Hormones Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are hormones?

A

Hormones are chemicals that affect human behaviour. They are produced by glands that make up the endocrine system. They enter directly into the bloodstream and therefore take longer than neurotransmitters to produce changes in behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe what an oxytocin does to the body?

A

Oxytocin is a hormone that acts primarily as a neurotransmitter in the brain. It has been long known that the hormone is released during labour and facilitates birth, breastfeeding and initiation of maternal behaviour. Oxytocin is also found in pair bonding and social behaviour such as trust.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the aim of Baumgartner’s 2008 study?

A

To investigate the role of oxytocin following breaches of trust.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Procedure of Baumgartner’s study?

A

The study had 49 participants placed in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanner and given either oxytocin or a placebo via nasal spray.
They were then asked to play a “trust game” in which they were assigned a role as investor or trustees. The investors were given a choice to invest the sum of money that had. If they do so, the total investment would be tripled. The trustee will now decide if they will keep the sum for their own or split the amount with the investor: by keeping the money a breach in trust was created.
In condition 1, participants played as investors with different trustees. In condition 2, the participants played against a computer instead.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Findings of Baumgartner’s study?

A

The results revealed that participants who took the placebo were more likely to decrease their trust after being told that their trust had been broken.
However, participants who received oxytocin were still likely to invest despite having their trust broken.
Moreover, fMRI scans revealed the participants who received oxytocin had decreased responses in the amygdala (region of brain involved in learning and memory); in the case it played a role in reward-related responses and learning to trust.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Conclusions of Baumgartner’s study?

A

This shows that oxytocin may have a role in decreasing fear reactions that are consequences of betrayal which may influence future decisions. Additionally, oxytocin may facilitate expressions of trust and lower mechanisms associated with risk by ignoring the negative outcomes. It also seemed that oxytocin only plays a role in human interaction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Strengths of Baumgartner’s study?

A

Repeated measures design which minimises individual differences.
Lab experiment: cause and effect can be established.
Study was similar to real life situations to an extent: ecological validity.
Use of fMRI to investigate brain activity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Limitations of Baumgartner’s study?

A

Repeated measures could have made participants aware of the nature of the experiment and may have affected the results.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the aim of Kosfeld et al’s 2005 study?

A

To check whether oxytocin affected trust in humans. `

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Procedure of Kosfeld’s study?

A

Humans were given either oxytocin intranasally or as a placebo. The independent variable was what chemical the humans received. The dependent variable was their behaviour in a trust game: do you trust the investor?
In the trust game, the participant was an investor who could choose to invest 4 monetary units and possibly get 12 monetary units in return.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Findings of Kosfeld’s study?

A

The oxytocin group was more willing to trust the investor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Conclusions of Kosfeld’s study?

A

This suggests that oxytocin increases our feelings of trustworthiness in others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Strengths of Kosfeld’s study?

A

They did a follow up study to ensure that oxytocin was not just increasing riskier behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Limitations of Kosfeld’s study?

A

The participants did not earn the money they used in the study.
You can argue that people are more careful with money they have earned themselves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe the role of testosterone on the body.

A

A hormone commonly associated with aggression and selfish behaviour. Linked to sexual development in males during puberty. Produced mostly in the testes in men and in the ovaries and adrenal glands in women.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the aim of Zak et al’s 2009 study?

A

To study the effect of testosterone on a man’s generosity and aggressiveness.

17
Q

Procedure of Zak’s study?

A

Sample was made up of 25 male students.
Participants had blood drawn to establish their baseline levels of testosterone.
Two conditions, given either a testosterone gel or a placebo to apply (testosterone levels were doubled in the experimental condition). Played a game where they had to decide to be generous or stingy to another player with their money. Participants repeated the experiment four weeks after in the other condition.

18
Q

Findings of Zak’s study?

A

Participants were found to be 27% stingier when they had received the testosterone gel.

19
Q

Conclusions of Zak’s study?

A

Findings suggest that testosterone has the opposite effect of oxytocin; causing a rise in distrust and increase in selfish behaviour.

20
Q

Strengths of Zak’s study?

A

Repeated measures design- this minimises individual differences.
Double blind counter-balancing- this minimises order effects, prevents participants from being aware of the aim of the study and researchers from being biased.

21
Q

Limitations of Zak’s study?

A

Lacks generalisability as the sample is small.
Low ecological validity as it is an artificial experiment and may not apply to real life situations (testosterone levels were manipulated and game was simplistic).
Reductionist in its explanation of human aggression and generosity.
Does not investigate other factors that influence or contribute to aggressive behaviours.

22
Q

What is the aim of Dabbs and Hargrove’s 1997 study?

A

To see whether testosterone was related to the type of violent crimes females commit and their behaviour in prison.

23
Q

Procedure of Dabbs and Hargrove’s study?

A

Measured testosterone in the saliva of 87 female prisoners. Looked at the criminal records of the prisoners for violent and non-violent crimes.
Added an extra category of defensive violence which they defined as females being violent towards a perpetrator levels predicted violent crimes.

24
Q

Findings of Dabbs and Hargrove’s study?

A

Found that testosterone levels predicted violent crimes.

Found that testosterone levels were related to their aggressive behaviour in prison.

25
Q

Conclusions of Dabbs and Hargrove’s study?

A

This indicates that testosterone is a hormone that is related to or plays a role in violent behaviour.

26
Q

Strengths of Dabbs and Hargrove’s study?

A

However, the behaviour of the participants are not artificial and reflect real life settings; therefore the study has high ecological validity.

27
Q

Limitations of Dabbs and Hargrove’s study?

A

The study is a natural experiment as there are no controlled variables. Thus, no causation relationship can be established - only correlational.
However, the argument that testosterone is the sole factor in violent behaviour is reductionist as there may be other factors, such as sociocultural factors that play a part in it.