Brain Imaging Techniques, Neuroplasticty and Localisation Flashcards
All three have similar studies
What are brain imaging techniques?
Brain imaging techniques are methods used in psychology to examine the human brain, allowing researchers to see where specific brain processes take place.
What is an fMRI (Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging)?
- A noninvasive test used to measure brain activity.
- fMRI creates detailed images of the brain during a specific experimental time period by looking at blood flow in the brain.
What is the aim of Fisher et al’s 2005 study?
To investigate the neural mechanisms associated with the attraction system (romantic love)
Procedure of Fisher et al’s study?
Fisher used fMRI scanning to see the brain activity of participants when they were shown images of their loved one, compared to a photo of a “neutral” friend.
What did Fisher find in their study?
The fMRI showed increased activity in the dopamine rich areas associated with reward, motivation and goal orientation when they looked at photos of their lover.
Increased activity in brain regions include the right mid-insular cortex and the right posterior cortex.
What can be concluded from Fisher’s study?
The fMRI brain scan helped us to understand that romantic love is associated with subcortical dopaminergic pathways in the reward system and that romantic love is primarily a motivation system, which leads to various emotions rather than just one specific emotion.
What are the strengths of Fisher’s study?
It can evaluate brain function safely, non-invasively and effectively. The images produced are very high resolution (as detailed as 1 mm).
What are the limitations of Fisher’s study?
- Expensive
- It can only capture a clear image if the subject stays completely still
- Results can be difficult to interpret
- Researchers can only look at blood flow in the brain, not activities of individual nerve cells (neurons), which are critical to mental function - limits the information that can be gained by the scan.
What is an MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging)?
MRIs detect pulses of energy emitted from hydrogen atoms in body tissue to obtain an image that maps the relative distribution of the atoms.
Aim of Maguire et al’s 2000 study?
To investigate the structural changes and function of the hippocampus in the brains of London taxi drivers.
According to Maguire, the role of the hippocampus is to facilitate spatial memory, in the form of navigation.
Procedure of Maguire et al’s study?
16 right-handed male taxi drivers who had undergone an intensive training programme on how to navigate the city were recruited. Their average experience was 14.3 years, ranging from 1.5 years to 42 years. All taxi drivers had healthy medical profiles. The control group consisted of 50 healthy right-handed males who did not drive taxis.
Findings of Maguire et al’s study?
It was found that the posterior hippocampi of taxi drivers were significantly larger than the control subjects and the anterior hippocampus were significantly smaller.
Conclusions of Maguire et al’s study?
Quasi-experiment, therefore no cause-effect inferences can be made. An alternative explanation could be that people with larger grey matter volumes are naturally deposited to choose professions that depend on navigational skills
Strengths of Maguire et al’s study?
- No health risks
- Many controls, such as age, experience and right-handedness
Limitations of Maguire et al’s study?
- Expensive
- All male participants - generalisability low
- Low ecological validity
What is the aim of Draganski et al’s 2004 study?
To find out whether the human brain is able to change the structure in response to environmental demands with the use of MRIs.
What is the procedure of Draganski et al’s study?
Sample: self-selected/ volunteer
Participants were randomly allocated into 2 groups: jugglers & non-jugglers. They made sure none of the participants had any experience with juggling. The first brain scan was performed at this point.
The juggler group spent 3 months subsequently learning a classic juggling routine with 3 balls. The second brain scan was then performed.
The participants spent another 3 months where they were asked not to practice any juggling. The third brain scan was then performed.
The control group (the non-jugglers) just lived their daily lives and had their brains scanned the same time as the juggler group.
What were the findings of Draganski et al’s study?
There were no differences prior in the brain scan results of the two groups prior to the start of the experiment.
The second brain scan showed that the juggler group had significantly more grey matter in some areas of the cortex, most notably, the mid-temporal areas in both hemispheres. These areas are known to be implicated in the coordination of movement. The third scan showed that these differences decreased, but the jugglers still had more grey matter than they did in the first scan.