How people respond to earthquakes Flashcards
why response measures are needed
- impossible to prevent EQ
- impt to restore a place, make it liveable again after disaster
- short term vs long term responses
short term responses
- occur immediately, last for weeks aft EQ
- provide survivors basic necessities of food, water, shelter
- ensure survival of ppl in affected areas aft event
types of short term responses
- search and rescue
2. humanitarian aid: providing emergency medical aid, food and water
short term response: search and rescue
-save those trapped under collapsed buildings, locate and free quickly
short term response: search and rescue (+)
- some survivors found aft being trapped for several weeks w/o food
- e.g. 2011 Tohoku, aft EQ, sniffer dogs and heat sensors deployed, rescue many trapped under rubble
short term response: search and rescue (-)
- limited time for rescue workers to find survivors, abt 3 days
- w/o food and water, unlikely to survive
short term response: humanitarian aid
- injured treated
- clean drinking water provided to survivors, prevent dehydration and spread of diseases
- emergency shelters for homeless
short term response: humanitarian aid (+)
- help survivors cope with disaster
- may also be aid sent to affected area by foreign gov, NGO
- e.g. after EQ in Afyon, Turkey 2002, Turkish Red Crescent Society, immediate response, deliver 20k tents, 50k blankets, 2k heaters
short term response: humanitarian aid (-)
- insufficient supplies, social unrest if those in need dont get supplies
- countries may not have means/money to provide extensive aid e.g. dont have enough workers/trained personnel (LDC vs DC, Haiti vs Japan)
- emergency shelters cramped, easy spread of air-borne, water-borne diseases
long term responses
- rebuild, prepare for next disaster
- stretch over months and years
long term responses: rebuilding and improving infrastructure
-infrastructure and amenities rebuilt and improved aft disaster
long term responses: rebuilding and improving infrastructure (+)
- authorities often develop stricter building codes
- ensure higher lvls of safety
- e.g. after 1995 Kobe Japan EQ,, spent billions developing tech to build more EQ resistant buildings
- change in building code ensures buildings able to withstand tremors from seismic waves
long term responses: rebuilding and improving infrastructure (-)
- reinforced buildings may be resistant to shaking of tremors, may not be for tsunamis
- e.g. though many buildings in Chile EQ resistant, coastal areas suffered damage frm tsunami when EQ struck (2010) (same for Tohoku EQ 2011)
long term responses: provision of and improvement of healthcare options
- healthcare options e.g. long term counselling
- loss of loved ones after EQ, long term trauma (PTSD)
long term responses: provision of and improvement of healthcare options (+)
- help injured/psychologically disturbed victims
- restore livelihoods thru identifying and addressing problems early
- e.g. a year aft Christchurch EQ, NZ in 2001, anxiety and depression prominent among all age groups of affected population, more health workers deployed in that area