HRM Midterm 2 Flashcards
From Oct. 7 - oct. 28th
quiz 9 through 15
Group v. team
Group
–3 or more, recognize themselves as distinct unit, work independently
team
- -2 or more, work together regularly in interdependent fashion to accomplish a common goal
- -key is COHESION!
- -best # depends on task at hand (5-9 range)
- -single most imp. predictor of success (neuroticism/stability)
- -virtual teams less effective (must meet in person sometimes)
- -some similarity in team members is valuable
- -authority to manage own work – sense of direction – all members skills are used
- -tackle more complex/diff. problems
ideal size - as small as possible for task you are working on
In assembling a team
LEARN FROM GEESE - video
purpose of assembling a team
- –accomplish larger, more complex goals, than what would be possible for indiv. working alone
- -perform, get results, and achieve victory in workplace
- -combine multiple skills or where buy=in is req. from several indiv.
- -the best managers are those who can gather together a group of indiv. and mold them into an effective team!
three types of task interdependence in teams
- pooled interdependence — unique assignment
- sequential interdependence
- -outputs become others’ inputs - reciprocal interdependence
- -passed back and forth - constantly alert
stages of team development
- forming
- storming
- -guard starts to go down btwn 1 and 2 - norming
- -feel relief! ready to work! good energy and have a social env! - performing
- adjourning
what does punctuated equilibrium model say about WHEN performing happens? (look it up!!!)
barriers to effective teams
- challenges knowing where to begin
- dominating team members
- poor performance of team members (social loafing etc.)
- poorly managed team conflict
all 4 are improved by psychological safety!!!!!!
social loafing – when you are in a group and you know the other group will take care of it then you just sit back and let them do the work
overcome barriers by using what — first 90 days tool
TEAM CONTRACT
- -norms of how to set schedules and spend time (purpose of meetings, length, time of day)
- -what to do if members don’t adhere to group procedures (lateness)
- -what is appropriate way to let team down, compensate
- -what are ways to criticize quality of work and appropriate channels to do it in
- -how will work and control over work be shared
- -when to revisit or revise the contract
team charter!!!!
- –at MIN team contract should contain guidelines for attendance and participation in team meetings - method for reaching team decisions, procedures for resolving conflict
- –ask what team is trying to accomplish? what are team goals? what roles will members play? how will team reach decisions? how will team evaluate and improve performance?
cohesive groups
those in which members are attached to each other and act as one unit
- common characteristics –>
- collective identity –>
- share a mutual bond –>
- share a sense of purpose –>
- work together on a common task –>
- establish a structured pattern of communication
steps to build cohesion
- -align group with greater org.
- -let members have choices in setting their own goals
- -define clear roles
- -give freq. praise
- -celebrate diff.
- -treat all members with dignity and respect
meetings - be sure meeting is even needed - create and distribute an agenda - reminders - start and end on time – summarize meeting with action items
too much cohesion can lead to social loafing and lack of creativity bc ppl are stuck in same mindset - not enough is too many ideas
- -low cohesion - low productivity and little to no psych. safety
- -middle = perfect amt. of innovation and idea sharing
- -high = too buddy buddy and group think
types of teams
GOING down = greater TIME and greater COHESION!!!
- task force
- -a temp. team which is asked to address a specific issue or problem until it is resolved - product development team
- -can be temp. or ongoing - cross-functional team
- -appears in org. where indiv. from diff. parts of org. staff the team which may be temp. or long standing in nature - harder so usually longer lasting
5 fundamental factors of group cohesion
- similarity
- stability
- size
- support
- satisfaction
can groups have too much cohesion
An internal pressure to conform may arise where some members modify their behavior to adhere to group norms —>
cohesive groups will often disapprove of members who dare to disagree –>
GROUPTHINK - group pressure phenomenon that inc. risk of group making flawed decisions
- –group members conform to majority viewpoint in group decision-making
- -need to fit in
- -disagreement can be uncomfortable
- -seems like less work
- -time pressure
- -close-mindedness
overcoming barriers by preventing social loaging
- –carefully choose the # of indiv. you need to get task done
- -assing tasks that are highly engaging and rewarding
- -clearly define each member’s tasks in front of the entire group
- -make sure indiv. feel they are needed
key elements to team success
IS NOT indiv. personalities or attitudes but the conditions under which a team operates
–leader inspires but mostly needs to create and maintain conditions
- psychological safety
- -team members feel safe to take risks and be vulnerable in front of each other
- -prevents group think!! - dependability
- -get things done on time and meet Google’s high bar for excellence - structure & clarity
- -team members have clear roles, plans and goals - meaning
- -work is personally imp. to team members - impact
- -team members think their work matters and creates change
Blake sports care pros and cons
pros/strengths
- -28% YoY growth
- -#1 position in world for sales in some categories
- -very loyal team members
- -CEO very entrepreneurial “inspiring, empowering, talented”
- competent team members
failures/problems
- -siloed departments w/ separate reporting
- -delays onboarding new customers
- -delays releasing new products
- -inability to launch new products
- -missed deadlines
- -infighting and poor morale
cohesive problem – weren’t being managed well
root problems at Blake sports
- trust and info. sharing
- -secretive and defensive w/ info. - goal alignment and incentives
- -attain comp. wide goals gets 5% bonus
- -95% of compensation based on indiv. goals
- -extra funds for exemplary indiv. v. collective performance - meeting effectiveness
- -no agenda, ppl give up, frustration, emails could have been better than meetings, ppl don’t show up, deadlines ignored - team design and cohesion
- -no internal leadership for daily op. - CEO style and actions
- -does not promote cohesion, manages one on one, sets casual tone, disconnected from daily ops., causes chaos with personal style - ignoring strategic issues
- -middle managers not empowered
- -too focused on day to day operations
blake sports solutions
- -incentives should be aligned to match level of team interdependence – compensation for one should not be at expense of another - team-based incentives
- -create a shared mindset – foster a common identity - team building activities
- -make meetings more effective
- -does team have right people - change team composition and size - celebrate successes
is a team necessary?
team
- -clear task/clear boundaries
- -authority to manage own work
- -all members skills used
- -membership stability
- -has a sense of direction
diversity
mix of ppl of diff. socially relevant group identities working or living together in a defined social system
- -diversity refers to ways ppl are similar or diff. from each other
- -gender, ethnic heritage, race, religion, age, mental/physical abilities, sexual orientation
diversity
mix of ppl of diff. socially relevant group identities working or living together in a defined social system
- -diversity refers to ways ppl are similar or diff. from each other
- -gender, ethnic heritage, race, religion, age, mental/physical abilities, sexual orientation
deep level diversity v. surface level
deep level
- -life applications
- -values, attitudes, beliefs
- -in the center of the circle!!!
- -secondary levels (work experience, geographic location, org. role/level, comm., work style, first language, hobbies/interests)
surface level diversity
- -education functional area
- -gender, race, age, physical abilities
- -outer circle
surface v. deep-level diversity applications
early-stage effects v. later effects
- –surface level influences relationships more strongly in short term groups
- -deep level influences relationships in longer term groups
relationships btwn surface and deep
–uses surface level to decide whether there are deep level differences
sterotypes v. generalizations
both are broad stmts. about a group of ppl
stereotypes
- -lock ppl into categories w/ ideas of limiting them
- -seek to judge v. describe
- -harder to modify, unconscious and reactive, rigid and judgmental, seek to oversimplify
generalizations
- -look at behavior and note similarities
- -descriptive and non-judgmental
- -can modify if find new examples which disprove the description we are trying to make
- -used consciously and analytically, descriptive and flexible, attempt to capture similarities and principles, constantly modified w/ new input
inclusion
creating a climate where the potential advantages of diversity for organizational or group performance are maximized while the potential disadvantages are minimized
goal: create a positive climate for diversity – feel welcome and included
why are diverse teams more innovative
- -diff. perspectives lead to better problem solving from wider range of interests and experiences
- -new ideas reach diff. mkts.
- -diversity signals market savvy which attracts human and fin. assets
- -it can be uncomfortable but productive
higher creativity in decision making
- -presence of diverse ppl makes everyone more willing to share
- -better understanding and service of customers
- -higher stock prices
- -higher comp. performance
- -more satisfied workforce
a 1% inc. in racial diversity correlates with a 9% gain in revenue
–better reputation and more innovative
types of diversity that bolster innovation and 2 that don’t
very high positive!!!!
- -industry background
- -country of origin
- -career path
high
–gender
no significant relationship
–academic background
highly negative relationship
–age
reasons diversity is diff.
- don’t get there in first place bc common culture is sustained
- –similariy attraction (ASA) - don’t get to know person bc of stereotypes and prejudice
- don’t want to be there - unsupportive/hostile env. (faultlines)
- don’t know what to do bc lack of exp.
- don’t think its imp.
- don’t want to change – resistance to change
ex. of illegal interview questions
have you ever been arrested?
are you married/children?
what religious holidays do you practice?
do you have outstanding debt?
response when asked illegal questions
- -refuse to answer
- -answer shortly
- -answer the intent
- -walk away from interview
become diversity competent
men are afraid to mentor women - here’s what we can do about it
- hold yourself and colleagues accountable for parity
- instead of running from discomfort, ask about it
- build mentor networks rather than silos
short answer questions:
–what is bias at work and what are three ways to mitigate bias?
–what elements of org. life make managing bias diff.
–name 3 reported performance benefits from diversity programs that seem feasibly to attempt and why
–what is bias at work and what are three ways to mitigate bias?
–what elements of org. life make managing bias diff.
–name 3 reported performance benefits from diversity programs that seem feasibly to attempt and why
short answer questions:
–what are three possible responses to illegal interview questions?
–T/F on issues around hiring based on merit or deep level vs. surface diversity
–can an employer be liable for harassment even if supervisor did not know but should have known due to prior complains?
–what are three possible responses to illegal interview questions?
- -T/F on issues around hiring based on merit or deep level vs. surface diversity
- –deep . level matters in longer term groups – many programs are starting w/ surface level today – but you can use surface level to start and then move to decide whether there are deep level differences
–can an employer be liable for harassment even if supervisor did not know but should have known due to prior complains?