How successfully did Henry VI strengthen central and local government? Flashcards
Henry’s aims in central/local gov
Although there had been progress in restoring ‘good government’ during the
second reign of Edward IV (1471-83) and Richard III (1483-85), Henry was
determined to ensure that law and order was firmly established after the
chaos of the Wars of the Roses. The problem was made worse as Henry lacked
experience of both the country and its government. However, most historians
agree that Henry was able to overcome the difficulties he faced and restore
government at national, regional and local levels
Changes to central gov
The Council was chosen by the king and although there were over 200 councillors
during his reign, meetings were attended by a much smaller number, and
on most occasions he relied on an inner group so that the efficiency of
central government was improved
used smaller committees from within the Council, as Richard had done, but made the practice more frequent, with
the establishment of a Court of Requests, Court of General Surveyors and the Council Learned in the Law
did not rely on particular families, but instead drew his
chief advisors from the lesser landowners, gentry or professional classes
particularly lawyers, as was seen in the rise of men such as Reginald Bray
and Edmund Dudley
Who was in the inner group of the council
This inner group was made up of: the
Lord Chancellor, Morton; the Lord Privy Seal, Fox; the Lord Treasurer,
Dynham; and five others
How did council differ little from Yorkist system
most were either
members of the nobility or the Church. However, some of the more
important members did come from the gentry
Why did Henry not rely on particular families
In order to exploit his finances the king needed
experts in property law and administration and therefore needed men of
ability, rather than just birth.
Hatred of the Council Learned in the
Law
hated by many because of its links with bonds and
recognisances, supervising their collection. This hatred became even more
pronounced after 1504 when, under the joint leadership of Empson and Dudley,
it ensured that royal rights were thoroughly enforced, causing much resentment.
Although there were some changes to the Council, particularly with the
establishment of committees, it was the exploitation of royal rights that was
the most noticeable change and caused such hatred that Empson and Dudley
were soon removed and executed by Henry VIII on his accession
How did Henry ensure that the authority of central government was upheld
in the outlying regions of the country
developed the Yorkist
use of regional councils in the north, Wales and Ireland. These were
the peripheral regions of the country where royal authority had been
traditionally limited.
Council of the North
At first, Henry had used the Earl of Northumberland to act as his deputy
in the north, but following his death during the Yorkshire rising
Henry appointed the Earl of Surrey. The Council of the North not only had
responsibility to defend the northern border, but also had administrative and
judicial power so that the law could be enforced quickly. However, the major
change was in practical terms as the Council in London closely watched the
Council of the North’s activities and Henry ensured that the members of the
Council were appointed by him, rather than Surrey, thus ensuring greater
loyalty and enforcement of royal will.
Council of Wales
Wales had been a particularly unruly area during the Wars of the Roses
due to the absence of continuous and effective rule from London. Although
Edward IV had established the Council of Wales and the Marches in
1472, no attempt had been made to create a single system of counties and
lordships, or abolish the privileges of Marcher lords, though it had brought
some improvement in restoring a degree of law and order. Henry revived the
Council in 1493, under the nominal head of his son Arthur, and with the
king’s Welsh connections and the death and loss of lands by a number of
Marcher lords he was able to increase his control.
Council of Ireland
Ireland, as Yorkist stronghold, was a particular problem for Henry. Direct
English control in Ireland was limited to an area around Dublin, known as
the Pale; outside of this area it was the influence of the major Irish families,
such as the Kildares, that held sway. Although Poynings’ Law was passed in
1494, stipulating that Irish parliaments could only be called and pass laws with the prior approval of the king, other attempts to increase his authority were limited in their success, Sir Edwand Poynings, Henry’s deputy in Ireland,
failed in his efforts to bring Ulster under greater control. Attempts to
increase control in Ireland would be costly and therefore Henry was
forced to rely on its rule through the traditional families, with the Earl of Kildare,
being restored as Lord Deputy.
Edward IV mistakes in attempting to restore law and order
The Wars of the Roses had seen the breakdown of law and order in many
areas and Edward IV had been forced to address this. In doing so he had
relied on a number of powerful families, but this reliance had given them
enormous amounts of power and influence which meant that they could, any
often did, ignore royal commands
why Difficulties in ensuring laws were obeyed
lacked paid officials in the localities to enforce his laws, and instead had to
rely on the support of the nobility and gentry to carry out his wishes. Henry
was content with this provided they upheld the law and did not disobey it
themselves, and relied on men such as the Earl of Shrewsbury in the West
Midlands and Lord Hastings in the North Midlands
Developing the office of Justice of the Peace
This was
not a new position, but in the past these unpaid officials had been either
under the influence of larger magnates or had used the system to further
their own interests. However, these problems were lessened by the system of
bonds imposed on both nobles and gentry who held such offices. Justices
of the Peace were appointed annually, and as under Edward IV, Henry VII
continued to choose men from the second rank of landowners, meaning that
their loyalty was more assured and further weakened the power of the greater
nobles
What new things did the role of JPs include
implementing social and economic statutes
# dispensing justice and trying criminal offences
upholding public order
# replacing suspect members of juries
# acting in cases of non-capital offences without a jury
# rewarding informers
# arresting and questioning poachers
# empowered to grant bail.
Weakness of JPs
Although their power was greatly extended by Henry, JPs were still dependent
on other officials bringing offenders to them. However, local officials were
often reluctant to act as it made them unpopular and local offices were
frequently left unfilled. As a result, Henry was heavily dependent upon
goodwill to ensure justice was implemented.