Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Criminal LAW > Homicide > Flashcards

Homicide Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
Civil Procedure 1L flashcards MBE flashcards MPRE flashcards
1
Q

UAM is governed by?

A

A range of common laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

UAM: the D had committed a crime and not a tort

A

Franklin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

UAM: the unlawful act is a positive act

A

Lowe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

UAM: the D must satisfy all of the elements of the unlawful act

A

Lamb

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

UAM: the D act is objectively dangerous if the reasonable and sober person foresees a risk of harm from their conduct

A

Church

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

UAM: objectively dangerous act doesn’t have to be aimed at the V

A

Larkin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

UAM: objectively dangerous act can be aimed at property

A

Goodfellow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

UAM: if the V had a obvious vulnerability, the D would know, and so would the reasonable and sober person

A

Watson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

UAM: reasonable and sober person has to foresee some harm and not a specific type of harm

A

JM v SM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

UAM: doesn’t matter if the D didn’t realise if their conduct was dangerous, as long as the reasonable and sober person would realise it

A

Bristow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

UAM: usual rule of causation also apply to UAM

A

Attorney General Reference ( No 3 of 1994)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

UAM: D must have the men’s rea of the unlawful act

A

Lamb

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

UAM: transferred malice can apply to UAM

A

Mitchell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

UAM: All that matters is that they satisfy the MR of the unlawful act

A

Newbury & Jones

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Diminished responsibility : governed by

A

S2(1) Homicide Act 1957 amended by S52 Corners and Justice Act 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Diminished responsibility: D’s state of mind is so different that a reasonable man would consider it abnormal

A

Lord Parker CJ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Diminished responsibility: the AMF doesn’t have to be permanent or present at birth

A

Gomez

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Diminished responsibility: depression

A

Gittens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Diminished responsibility: irresistible impulses

A

Bryne

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Diminished responsibility: battered wife syndrome

A

Ahluawalia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Diminished responsibility: alcoholism

A

Wood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Diminished responsibility: ADS

A

Stewart

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Diminished responsibility: paranoia

A

Simcox

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Diminished responsibility: adjustment disorder

A

Dietschmann

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Diminished responsibility: Schizophrenia

A

Moyle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Diminished responsibility: medical evidence is required for the defence to be successful

A

Bunch

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Diminished responsibility: rational judgement

A

Simcox

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Diminished responsibility: nature of his conduct

A

Stewart

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Diminished responsibility: exercise self control

A

Bryne

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Diminished responsibility: substantial doesn’t mean a total impairment, but is more than minimal or trivial

A

Lloyd

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Diminished responsibility: AMF is the cause or significant contribution in the unlawful killing

A

S1B Homicide Act 1957

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

GNM: governed by

A

Adomako

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

GNM: definition of duty of care is the same as in negligence

A

Wacker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

GNM: reasonable steps to remedy a dangerous situation

A

Miller

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

GNM: voluntarily took on a duty of care

A

Stone and Dobinson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

GNM: duty of care due to a special relationship

A

Gibbons and Proctor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

GNM: contractual duty of care

A

Pittwood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

GNM: a duty of care due to a public duty role (police officer)

A

Dytham

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

GNM: doctor and patient

A

Adomako

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

GNM: landlord and tenant

A

Singh

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

GNM: employers and employees

A

Dean

42
Q

GNM: the duty of care will apply whenever a Ds conduct carries a foreseeable risk to those around them

A

Evans

43
Q

GNM: if the D fails to reach the standard of care expected of a reasonable person in the same position and the breach is so serious, it is criminally wrong

A

Adomako

44
Q

GNM: the Ds conduct must pose a reasonably foreseeable serous and obvious risk of death

A

Rose

45
Q

GNM: usual rules of causation apply to GNM

A

Singh

46
Q

GNM: the breach has to be gross and go beyond a mere matter of compensation between parties

A

Adomako

47
Q

GNM: if the breach is flagrant and atrocious, it is gross and therefore a crime

A

Cornish

48
Q

GNM: it is the jury to decide if the D is grossly negligent

A

Sellu

49
Q

Murder: the Ds conduct causes the unlawful killing of a creature in being during kings peace with malice aforethought expressed or implied

A

Lord Justice Coke

50
Q

Murder: a reasonable creature in being is a human being that is independent from its birth mother

A

Poutler

51
Q

Murder: the umbilical cord doesn’t need to be cut to be a reasonable creature in being

A

Reeves

52
Q

Murder: a foetus is not a reasonable creature in being

A

Attorney General Reference (No3 of 1994)

53
Q

Murder: the destruction of a foetus can be criminal

A

Infant life (preservation) act 1929

54
Q

Murder: a person on life support with no brain activity is a reasonable person in being

A

Malcherek

55
Q

Murder: there is no time limit on death after the unlawful act or omission, but if it is more than 3 years after the event, the consent of the attorney general may is needed to prosecute

A

Law reform (year and a day rule) act 1996

56
Q

Murder: for a killing to be during kings peace, it must not be a part of war

A

Blackman

57
Q

Murder: D committed the unlawful killing with malice aforethought expressed or implied

A

Lord justice Coke

58
Q

Murder: Ds aim or purpose to unlawfully kill a creature in being (direct intent)

A

Mohan

59
Q

Murder: Ds aim or purpose to cause GBH (direct intent to cause serious harm)

A

Vickers

60
Q

Murder: D did not intent to kill the V, but it was virtually certain death or serious harm would occur and they realised this (foresight of consequences)

A

Woollin

61
Q

Murder: governed by

A

Law: Lord justic coke
Intro: Homicide Act 1957

62
Q

Loss of control: governed by

A

S54 coroners and justice act 2009

63
Q

Loss of control: the burden of proof is on the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the D didn’t have a loss of control when they killed

A

Martin

64
Q

Loss of control: the D must have suffered from a loss of control at the time of the killing

A

Jewell

65
Q

Loss of control: the Ds loss of control doesn’t have to be sudden after a qualifying trigger

A

S54(2) coroners and justice act 2009

66
Q

Loss of control: one qualifying trigger is a fear of serious violence

A

S55(3) coroners and justice act 2009

67
Q

Loss of control: The D must fear serious violence

A

Goodwin

68
Q

Loss of control: the fear of violence can be towards an identified person and not just the D

A

Ward

69
Q

Loss of control: the fear of serious violence can come from another person and not the V

A
70
Q

Loss of control: one qualifying trigger is a thing said or done

A

S55(4) coroner and justice act 2009

71
Q

Loss of control: the thing said or done must be extremely grave in character to the D; and gives them justifiable sense of being wronged

A

Zebedee

72
Q

Loss of control: a breakdown of a relationship isn’t circumstances of the extremely grave character or justify a sense of being wronged

A

Hatter

73
Q

Loss of control: revenge is not an allowed qualifying trigger

A

Ibrams and Gregory

74
Q

Loss of control: Ds inciting something said or done isn’t a qualifying trigger

A

S55(6)(a) coroners and justice act 2009

75
Q

Loss of control: sexual infidelity is not a qualifying trigger

A

S55(6)(c) coroners and justice act 2009

76
Q

Loss of control: sexual infidelity can be considered as a qualifying trigger when there are other factors with it

A

Clinton

77
Q

Loss of control: standard of control test is governed by

A

S54(1)(c) coroners and justice act 2009

78
Q

Loss of control: would a normal person of the same age

A

Camplin

79
Q

Loss of control: and gender with tolerance and self restraint

A

Mohammed

80
Q

Loss of control: In the same circumstance as the D

A

Gregson

81
Q

Loss of control: Response in the same or similar way

A

Van dongen

82
Q

Loss of control: unemployment, depression and epilepsy

A

Gregson

83
Q

Loss of control: sexual abuse

A

Hill

84
Q

Loss of control: PTSD

A

Rejmanski

85
Q

Loss of control: personality disorder

A

Wilcocks

86
Q

Loss of control: sexual infidelity, as long as other qualifying triggers are present

A

Clinton

87
Q

Loss of control: if D is intoxicated this must be ignored as the normal person is someone who is sober

A

Asmelash

88
Q

Intoxicated Diminished responsibility: governed by

A

S2(1) Homicide Act 1957 amended by S52 Corners and Justice Act 2009 & Stewart

89
Q

Intoxicated Diminished responsibility: if the D was intoxicated but did not suffer from an AMF at the time they killed, the partial defence of diminished responsibility is unavailable

A

Dowds

90
Q

Intoxicated Diminished responsibility: The Ds AMF and intoxication were unrelated, therefore the intoxication is disregarded and the diminished responsibility test is applied as normal

A

Deitschmann

91
Q

Intoxicated Diminished responsibility: as the Ds AMF is due to ADS, a modified version of the s2(1) homicide act 1957 amended by s52 coroners and justice act 2009 diminished responsibility legal test is applied

A

Stewart

92
Q

Intoxicated Diminished responsibility: intoxication criteria- if the D suffered an AMF caused by ADS at the time they killed, they do not have to have brain damage and their drinking doesn’t have to be 100% involuntary

A

Wood

93
Q

Intoxicated Diminished responsibility: AMF- same as in diminished responsibility test

A

Stewart

94
Q

Intoxicated Diminished responsibility: Recognised medical condition- same as in diminished responsibility test but only ADS is the only WHO condition

A

Stewart

95
Q

Intoxicated Diminished responsibility: substantial impairment- first, the extent and seriousness of the Ds dependency on alcohol and the extent to which they could control the drinking at the time of the killing

A

Lord Parker CJ in Stewart

96
Q

Intoxicated Diminished responsibility: substantial impairment- rational judgement

A

Simcox

97
Q

Intoxicated Diminished responsibility: substantial impairment- nature of their conduct

A

Stewart

98
Q

Intoxicated Diminished responsibility: substantial impairment- exercise of self control

A

Byrne

99
Q

Intoxicated Diminished responsibility: substantial impairment- the AMF is more than the minimal or trivial cause of the killing (as it is the only cause)

A

Lloyd

100
Q

Intoxicated Diminished responsibility: provides an alternative explanation for the killing- the AMF is the cause or significant contribution in the unlawful killing and explains the Ds conduct

A

S1B homicide act 1957

Criminal LAW (6 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions