How To Answer Paper 1 Language Questions Flashcards
What should you do before you write?
Read the text straight through quickly for 4min
Q1 advice and timing
- Spend 2min
- Make sure the four things you list come from the correct section in the text
- Make sure the four things you list are correct by reading quotes in the context of the whole sentence and whole passage to avlid misunderstanding
- Don’t try to be too clever
Q2 timings
12min in total
4min annotating and 8min writing
Question 2 advice
- Read the question and focus on what the question is asking. Always relate it to the question
- Only annotate the extract specified in the question NOT the whole text
How do you annotate for q2?
- Read through one sentence at a time and ask yourself,”what words or phrases or aspects of sentence structure/length,” in this sentence do I find striking? How does it have a particular effect? Then, highlight these words.
- In the margin, write down the appropriate technical term
- Next to the technical term, note down the effect
- Look for patterns in the text which gives you the higher grades
For q2 how do you write your response?
Use the formula: TQSB
Technical term + quote + suggests (for interpretation) + because/as (for analysis)
To make it flow develop your analysis and make links between other elements in the specific text
Try and find patterns in the text
Try to weave in quotes in your answer
How much time do you spend in q3?
12min in total
4min annotating the whole source for strutural elements and 8min writing
Q3 advice
- Remember that this question is also focused on effect. Explain how the structural elements and how they relate to the content of the text.
How to annotate for q3?
- Skim read each paragraph and note in the margin what it focuses on
- To this, add significant structural language (eg. beginning, unspecified, move from outside to inside, in media res)
- Once all paragraphs have been briefly annotated, look for patterns across the text
What patterns can you identify in q3?
- Does the text end in the same place or with a similar image to the one it started with?
- Does each paragraph gradually ‘zoom in’ the focus from an opening ‘big picture’ to a significant detail at the end, or in the middle?
- Is there a movement in the text between outside and inside, or between a focus on objects and a focus on people, or between one perspective and another; or between description and dialogue; or between the gneral and the particular?
- Any significant contrasts?
- Is there a recurring image/idea running all the way through the text - or perhaps through two or three paragraphs?
Question 3 formula
- Identify/name structural feature
- Specify exactly where this occurs/what it looks like ‘quote’
- Explain the effect of using this element of structure in the context of what the text is about (sense of anticipation, threat, sorrow, panic, sympathy, happiness, loving …)
Technique + Quote + EFFECTS
How much time do you spend on q4?
30min
5-10 min annotating to interpret and analyse methods; 20-25min writing
Question 4 advice
- Remember to answer the question only on the part of the text named in the question
- This question requires you to interpret and evaluate (have a personal response/think for yourself) - and to support your interpretations with detailed analysis of the techniques used by the author
- Read the question carefully. Keep referring back to the question for every point you make
- To plan, read through the text, making a list of any evidence to support your view in response to the question. This evidence should range across all the relevant methods that the writer is using to present his ideas/characters/setting.
In q4, if the question asks for a view on a character, what can you focus on?
- Physical appearance
- Dialogue - what they say and how they say it
- Name
- What other characters think/say about them or react to them
- How they react to/ treat other characters
- What they do and how they do it
- Use of narritive perspective
How should you structure your response for q4
Ensure you are continually put forward an agreement/your view in response to the question, each time supporting your view with an analysis of the authorial methods used.