History of Cognition Flashcards
With what disciplines deals cognitive psychology?
- Mind
- Behaviour
- Behaviour
What is the mind?
- Fire
- Spirit
- Soul
- Consciousness
- Intellect
- Anima (Greeks)
- Ātman (Hindu Philosophy)
- Dasein (German Philosophy)
- Experience
There is no good definition of cognition because it depends on the philosophical stance of the respondent.
What can we say in general?
Cognition is about knowing.
Inherently a relation between the knower and the known.
Who dominated the Pre-Socratic philosophy?
Heraclitus (500 BC):
- Things are constantly changing
- Universal flux; A reality exists and persists by virtue of constant change of its parts
- You can step in the same river, but not the same water
Parmenides of Elea (5th century BC):
- Wrote a complex metaphysical poem
- Universal stasis; to exist is not to change
How did Aristotle ( 384-322 BCE) influence cognitive theory ?
- Devices a method of correct reasoning-logic: - an argument in which, when certain things are laid down, something else follows of necessity in their virtue of their being so
- Deductive Reasoning- Syllogisms
- Required the conviction of universal constants or truths
Associationism involves Aristotle‘s law on remembrance and recall.
Which 4 components does it contain?
- The law of contiguity (Things or er events that occur close to each other in space or time tend to get linked together in the mind)
- The law of frequency (The more often two things or events are linked, the more powerful will be the association)
- The law of similarity (If two things are similar, the thought of one will tend ti trigger the thought of the other)
- The law of contrast (Seeing or recalling something may also trigger the recollection of something completely opposite)
What did René Descartes (1596-1650),
who was a catholic rationalist who wanted to establish a foundation for the true and certain knowledge, state sbout the perceived world?
‚So after considering everything thoroughly, I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived by my mind‘ (Meditation 2, AT 7:25).
How did Descartes (1596-1650) create the mind-body-problem?
He said that:
- The ‚I‘ is durable - soul / cogito / mind
- Mental phenomena and the physical structures on which they depend seem qualitatively different
- The mental and the physical are made of different stuff - dualist approach
- but they do interact!
—> this creates the mind-body problem for subtance dualism
Descartes (1596-1650) viewed the body as a mechanical system, an automata, that obeys physical laws.
It was not until Isaac Newton (1642-1727) that these physical laws were described. What became the question then?
The question becomes ‚What are the laws for the mental world?‘
This would be the first and foremost question for the scientific field, called psychology.
How was Empiricism developed?
- John Locke (1632-1704, English)
- George Berkley (1685-1753, Irish)
- David Hume (1711-1776, Scottish)
—> Contrary to Descartes, all knowledge is seen as grounded in the experience of the world mediated by senses; knowledge through engagement with the world
What is Molyneux’s question?
‘Suppose a man born blind, and now adult, and taught by his touch to distinguish between a cube, and a sphere of the same metal, and nighly of the same bigness, so as to tell, when he felt one and t’other, which is the cube, which is the sphere.
Suppose then the cube and the sphere placed on a table, and the blind man to be made to see. Quære, whether by his sight, before he touched them, he could now distinguish, and tell, which is the globe, which is the cube (Locke, 1694/1979).’
What happened to Associationism during the Enlightenment?
- Associations were seen as part of passive reason, not active reason, such as abstraction
- Locke assumed that complex ideas form for associating simple ideas and simple reflections
- Hume: all coherence are due to laws of resemblance and contiguity
What are the keypoints of Rationalism and Empiricism?
Rationalism:
- Innate knowledge
- Reason and deduction
- Certainty
- a priori
Empiricism:
- Tabala rasa
- Inference and induction
- Tentative knowledge
- a posteriori
How did Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) attempt to synthesise the insights of the rationalist and empiricist views?
- Regarded space and time as a priori of experience, and grounding the notion of cause and effect
- The natural laws can not be applied to living creatures, including humans
- Therefore psychology as a science is not possible
Kant agreed with the scepticism about what the senses provide and therefore we can never know about the world itself, as all information is relayed through our senses. Thus, there is no direct knowledge of the world. Any knowledge that is gathered is limited by the person’s senses. Even when using sophisticated equipment, reading the measurements still requires the senses. The objective study of the mind, in the same way as physics is an objective science, it is not possible.
What does Kant’s in regards to psychology as a transcendental subject state?
- We can never know about the world in itself, as all information is relayed through our senses
- There is no direct knowledge of the world
- Any knowledge is limited by the person’s senses
- Objective study of the mind impossible