Hit to Lead and Lead to Drug optimization Flashcards

1
Q

Hit

A

A small molecule which exhibits the desired pharmacology towards the target (TDD) or phenotype (PDD)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Lead

A
  • Novel structure that exerts disease modifying effects (typically in an animal model) that has a defines SAR and plausible optimisation path towards the drug
  • patentable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Drug/ candiate

A

product of the optimisation effort that will be progressed towards clinical and pre-clinical development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

TPP

A

Description of the new drug asset and how it addresses an unmet clinical need

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Drug Selection Matrix

A

A detailed description (matrix) of the clinical and pre-clinical endpoints that a candidate directed to the TPP must satisfy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Drug Assay Cascade

A

A series of experiments/assays that have been stratified to enable a stage wise progression from a hit to lead and lead to a candidate that fulfils stipulated requirements of the DSM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Stage 1

A

Potency: EC50 < 100 nm

Sel > 50 fold

Log P, D MW, TPSA etc

LE > 0.4

LipE > 4

LELP < 8

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Stage 2

A

ADME

  1. Solubility Sw > 30 uM
  2. Permeability Papp > 4e-6 cm/s
  3. Microsomal stab HLM t/12 > 120 mins
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Stage 3

A

Toxicokinetics

Rodent PK, Repeat dose tox, cytotoxicity

  1. Oral BA > 20% , T1/2 > 4h, Cmax 10xIC50
  2. NOAEL > 300 mg/ kg
  3. Cytotox > 30 uM
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Stage 4

A
  1. Efficacy
  2. Off target
  3. Cyp inhibition
  4. Chromosomal Tox
  5. Stability studies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

SAR guided optimization

(w/ functional groups and their issue)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Increasing potency

A

Potency needs to be considered as a function of molecular weight, as increasing MW results in promiscuity and solubility issues

Potency should be increased via the addition of the minimum number of C,N, and O

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Diversity Space

A
  • Proteome of a binding site which needs to be filled by binding elements
  • Combinations and permutations of binding elements seperated by an amount of space. Seperated by bonds i.e. 2-50 A.
  • A modestly sized library is required for a protein binding site required with 2 binding sites
  • Three binding elements induces an additional dimension and thereby a much larger divesity space is created
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

SAR guided optimization of potency

A
  • Functional groups roles in roles are examined and can be changed to determine their contribution towards binding
  • general focus is to define a chemical class with a tractable SAR relationship, develope new IP, develop suitable ADME and PK parameters from early proof of concept experiments in cellular and animal models
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Ways in which to modify hits

A
  • Modify the periphery, functionalize so groups can easily be attatched
  • Modify the core
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Chemical Modifications which can be used to improve potency

A
  • Increasing SP3 content- improves selectivity (but adds chirality) and solubility
  • Cyclisization, conformational lock: Pharmacophores are held into place

Steric Bias i.e. adding a methyl group to select for the more potent conformer

17
Q

Systematic exposure

A

Desires: 10-20 h which aproximates 3-7 hours in rat ans 2-4 in mouse

18
Q

Improving permeability

A
  • Remove ionic groups/modulate pKa
  • Reduce PSA
  • Increase LogP (only if very low)
  • Retain solubility
19
Q

Short Half-Life

A
  • Verify Clearance: metabolism or transport: renal/liver/other
  • Determine metabolite ID via LCMS
  • Biosteric replacement
  • Reduce LogP
20
Q

Testing Solubility

A

Kinetic Solubility: Concentration at which a drug (added as DSMO) solution begins to ppt from aq buffer solution (pH = 6.5)

21
Q

Testing Permeability

A

Note: Papp-BA/Papp-AB > 2 => PGP substrate

22
Q

Phase 1 enzymes

A
  1. CYP-p450
  2. FMO
  3. MOA
  4. Esterases and amidases
  5. Alcohol Dehydrogenase
23
Q

Phase 2 enzymes:

A
  1. UGT
  2. ST
  3. Acetyl- Transferase
  4. Gluthathione-S-Transferase
24
Q

Aromatic Oxidation

A

Remedy: Replace H with F (bioistere) or CH with N

25
Q

Methy and Alkyl group oxidation

A

Remedy: Flouro-bioestere or deuterium

26
Q

Ester/Amide hydolrysis

27
Q

Dealkylation

28
Q

Vd

A

Increasing Vd will increase (T1/2)

Anionic drugs: Show high plasma protein binding, are confined to body water

Neutral drugs: Show even distribution: moderate Vd, increases with lipophilicity

Basic Cationic Drugs: Show high tissue binding: High Vd > 8 L/kg

To improve Vd, acid/anions can be replaced with higher pKa biosteres