HIV/AIDS Flashcards
What do AIDS and HIV stand for?
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome
Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Gilman (1987), Social construction of AIDS
People have been stigmatized (and destroyed) as much by the “idea” of AIDS as by its reality.
Gilman (1987), Iconography of disease
Icons of disease appear to have an existence independent of the reality of any given disease
Disease is thus restricted to a specific set of images, thereby forming a visual boundary, a limit to the idea (or fear) of disease
It is in the world of representations that we manage our fear of disease, isolating it as surely as if we had placed it in quarantine
AIDS cases first identified (though not understood as AIDS)
1979 Alvin Friedman-Kien of New York University Medical Center identified a group of patients suffering from a rare form of cancer, Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS), which presents striking symptoms, bluish or purple-brown lesions on the skin
Normal course of the disease seldom fatal, but these young patients were dying within eight to twenty-four months of their diagnoses
Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), initial attempts to construct image of the patient
- living in large urban areas (New York, Miami, Los Angeles, and San Francisco) - all young men
- all homosexual
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), June 5 1981 - noted the patients’ sexual orientation, and more importantly its “quality”: ‘Two of the
five [patients] reported having frequent homosexual contacts with various
partners’
Emergence of gay-related immunodeficiency (GRID) label
first quarter of 1982
Gilman 1987, initial understanding of AIDS
specific subset of the larger category of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), as a disease from which homosexuals suffered as a direct result of their sexual practices and related “life-style” -for example, the use of “poppers”
fact that AIDS appeared in the late 1970s served to link the disease to two unrelated social concerns: first, the perception of an increase in STDs in the US (following a period of perceived decline), signalled in 1975 by the declaration of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases that research into STDs was its number one priority; and second, the growth of public awareness -at least in large urban areas - of the gay liberation movement, which followed in the wake of the Stonewall riots in Greenwich Village in 1969
AIDS was characterized not as a viral disease, such as Hepatitis B, but as a sexually transmitted disease, such as syphilis.
Appearance of syndrome among groups such as haemophiliacs and IV drug users first recorded by the MMWR
late 1982
Gilman (1987), AIDS and Syphilis
Stresses link between iconographies of AIDS and syphilis:
appropriation of the iconography of syphilis for the representation of people with AIDS is not random; it is, rather, a result of the perception that the sexual orientation of people with AIDS was determinant, and that these people suffered from a sexually transmitted disease
“taming” of syphilis and other STDs with the introduction of antibiotics in the 1940s left our culture with a series of images of mortally infected and infecting people suffering a morally repugnant disease -without a sufficiently powerful disease to function as the referent of these images.
Gilman (1987), Syphilis iconography over time
August 1, 1496, the first visual representation of the syphilitic appeared in a broadside written by Theodoricus Ulsenius and illustrated by Albrecht Diirer
- portrayed as a victim of the signs of the zodiac, which determine his affliction. The syphilitic is seen as isolated, visually recognizable by his signs and symptoms, and sexually deviant
Enlightenment - image of the syphilitic shifts from male to female, and shift from victim to source of infection. Prostitute/ seductress as source of pollution
by the nineteenth-century “vice” has become “disease,” seduction has become infection
Gilman (1987), AIDS iconography over time
In a photograph that appeared in the New York Times on December 23, 1985, we see an image of the PWA as a patient isolated from the supposed act of healing (parallel to the images of the exemplary syphilitic). The sense of physical distance is palpable
1985 (and subsequently), the New York Times was full of articles on the anxiety of health workers treating people with AIDS.
This is a homosexual male, both victim and cause of his own pollution. Already feminized in the traditional view of his sexuality, the gay man can now also represent the conflation of the images of the male sufferer and the female source of suffering traditionally associated with syphilis.
association of the “AIDS victim” with the traditional iconography of melancholy is an extraordinarily powerful one; it reappeared as the first illustration for an update on AIDS in the popular scientific journal Discover in September 1986
But the Discover photograph not only draws the analogy with the despair of impending death. Through a broader analogy extended to the “general population,” which is seen to suffer from “unwarranted” AIDS phobia, it in- tends the PWA to function as a stand-in for the mental illness (read: fearful fantasy) of an entire nation
AIDS is perceived as endemic to cities, which have traditionally been seen as harborers of disease and degeneracy.33
Thus arises the seemingly natural association among three quite distinct groups perceived as corrupt city-dwellers: homosexuals, IV drug users, and Haitians. And purity lives where nature dominates: on the farm and in the small town
Gilman (1987), AIDS and race/ geography
Blacks were deemed to be at risk because of their perceived sexual difference- their “hypersexuality”-as well as their “sociopathic” use of drugs. Black sexuality, associated with images of sexually transmitted disease, became a category of marginalization, as it had in the past. But in the 1980s, after the intolerable state of blacks in this country was made visible by the civil rights movement in the ’60s and ’70s, it was no longer so easy to locate the source of disease among American blacks
Instead, the source of pollution was perceived to be foreign blacks, black Africans and Haitians, and thus American “liberal” sensibilities were assuaged even while speculations about the origin of AIDS continued to be determined by American racist ideology.
withdrawal of the “risk group” label from Haitians followed a period of severe persecution. To be Haitian and living in New York City meant that you were perceived as an AIDS “carrier.”
The pattern of infection in the US, where the disease existed only among marginal groups (including blacks), was understood as characterizing a later phase of the disease’s history. It was only in “higher” cultures, such as the United States, that the disease was limited to such specific groups as could be immediately and visually identifiable.
transmission of HIV in black Africa has its roots in the imposition of models of Western medicine. The status of Western medicine and its association with inoculation is so high that no medical treatment, even by indigenous medical practitioners, is considered complete without an injection.32 Due to the prohibitive cost of needles and syringes, blood is passed from patient to patient as the needle is used and reused. It is thus not the fantasized perverted nature of black sexuality that is at the core of the transmission of the disease in Africa
AIDS is popularly perceived in Europe as born in the USA
For the Soviets the geographic origin of the disease is also the US: the HIV virus was man-made by the biological warfare specialists at Fort Detrick, Maryland, in conjunction with the scientists at the CDC.
This attempt to place the blame for AIDS on the United States worked only until the spring of 1987, when the Soviets, in the climate of glasnost, admitted that they, too, had indigenous cases of the disease.
1985 and 1986, “orthodox” Soviet view was that homosexuality-and thus AIDS-was a
pathological reflex of the late forms of capitalism which would (and did) vanish once the Soviet state was created
Gilman (1987), Potency of AIDS stigma
permeated social categories ordinarily exempt from stigma. In 1985, two community school boards in Queens sued the New York City Board of Education in order to exclude a seven-year old child, diagnosed as having AIDS, from the school system
Gilman (1987), the psychological importance of stigma
It clearly defines the boundaries of pollution, limiting the risk to the homosexual (and those other groups now stigmatized), and thus confines heterosexuals’ fears about their own vulnerability
Gilman (1987), shifting public understandings of AIDS late 1980s
By the spring of 1987 the public understanding of AIDS as a disease not limited to specific marginal groups had begun to grow. The statement of Surgeon General C. Everett Koop in support of extending information about condoms, together with increased media attention to heterosexual transmission, meant that by March 1987 the majority of those tested in the public AIDS clinics in New York and San Francisco were heterosexuals.
However, shift -from male victim to female (outside limits of social respectability) as source of pollution - clearly repeating the history of the iconography of syphilis.
in a cartoon of mid-March 1987, J. D. Crowe of the San Diego Tribune depicted the source of heterosexual transmission as a group of prostitutes proffering death.
Fee, Krieger (1993), significance of historical study of AIDS
offers a complex and vivid example of the ways in which people create multiple, contested explanations of health and illness.
Fee, Krieger (1993), first of three clashing paradigms of AIDS
conceived of primarily as a “gay plague,” by analogy with the sudden, devastating epidemics of the past
epidemiologists struck by its seemingly exotic preference for young, homosexual men; they therefore searched for causes in the behaviors or “life-styles” common to gay men
looked for risk factors prevalent in this “risk group” and indicted life in the fast lane, including “promiscuity,” “poppers” (amyl nitrate), and anal sex.
researchers at first ignored the cases of AIDS that did not fit the gay plague model
however, shift to “4-H risk groups”: homosexuals, Haitians, hemophiliacs, and heroin addicts
In popular perception, all members of the identified risk groups were seen as potentially contagious; from there it was but a short step to perceive those populations as “responsible” for AIDS.
This in turn led to the prevalent media descriptions of the “innocent victims” of disease, such as hemophiliacs and children; by implication, the others were “guilty” culprits.
unmediated associations between homosexuality and disease that appeared in the declarations of rightwing ideologues, who lost no opportunity to castigate homosexuals in the name of “family values” and the “American way of life.”
In 1983, the identification of HIV, the AIDS virus, led to a new phase of the epidemic, in which AIDS was clearly characterized as an infectious disease.”
Once the virus was identified, scientists tended to lose interest in the social factors accompanying transmission. Theyinstead turned to laboratory studies of the virus
virus was perceived as something easy to catch; the idea that AIDS was caused by a virus, along with vague announcements about bodily fluids, may well have increased fears of casual transmission
many people in the United States simultaneously embraced scientific, traditional, and folk explanations of AIDS, with little sense of contradiction. Ideas of “magical contagion” led otherwise well-informed people to fear contact with AIDS patients. For example, one study found that most people would refuse to wear a sweater previously worn by an AIDS patient
scientific search for biomedical risk factors, agents, and other proximate causes of disease had failed to satisfy the broader need for ultimate explanations-the “why” and not just the “how” of disease causation.
Among health professionals, the identification of HIV seemed to clarify strategies for AIDS prevention. It shifted attention away from the early risk-group designations and highlighted the importance of risk behaviors, thus focusing attention on specific acts rather than on sexual identities.
Condoms advocated.
Opposed by right wing set against nonmarital sex.
Providing individuals with clean needles was problematic because many people perceived the distribution of needles and bleach as a possible encouragement of drug use.
Many African Americans were convinced that these programs were part of a long-standing, White-led genocidal policy against Blacks, and they called instead for drug treatment programs and jobs. By contrast, many conservatives simply wanted drug addicts thrown into jail.
Prevention methods to curtail blood transmission were similarly framed in individualistic terms. People were urged to refrain from donating blood if they had any reason to believe they were at risk for HIV infection; people needing blood were encouraged to store their own blood prior to surgery or to collect blood from family
and friends. Blood was now increasingly seen as an individual possession.
Ultimately, the identification of HIV and the discovery of a blood test for HIV antibodies made possible the traditional approach to infectious disease control - identification of those infected, followed by isolation, quarantine, or other societal action to cut off transmission - and led to battles over testing immigrants, blood donors, and individuals considered to be at risk.
From the biomedical and epidemiological point of view, if individuals knew their serostatus, they would more readily change behaviors
However, this logic ignored the complex power dynamics of sexual relationships. Did not consider the social reality of discrimination in health insurance, jobs, and housing that faced those diagnosed as HIV positive
also ignored the ethical problem that, in the early stages of the epidemic, no therapy was available; testing exposed the individual to considerable social risk while offering no medical benefit.
Fee, Krieger (1993), gay and lesbian communities’ activism
rejection of concept of ‘innocent’/ ‘guilty’ AIDS victims and divisions caused by categorisaiton of seropositive and seronegative
These communities had a recently formed, self-conscious sense of their social and political identity, forged in part out of a successful struggle with the medical establishment over the psychiatric definition of homosexuality as a pathological disorder.
The epidemiologists’ apparently neutral categories were perceived as an attempt to resurrect the earlier biomedical construction of homosexuality as a sickness
Identification of HIV
1983
Fee, Krieger (1993), second of three clashing paradigms of AIDS
In the second paradigm, AIDS was normalized as a chronic disease to be managed medically over the long term
predictions about the massive spread of AIDS throughout the entire US population-the threatened “heterosexual explosion”-had not been fulfilled. Indeed, statisticians were revising downward the early estimates of the number of HIVinfected persons.
Researchers and health care professionals shifted the focus of their concern from etiology to pathology and from prevention to potential therapies. The development of palliative treatments such as azidothymidine (AZT) for people with AIDS (and, later, for those who were HIV positive) placed new emphasis on health services, as reflected in the growing numbers of dedicated AIDS units for both inpatient and outpatient care
AIDS was becoming just another expensive disease, like cancer, with which the medical system could cope
When first conceived of as an infectious chronic disease, AIDS was likened to such diseases as tuberculosis and syphilis
Funding now flowed for studies of the natural history of AIDS, AIDS pathology, and clinical trials.
Few research dollars were expended on studies designed to improve prevention. The US Congress, for example, canceled two national surveys of sexual behaviour
Testing for HIV was now encouraged more as a means of drawing infected people into early treatment than as an incentive to modify behavior.
People with AIDS explored alternative therapies and unconventional drugs
Many rejected the exclusively tragic imagery of dying in favor of diverse representations of living with AIDS. Their work incorporated the voices, faces, and experiences of people with AIDS,
As AIDS touched every aspect of public life, from art to politics to sports, increasing popular awareness of the disease led to growing acceptance of people with AIDS. When the basketball star Magic Johnson announced he was HIV positive, he was wamily applauded for his honesty and bravery.
language of guilt was less often applied to people ill with AIDS, but the distinction between innocent and guilty “victims” lingered, as seen in the general hysteria over infected health care workers
Fee, Kreiger (1993), model of chronic disease
chronic diseases are debilitating and often fatal conditions that are slow to develop, persist for many years, and require long-term management
Research focuses on disease mechanisms, usually at the cellular level, and increasingly concentrates on genetic determinants. Based on this understanding of disease, health interventions most commonly emphasize screening, early detection, and treatment, not primary prevention
Fee, Krieger (1993), Lack of med knowledge about AIDS
One study found that more than 80% of a national sample of primary care physicians said lacked info about AIDS
Surveys found that most people obtained information about AIDS from the mass media, family, and friends, and that fewer than 10% had ever discussed the disease with their physician.
Fee, Kreiger (1993), successes of AIDS activism
Reflecting their success and also the growing understanding of the progression of HIV disease, the Centers for Disease Control revised its diagnostic definition of AIDS in 1991 to include T-cell counts and, in 1992, to include cervical cancer and pulmonary tuberculosis among HIV-associated diseases.
Food and Drug Administration agreed to streamline its procedures for drug approval.
Reflecting the clash between the first and second paradigms of AIDS, other AIDS activists questioned the singleminded focus on treatment and emphasized prevention.
AIDS activists initially forced a major shift in the old public health approach to infectious disease control: for example, constraints on or quarantine of those infected.
political strength of the gay movement engendered within public health circles a new sensitivity to issues of stigma
Fee, Krieger (1993), critique of chronic disease model
In accepting the chronic disease model’s emphasis on pathology and treatment, many scientists and health care professionals have lost sight of the fact that AIDS is both infectious and preventable
Although the incidence rates of a few cancers (e.g., stomach cancer) have declined, often for unknown reasons, the rates for many other types of cancer are stable or increasing.
While preventive interventions based on the chronic disease model have stressed individually oriented dietary and behavioral modifications, it is unclear how much health behaviors have really altered.
Fee, Krieger (1993), critique of infectious disease model
reputation for success in controlling epidemics was overinflated. Historians have argued that much of the decline in infectious diseases predates scientific medicine
Fee, Krieger (1993), critique of biomedical models
Ultimately, the biomedical model embodies an approach to analyzing disease that is fundamentally individualistic and sanctions only the physicians’ or scientists’ point ofview. Profoundly ahistorical, it contains within itself a dichotomy between the biological individual and the social community, and then it ignores the latter
The only preventive actions seriously suggested are those that can be implemented by solo individuals
these attitudes implicitly accept social inequalities in health and fail to challenge the social production of disease.
Fee, Krieger (1993) third of three clashing paradigms of AIDS
AIDS as a Colletive, Chromic Infectious Disease and Persistent Pandemic
AIDS is, in essence, a social disease
public health must initiate two-way learning process
One study study found that injection drug users were more influenced by their material circumstances, such as access to clean needles and a private setting for drug use, thanby their perceptions of risk of contracting AIDS from dirty needles.
Recognizing the importance of basing health education campaigns on what people really believe, researchers have begun to document the plurality of popular conceptions about health and disease causation in order to make AIDS education materials more compatible with people’s own modes of understanding.
Health education campaigns within the gay community have been creative-and controversial-in attempting to eroticize safer sex
Fee, Krieger (1993), AIDS in Central African, Latin American and Southeast Asian countries
IDS can be characterized neither as a peculiarly gay plague nor as a chronic disease; most people with AIDS are heterosexual and few can afford the luxury of extended treatment
Berridge (1992), Importance of AIDS for status of History
Historians have, until recently, played a relatively small role in researching the history of post-war science and medicine in its policy context.
The advent of AIDS as a scientific, medical and policy issue - and also as an epidemic seen to have historical significance - has brought with it a reassessment of the role and significance of historical work on the post-war period.
Berridge (1992), early historical input on AIDS
focused primarily on historical parallels from previous centuries or on the history of the regulation of sexually transmitted diseases
Berridge (1992), more recent historical input into AIDS
AIDS itself has emerged as a historic occurrence and a subject for historical investigation. Grmek in his History of AIDS has brilliantly elucidated the pre-history of AIDS as a disease and assessed competing explanations of its origin
Berridge and Strong (1991), Overview of AIDS in Britain, 1980s
years from 1981 to 1986 were a time of surprise and initial horror.’ This period saw the apparently sudden outbreak of the disease in several widely differing groups, rapidly gathering public alarm, growing stigmatization and, on the policy side, relatively little official action. Behind the scenes, however, there was considerable openness to new actors, the establishment of new sorts of alliance and a good deal of policy development from below.
This phase was succeeded in 1986-7 by a brief period of war-time emergency in which politicians publicly and dramatically intervened, their actions being reinforced by a voluntary, if temporary, mobilization of the mass media. AIDS was officially established as a high level national emergency
from 1987 onwards, these two initial phases have been followed by a third phase of normalization of the disease and of the public reaction to it.
Berridge and Strong (1991) - chronic or infectious?
AIDS has become another chronic disease
Berridge and Strong (1991), differences between AIDS in UK and AIDS in US
disease appeared earlier there, has been on a far greater scale and has generated considerably more public controversy.
Berridge and Strong (1991) on material on AIDS composed in early years of the crisis -
Much of the material under review was written during the early years of the epidemic, a fact which gives the great part of it a real sense of crisis and urgency
No haemophiliacs or injecting drug users have openly joined the academic fray, but gay men have played a prominent role. Much of the work aims to contribute directly to policy and some of it is passionately and personally committed.
Berridge and Strong (1991), early historical input on AIDS
Initially, AIDS was a ‘new’ policy area where established interests and policy lines had not yet ossified. In an open situation, history could play a practical rather than symbolic role.
The initial input focused on three broad areas; the role of epidemic disease in past societies, in particular the association between disease and ‘moral panic’, or disease and stigmatized minorities; the historical record, in particular the tradition of voluntarism in the area of sexually transmitted diseases, notably the controversies around the Contagious Diseases Acts in Britain in the nineteenth century; and more general questions of public health policy and the means of carrying them out, such as quarantine or notification, thus contributing to the classic debate between the common good and individual rights
Historians of cholera and other epidemics found themselves catapulted into a round of AIDS conferences which actively sought to hear the ‘lesson of history’. The annual international AIDS conference, a jamboree of mammoth proportions, developed a history strand
In Britain, the preceding historical interests of two key actors, Professor Michael Adler at the Middlesex Hospital and Sir Donald Acheson, Chief Medical Officer at the Department of Health, ensured that the historical record was brought into the policy debates. The reports of the Chief Medical Officer in the early AIDS years were consciously historical
In the British context at least, the historical arguments appear to have had some degree of policy impact. Roy Porter’s editorial in the British Medical Journal in 1986 headlined ‘History says no to the policeman’s response to AIDS’, attracted a barrage of interest.5 His type of argument, drawing on analogies from the history of public health in relation to civil liberties and on historical examples of the control of sexually transmitted diseases, also entered into the policy area.
Sir Donald Achcson in his evidence to the House of Commons Social Services Committee enquiry into AIDS in 1987 cited the historical record as a prime reason for avoiding a punitive response to AIDS.
Berridge and Strong (1991), historical input in different countries
In different national contexts the ‘lesson of history’ had a differential impact. In the United States, for example, debate around the issues of compulsion and confidentiality arose from differing historical perspectives. The ‘lesson of history’ was mediated by different national cultures
Berridge and Strong (1991), shift in history’s contribution into AIDS
AIDS is no longer in many senses an open policy area. The difference is conceptualized in the contrast between the Millbank collection in 1986, full of historical parallels, and the Daedalus issue in 1989 where only one article, by Charles Rosenberg, makes direct reference to the historical perspective.
Rosenberg’s piece, too, is distinctly post-heroic in tone. It notes the range and stages of policy choices in an epidemic
The historical input mirrors the normalization of AIDS itself. Chronic, not epidemic, disease is the focus.
Berridge and Strong (1991), criticisms of historians’ initial attempts to be relevant to AIDS crisis
Whiggish assumption that there was indeed a ‘lesson of history’
implied history was incontrovertible ‘fact’, rather than a mass of differing interpretations
Randy Shilts’s And the Band Played On (Berridge and Strong’s account
catalogue of blame—for the deaths of many who, he argues, died unnecessarily of delay and prejudice. He points the finger at the US media and public in general, little concerned about a ‘gay disease’; and at the Reagan administration, concerned only with tax cuts, not health funding. But in particular, he castigates two communities—the medicoscientific one, caught up in internal rivalries and politicking to the degree that advancement of reputations appeared more important than a life or death race against disease; and, most controversially, sections of the gay community itself, whose reaction was based on the need to defend the gains of the 1970s, in particular the ideology of sexual liberation, rather than to combat the disease. Gay political power in San Francisco initially ensured the continuance of the virus-spreading bath houses instead of propagating the notion of safe sex.
Berridge and Strong (1991), AIDS and sociology
bulk of social science research funding has gone to sociology
large number of primarily quantitative projects have been funded by research councils, government departments and charities
most of the research has been focused on practical rather than sociological problems. AIDS has brought a revival of positivist social science; and conceptual development has played a very minor part
main empirical focus has been the social dynamics of transmission of both the virus and health education
Berridge and Strong (1991), criticisms of cultural studies work on AIDS
Many authors write as if labelling and metaphor were diseases which could somehow be cured through appropriate linguistic therapy. Most sociologists, however, would hold that these features arc intrinsic to language use.
often surprisingly little reference to the considerable body of sociological research into stigma and the natural history of social problems and, conversely, far too much stress on the fragile notion of ‘moral panic’.
The idea needs careful separation from genuine panic and fear
Dennis Altman’s AIDS and the New Puritanism (1986) (Berridge and Strong’s account)
- consciously written as a ‘contemporary history’, combining both sociological and historical perspectives
- particularly good at setting the gay response to AIDS in its immediate historical context. He shows, for example, the way in which the establishment of Gay Men’s Health Crisis in New York built on a decade of gay organization and pre-existing gay health networks
- notes the positive as well as negative effects AIDS has had on the gay community: the way it has created a new professional gay cadre based on expertise rather than movement experience or popular representation—a fact which has led to a much greater degree of institutional recognition.
- comments about research are also perceptive: the way, for example, gay social scientists have used research to work through their own feelings; or the way AIDS has served to develop the links between commerce and scientific research
Fox, Klein, Day (account of Berridge and Strong)
first article to challenge the conventional activist line
Neither right-wing ideology nor public opinion had much effect. Much noise was made, particularly in the USA, but policy, as in almost all health arenas, was still dominated by the traditional, liberal, bio-medical elite
Berridge and Strong (1991), conventional activist line on AIDS crisis
(to be found in both Shilts and Weeks) AIDS was a heaven-sent opportunity for the populist New Right governments of the 1980s to roll back the moral frontier. On this thesis, national action was scandalously slow because governments did not care so long as merely gay men were affected. Serious intervention occurred only when the threat to the heterosexual population became clear.
Berridge and Strong view on Fox, Klein, Day
underestimate the openness and fluidity of AIDS policy-making in the early stages of the epidemic.
What distinguishes history from other disciplines in approach to AIDS? (Berridge and Strong, 1991)
Three broad areas:
- the use of a chronological approach
- a sense of continuity as well as change
- within an overall chronology, a synthetic ability to interweave different levels of interpretation.
Rosenberg (1989), modern use of term ‘epidemic’
Use the term in a variety of ways, most of them metaphorical, moving it further and further from its emotional roots in specific past events.
In the mass media every day, we hear of “epidemics” of alcoholism
intent is clear enough: to clothe certain undesirable yet blandly tolerated social phenomena in the emotional urgency associated with a “real” epidemic
Rosenberg (1989), defining aspects of epidemics
- fear and sudden widespread death
- episodic quality. Event, not a trend
immediate and widespread response. It is highly visible - Thus, as a social phenomenon, an epidemic has a dramaturgic form
- takes on the quality of pageant, mobilizing communities to act out proprietory rituals that incorporate and reaffirm fundamental social values and modes of understanding. Thus, illuminate fundamental patterns of social value and institutional practice
Rosenberg (1989) epidemic Act I: Progressive Revelation
most communities are slow to accept and acknowledge an epidemic.
to admit the presence of an epidemic disease was to risk social dissolution
Only when the presence of an epidemic becomes unavoidable is there public admission of its existence
Rosenberg (1989) epidemic Act II: Managing Randomness
Collective agreement on explanatory framework, in which epidemic’s dismaying arbitrariness may be managed, may be seen as the inevitable second stage in any epidemic
For most previous centuries that framework was moral and transcendent; the epidemic had to be understood primarily in terms of man’s relationship to God
Since at least the sixteenth century, however, such spiritual assumptions have always coexisted with, and gradually yielded in emphasis to, more secular and mechanistic styles of explanation
When threatened with an epidemic, most men and women seek rational understanding of the phenomenon in terms that promise control, often by minimizing their own sense of vulnerability.
Such consolatory schemes have always centered on explaining the differential susceptibility of particular individuals
Particularly important was belief in the connection of volition, responsibility, and susceptibility
nineteenth-century debates about the cause of epi demics were in actuality rather more nuanced. Epidemics did tend, for example, to be associated with place of residence and occupation as well as behavior. And environmentalist, and thus determinist and morally exculpating, implications were there to be drawn
layman’s almost universal association of epidemic with contagious disease played a parallel role. At least a presumed knowledge of the epidemic’s mode of transmission could provide a measure of understanding and thus promise control
Rosenberg (1989), epidemic Act II, Negotiating Public Response
One of the defining characteristics of an epidemic is in fact the pressure it generates for decisive and visible community response.
An epidemic might in this sense be likened to a trial, with policy choices constituting the possible verdicts
the imposition of a quarantine, let us say, or the burning of tar to clear an infected atmosphere, the gathering of men and women in churches for days of fasting and prayer, all play a similar role - the visible acting out of community solidarity.
These collective rituals affirm belief - whether in religion, in rationalistic pathology, or in some combination of the two - while those beliefs promise a measure of control over an intractable reality.
picture of a consistent if occasionally awkward coexistence between religious and rationalistic or mechanistic styles of thought was characteristic of mid-nineteenth century Anglo-American society
The poor and socially marginal have historically been labeled as the disproportionately likely victims of epidemic illness, and they have been traditionally the objects of public-health policy
Rosenberg (1989), How do epidemics usually end?
With a whimper, not a bang. Susceptible individuals flee, die, or recover, and incidence of the disease gradually declines.
But it also provides an implicit moral structure that can be imposed as an epilogue.
Historians and policymakers concerned with epidemics tend to look backward and ask what “lasting impact” particular incidents have had and what “lessons” have been learned. Have the dead died in vain?
Epidemics have always provided occasion for retrospective moral judgment
Rosenberg (1989), AIDS shattering preconceptions
- we seem not to have conquered infectious disease
- Death is not associated exclusively with a particular and advanced age
Rosenberg (1989), In what ways is AIDS similar to the traditional phenomenon of the ‘epidemic’?
- gradual and grudging acceptance of the epidemic as reality, and the resentment expressed toward bringers of bad tidings, the physicians and activists who demand a response
- coping with randomness has provided an occasion for reaffirming the social values of the majority, for blaming victims
- Mixture of biological mechanism invested with imposed moral meaning
- search for meaning. Most Americans find reassurance in faith in the laboratory and its products; they see AIDS as a time-bound artifact of that transitional period between the discovery of this new ill and the announcement of its cure. Others, of course, see its primary meaning in the realm of morality and traditional piety.
- Many of us impose multiple frames of meaning. majority of Americans retain their faith in the laboratory but at the same time believe that AIDS points variously to truths about government, the political process, and personal morality
- Reminds us of reality of our mortality + the anxiety of indeterminacy
Rosenberg (1989), two categories of disease
- diseases whose prevention demands individual behavioral change, like syphilis, AIDS, and lung cancer
- diseases that can be prevented by collective policy commitments, like typhoid fever
Rosenberg (1989), difficulties posed by AIDS
AIDS reminds us of the difficulty of inducing changes in behavior and thus of the intrinsic complexity of the decisions facing local governments and public-health authorities
has forcefully reminded us of the difficulty of providing adequate care for the chronically ill in a system oriented dispropor tionately toward acute intervention
Rosenberg (1989), similarities between AIDS public health campaign and previous ones
- during first decades of 20th C, public health workers who urged the use of condoms and prophylactic kits to prevent syphilis met some of the same kind of opposition their successors in the 1980s faced when they advocated distributing sterile needles to intravenous drug users. In both cases debate turned on distinctions between “deserving” and “innocent” victims.
In the case of syphilis, the presumed innocents being the wives of erring husbands and their infants; in the case of AIDS, the recipients of contaminated blood or the offspring of infected mother
Rosenberg (1989), ritual
AIDS reminds us of need for ritual, even in fragmented modern soc
It is a need that is recognized:
- in the AIDS memorial patchwork quilt that has recently circulated throughout the United States
- public distribution of condoms in public spaces
- calling of conferences graced by individuals representing various agencies of social authority
Rosenberg (1989), in what ways is AIDS different from traditional epidemic?
- rapidity of its geographic spread
- rapidity of its identification as a unified clinical entity
- has existed at several levels simultaneously, mediated by the at first uninterested, then erratically attentive media
- novel capacities of late 20th-C med. Providing substan tive cognitive change during the course of an ongoing epidemic, the laboratory and its intellectual products have played a novel role in the narrative structure of our encounter with AIDS. Without the option of serological screening, for example, the intense and multifaceted debate over the imposition of such tests could hardly have been framed. Without knowledge of an infectious agent, the options for public policy would necessarily have been defined differently
- institutional complexity of modern US society
Rosenberg (1989), AIDS as Postmodern Epidemic
role of the media and social scientists in our contemplating ourselves
AIDS has underlined the inadequacy of any one-dimensional approach to disease, either the social constructionist or the more conventional mechanistically oriented perspective
AIDS is socially constructed (as society perceives and frames the phenomenon, blames victims, and laboriously negotiates response) yet at the same time fits nicely into a one-dimensionally reductionist and biologically based model of disease.
Fee, Fox (1989), AIDS historiography compared to that of other diseases
has stimulated more interest in history than any other disease of modern times
Fee, Fox (1989), historians’ initial reaction to AIDS
- early 1980s, Historians, like most other people who paid attention to AIDS, addressed it as a startling discontinuity with the (recent) past
- analogies with time-limited visitations of diseases of more distant past (paper’s authors of also adopted this perspective
- insensitivity of governments, socially and morally repressive attitudes to sexual behavior, the tendency of those in power to blame the poor or other disenfranchised groups for harboring dread diseases, and the potential threat of quarantines or other attacks on individual rights
Fee, Fox (1989), context of time at which AIDS struck
- disease allowed some journalists and politicians a ready opportunity to express/ resurrect fear and resentment toward newly visible and assertive gay communities
- struck at the time when containing health costs had become a major objective of governments in the United States and western Europe, and these governments were reluctant to recognize, let alone deal with, the potentially devastating costs of coping with a new epidemic
Fee, Fox (1989), alarmists vs advocates of equanimity
alarmists - found analogies to the present in the great epidemics of infectious disease. urged adoption of what had become the classic repertoire of public health responses to epidemics: enhanced surveillance, mobilization of medical resources, and increased research.
Advocates of equanimity - diff historical parallels. Recalled times in the past when exaggeration ofthe severity of an outbreak of infectious disease had led to the deflection of resources from areas of greater need, the exchange of individual rights for an illusory collective good, and diminished repute for the enterprise of public health. E.g. flu non-epidemic of 1976.
Fee, Fox (1989), selective use of historical analogy
most of those who used historical analogies avoided the most pertinent aspects of the histories of venereal disease and tuberculosis, emphasizing issues of surveillance and personal control policy and ignoring the problems of housing, long-term care, public education and the financing of palliative care for people suffering from chronic infections
The history of the two leading chronic infectious diseases of modern times was used to understand a very different situation, a polity threatened by devastating plague
Fee, Fox (1989), explanation for adopting/ maintaining belief that AIDS = discontinuity
- insistence on discontinuity was useful, politically
- psychological alternative is devastating. Difficulty of admitting that the threat of disease is not transient
- For public officials, health industry leaders and physicians, the idea that AIDS would become another killer chronic disease unpalatable bc adds to the already overwhelming financial and organizational problems of health policy
Fee, Fox (1989), AIDS by the mid-1980s
AIDS was institutionalized within academic medicine and the medical care establishment.
Fee, Fox (1989) view on most accurate framework in which to understand AIDS
we are not dealing with a brief, time-limited epidemic but with a long, slow, process more analogous to cancer than to cholera
Shift towards acceptance of the Fee and Fox model of AIDS
presented earlier version of argument about AIDS as chronic in March 1989, generating considerable distress and skepticism
Three months later, by June 1989, the idea was widely accepted
Samuel Broder, head of the National Cancer Institute, publicly declared that AIDS was a chronic disease and cancer the appropriate analogue for therapy in his speech at the final plenary session of the international AIDS meeting in Montreal
Fee, Fox (1989), practical approaches to managing AIDS late 1980s
relatively little talk about quarantine, isolation, and mass testing for the disease. The immediate panicked reactions to the disease have been replaced by medical management
Fee, Fox (1989), historiographical shift
rapidly accumulating body of secondary sources in contemporary history has had important impact
cumulative weight of these publications has made obsolete history-by-analogy and, implicitly, challenged the assumptions about discontinuity and the pertinence of the classic plague model on which it was based
These rich secondary sources make plain the continuity between the HIV epidemic and the recent past
(Most of the people who have written these histories have little or no interest in historiography)
Fee, Fox (1989), AIDS and social constructivism
AIDS is a particularly good example of the social construction of disease. Oppenheimer, for example, shows how the first pathological evidence was constructed through early epidemiological accounts as GRID, gay-related immunodeficiency disease, despite published reports of heterosexual intravenous-drug using patients with the new syndrome.21 Definitions of disease between 1981 and 1987 focused on a definition of convenience, agreed upon by the Centers for Disease Control and the World Health Organization, that stressed the point at which specific secondary infections were recognized. From 1987, the definition of HIV-related disease brought the conception of disease as close as possible to the point of infection.
Fee, Fox (1989), AIDS and ‘progress’
Many of the debates and much of the anger between gay activists and scientists revolve around the idea of scientific progress or the lack of it: the accusation on the part of many activists that scientists have not lived up to the promises of progress and the defensive reaction from scientists that an enormous amount has been learned about the disease in the time available. Most recently, this debate was played out at the international AIDS meeting in Montreal in June 1989
Pressman (1990) critique of literary analysis/ analystis
Literary analysis alone cannot give insight into the larger process by which social mores and beliefs change, a question that is at the center of such endeavours
Sontag, for example, exhibits a quaint naivete in her trust of scientific “facts” to liberate us from erroneous or repugnant beliefs
Sontag and others see in AIDS the high-water mark of sexual liberation, a reinforcement of a broad er return to convention, with the implication being that gay liberation ultimately slammed the door on heterosexuals pursuing similar freedoms. This may be premature statement/ an unfair distortion
Gilman’s work, even on its own terms, is less successful than Sontag’s. His reliance upon a static sociopsychoanalytic model decontextualizes the artefacts under study, leading Gilman to forced readings and, ultimately, ahistoricism.
The cultural meaning of sexually transmitted diseases has changed over time and place It is these differences that need further elucidation
Pressman (1990) - overview of historians’ criticisms of process of science
Treichler analyzes the descriptive categories used to tabulate patients in the early case reports and finds that the belief in the homosexual origins of the disease led researchers to shunt aside contrary cases, such as those involving women, into the rubric of “Other.’
Oppenheimer establishes that the first published accounts of the mysterious syndrome downplayed causal models based on infectious diseases, such as a virus or germ, in favour of models that underscored the hazards of a “promiscuous” gay “lifestyle.”
Not yet understood is the role played by the concentration of medical attention in the late 1970s upon the sexually transmitted diseases of gays, when the general medical community first became aware of the sexual activities of homosexuals.
as Oppenheimer narrates, when the first cases of AIDS appeared in ‘innocent” children - the moment when the illness was first brought to national attention -prominent medical authorities responded, reflexively, by explaining to the public that the disease can be contracted through casual, innocent contact
The net result was an immediate firestorm of public hysteria and, later, public distrust of physicians when they backtracked on the issue of transmissibility
Pressman (1990), differences between AIDS and other infectious diseases
Unlike Parran’s model of syphilis, an individual with AIDS will find it difficult to claim to have contracted the disease i’innocently.” Explanations such as accidental exposure to needle sticks, blood transfusion and hemophilia are all matters of public record
Fee on syphilis (Pressman, 1990)
Fee’s case study of Baltimore mid-20th C reveals that the syphilis campaign was used as a basis for laws against sodomy, and for J. Edgar Hoover’s and others’ attempts at a total ‘supression of sexual promiscuity” (p. 134). Post-AIDS legislation targeted at bathhouses, ses clubs, adult theaters, and prostitution no doubt reflects some of this legacy
Pressman (1990), positive impact of AIDS on gay community
AIDS epidemic is historically unusual in that it befell a preexisting, well-defined lobby group already in motion
as Dennis Altman illustrates:
gay concerns have found an unprecedented national visibility, an issue around which to congeal an increasingly powerful political voice.
raising of money for “wars” against disease through civic events such as walk-a-thons and philanthropic auctions is a peculiarly American tradition, a process that helped to incorporate gay awareness into many a local community
Pressman (1990), impact of gay community on relationship between scientists and the public
- experimental protocols no longer are left to the full control of investigators
- no longer is access to experimental drugs fully in the control of the FDA
Pressman (1990), lessons of AIDS history
- we must understand the subtle process by which slow-moving social and cultural beliefs dynamically interact with the fast-paced movement of laboratory knowledge
- historian too is caught within this larger, complex process by which knowledge and society interact
Scandlyn (2000), acute illnesses
characterized by a sudden onset, obvious signs and symptoms, and some limitation of normal function
In the United States, metaphors for acute illness arise from the arena of war: viruses invade, bacteria attack, and parasites infest
Scandlyn (2000), Chronic illnesses
may arise from an acute episode that does not resolve to full health—for example, a diabetic coma. The course of a chronic illness is uncertain and unlimited in time, usually characterized by alternating periods of acute crisis and remission
Treatment is directed at relieving symptoms and slowing degeneration, not effecting cure
Metaphors for chronic illness are drawn from the language of business: symptoms are managed, crises are averted, support systems are organized, and regimens are designed. Whereas the battle against acute illness is dramatic and heroic, the management of chronic illness, despite its complexity, is banal
Scandlyn (2000), two types of AIDS on international level
chronic AIDS in the Western world, where resources are available for treatment with zidovudine and other drugs
acute AIDS in the developing world, where there are no funds for such treatments
Scandlyn (2000), consequences of shift to AIDS as chronic illness on national level
- shift in the priority it receives in national health policy and a growing inequity in how resources for its treatment are allocated among the population
- its power as a metaphor for evil is diminished
- Most chronic illnesses carry a stigma
- living with a chronic disease requires a different view of the self and the meaning of the illness and one’s life. When AIDS was an acute illness, the diagnosis was delivered as a death sentence. Chronic and life-threatening illnesses challenge the view of life as linear, consisting of continuity and order
- responsibility for all aspects of management—physical, mental, and social—increasingly falls on the shoulders of those who have the illness. In the absence of a crisis, it is easy to forget that people with an illness are still working hard to care for themselves
Scandlyn (2000), When was control of AIDS given high priority from public health officials and govt agencies?
once transmission to women, children, and heterosexual men was identified
Political activity by gay men, most of whom were white, deliberately played on fears of virulence and heterosexual transmission and was effective in securing government support for research and treatment
Scandlyn (2000), changes caused by recognition that most new cases of AIDS occur among heterosexuals
- AIDS has become normalized in the sense that more of the population is viewed as vulnerable to infection. Helpful in reducing stigma assoc w AIDS, but has broken down some of the political alliances that mobilized advocacy for people with AIDS in the 1980s.
- incidence of AIDS is several times higher among African American and Hispanic men, women, and children than among whites. Given that minority populations have lower rates of health insurance coverage, treating AIDS means increasing public expenditures on a broad scale. As a chronic illness, AIDS is another problem in a health care system already riddled with problems
Scandlyn (2000), impact of development of category HIV positive
has alleviated some of the public fear of the disease and those who have it.
However, people who are HIV positive are stigmatized once their diagnosis is known. Reactions are rarely predictable, thus generating a great deal of anxiety in encounters with strangers or new acquaintances.
Scandlyn (2000), ‘stigma’
Every society embodies models or paradigms of how a healthy, normal, whole person appears, acts, feels, and thinks. An attribute that causes the person to deviate from normal is a stigma.
Deviant people are viewed as somehow responsible for their abnormality; thus, their moral character is also challenged
Stigmatized people share society’s view of what is normal. They know they fail to match the model
Forstein (2013), gay liberation
The Stonewall “revolt” of 1969 had begun an overt sexual liberation movement that celebrated sex for its own pleasure and affirmed romantic and platonic same sex relationships. Gay men flocked to the urban centers to come out of the closet, creating social structures unique to gay male behavior, such as bathhouses, sex clubs, and backrooms in bars
Forstein (2013), importance of gay activism
Were it not for the loud and often abrasive voices of many, science and medicine would not have made the enormous strides in identifying HIV and pushing research to find treatments we now take for granted.
Forstein (2013), how history of AIDS should be told
The history of AIDS cannot be told but in the personal accounts of each of us who have suffered with AIDS, or been affected by those who have
Forstein’s background
a gay man and a psychiatrist who trained during the very first days of the epidemic
Forstein (2013), origins of AIDS epidemic
largely the result of a perfect storm of sexual freedom in the urbanized gay male culture, and the availability of narcotics on a scale never before seen in the world.
Forstein (2013), first of three phases of the epidemic: Pre HIV/AIDS
social upheaval
growing visibility of lesbians and gay men in the major urban areas and the emergence of a sexual liberation initially seemed to push society toward a more realistic view of gay and lesbian people.
Forstein (2013), second of three phases of the epidemic: Post-AIDS, Pre-treatment
The words “Gay and AIDS” rapidly became the association in the popular press, and attitudes toward homosexuality throughout the medical professions were negatively biased and hostile toward gay and lesbian physicians and other health care providers
epidemiology tracked by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) made it obvious that we were dealing with a sexually transmitted disease.
Mayor of Boston appointed a task force on AIDS to which I was appointed in 1982 while a resident.
calls to round up gay men in the urban centers and sequester them to keep them from purveying AIDS through “immoral” sexual activity
AIDS was blamed for any social ills that befell the country.
Seemed that much of the growing acceptance of homosexuality in the urban centers was being countered by anti-homosexual religious groups that equated being homosexual with AIDS
Funeral parlors sometimes refused to take the bodies of men who had died from AIDS.
Obituaries ran with the code “died from a long bout of cancer.”
I emphatically pleaded for gay men to take control over our sexual lives by using condoms
Boston radical magazine (Fag Rag) labeled me anti-sexual and regressive in my politics
The long fought battle for sexual freedom had slammed up against the medical establishment’s long anti-gay bias. The medical field was accused of trying to limit homosexual behavior.
Forstein’s high-profile role in combating AIDS crisis
Within the American Psychiatric Association, the emergence of the gay and lesbian psychiatry group helped push the establishment of an APA Task Force on AIDS in 1985.
1986 the group became a formal Committee on AIDS.
As a member of that group we pushed the APA to develop a stronger voice for the profession and established policies that were intended to decrease stigma about homosexuality and AIDS, and to incorporate learning about AIDS as a complex bio-psycho-social illness.
Commission on AIDS was formed in 1988 to report directly to the Board of Trustees of the APA.
I was appointed Chair of that Commission by APA President Larry Hartmann in 1991 and served in that capacity until 2002
When structural changes in the APA moved the work of the Commission into the APA’s Institute for Research and Education (APIRE) in a dedicated Office on HIV Psychiatry, I served as the Chair of the Steering Committee on HIV /AIDS, changing the mission of the group from simply developing policy to focusing on educating and training medical students, residents and psychiatrists in practice
Forstein (2013), two scientific camps
one favoring the infectious, sexually transmitted/blood-borne theory
one blaming gay sex for overloading the immune system because of the ingestion or anal entry of male semen
Forstein (2013), psychological side of AIDS
People with the systemic signs of AIDS were presenting with a subcortical type of dementia previously not seen in this age cohort
AIDS anxiety, death and dying, survivorship, disability, and dementia became the issues in a young population
One patient described his sense of feeling “contaminated” and ashamed that he was proving his parents’ admonitions that being gay would lead to hell.
Forstein (2013), fears of interacting with AIDS patients
Often, hospital workers would leave food trays outside the door out of fear of being infected from placing a tray by the bedside
Forstein (2013), AIDS and race
Homosexuality was seen as a “White gay man’s disease,” leaving gay and bisexual men of color, already managing dual identities in their communities, to deny their own risk, although the numbers of infected men in the minority communities continued to rise.
Forstein (2013), debates around HIV testing
some claimed public had right to know who was infected
Others pushed individual rights to know about one’s health status
many in behaviour health field unsure of risks/ benefits - knowledge does not always lead to healthier behaviours
Forstein (2013), end of debate about testing
1995 when multiple regimens began to change the very course of HIV infection from an acute, life-threatening illness to a chronic disease
Forstein (2013), phase 3 of three, Post-AIDS, post-treatment
Failure of AZT as monotherapy mid-1980s
In 1992, the first multidrug trials were approved
Research into AIDS expanded, and behavioral studies about adherence began to overshadow prevention efforts, particularly in the most vulnerable populations, who for various social and psychological reasons found adherence to the complex regimen more difficult than had been expected. 95% adherence to a three drug regiment, often multiple pills three times daily, was necessary to curtail infection.
the stigma of being HIV positive continued within the gay male community as well as in the larger society
although clean needle exchange programs began to develop and prove effective, only a few states allowed these programs.
Even with the advent of anti-retrovirals, the future for each individual remains ultimately uncertain, dependent on so many variables of biology, adherence behavior, coping mechanisms, and their personal history with the virus.
As the epidemic has transformed into a chronic condition for those who are capable of taking their anti-retrovirals scrupulously, concern about getting infected has decreased
the sense of urgency that remains around the world has decreased in the United States and other developed nations
Forstein (2013), Changes to those contracting AIDS, 1990s and 21st Century
shifts in terms of who was getting newly infected
The generation who did not know they were at risk had been decimated, and many gay men made significant behavioral changes whether or not they had been tested.
We continue to have more than 50,000 new infections a year, with the majority occurring in young men of color, African Americans who have sex with men making up the greatest number. The young, racial minorities, people with psychiatric disorders, and the old account for the new infections of HIV in the United States.
Clinically, mental health providers are seeing an increasing greater proportion of those newly infected with HIV with pre-existing psychiatric conditions.
As the population with HIV ages, increased rates of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular changes affect cognition and long-term health. Complex drug interactions occur between medications used for HIV, co-morbid medical, and psychiatric disorders
What is ART?
Antiretroviral therapy
Forstein (2013), what did we learn from AIDS epidemic?
adherence and behavior are not rationally governed
McKay (2014), Gaétan Dugas
the gay Air Canada flight attendant at the center of the “Patient Zero” myth: the man who supposedly introduced the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) to the United States.
Shilts re-created a November 1982 confrontation between one of his book’s heroines, Selma Dritz, a San Francisco public health official, and Dugas, in which the flight attendant declared that it was his right to do what he wanted with his body. Dugas’s reported refusal to give up sex, in the face of allegedly strong evidence suggesting the sexual transmissibility of an AIDS-causing agent, is still often cited as proof of a profound disregard for social responsibility.
Mirko Grmek wrote that Dugas had “sown the disease and death all along his route, at the rate of about 250 partners per year’
I oppose the assertion that Dugas ignored incontrovertible information about AIDS and was intent on spreading his infection. Instead, I argue that scientific ideas in 1982 and 1983 about the condition and the transmissibility of a causative agent were later portrayed, by Shilts and others, to be more self-evident and narrowly cast than they in fact were at the time
Dugas was one of many gay men of the time who viewed medical claims and advice with skepticism.
absence of an agreed-upon cause of AIDS or mode of transmission at this time
Dritz herself admitted that when she confronted Dugas with the demand that he stop having sex, it involved stretching the available evidence
In the single available piece of evidence written by Dugas himself - a letter - the flight attendant lamented the difficulty of obtaining reliable information about the condition
evidence suggests that Dugas eventually came to subscribe to the “immune overload” or “multifactorial” theory.
The fact that he did make changes to his behavior—indeed, that his assistance helped guide some of the early efforts of Vancouver’s first AIDS organization—shows that there was much more to Gaétan Dugas than Shilts and St. Martin’s Press saw fit to print
McKay (2014), ‘Denver Principles’
June 1983, statement issued by the Advisory Committee of People with AIDS at a gay and lesbian health conference in Denver.
“Denver Principles” explicitly rejected the “passivity” of labels like “patient” and “victim” in favor of the more empowering “people with AIDS” or “PWA” moniker.14 Individuals with AIDS were challenging the notion that they were patients, or indeed patient
Shilts’ influence
2007 USA Today article listed the bestselling Band, alongside A Brief History of Time and The Satanic Verses, as one of the most influential books of the previous quarter century
more recently, it was selected by the Library of Congress as one of eighty-eight “Books That Shaped America.
McKay (2014), Origins of ‘Patient Zero’
William Darrow, the CDC investigator who was eventually able to expand the Los Angeles cluster to connect forty cases in several cities:
acknowledged in a 2008 interview that the term “patient O”—the letter “O” abbreviating the patient’s “Out[side]-of-California” residential status—evolved within the CDC to become the numerical “patient 0.”
Patient Zero was not supposed to indicate the original carrier who brought AIDS to the US
Shilts’ portrayal of Dugas
dangerous foreigner bringing in disease from abroad and threatening the American public’s health, a trope that would have resonated with many of his book’s readers, given the U.S. government’s moves in 1986 and 1987 to exclude noncitizens with HIV
appears that Dugas, in Shilts’s history of AIDS, was to exemplify those who continued to have sex during the epidemic’s early period of uncertainty
I contend that Shilts gradually combined his originally planned “Epidemic” character with the information he was gathering about Dugas to create a deeply powerful figure of evil, investing the virus itself with agency
Dugas’s sexual exploits, in a time before AIDS was conclusively demonstrated to be caused by a sexually transmissible agent, became conscious acts of infection in Shilts’s book
Epstein, Impure Science (McKay’s account)
period from 1982 to 1983 generated both intense debate and strong criticism of scientists and biomedical researchers, and individual self-education was considered to be the best approach for many gay men
McKay (2014), gay community mistrust of docs
In the Body Politic, the left-leaning gay periodical, the gay activist Michael Lynch argued that “gays are once again allowing the medical profession to define, restrict, pathologize us’
Brier on Reagan administration (McKay’s account)
most important factor shaping the Republican administration’s response to AIDS was the lead role taken by members of the Department of Education
The department’s secretary, William Bennett, and the under secretary, Gary Bauer, who was also Reagan’s advisor on domestic policy issues, developed a response that was in keeping with the religious support base of the New Right. Their approach took every opportunity to reinforce the supremacy of heterosexual marriage and traditional gender roles.
constructed ‘deserving’ person w AIDS
McKay (2014), immediate influence of And the Band Played On, published 1987
timing ensured that the figure of the deliberate, malicious AIDS spreader, which had been forming in a somewhat inchoate manner earlier in 1987, and which built upon previously existing fears of people with AIDS, took root in the public imagination
Significantly, this figure now had a name and, following a 60 Minutes television news special in November 1987, a nationally broadcast face
this historical case gave lawyers a powerful example of a malicious disease spreader that allowed them to circumvent the difficulties that they would have faced in terms of establishing malice and an intent to infect in a court of law.
y November 1987, the same month that the book went into wide release, advocates of tough penalties for HIV transmission were mobilizing the “Patient Zero” story.
The State Factor, a conservative legal publication put out by the American Legislative Exchange Council lobby group, , featured Dugas’s interaction with Selma Dritz in its December issue. The article argued that criminal laws were needed to deal with this small minority of AIDS patients who “either are intent on infecting others—or simply do not care enough to change their sexual practices.
Presidential Commission on the Human Immunodeficiency Virus that President Reagan had assembled in the summer of 1987. The commission held its first hearings in September, just as the prerelease publicity for Shilts’s book began to take hold in the national media, and continued its deliberations until June 1988, when became nonfiction bestseller
The commissioners were evidently concerned with the potential risk posed by individuals like Shilts’s “Patient Zero.”
Seems likely that the recommendations of their final report for increased use of criminal law and the powerful stories of deliberate disease spreading typified by the example of Dugas may have contributed to just this type of trend
By the end of the 1990s most states had in their statutes some form of legislation that addressed the deliberate transmission of HIV
This controversial approach was subsequently transferred internationally to several west African countries, through the process of “model HIV law,” where ready-made legal frameworks were exported abroad as part of U.S.-funded development aid.
McKay (2014), similarity with previous epidemics
suspicion of vengeful transmission, as exemplified by Shilts’ portrayal of Dugas
Sontag (1989), special status of AIDS as disease
displaced cancer as most stigmatized disease
Seems that societies need to have one illness which becomes identified with evil, and attaches blame to its ‘victims’, but it is hard to be obsessed with more than one
Sontag (1989) AIDS’s dual metaphoric genealogy
invasion - e.g. cancer
pollution - e.g. syphilis
Sontag (1989), AIDS and military metaphors
different to those used to describe cancer
AIDS - enemy is what causes the disease. Infectious agent from the outside, not inside.
Alien takeover familiar in science-fiction narratives - in era of Star Wars and Space Invaders, AIDS = ideally comprehensible
Sontag (1989), what makes AIDS so terrifying?
contamination, and therefore vulnerability, is understood as permanent and progressive
dehumanizing nature of AIDS. Significance of effect on face due to face>body hierarchy. Worst are alterations which appear like mutations into animality
Underlying some of moral judgements attached to disease are aesthetic judgements about beautiful and ugly, clean and unclean, familiar and alien
status of AIDS as unexpected event, entirely new disease - new judgement - adds to dread
Sontag (1989), stages of AIDS
HIV to AIDS-related complex (ARC) to AIDS
Definition of AIDS depends on this temporal sequence of stages
Sontag (1989), lack of positive portrayal of AIDS
AIDS does not allow romanticizing or sentimentalizing, perhaps bc its assoc w death too powerful
AIDS and stigma, Sontag (1989)
to get AIDS is to be revealed as member of a certain ‘risk group’, community of pariahs.
Unsafe behaviour that produces AIDS is judged to be more than just weakness. It is indulgence, delinquency - addictions to chemicals that are illegal and sex regarded as deviant
Getting the disease through a sexual practice is thought to be more wilful, therefore deserves more blame
ostracizing even of hemophiliacs and blood-transfusion recipients - potentially rep greater threat bc not as easy to identify as the already-stigmatized
Indeed, AIDS is perceived as afflicting the already stigmatized
Sontag (1989), AIDS and race
US - ppl told that heterosexual transmission extremely rare and unlikely - as if Africa did not exist
illustrating the classic script for plague, AIDS is thought to have started in the ‘dark continent,’ then spread to Haiti, then to the US and Europe. It is understood as a tropical disease.
Links to familiar racist stereotypes about animality, sexual license and blacks
Were AIDS only an African disease, few outside Africa wld be concerned w it. Wld have been seen as ‘natural’
Sontag (1989), significance of status of AIDS as a ‘syndrome’
makes it v much product of definition and construction
Contention AIDS is invariably fatal depends partly on what docs decided to define as AIDS
this rests on notion of ‘full-blown’ disease. Botanical/ zoological metaphor - what is immature is destined ot become mature. Metaphor leads support to interp of clinical evd which is far from proved - idea that infection will always produce something to die from
moves to phase out category of ARC and stress continuity of disease - strengthens fatalism already in place
Testing positive for HIV increasingly equated w being ill - infected means ill.
‘Infected but not ill’ - notion of clinical med - is being superseded by biomed concepts which amount to reviving antiscientific logic of defilement, and making infected-but-healthy a contradiction in terms
Sontag (1989), negative consequences of testing HIV-positive
Ppl losing jobs
US Dept of Defense - military personnel discovered to be HIV-positive being removed from ‘sensitive, stressful jobs’
social death
Sontag (1989), AIDS and premodern experience of illness
AIDS reinstates something like premodern experience of illness
modern biomed testing - new class of lifetime pariahs, the future ill
Radical expansion of notion of illness
Throwback to era when illnesses were innumerable, mysterious, and progression from seriously ill to dying was something normal
Sontag (1989), principal metaphor by which AIDS epidemic understood
plague
AIDS understood in premodern way - disease incurred by ppl both as individs and mems of ‘risk group’ - category which revives archaic idea of a tainted community that illness has judged.
Plague = viewed as judgement on society and its morals
assumed AIDS must become widespread elsewhere in same catastrophic form in which has emerged in Africa.
Plague metaphor is essential vehicle of the most pessimistic reading of the epidemiological prospects
Sontag (1989), common African belief about AIDS
virus fabricated in CIA-Army lab in Maryland
This view spread by Soviets e.g. ‘Radio Peace and Progress’
Jerry Falwell
‘AIDS is God’s judgement on a society that does not live by his rules’
Sontag (1989), secular motives of those mobilising rhetoric of AIDS as plague/ threat
Authoritarian polit ideoogies have vested interest in promoting fear, sense of imminence of takeover by aliens.
most extreme nativist, racist views in France from Jean-Marie le Pen - calling for nationwide testing and quarantine of everyone carrying AIDS
denunciations of ‘gay plague’ = part of much larger Western antiliberals’ complaints about contemporary permissiveness of all kinds
AIDS as tool for mobilising neo-constervatives’ politics of the will - intolerance, paranoia, fear of political weakness
fears of uncontrollable pollution and unstoppable migration from Third World
Sontag (1989), ‘us’ and ‘them’
this stressed by antileberals - who emph that AIDS mustn’t be made everyone’s problem
Sontag (1989), AIDS, individual and collective
AIDS fosters ominous fantasies about disease which is marker of both individual and social vulnerabilities.
Virus invades body; disease invades whole of society
Sontag (1989) AIDS and metaphorical potency of the ‘virus’
virus = synonym for change
many metaphors drawn from virology - e.g. in computers - partly stimulated by omnipresence of talk of AIDS, are turning up everywhere.
They reinforce sense of the omnipresence of AIDS
Sontag (1989), AIDS and medicine
Med had been viewed as age-old military campaign nearing final phase leading to victory
Advent of AIDS made clear infectious diseases far from conquered
Sontag (1989), AIDS and changes in morality
Med changed mores - contraception and assurance of eary curability of STDs made it poss to regard sex as adventure w/o consequences. AIDS obliges ppl to think of sex as poss having consequences.
AIDS reveals all but long-term monogamous sex = promiscuous and deviant
fear of polluting ppl
AIDS reinforces American moralism about sex
It further strengthens culture of self-interest
AIDS fear enforces more moderate exercise of sexual appetite - US sexual behaviour pre-1981 now seems for the m-c part of a lost age of innocence
AIDS stimulating return to ‘conventions’. Amplifies widespread questioning rising throughout 1970s of many of ideals of enlightened modernity
Sontag (1989), different nations’ public health responses to AIDS
US Guide for Schools late 1987 by Dept of Ed - refused to discuss reducing risk and proposes abstinence.
Talk of condoms and clean needles is felt tantamount to condoning and abetting illicit sex, illegal chemicals
European societies are unlikely to urge ppl to be chaste.
Instead advising caution and individual research - ‘Don’t die of ignorance’.
Advocation of condoms
Saying it over and over to instill consciousness of risk, necessity of prudence
Sontag (1989), capitalism
encourages abundant appetites/ individual liberty
recreational, risk-free sexuality is inevitable reinvention of culture of capitalism.
AIDS changed all that
Warnings to consumers to be more cautious and selfish may stimulate culture of consumption - anxieties require further replication of goods and services
Sontag (1989), AIDS and apocalyptic thinking
AIDS occupies such a large part in our awareness bc = model of all catastrophes privileged populations feel await them
Biologists and public hlth officials predict something far worse than can be imagined or that society (and economy) can tolerate
Talk in the US is of national emergency. New York Times editorial last yr - ‘we live in time of plague such as has never been visited on our nation’
AIDS as part of wider apocalyptic talk - e.g. death of oceans and lakes and forests. Inevitable rise in apocalyptic thinking in countdown do millennium but also taste for worst-case scenarios reflecting need to master fear of what is felt to be controllable
as with other events - AIDS as event (present state) and image - fears of imminent future disaster
Harvard historian of science, Gould, in 1980s
AIDS may rank with nuclear weaponry as ‘the greatest danger of our era’
Sontag (1989), AIDS as global phenomenon
AIDS is one of the dystopian harbringers of the global village
WHO head, Dr Mahler - ‘AIDS cannot be stopped in any country unless it is stopped in all countries
Darwinian test of aptitude for survival - German AIDS specialist Dr Helm - ‘a society that is not able… to prevent the spread of AIDS has v poor prospects for the future
Which illness/ AIDS metaphor is Sontag (1989) most eager to see retired?
Military metaphor:
- over-mobilizes
- overdescribes
- powerfully contributes to the excommunicating and stigmatizing of the ill
Wilton (1992), HIV infection as global epidemic
shows little sign of slowing
spread to every country int he world
AIDS leading cause of death for women and men aged 20-40 in many major cities in Americas, Western Europe and parts of Africa
WHO notified of 334,216 cases of AIDS around globe by beginning of March 1991
AIDS underreported in all countries
WHO - end of 1990, 802,000 reported cases of AIDS, w further 8.5 mil estimated to have HIV
This is in no sense an epidemic we can be sure of vanquishing
Wilton (1992), UK AIDS stats
end of Sept 1991, 4,777 men and 288 women known to have AIDS in UK, of whom 3,158 had already died
Wilton (1992), three common opportunistic infections in AIDS
Karposi’s sarcoma - skin cancer. Purplish lesions
Candida albicans (thrush) - white patches
pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP)
Wilton (1992), recent shift from ‘risk groups’ to
‘risk behaviours’
1988 Health Education Authority survey to evaluate public information campaign
most ppl in the UK now know HIV spread by unprotected sex, med use of contaminated blood, sharing drug-injecting equipment, mother to baby
Wilton (1992), UK govt slow reaction to AIDS
despite urgent pressure from groups e.g. Terrence Higgins Trust (THT) and Health Education Council (HEC), not until 1986, 5 yrs after first AIDS-related deathsi n UK, that the govt launched national public education campaign
routine confiscation of imported gay magazines from USA meant safer sex expertise developing in US not available to ppl in the UK
Wilton (1992), British press reaction
all-out attack on homosexuality
Times, 27 July 1983 - network of promiscuous urban homosexuality, constantly folding back on itself, provides idea diffusion field for any infection getting into it
overt homophobia, covert homophobia and guilt by differentiation
it is the press who have created the widely accepted distinction between ‘innocent victims’ of HIV/ AIDS and those who are, by that logic, presumed ‘guilty’
hysteria of AIDS reportage put lives at risk - paramedics and public alike less willing to touch those bleeding + in need
unique nastiness of the British gutter press
increased risk to heterosexuals - insistence AIDS = homosexual problem
homosexuals symbolically cast out of ‘public’
The Sun 14 Oct 1985
Headline of story - ‘I’d Shoot My Son If He Had AIDS Says Vicar’
Daily Star, December 1988
‘Ghettos? A Good Idea!’
calls for setting up of ‘leper-like colonies’
Sun, 6 May 1987
‘Fly Away Gays - And We Will Pay!’
offered free one-way airline tickets to Norway
Observer (28 December 1986)
‘New Morality and The Sexual Time Bomb’
Wapshott - show ‘sympathies and understanding for those trapped by their own proclivities’
Woman’s Own (3 May 1986)
‘I’ve got nothing against the homosexual community… but they were consenting adults, they did have a choice’
1986 Daily Express
homosexuals who have brought this plague upon us shld be locked up
Poll of News of the World readers (1 March 1986)
56.8% in favour of suggestion AIDS carriers shld be sterilised and given treatment to curb their sexual appetite
Wilton (1992), press later in epidemic
link between homosexuality and AIDS defended more overtly
Telegraph - 5 June 1988 - no risk to heterosexuals, and notion of heterosexual spread propagated by ‘gay conspiracy’
Wilton (1992), women and AIDS
Women’s second-class social status
women referred to by many med writings simply as ‘vectors of infection’
as though infection may only be said to have occurred once a man has been infected - infecting a woman somehow does not count until she passes it on
HIV/ AIDS predom seen as male med problem
contraception has come to be seen as women’s business
dictates of masculinity demand full penetration and orgasm inside of woman. Prevent woman from negotiating use of condom
women culturally assoc w contamination and disease
Wilton (1992), hlth promotion
med profession’s reluctance to accept as ‘sex’ anything which departs from ‘normal’ model of penis-in-vagina intercourse makes difficult for non-penetrative sex to gain ‘official’ recognition as single most effective physical strategy to prevent transmission of HIV
plenty of safer sex advice for heterosexual women - v little for heterosexual man
Black and minority groups poorly served in UK
Wilton (1992), AIDS and race
epidemiological studies have led researchers to conclude no evd to suggest virus present in African before US
Haringey Council Race quality Unit, paper AIDS and Racism - sophisticated genetic tests have shown that virus which infects African green monkeys = fundamentally different to HIV,
lack of public sphere efforts to share disproving of green money theory, tho there had been much attention to theory when propounded
impressions of Africa as dirty, uncontrolled sexuality
Findings in one of the London hosps early 1992, showing high percentage of pregnant women testing positive for HIV antibodies had connections w Africa - copious press coverage
Disease most prevalent in cities in Africa but to judge by media representation in UK, there is no urban Africa
relief to be able to believe AIDS just one more disaster in distant Africa
Wilton (1992), state of AIDS in Africa
Reported cases of AIDS across the 53 African countries vary from 0.3 per million in Nigeria to 568 per mill in Congo
avg rate over Africa as whole = 78.1 per million, compared to avg across US of 464 per mil, equalling that across Uganda
Malaria frequently gives false positive result on HIV antibody test
Guardian 3 Feb 1987
Strange habits of the ‘Nairobi hooker’ who ‘emerges after dark’ to ‘preen’ and ‘stalk her prey’
Wilton (1992), Racism and AIDS within nations
South Africa:
- whites have doc-patient ration of 1:330
- Black ratio 1:1,200
US:
Latina woman 9x more likely than white woman to contract HIV
Black woman 12x more likely
due to poverty
Terrence Higgins Trust informative booklet ‘AIDS and HIV’, 1997
who can get HIV infection?
ppl having sex w ppl who have lived in or visited central Africa
anyone who has lived there or visited the area and had sexual intercourse there could… be at risk
(no mention that risk greater in some US cities than some African countries!)
National Front leaflet, ‘Conspiracy to Destroy our Nation through AIDS’
AIDS-infested Africans brought into Britain to live on dole and social security
US President publicly recognised AIDS as problem (Wilton 1992)
1987
after 25,644 Americans known to have died
Wilton (1992), early response to AIDS in US and UK
- fire-fighting mentality, working reactively rather than proactively
- development of ‘deviant’ expertise. expertise of gay men
new right ascendancy, crusade against ‘permissiveness’. Overtly Christian morality. ‘Victorian values’
Thatcher, May 1988
‘A nation of free people… will only continue to be great if fam life continues and the structure of that nation is a fam one’
Wilton (1992), sex ed
doctrine of sex ed developed and implemented
Thatcher, 1987 Tory Party conference
‘children who need to be taught to respect trad moral values are being taught that they have an inalienable right to be gay’
Terrence Higgins Trust
- estab 1983 by friends of Terrence Higgins, one of the first gay men to die w AIDS in Britain
- charitable status 1984
- produced AIDS ed leaflets and materials, initially for gay men but v quickly for wider audience
- lobbied govt gor response
- telephone help line from 14 Feb 1984
- Sept 1985, govt grant of £35,000
- Tony Whitehead, head of the trust in 1986
Press, media, govt came to rely on the Trust for information - same reversal of expertise as in State
Govt hostility - £466,000 funding to THT up to autumn 1987
£10 million given to Haemophilia Society to set up trust fund for HIV+ haemophiliacs
- govt gave £250,000 less than agreed in 1987
UK Public Health and Control of Diseases ACT, 1984
enforced hospitalization and if necess detention of PWA
blood screening programme
AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power
est 1987 in US, out of mtg called by Larry Kramer
- civil disobedience
- demonstrations demanded changes in drugs trial procedures and increased funding for AIDS treatment research
-ACTUP chapters estab in UK
Bt govt hlth promotion campaign targeting ‘youth’
‘Don’t Aid AIDS’ in youth press (1986)
‘Don’t Inject AIDS’ in youth press (1987)
National UK media campaigns
Don’t Die of Ignorance - 1987
You’re as Safe as You Want to Be - 1988
Section 28 Local govt act
becomes law 1988 despite mass opposition
prohibits use of local govt funds to ‘promote’ homosexuality, or represent ‘pretended fam relationships’ as acceptable
paragraph tacked on exempting anything carried out to prevent spread of disease
First UK case
December 1981
Discovery of cause retrovirus
1983
initially labelled HTLV and LAV
Renamed HIV in 1986
Don’t Die of Ignorance campaign
- £20 million
- Mass Media - leaflets, TV, billboards, Tube adverts
- Jan 1987 TV broadcast. ‘Monolith’. John Hurt voiceover. Hard-hitting. Images of person hammering AIDS to tombstone. ‘So far confined to small groups but spreading’. ‘Anyone can get it’. Emph on individ. If you ignore cld be the death of you
- Feb 1987 broadcast - iceberg at sea, camera pans to water to show AIDS. idea that small groups hit so far = tip of iceberg (?)
-leaflet. stark black cover with bold type.
10 points. 1 - includes encouragement to tell children if feel they need to know. 2 - anyone can get. 4 - transmission. 5 - fewer partners, less risk. Best to stick with one faithful partner. Use condoms for safer sex.
7 - Not safe to use equipment for tatooing, piercing, acupuncture unless you know sterilised
8 - can’t get through normal contact e.g. shaking hands. No danger from public toilets. Giving blood is safe. All blood used for blood transfusion in this country rigorously checked
9 - dangers of abroad. Certain developing countries med equipment may not be properly checked - avoid any treatment involving injections and surgical procedures.
10 - ultimately defence against the disease depends on all taking responsibility for own actions
- Declining rates of STIs, more people coming forward for tests
Bayer (1992), potential negatives of epidemic appearing less threatening than thought
fear of more limited funds
increasing association of AIDS with the underclass may fundamentally weaken the political alliance that underlay the voluntarist consensus which dominated public discourse about prevention policies in the epidemic’s first decade.
Bayer (1992), HIV testing
controversy centered on the role of testing in supporting the radical modifications of behavior that were universally deemed critical to altering the epidemic’s course. Out of these debates emerged a broad consensus, often codified in state statutes, that testing should be conducted only with the informed voluntary and specific consent of individuals.
Despite that standard, and the carefully defined, though always contested, exceptions to its scope, many clinicians and hospitals undertook surreptitious testing of patients, justifying their practices by the belief that the protection of health care workers and sound diagnostic work required such screening
With the announcement in mid-1989 that clinical trials had revealed the efficacy of early therapeutic intervention in slowing the course of illness in asymptomatic but infected persons and in preventing the occurrence of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, the political debate about testing underwent a fundamental change. Gay groups such as Project Inform in San Francisco and the Gay Men’s Health Crisis in New York, which had formerly opposed testing, now began to encourage people in high-risk groups to determine whether or not they were infected
Bayer (1992) AIDS and public health US
it has remained clear that the AIDS epidemic will be stemmed only when radical voluntary changes in behavior are made and sustained. Educational campaigns and counseling programs, most effectively undertaken by groups linked to the populations at risk, have remained the centerpiece of that preventive effort. Such efforts are still limited by moralistic trends in American society, and especially by those reflecting the abhorrence of homosexuality. The most striking failure in the preventive realm, however, is rooted in the unwillingness to commit the resources necessary for the provision of drug abuse treatment.
The dimensions of that failure were underscored in the 1988 preliminary report of the Presidential Commission on the HIV Epidemic.[34] A vast expansion in government efforts was needed. One and a half billion dollars a year would be necessary for drug abuse treatment and education.
Bayer (1992), strains produced by chronic features of AIDS
spring of 1988, investigators writing in the Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine could assert that “to ignore the possibilities inherent in the empirical evidence available is to create a social calamity even greater than the one already perceived. … One can imagine bitter competition for hospital beds
Volunteerism was no substitute for the institutional response that was demanded. Three to five hundred new acute care hospital beds would be needed each year for five years in order to meet requirements of those who became ill. In addition, hundreds of nursing home beds and special housing units would be needed for those requiring less intensive medical care. The capital costs alone for meeting these demands would be over $700 million. And if only half of those who could benefit from ambulatory care for HIV infection were to seek it, the city’s already overburdened clinic system would have to absorb an additional 800,000 visits a year
winter of 1990 Senator Edward Kennedy, the exemplar of Democratic party liberalism, and Senator Orrin Hatch, a Republican whose stance on abortion often cast him in the role of a conservative, jointly sponsored legislation—the Comprehensive AIDS Resource Emergency Act of 1990—that would provide a major infusion of federal assistance to those localities most severely burdened by AIDS.
Legislation promised to provide $2.9 billion over 5 yrs.
Success in Senate - 95-4.
Fall - Congress, confronted with a severe budgetary crisis, slashed funds for the now-renamed Ryan White Act.
If those with HIV infection can receive ongoing clinical care, behavioral changes can be encouraged, supported, and sustained
Berridge (2007), public hlth 19th C
- spur to reform was epidemic disease—and especially the impact of cholera outbreaks in 1831-2,
in 1848, and again in the 1860s. - Edwin
Chadwick, Report on the Sanitary Condition of the
Labouring Population (1842). Chadwick drew the link between dirt and
disease, and its association with overcrowding and poor sanitation
he saw a strong role for
the central state in order to achieve the greatest good for the greatest
number.
-The Public Health Act
of 1848 set up a Central Board of Health. But legislation was only
permissive and not compulsory
-Sir John Simon, as medical officer to the Privy Council Office, helped to push
through Public Health Acts in 1872 and 1875 which forced every local
authority to establish a sanitary body as well as to inspect housing and
monitor food supplies and ‘nuisances’
- Medical Officer of Health (MoH), compulsory for the first time at the local level under the 1875 Act
- impetus behind public health was informed by fear. Fear was focused on what was seen as the growth of a ‘residuum’, a race of degenerates
Winslow, American public hlth authority, three phases in devel o public hlth
- from 1840 to 1890, environmental sanitation
- from 1890 to 1910, developments in bacteriology, resulting in an emphasis on isolation and disinfection
- 1910, emphasis on education and personal hygiene, referred to as personal prevention
Berridge (2007), significance of discoveries of Koch and Pasteur for public hlth
made public health more important as a profession
moved the focus of attention away from the environment and towards
the individual patient as the locus of infection
Berridge (2007), new public hlth of early 20th C
founded on the concept of ‘personal prevention’. This was also a marriage between public health and eugenics.23 The political
imperative for reform was there, especially after the Boer War had revealed the shortcomings of British army recruits and heightened eugenic fears of ‘national deterioration’ and ‘racial decline’.
focus was on the individual—and especially the individual mother.
Berridge (2007), new environmentalism
new environmentalism based on the individual came into the smoking story through the rise of passive smoking
This new environmentalism also carried with it a revival of the fear of infection which found its apogee in the impact of HIV/AIDS in the later 1980s
Berridge (2007), framework in which HIV/AIDS was understood/ handled by public hlth
HIV/AIDS symbolized a revival of communicable disease in public health, later to be confirmed by BSE, SARS, and bird flu. But AIDS was also a lifestyle disease par excellence in its initial incarnation, and the response to it in the UK epitomized the key tenets of that style of public health, with the emphasis on behaviour modification and individual responsibility.
The Iconography of AIDS
Gilman, 1987
Influenced by the construction of the iconography of STIs (eg syphilis) - isolation, labelling women as the source of disease
Distance
- NYT, 1985, doctors distanced from ‘act of healing’ - this was typical of reporting which created and reflected an anxiety about ‘polluting’ contact with PWAs/STI sufferers
Fee + Krieger (1993) on the construction of AIDS
Three paradigms
Paradigm One: ‘gay plague’, analogy with epidemics of the past
Paradigm Two: a normalised, chronic disease
–> Both inadequate, they propose: ‘a collective chronic infectious disease and persistent pandemic, manifested through myriad specific diseases associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
Fee and Kreiger (1993) - AIDS as infectious?
The significance of HIV identification
- 1983, HIV virus identified and AIDS is seen as an infectious disease
- vague notions of ‘virus’ and spread by ‘bodily fluids’ increased fear
- refusal to wear/touch clothes previously worn by AIDS patients
- Shift in focus from risk groups to risk behaviours
How did the treatment of AIDS change when it came to be seen as chronic?
Patient’s efforts?
Fee and Kreiger, 1993
- etiology > pathology
- Palliative Treatment: azidothymidine (AZT) for people with AIDS/HIV positive people
- ‘from the point of view of health service delivery, AIDS was becoming just another expensive disease, like cancer…’
- change in focus from prevention to detection and treatment
Alternative therapies pioneered by patients (buyers’ clubs, Chinese medicine)
What criticisms do Fee and Kreiger offer of their first two paradigms of AIDS?
Fee and Kreiger (1993)
- Gay plague ignores long-term perspective
- ‘In accepting the chronic disease model’s emphasis on pathology and treatment, many scientists and health care professionals have lost signt of the fact that AIDS is both infectious and preventable.’
Berridge, Strong (2009)
British Policy Response to AIDS
1981-6 - ‘surprise and shock’
1986-7 - ‘high-level national emergency’
1987 - ‘normalisation’: a calmer period has ensued
(chronic>epidemic)
How did the modelling of AIDS change in the 1980s?
BEFORE
- AIDS (renamed) seen as a novel disease
- focus on risk groups, not risk acts heterosexual population came to be seen as a potential risk group, changing this
- Historical analogies to AIDS were smallpox, cholera, not TB, which would have raised to mind rather different policies issues, involving problems of housing, poverty and community care.’
AFTER
- ‘plague’ –> chronic: isolation of HIV meant AIDS became ‘a set of biomedical problems open to chemical resolution’
- ‘cure’ –> ‘management’ of disease with drugs like AZT
- Health education campaign launched 1986 when threat to heterosexual community was recognised
Ewan Ferlie, The NHS Responds to HIV/AIDS
Aids as a ‘crisis’?
- AIDS was seen as a ‘crisis’ as Britain looked to America and considered itself to be only four years behind their state of crisis –. education campaign, media interest.
VIRGINIA BERRIDGE and PHILIP STRONG*
AIDS and the Relevance of History
- Sir Donald Acheson, Chief Medical Officer in the DoH, made sure historians were listened to:
- Historians of past epidemics like cholera
- History of ‘moral panic’, stigmatisation of past STIs
What Is an Epidemic? AIDS in Historical Perspective
Author(s): Charles E. Rosenberg (1989)
What qualifies AIDS as an epidemic? Is our understanding of the nature of that epidemic straightforward?
‘an event, not a trend…does not proceed with imperceptible effect until retrospectively “discovered” by historians and demographers’
‘AIDS has shown itself both a very traditional and a very modern sort of epidemic’
Ewan Ferlie, The NHS Responds to HIV/AIDS
Local political cultures as a factor in variation of the response to the AIDS crisis?
Local political cultures were also important: the context was perhaps more receptive in Inner London (where the gay social movement was best developed), while some of the councils in the regional centres showed greater nervousness about dealing with issues related to sexuality, and the Scottish political culture complicated efforts to develop services for drug injectors.
What Is an Epidemic? AIDS in Historical Perspective
Author(s): Charles E. Rosenberg (1989)
What factors were believed to make victims of an epidemic predisposed to infection in the past?
How significant were social factors in past epidemics?
How are these considerations relevant to the AIDS crisis today?
During nineteenth-century cholera epidemics, for example, alcoholism, gluttony, sexual promiscuity, and filthy personal habits were widely accepted as predispositions to
the disease
victims were predisposed by their environment to indulgence in such habits as drinking and sexual promiscuity yet could still be held responsible for the physical consequences of such indulgence. - social factors?
What Is an Epidemic? AIDS in Historical Perspective
Author(s): Charles E. Rosenberg (1989)
How is AIDS a modern epidemic?
For most Americans, insofar as this epidemic can be
construed as a national phenomenon, it is a media reality, both exaggerated and diminished as it is articulated in forms suitable for mass consumption. The great majority of Americans have been spectators, in but not of the epidemic.
‘novel capacities of late 20th c medicine’
Finally, Americans have created a complex and not always consistent health-care system, and AIDS has been refracted through the needs, assumptions, and procedures of that system. - difficulties of caring for chronically ill in a system oriented disproportionately towards acute intervention
PRIMARY SOURCE: Roy Porter (1986) History says no to the policeman’s response to AIDS
- the crucial weapon must be education, as cure is years away
- Should AIDS be added to the Notifiable Diseases Act?
- Historical precedent says no
- Faced with the enormity of the suffering AIDS will inflict, humanity demands that we at least consider draconian meaures such as
compulsory screening for suspected virus carriers and further steps to protect others. - If we begin to treat victims like criminals we alienate those whose cooperation is most needed and encourage them to behave
How did the British press represent the homosexual?
- The twilight world of the homosexual
- ‘climate of fear’
How did the British Gay Community respond to AIDS?
- The Gay London Switchboard: calls worrying about the new disease
- Many gay men had to come out to families, some thrown out of homes
Fighting AIDS: Middlesex Hospital
- seen as ‘a clinic that welcomed gay men’
AIDS deaths UK
- First death, terrence Higgins, in 1982
- By 1984, 400 deaths
- 1985, Edinburgh, 1/2 of heroin addicts had virus
Medical breakthroughs in AIDS
- 1982 - Aids, Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, is first used as a term.
- 1984 - HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) is isolated by Luc Montagnier of the Pasteur Institute in Paris and Robert Gallo of the US National Cancer Institute.
- 1985, AIDS test
Conservative backlash against AIDS education
- Chief Rabbi (Norman Fowler): ‘all you’re doing is teaching people how to sin and get away with it’
- Adrien, the Moral Basis of Freedom: ‘it’s a disease ridden occupation, it’s a sterile production…it’s deviant and abnormal’
- ‘Churches that denounce the sin of sodom have a right to denounce it’
- The AIDS scare could cause a backlash against gays, government ministers believe’
Primary Source: Thatcher’s opposition to an AIDS campaign
- Mrs Thatcher, is there any truth to the suggestion one hears that this government has been dragging its feet on AIDS because of your distaste for the whole subject
- –> ‘we shall have to be very explicit because I think that it’s only when people realise the full enormity of the problem that is facing us that they will be prepared to have things coming through the letterbox that otherwise they would’ve found unusual
Primary Source: AIDS, Don’t Die of Ignorance (recap + diff details)
- because it has to deal with matters of health and sex, you may find some of the information disturbing
- it is not just a homosexual disease
- by the tie you read this, probably about 300 people will have died in the country. It is believed that a further 30 000 carry the virus
- risk from semen or vaginal fluid, oral or anal sex
- you cannot know who is infected and who isn’t…it is safest to stick to one faithful partner
- advises drug users not to share equipment
- don’t share tattoo/piercing equipment, toothbrush, razor
Primary Source: AIDS, don’t die of ignorance campaign TV Ad
1) (1987)
- ‘There is now a danger that has become a threat to us all’
- by sexual intercourse with an infected person
- If you ignore AIDS it could be the death of you
2) 1988
- The more partners you have the greater the risk
- Both men and women can pass on virus
- Facts about AIDS/unsettling music cuts through scene of woman inviting man to stay for the night
Tainted blood scandal
- The tainted blood scandal in the United Kingdom arose after 1,243 people with Haemophilia became infected with HIV, the virus that leads to acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS),
- as a result of receiving contaminated clotting factor products supplied by the National Health Service (NHS) in the 1970s and 1980s.[1]
- Of the 1,243 victims who were co-infected with both hepatitis C and HIV, fewer than 250 are believed to survive as of 2017
Hughes, Anthony (2006), HIV and drug policy
Emergence of HIV and perceived threat to individuals and communities, as pub hlth issue, led to refocusing of drug policies. Harm reduction approaches became important bc they recognized drug users may not necessarily halt drug use.
Reducing spread of infection through needle exchange schemes, for example, was regarded as more important for drug users and society than halting the consumption of drugs per say