History of Court System Flashcards
The definition and role of the Nigerian Judiciaty
Before discussing the history of court systems, it is best to give an overview of the definition of judiciary and the role it plays in society.
What is the major problem faced when discussing the history of Court System
The answer is this. That it doesn’t have a uniform pattern of development. This is because of its diverse culture.
The development of the court system is divided into 3 parts, which are?
Pre Colonial era
Colonial era
Post Colonial era
The origin of the Nigerian Court System can be traced to a time preceding the arrival of the British with regions that now constitute the nation. True or False
True
How does history account for this?
It states that before the 19th century, each of these regions possessed an established framework of judicial administration. This was prior to the emergence of Colonial governance and the merging of northern and southern Nigerian protectorate that lays the foundation for the present day Nigeria.
What was the system of administration in play under the pre Colonial era?
Under this era, they existed different kingdoms and empire this in their own right, was their government administration.
What was its status under international law
This administration were not called countries because they were not governed on the model of the West parlia system. There were also certain things under international law that aided the invasion of European powers into existing territories that were now governed by non European authorities.
What was the status of the judiciary under these administration
The judiciary installed was dictated by its historical past, political structure, and socio cultural values.
Did they all aim at doing justice in the modern sense
No. They aimed at rather maintaining peace and order, the promotion of social welfare, and the sustainability of social equilibrium in society concerned.
What was the prime motive then?
This was in the resolution of disputant, ensuring they deliver justice that makes no one superior or superior to the other.
How can the political structure be classified
It is classed in different ways. We have monarchical amd republican, we have chiefly and chiefless, we have a centrally and non centrally organised state.
What was a remarkable feature of these administration
This was in the absence of clear demarcation between executive, legislative, and judiciary functions.
What was the status of the monarchical state?
They had an order of hierarchy where at the head we have Oba and Emir. Assisted by their council of chiefs. There was delegation of powers to chiefs and village heads.
How was the judiciary organised in a monarchical system
The village heads and chiefs were to settle minor disputes within their areas of authority while appeals went to the obas and emirs. They had their own separate court for determination of more serious issues against the state. It was also the last resort to justice and was duly constituted of the emir, Obas, and his council of chiefs.
How about judicial administration under the republican state?
This was prevalent in the igbo parts of Nigeria and part of the Middle East. There were no recognized heads as such. Thus, each clan was governed by a council of elders constituted of adult male members. It was these members that exercised judicial control in the society.
What of traditional religious institutions and beliefs
They also helped in the sustenance of the adjudicatory system.