Hoofdstuk 10 Mergers and acquisitions Flashcards
Acquisition
Purchases a second firm
Friendly or unfriedly
Merger
The assets of two similar-sized firms are combined. One firm purchases some percentage of a second firm’s assets while the second firm simultaneously purchases some percentage of the first firm’s assets
Value M&A
M&As have value when bidding and target firms are strategically related
Cannot generate monopoly profits
Categories
Vertical merger: a firm acquires former suppliers or customers
Horizontal merger: a firm acquires a former competitor
Product extension merger: a firm gains access to complementary products through an acquisition
Market extension merger: a firm gains access to complementary markets through an acquisition
Conglomerate merger: there is no strategic relatedness between a bidding and a target firm
Strategic relatedness
Lubatkin
- Technical economies (the physical processes inside a firm are altered so that the same amount of input produce a higher quantity of outputs)
- Pecuniary economies (ability of firms to dictate prices by exerting market power)
- Diversification economies (improve a firm’s performance relative to risk attributes, or lower risk attributes relative to performance)
Jensen and Ruback
- To reduce production or distribution costs (economies of scale, vertical integration, more efficient production or organizational technology, increased utilization of the bidder’s management team, reduction of agency costs by bringing organization-specific assets under common ownership)
- Financial motivations (access to underutilized tax shields, avoid bankruptcy, increase leverage, gain other tax advantages, market power, eliminate inefficient target management)
To be economically valuable…
Links must build on real economies of scope between bidding and target firms and reflect either cost savings or revenue enhancements that are created by combining firms.
It must be less costly for the merged firm to realize than for outside equity holders on their own
Motivations for M&A even though they usually do not generate profits for bidding firms
- To ensure survival (every firm does it)
- Free cash flow (spend money on something)
- Agency problems (diversify human capital and increase management compensation)
- Managerial hubris (managers belief they are better than the target firm’s management)
- The potential for above-normal profits
Valuable, rare, and private economies of scope
A target is worth more to one bidder than it is to any other bidders. This must be unknown to other bidders
Implications for bidding firm managers
- Search for valuable and rare economies of scope
- Keep information away from other bidders
- Keep information away from targets
- Avoid winning bidding wars (always overpay)
- Close the deal quickly
- Operate in ‘thinly traded’ acquisition markets (small number of buyers and sellers, information is not widely known, and other interests than maximizing value are important)
Implications for target managers
- Seek information from bidders
- Invite other bidders to join the bidding competition
- Delay but do not stop the acquisition
Organizing M&A
Coordination and integration between the bidding and target firms after an acquisition