hot intelligences Flashcards

1
Q

what are hot intelligences?

A

alternative theories that focus on being ‘streetwise’ rather than booksmart

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what fostered the notion of hot intelligences

A

there were so many examples of people who had performed poorly in school that ended up being very successful in life - cognitive ability isnt everything

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the 4 types of hot intelligences? - include names of resarchers

A
  • social intelligence (thorndike, 1920)
  • multiple intelligences (gardner, 1999)
  • practical intelligence (sternberg, 1985)
  • emotional intelligence (salovey, mayer, goleman, 1990)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what were the 2 original domains of social intelligence?

A
  • ability to manage others

- act wisely in relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what was thorndike the first to do

A

think of something else that was not a traditional part of intelligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

why is social intelligence important?

A
  • it tells us something more about intelligence as academic and cognitive abilities are not the perfect predictors of performance
  • helps us to understand social disorders where cognitive skills failed to distinguish between healthy and mentally impaired individuals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what problems are there with social intelligence?

A
  • how do we measure it? -
  • it is very subjective and we are sometimes not insightful about ourselves and may not answer truthfully.
  • early measures of SI correlated with academic intelligence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

“social intelligence eludes from formal standardized conditions of the testing laboratory” - who?

A

Thorndike (1920)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

ford and tisak (1983) did what?

A

designed and tested a psychometrically coherent social intelligence scale on a sample of 600 participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what 5 dimensions of social intelligence did ford and tisak (1983) develop from their testing?

A
  • interest and concern for other people
  • social performance skills
  • empathic ability
  • emotional expressiveness and sensitivity to others emotional expression
  • social anxiety and lack of social self-efficacy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

were ford and tisak’s dimensions related to cognitive abilities?

A

no.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is there dispute over in testing of SI?

A

the number of dimensions:
sternberg - 2
steinberg - 7

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

who developed the theory of multiple intelligence’s?

A

Gardner (1983, 1999).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are gardners views?

A
  • supports thurstones idea that intelligence comes in multiple forms
  • brain damage could dimish one type of ability but not others
  • 8 different intelligences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what are the criticisms of gardners multiple intelligences?

A
  • its hard to measure things like musical intelligence
  • he had no evidence to support his notion of multiple independant intelligences
  • the list of intelligences is probably not representative of the real number of abilities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what did De Visser (2006) find from testing multiple intelligences?

A

that many of the ‘independant’ factors were positively correlated with each other eg spatial ability correlated with local/mathematical ability

17
Q

what was wrong with the way that gardner tested his theory?

A

he measured preferences rather than skills eg questions like - i prefer …
this was unsophisticated and unreliable

18
Q

what is the notion behind practical intelligence (sternberg)

A
  • agrees with the need for multiple intelligence but suggests 3 rather than 8
  • no one is good at everything or nothing so there is no point in talking about g.
19
Q

what are the 3 subcomponents of practical intelligence?

A
  • componential
  • experiential
  • contextual
20
Q

emotional intelligence is routed in the works of…

21
Q

what are criticisms of practical intelligence?

A

relationships between subtheories are not specified which made it difficult to measure the model

22
Q

who were the main researchers of emotional intelligence?

A

Salovey and Mayer (1990)

Goleman (1995)

23
Q

what did goleman (1995) think about emotional intelligence?

A

It is not about your IQ but rather emotional intelligence - it may be the best predictor of success in life. defines what it means to be smart

24
Q

how do salovey and mayer (1990) define emotional intellince?

A

the ability to monitor own and others feelings , discriminate among feelings and use guided thinking.

25
What research did Petrides and Furnham (2000) conduct? | What sex differences were found?
An emotional intelligence questionnaire that had 4 factors - optimism, appraisal of emotions, social skills and the localisation of emotions. found that there was only a significant difference between men and women on social skills. men self-reported higher than they performed and women self-reported lower.
26
what is problematic about emotional intelligence testing? | how it is tested?
- the tests are different to traditional intelligence tests. | - it is assessed in the same away that personality it (self/observer reports or projective measures)
27
what intelligence test did mayer, salovey and caruso develop (1990)
the mayer salovey and caruso emotional intelligence test (MSCEIT)
28
what did the MSCEIT test? (4 dimensions of EI)
- accurately perceiving emotions - using emotions to facilitate thinking - understanding emotional meanings - managing emotions - a series of emotion based problem solving tasks
29
what sex differences were observed by salovey and mayer in the ability model of EI? (MSCEIT)
- women scored higher than men across all 4 aspects of EI (Day and Carroll, 2004) - women better at perceiving, using and understanding emotional meanings and managing emotions.
30
what sex differences were found from Goleman (1995) mixed model? and by who?
Cavallo (2006) - women have higher levels of self-awareness, have better communication skills and are better at developing others.
31
What is appealing about alternative theories of intelligence?
they encompass skills that are not acknowledged in traditional conceptualisations of intelligence
32
what are the main limitations of hot intelligences?
- limited by measurement difficulties - gender differences in EI could be due to the type of assessment took used - self-report measures coul foster biased results - subjective so a lack of clarity.