless, a person to whom this Act applies by virtue of the provisions contained in this section.
- Definitions and interpretations.
(1) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires-
(a) “agnate” – one person is said to be an “agnate” of another if the two are related by blood or adoption wholly through males;
(b) “Aliyasantana law” means the system of law applicable to persons who, if this Act had not been passed, would have been governed by the Madras Aliyasantana Act, 1949, or by the customary Aliyasantana law with respect to the matters for which provision is made in this Act;
(c) “cognate” – one person is said to be a cognate of another if the two are related by blood or adoption but not wholly through males;
(d) the expressions “custom” and “usage” signify any rule which having been continuously and uniformly observed for a long time, has obtained the force of law among Hindus in any local area, tribe, community, group or family:
Provided that the rule is certain and not unreasonable or opposed to public policy:
Provided further that in the case of a rule applicable only to a family it has not been discontinued by the family;
(e) “full blood“, “half blood” and “uterine blood“-
(i) two persons said to be related to each other by full blood when they are descended from a common ancestor by the same wife, and by half blood when they are descended from a common ancestor but by different wives;
(ii) two persons are said to be related to each other by uterine blood when they are descended from a common ancestress but by different husbands;
Explanation-
In this clause “ancestor” includes the father and “ancestress” the mother,
(f) “heir” means any person, male or female, who is entitled to succeed to the property of an intestate under this Act;
(g) “intestate” – a person is deemed to die intestate in respect of property of which he or she has not made a testamentary disposition capable of taking effect;
(h) “marumakkattayam law” means the system of law applicable to persons-
(a) who, if this Act had not been passed, would have been governed by the Madras Marumakkattayam Act, 1932; the Travancore Nayar Act; the Travancore Ezhava Act; the Travancore Nanjinad Vellala Act; the Travancore Kshatriya Act; the Travancore Krishnanvaka Marumakkathayyee Act; the Cochin Marumakkathayam Act; or the Cochin Nayar Act with respect to the matters for which provision is made in this Act; or
(b) who belong to any community, the members of which are largely domiciled in the State of Travancore-Cochin or Madras [as it existed immediately before the 1st November, 1956,] and who, if this Act had not been passed, would have been governed with respect to the matters for which provision is made in this Act by any system of inheritance in which descent is traced through the female line;
but does not include the Aliyasantana law;
(i) “Nambudri law” means the system of law applicable to persons who if this Act had not been passed, would have been governed by the Madras Nambudri Act, 1932; the Cochin Nambudri Act; or the Travancore Malayala Brahmin Act with respect to the matters for which provision is made in this Act;
(j) “related” means related by legitimate kinship:
Provided that illegitimate children shall be deemed to be related to their mother and to one another, and their legitimate descendants shall be deemed to be related to them and to one another; and any word expressing relationship or denoting a relative shall be construed accordingly.
(2) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires, words imparting the masculine gender shall not be taken to include females.
- Overriding effect of Act.
(1) Save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act,-
(a) any text, rule or interpretation of Hindu law or any custom or usage as part of that law in force immediately before the commencement of this Act shall cease to have effect with respect to any matter for which provision is made in this Act;
(b) any other law in force immediately before the commencement of this Act shall cease to apply to Hindus insofar as it is inconsistent with any of the provisions contained in this Act.
(2) Omitted in 2005.
Chapter II of Hindu Succession Act – Intestate Succession
GENERAL
- Act not to apply to certain properties.
This Act shall not apply to-
(i) any property succession to which is regulated by the Indian Succession Act, 1925, by reason of the provisions contained in Section 21 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954;
(ii) any estate which descends to a single heir by the terms of any covenant or agreement entered into by the Ruler of any Indian State with the Government of India or by the terms of any enactment passed before the commencement of this Act;
(iii) the Valiamma Thampuran Kovilagam Estate and the Palace Fund administered by the Palace Administration Board by reason of the powers conferred by Proclamation (IX of 1124) dated 29th June, 1949, promulgated by the Maharaja of Cochin.
- Devolution of interest in coparcenary property.
(1) On and from the commencement of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, in a Joint Hindu family governed by the Mitakshara law, the daughter of a coparcener shall,-
(a) by birth become a coparcener in her own right in the same manner as the son;
(b) have the same rights in the coparcenary property as she would have had if she had been a son;
(c) be subject to the same liabilities in respect of the said coparcenary property as that of a son,
and any reference to a Hindu Mitakshara coparcener shall be deemed to include a reference to a daughter of a coparcener:
Provided that nothing contained in this subsection shall affect or invalidate any disposition or alienation including any partition or testamentary disposition of property which had taken place before the 20th day of December, 2004.
(2) Any property to which a female Hindu becomes entitled by virtue of sub-section (1) shall be held by her with the incidents of coparcenary ownership and shall be regarded, notwithstanding anything contained in this Act or any other law for the time being in force in, as property capable of being disposed of by her by testamentary disposition.
(3) Where a Hindu dies after the commencement of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, his interest in the property of a Joint Hindu family governed by the Mitakshara law, shall devolve by testamentary or intestate succession, as the case may be, under this Act and not by survivorship, and the coparcenary property shall be deemed to have been divided as if a partition had taken place and,-
(a) the daughter is allotted the same share as is allotted to a son;
(b) the share of the pre-deceased son or a pre-deceased daughter, as they would have got had they been alive at the time of partition, shall be allotted to the surviving child of such pre-deceased son or of such pre-deceased daughter; and
(c) the share of the pre-deceased child of a pre-deceased son or of a pre-deceased daughter, as such child would have got had he or she been alive at the time of the partition, shall be allotted to the child of such pre-deceased child of the pre-deceased son or a pre-deceased daughter, as the case may be.
Explanation-
For the purposes of this sub-section, the interest of a Hindu Mitakshara coparcener shall be deemed to be the share in the property that would have been allotted to him if a partition of the property had taken place immediately before his death, irrespective of whether he was entitled to claim partition or not.
(4) After the commencement of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, no court shall recognise any right to proceed against a son, grandson or great-grandson for the recovery of any debt due from his father, grandfather or great-grandfather solely on the ground of the pious obligation under the Hindu law, of such son, grandson or great-grandson to discharge any such debt:
Provided that in the case of any debt contracted before the commencement of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, nothing contained in this sub-section shall affect-
(a) the right of any creditor to proceed against the son, grandson or great-grandson, as the case may be; or
(b) any alienation made in respect of or in satisfaction of, any such debt, and any such right or alienation shall be enforceable under the rule of pious obligation in the same manner and to the same extent as it would have been enforceable as if the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 had not been enacted.
Explanation-
For the purposes of clause (a), the expression “son”, “grandson” or “great-grandson” shall be deemed to refer to the son, grandson or great-grandson, as the case may be, who was born or adopted prior to the commencement of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005.
(5) Nothing contained in this section shall apply to a partition, which has been effected before the 20th day of December, 2004.
Explanation-
For the purposes of this section “partition” means any partition made by execution of a deed of partition duly registered under the Registration Act, 1908 (16 of 1908) or partition effected by a decree of a court.
Statement of Objects and Reasons [The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005]
Section 6 of the Act deals with devolution of interest of a male Hindu in coparcenary property and recognises the rule of devolution by survivorship among the members of the coparcenary. The retention of the Mitakshara coparcenary property without including the females in it means that the females cannot inherit in ancestral property as their male counterparts do. The law by excluding the daughter from participating in the coparcenary ownership not only contributes to her discrimination on the ground of gender but also has led to oppression and negation of her fundamental right of equality guaranteed by the Constitution having regard to the need to render social justice to women, the States of Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Maharashtra have made necessary changes in the law giving equal right to daughters in Hindu Mitakshara coparcenary property. The Kerala Legislature has enacted the Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975.
It is proposed to remove the discrimination as contained in section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 by giving equal rights to daughters in the Hindu Mitakshara coparcenary property as the sons have.
State Amendment
Sections 6A to 6C
Karnataka: After section 6 the following sections shall be inserted, namely-
6A. Equal rights to daugher in co-parcenary property.
Notwithstanding anything contained in section 6 of this Act-
(a) in a joint Hindu family governed by Mitakshara law, the daughter of a co-parcener shall by birth become a co-parcener in her own right in the same manner as the son and have the same rights in the co-parcenary property as she would have had if she had been a son inclusive of the right to claim by survivorship and shall be subject to the same liabilities and disabilities in respect thereto as the son;
(b) at a partition in such a joint Hindu family the co-parcenary property shall be so divided as to allot to a daughter the same share as is allotable to a son:
Provided that the share which a predeceased son or a predeceased daughter would have got at the partition if he or she had been alive at the time of the partition, shall be allotted to the surviving child of such predeceased son or of such predeceased daughter:
Provided further that the share allotable to the predeceased child of a predeceased son or of a predeceased daughter, if such child had been alive at the time of the partition, shall be allotted to the child of such predeceased child of the predeceased son or of such predeceased daughter, as the case may be;
(c) any property to which a female Hindu becomes entitled by virtue of the provisions of clause (a) shall be held by her with the incidents of co-parcenary ownership and shall be regarded, notwithstanding anything contained in this Act or any other law for the time being in force, as property capable of being disposed of by her by will or other testamentary disposition;
(d) nothing in clause (b) shall apply to a daughter married prior to or to a partition which had been effected before the commencement of Hindu Succession (Karnataka Amendment) Act, 1990.
6B. Interest to devolve by survivorship on death.
When a female Hindu dies after the commencement of the Hindu Succession (Karnataka Amendment) Act, 1990, having at the time of her death an interest in a Mitakshara co-parcenary property, her interest in the property shall devolve by survivorship upon the surviving members of the co-parcenary and not in accordance with this Act:
Provided that if the deceased had left any child or child of a pre-deceased child, the interest of the deceased in the Mitakshara coparcenary property shall devolve by testamentary or intestate succession as the case may be under this Act and not by survivorship.
Explanations-
(1) For the purposes of this section the interest of female Hindu Mitakshara co-parcenary shall be deemed to be the share in the property that would have been allotted to her if a partition of the property had taken place immediately before her death, irrespective of whether she was entitled to claim partition or not.
(2) Nothing contained in the proviso to this section shall be construed as enabling a person who, before the death of the deceased had separated himself or herself from the co-parcenary, or any of his or her heirs to claim on intestacy a share in the interest referred to therein.
6C. Preferential right to acquire property in certain cases.
(1) Where, after the commencement of Hindu Succession (Karnataka Amendment) Act, 1990 an interest in any immovable property of an intestate or in any business carried by him or her, whether solely or in conjunction with others devolves under sections 6A or 6B upon two or more heirs and any one of such heirs proposes to transfer his or her interest in the property or business, the other heirs shall have a preferential right to acquire the interest proposed to be transferred.
(2) The consideration for which any interest in the property of the deceased may be transferred under sub-section (1) shall in the absence of any agreement between the parties, be determined by the court, on application, being made to it in this behalf, and if any person proposing to acquire the interest is not willing to acquire it for the consideration so determined, such person shall be liable to pay all costs of or incidental to the application.
(3) If there are two or more heirs proposing to acquire any interest under this section, that heir who offers the highest consideration for the transfer shall be preferred.
Explanation-
In this section ‘court’ means the court within the limits of whose jurisdiction the immovable property is situate or the business is carried on, and includes any other court which the State Government may by notification in the Official Gazette specify in this behalf.
[Vide Karnataka Act 23 of 1994, sec. 2 (w.e.f. 30-7-1994).]
Partition of coparcenary property-
(i) The contention of the petitioners that there was automatic partition amongst the heirs of the deceased Karta on his death has been negatived because it is only when the deceased had left his surviving female heirs as provided in proviso to section 6 of the Act, a notional partition is deemed to have taken place in the joint family property for the purpose of ascertaining the share of the deceased in the joint family properties which comes to the share of the female heirs. If there are male heirs there is no automatic partition;
Shivgonda Balgonda Patil v. Director of Resettlement, AIR 1992 Bom 72
(ii) The heirs will get his or her share in the interest which the deceased had in the coparcenary property at the time of his death in addition to the share which he or she received or must be deemed to have received in the notional partition;
Gurupad v. Hirabai, AIR 1978 SC 1239
(iii) The fiction in the explanation of section 6 of the Act should be carried to a narrow extent only with a new point to implement the purpose for which it was introduced. When there were only two coparceners and one of them died, then if any person other then the coparcener is entitled to a share as a result of severance of the share of the deceased coparcener, the share of such other person will become fixed;
Shushilabai v. Naraynarao, AIR 1975 Bom 257
(iv) The deceased coparcener’s share gets fixed on the date of his death, subsequent fluctuations in the fortunes of the coparceners do not affect it;
Karuppa v. Palaniammal; AIR 1963 Mad 254
- Devolution of interest in the property of a tarwad, tavazhi, kutumba, kavaru or illom.
(1) When a Hindu to whom the marumakkattayam or nambudri law would have applied if this Act had not been passed dies after the commencement of this Act, having at the time of his or her death an interest in the property of a tarwad, tavazhi or illom, as the case may be, his or her interest in the property shall devolve by testamentary or intestate succession, as the case may be, under this Act and not according to the marumakkattayam or numbudri law.
Explanation-
For the purposes of this sub-section, the interest of a Hindu in the property of a tarwad, tavazhi or illom shall be deemed to be the share in the property of the tarwad, tavazhi or illom, as the case may be, that would have fallen to him or her if a partition of that property per capita had been made immediately before his or her death among all the members of tarwad, tavazhi or illom, as the case may be, then living, whether he or she was entitled to claim such partition or not under the marumakkattayam or nambudri law applicable to him or her, and such share shall be deemed to have been allotted to him or her absolutely.
(2) When a Hindu to whom the aliyasantana law would have applied if this Act had not been passed, dies after the commencement of this Act, having at the time of his or her death an undivided interest in the property of a kutumba or kavaru, as the case may be his or her interest in the property shall devolve by testamentary or intestate succession, as the case may be, under this Act and not according to the aliyasantana law.
Explanation-
For the purposes of this sub-section, the interest of a Hindu in the property of kutumba or kavaru shall be deemed to be the share in the property of the kutumba or kavaru as the case may be, that would have fallen to him or her if a partition of that property per capita had been made immediately before his or her death among all the members of the kutumba or kavaru, as the case may be, then living, whether he or she was entitled to claim such partition or not under the aliyasantana law, and such share shall be deemed to have been allotted to him or her absolutely.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), when a sthanamdar dies after the commencement of this Act, sthanam property held by him shall devolve upon the members of the family to which the sthanamdar belonged and the heirs of the sthanamdar as if the sthanam property had been divided per capita immediately before the death of the sthanamdar among himself and all the members of his family then living, and the shares falling to the members of his family and the heirs of the sthanamdar shall be held by them as their separate property.
Explanation-
For the purposes of this sub-section, the family of a sthanamdar shall include every branch of that family, whether divided or undivided, the male members of which would have been entitled by any custom or usage to succeed to the position of sthanamdar if this Act had not been passed.
- General rules of succession in the case of males.
The property of a male Hindu dying intestate shall devolve according to the provisions of this Chapter-
(a) firstly, upon the heirs, being the relatives specified in class I of the Schedule;
(b) secondly, if there is no heir of class I, then upon the heirs, being the relatives specified in class II of the Schedule;
(c) thirdly, if there is no heir of any of the two classes, then upon the agnates of the deceased; and (d) lastly, if there is no agnate, then upon the cognates of the deceased.
(d) lastly, if there is no agnate, then upon the cognates of the deceased. - Order of succession among heirs in the Schedule.
Among the heirs specified in the Schedule, those in class I shall take simultaneously and to the exclusion of all other heirs; those in the first entry in class II shall be preferred to those in the second entry; those in the second entry shall be preferred to those in the third entry; and so on in succession. - Distribution of property among heirs in Class I of the Schedule.
The property of an intestate shall be divided among the heirs in class I of the Schedule in accordance with the following rules:
Rule 1– The intestate’s widow, or if there are more widows than one, all the widows together, shall take one share.
Rule 2– The surviving sons and daughters and the mother of the intestate shall each take one share.
Rule 3– The heirs in the branch of each pre-deceased son or each pre-deceased daughter of the intestate shall take between them one share.
Rule 4– The distribution of the share referred to in Rule 3-
(i) among the heirs in the branch of the pre-deceased son shall be so made that his widow (or widows together) and the surviving sons and daughters get equal portions; and the branch of his predeceased sons gets the same portion;
(ii) among the heirs in the branch of the pre-deceased daughter shall be so made that the surviving sons and daughters get equal portions.
Distribution of property among heirs in class II of the Schedule.
Section 11
Section 12
Order of succession among agnates and cognates.
Provides three rulesRule 1– Of two heirs, the one who has fewer or no degrees of ascent is preferred.
Rule 2– Where the number of degrees of ascent is the same or none, that heir is preferred who has fewer or no degrees of descent.
Rule 3– Where neither heirs is entitled to be preferred to the other under Rule 1 or Rule 2 they take simultaneou
Computation of degrees.
S 13
Property of a female Hindu to be her absolute property.
Section 14
Section 15
General rules of succession in the case of female Hindus.
Order of succession and manner of distribution among heirs of a female Hindu.
Section 16
Special provisions respecting persons governed by Marumakkattayam and Aliyasantana laws.
Section 17
Section 18
Full blood preferred to half blood
Section 19
Mode of succession of two or more heirs.
Right of child in womb.
Section 20
Presumption in cases of simultaneous deaths.
Section 21
Section 22
Preferential right to acquire property in certain cases.
Special provision respecting dwelling houses.
Section 23
Certain widows remarrying may not inherit as widows.
Section 24
Murderer disqualified.
Section 25
Convert’s descendants disqualified.
Section 26
Section 27
Succession when heir disqualified.
Section 28
Disease, defect, etc. not to disqualify.
Section 29
Failure of heirs.
Escheat
Testamentary succession.
Section 30
Chapter III of Hindu Succession Act – Testamentary Succession
Heirs in Class I
Son;
daughter;
widow;
mother;
son of a pre-deceased son;
daughter of a pre-deceased son;
son of a pre-deceased daughter;
daughter of a pre-deceased daughter;
widow of a pre-deceased son;
Class II heirs
I. Father.
II. (1) Son’s daughter’s son, (2) son’s daughter’s daughter, (3) brother, (4) sister.
III. (1) Daughter’s son’s son, (2) daughter’s son’s daughter, (3) daughter’s daughter’s son, (4) daughter’s daughter’s daughter.
IV. (1) Brother’s son, (2) sister’s son, (3) brother’s daughter, (4) sister’s daughter.
The distribution of the property of a Hindu male Dyeing is state is done according to
Section 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 19 to 28
The list of class 1 and class 2 as provided in Schedule
The distribution of the property of Hindu female dying intestate is done according to
Section 15, 16 & 19 to 28
In which case the supreme court laid down the rights of female Hindu under section 14 subsection one and two of Hindu succession act
V. Thulasamma v V. Seshareddy 1977 SC
R. Kantha versus union of India
Right of a daughter to reopen the partition is valid
In which case section 118 of Indian succession Act 1925 was declared unconstitutional
John vallamatom versus union of India
