H.M.A Flashcards
In which case it was held that matrimonial rights are not violative of article 14 and 21 of the constitution
Saroj v. Sudarshan
In which case it was held for the first time that “Hindu is by birth and can also be made”
Ibrahim versus Ibrahim
Jyotish Chandra v. meera
Is related to constructive desertion
In explaining unsound mind a ground for seeking diverse under Hindu marriage Act 1955 in which case the supreme court held that “a sound mind in disputably is a key to a happy married life”
Sharda V dharmpal air 2003 SC
Samar ghosh v jaya Ghosh 2007 4 SSC
While examining amplitude of cruelty for the purpose of Hindu marriage Act 1955, supreme Court lay down broad parameters which may be relevant in dealing with the case of mental cruelty
Sarla Mudgal versus union of India
Hindu husband converting to Islam in wearing again will be guilty of bigamy
Which law commissions report recommended the breakdown principle to be accepted as a additional ground for divorce
71st Commission report
Rules relating to sapinda relationship are based on the principle of
Exogamy
In which case supreme Court held that staying together under the same roof is not a pre-condition for mental cruelty
K. Shrinivas Rao V. DA Deepa a i r 2013 SC
A degree for restitution of conjugal rights may be enforced by
Attachment of property provided under order 21 rule 32
Section 9 Hindu marriage Act
A female cannot be a Karta of joint family has been held by supreme Court in case of
Commissioner of income tax v Seth govindram air 1966 SC
In which case the supreme Court has directed that marriages of all persons belong to any religion be registered in their respective States where marriages solomonized if they are citizens of India
Seema V Ashwini Kumar
In which case the supreme Court has directed the states and Central Government to make loss for compulsory registration of all marriages in India
making laws for compulsory registration of all marriages in India is provided under Section 8 sub section 1 of Hindu marriage Act but the same has been held in the case of Seema V Ashwini Kumar
In which of the following the constitutional validity of section 9 Hindu marriage Act was up held by supreme Court
In this case it was also held that matrimonial rights are not violative of article 14 and 21 of the constitution
Saroj Rani versus Sudarshan Kumar
Which case is on the concept of desertion
BipinChandra versus prabhavati
Desertion- course of conduct, persistent
3 year period
Intention to desert may to presumed to continue unless divorce proceedings are commenced, if a deserting spouse comes back w/ full intention to resume all duties
Lakshman Uttam Chand Kriplani v Meena
Desertion
Other than Saroj Rani versus Sudarshan Kumar in which other case it was held at section 9 of Hindu marriage Act is not violative of constitution of India article 21
Smt. Harvinder Kaur v. harmandir Singh
In which case the constitutional validity of section 9 Hindu marriage Act first time came for consideration
T. Sarita v. t Venkata subbaih
Short title and extent.
Section.1
Section.2
Application of Act.
Definitions
Section.3
the expression “Custom” and “usage”
Cl.a
Cl. C
full-blood” and “half-blood”
uterine blood
Cl. D
Cl f (i)
(f) (i) “Sapinda relationship”
degrees of prohibited relationship
Cl. G
Section.4
Overriding effect of Act.
Conditions for a Hindu Marriage.
Section.5
Section.7
Ceremonies for a Hindu Marriage.
Registration of Hindu Marriages.
Section.8
Section.9
Restitution of conjugal rights.
Section.10
Judicial Separation.
Void marriages
Section.11