Hoorcollege 2: understanding conflict; from analysis to conflict management Flashcards
Symmetric conflict
Conflict where parties are similar
Three ways of approaching asymmetric conflict without coercion third party
- Influencing and persuading powerholders
- Mobilising popular movements, increading solidarity, making demonstrations of resolve and establishing a demand for change
- Empowering and strengthening the underdogs (challenges legitimacy top dog)
Asymmetric conflict
Conflict where parties are dissimilar. Root of the conflict lies in the structure of who they are and their relationship, not issues of interest. Quantitative asymmetric = dissimilar in resources. Qualitative asymmetric = dissimilar in type (state vs rebel). Goal is to change structure, cannot be in favour of the top dog.
Intrastate conflict
A conflict between a government and a non-governmental party, with no interference from other countries.
Internationalized conflict
An armed conflict between a government and a non-government party where the government side, the opposing side, or both sides, receive troop support from other governments that actively participate in the conflict.
With armed conflicts that are non-interstate, three types are predominant in relation to motivations:
a) Revolution / ideology conflict.
b) Identity / secessionist conflict.
c) Economic / resource conflict.
Revolution / ideology conflict
The aim of changing the nature of government in a state.
Identity / secessionist conflict
Involves the relative status of communities or ‘communal groups’, however defined, in relation to the state. Depending on the nature of the group and the contextual situation, this includes struggles for access, for autonomy, for secession or for control.
Economic / resource conflict
To seize or retain state power or state resources merely to further economic and other interests.
Azar’s theory on protracted social conflict focuses on four main preconditions:
Communal content of identity groups: groups with a common identity in religion, racce, ethnicity, etc. are best to analyse. The link between state and society is often at the colonial history.
Deprivation of human needs: needs are ontological and non-negotiable, so if conflict comes, it will be intense.
Governance and the state’s role: the government and her role are critical factors in the satisfaction or frustration of her subjects, because the role of the government is big.
International linkages: political-economic dependency and political-military links constitute regional and global patterns of clientage and cross-border interest.
Five levels of conflict
- Global
- Regional
- State
- Identity group
- Elite/individual
Global drivers of conflict
- Geopolitical transition
- North-South economic divide
- Discrepancy between state system and distribution of peoples
- Global ideological contestation
Transnational connectors in conflict global level
Movement and exchange of people, weapons, capital, criminal and terrorist networks, economic resources, and ideas that connect global/local via intermediate levels.
Intra-regional dynamics in conflict
- Regional rivalries
- Spillover
- Cross-border demography
- Contagion
- Diaspora
etc.
Measures of fragility state level
- Weak society: cultural divisions, ethnic imbalance
- Weak economy: poor resource base, relative deprivation
- Weak polity: partisan government, regime illegitimacy, levels of repression
- Weak central control