History And Approaches Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
0
Q

who is william james

A

William James (1842 - 1910) was a psychologist and philosopher, and was recognized for writing the Principles of Psychology, which is considered to be a monumental work in the history of psychology.

James is known for the James-Lange Theory of Emotion, which he formulated independently of Carl Lange. According to the theory, an emotion is simply the mind’s interpretation of certain physiological processes that occur as a response to certain stimuli.

One of James’ most famous examples is that when we see a bear, we do not run because we are afraid. According to James, we see a bear and then we run, and that is why we are afraid. His explanation is that when exposed to a stimulus such as a bear, our nervous system reacts with an increased heart rate, a rush of adrenaline, or muscle tension, and our perception of those changes is what is referred to as emotion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Who is Wilhelm Wundt

A

Wilhelm Wundt (1832 - 1930) is known as the “Founder of Modern Psychology” and the “Father of Experimental Psychology”. He established the first laboratory in the world that was dedicated to Experimental Psychology, particularly investigations on the senses and perceptions.

Wundt used the method of Introspection to investigate psychological phenomena. This involved the subject’s observation and reporting of his own inner thoughts and sensations, and was very difficult to master.

Although Wundt’s theories and methods fell out of favor in the 1920’s, his greatest contribution was to demonstrate that psychology could become a true science.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the definition of psychology

A

Psychology is the scientific study of behavior and mental processes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is introspection

A

The process of “looking inward” and examining one’s self and one’s own actions in order to gain insight. This was a central component to the early days of psychology during the Structuralist period. Wundt and other psychologists had people introspect and then report on their feelings, thoughts, etc. Of course, the problem with introspection is, if you are having some feeling and then you have to stop to think about and report on the feeling, you’ve just changed the experience and therefore, the feeling itself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is structuralism

A

Structuralism was a school of thought that sought to identify the components (structure) of the mind (the mind was the key element to psychology at this point). Structuralists believed that the way to learn about the brain and its functions was to break the mind down into its most basic elements. They believed, the whole is equal to the sum of the parts.

Wilhelm Wundt, who is considered the pioneer Structuralist, set up the very first psychological laboratory in 1879. Following Wundt was Titchner who popularized the field (he was one of Wundt’s students). TItchner was interested in the conscious mind. He used a technique called introspection to try to understand the conscious mind. Introspection is a process of having a person “look inward”, focus on, and try to understand the emotion or thought they are experiencing at that moment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is functionalism

A

Functionalism was the psychological school of thought that followed Structuralism and moved away from focusing on the structure of the mind to a concern with how the conscious is related to behavior… How does the mind affect what people do? One of the major proponents of Functionalism was Thorndike (created the ever-popular puzzle box) who studied the primary issue of functionalism…WHAT FUNCTION DOES A BEHAVIOR HAVE. In addition, this school of thought focused on observable events as opposed to unobservable events (like what goes on in someone’s mind).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is biopsychology/neuroscience

A

The scientific field of study that examines the relationships between biology and psychology, and how they influence behavior and cognition.

For example, biopsychology examines topics such as how your eyes are able to inform your brain what you are reading, how the brain interprets this information, and how your brain communicates with your hand to move the mouse and click on different links.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what dose evolutionary mean

A

According to the Center for Evolutionary Psychology, Evolutionary Psychology is “an approach to psychology, in which knowledge and principles from evolutionary biology are put to use in research on the structure of the human mind. It is not an area of study, like vision, reasoning, or social behavior. It is a way of thinking about psychology that can be applied to any topic within it. In this view, the mind is a set of information-processing machines that were designed by natural selection to solve adaptive problems faced by our hunter-gatherer ancestors.” As such, this field really examines natural selection and how it favors behaviors that help keep a species going from one generation to the next.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is psychoanalytic

A

The psychoanalytic approach focuses on the importance of the unconscious mind (not the conscious mind). In other words, psychoanalytic perspective dictates that behavior is determined by your past experiences that are left in the Unconscious Mind (people are unaware of them). This perspective is still based on Freud’s psychoanalytic perspective about early experiences being so influential on current behavior, but the focus on sex is not as great.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What dose behavioral mean

A

The behavioral approach was founded by John B. Watson and originally rejected the study of mental processes in favor of the study of overt behavior (observable behavior) and external factors - study of observable events. The behaviorists believed all behavior was determined by stimuli in the environment. Today, this approach still stresses the importance of the environment on behavior, but also allows for inclusion of cognitive processes and feelings (early behaviorists rejected cognition in the study of behavior).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What dose humanistic mean

A

This is the psychological perspective popularized by Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow (hierarchy of needs) that emphasizes the human capacity for choice and growth. The overriding assumption is that humans have free will and are not simply fated to behave in specific ways or are zombies blindly reacting to their environments. So, the Humanists stated that the subject matter or psychology (what psychology should focus on) is the human subjective experience of the world - how humans experience things, why they experience things, etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What dose cognitive mean

A

All the mental activities associated with thinking, knowing, and remembering. As you can tell, any of your ideas, thoughts, memories, etc., are all types of cognitive processes. What you are doing (reading and learning this explanation) is a type of cognition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What dose social cultural mean

A

The socio-cultural approach is based on the idea that society and culture shape cognition. Social customs, beliefs, values, and language are all part of what shapes a person’s identity and reality. According to this approach, what a person thinks is based on his or her socio-cultural background. A socio-cultural approach takes into account more than the individual in attempting to understand cognitive processes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Hindsight bias

A

the tendency to believe, once the outcome is already known of course, that you would have forseen it…that even though it’s over and you know the outcome, you knew it all along.

Are you a Monday-morning quarterback? Have you heard the expression “hindsight is 20-20”? Have you ever said, “I knew it all along” after something happened?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Overconfidence

A

refers to the tendency to be very sure of a fact and later finding that the objective reality was different. It remains to be studied how personality and mental abilities affect this Overconfidence, but tests show that when asked difficult questions about an unfamiliar topic, individuals believe they will have a low percentage of errors when they actually end up with a lot more mistakes.

A person who thinks his sense of direction is much better than it actually is. The person could show his overconfidence by going on a long trip without a map and refusing to ask for directions if he gets lost along the way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Scientific method

A

The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step procedure psychologists use when conducting research. By following these specific steps, psychologists seek cause and effect relationships which means that they can be certain (at least have a high level of confidence) that one variable causes an effect on another variable and that the results of the study are caused by the variable being studied and not some other, outside (extraneous) variables.

The steps to the scientific method include describing the topic of study, making predictions (hypotheses), select a method for the study, controlling external variables, collecting data (running the study), analyzing & explaining the findings, and reporting & sharing the findings (usually via publication or lecturing). There are variations but these are the basic steps in the scientific method.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Hypothesis

A

testable prediction about the relationship between at least two events, characteristics, or variables. Hypotheses usually come from theories; when planning an experiment, a researcher finds as much previous research on the topic of study as possible. From all of the previous work, the researcher can develop a theory about the topic of study and then make specific predictions about the study he/she is planning. It is important to note that hypotheses should be as specific as possible since you are trying to find truth, and the more vague your hypotheses, the more vague your conclusions.

For example, if I am conducting a study on the effects of different drugs on pain relief, it would be bad to hypothesize that “one drug will have an effect on pain.” What the heck does that mean? How can you test to find out if that is true? A better hypothesis might be, “Drug A (whatever that is in that study) will reduce the amount of pain significantly more than Drug B according to participants’ ratings of pain using the Pain Intensity Scale.”

Related term of interest: Null Hypothesis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Operational

A

A statement of the procedures or ways in which a researcher is going to measure behaviors or qualities. For example, let’s say you wanted measure and define “life change”. You could do this by giving people the Social Readjustment Rating Scale and then operationally define “life change” as the score on the social readjustment rating scale.

18
Q

Replication

A

Getting some results in one research study is nice, but as scientists we like to make sure of the findings. To be more sure we replicate studies, which means that the study is conducted again in the same way but using different participants. This allows us to retest the subject matter and also to find out if the results can generalize to other participants and maybe even other situations.

19
Q

Case study

A

A case study is one type of observational data collection technique in which one individual is studied in-depth in order to identify behavioral, emotional, and/or cognitive qualities that are universally true, on average, of others. Case studies often include face-to-face interviews, paper and pencil tests, and more.

20
Q

Survey

A

A survey is a method for collecting information or data as reported by individuals. This is a type of data collection known as self-report data, which means that individuals complete the survey (or provide the information) themselves. For example, if I wanted to collect information about what classes students enjoy the most, I might create a survey (has different types of questions on it pertaining to enjoyment of classes), pass it out to lots of students and ask them to complete it. The students respond to the questions themselves and then give the data back to me.

21
Q

Wording effect

A

when even subtle changes in the order or wording of questions can have major effects. Asking questions is tricky and the response you get may depend on how you worded your question.

22
Q

Sampling

A

In statistics, a sample is a subset of a population that is used to represent the entire group as a whole. When doing research, it is often impractical to survey every member of a particular population because the sheer number of people is simply too large.

23
Q

Representative sampling

A

When conducting a study, a researcher selects a relatively small group of participants (a sample) from an entire population of all possible participants (for example, selecting college students at a couple of colleges from all college students in the world). Ideally, the researcher would have participants with characteristics that closely match the characteristics of the whole population - this is called having a Representative Sample.

For example, imagine you are at the supermarket picking out grapes. There are red, green, small, large, and globe grapes. In a representative sample you would have an equivalent number of each type of grape. You could then taste them all and make generalizations about all grapes just from tasting these few because your sample represents the larger population.

24
Q

Population

A

When conducting research there are lots of factors to consider. Psychologists may want to study, for example, the effect of some new test on all college students, but this is obviously not possible. Instead, what they do is test on a sample or a smaller group of college students. In this example, everyone who could possibly be a participant in the study (meaning, all college students) is part of the population. College students would be the population the researcher wants to study and from which they select a sample.

25
Q

Random sample

A

Since researchers can’t study every person in the world that is of interest to them, they need to study a subset of this entire population, also known as a sample. Then, people are picked from this sample “at random” to participate in the study. It is hoped that the random sample will be representative of the entire population. Often researchers use random numbers table to help them pick participants at random (take a look in the back of your introductory psychology textbook. I bet it has a random numbers table).

26
Q

Naturalistic observation

A

Naturalistic observation is a research method commonly used by psychologists and other social scientists. This technique involves observing subjects in their natural environment. This type of research is often utilized in situations where conducting lab research is unrealistic, cost prohibitive or would unduly affect the subject’s behavior.

27
Q

Correlation

A

A correlation is a statistical index used to represent the strength of a relationship between two factors, how much and in what way those factors vary, and how well one factor can predict the other. Using correlations does NOT (I repeat, does not) provide you with cause and effect information; it will not tell you if one factor causes or is caused by the other.

This fact was an important component in the court cases against the tobacco companies that occurred in the late 1990’s. The studies conducted previously on the effects of smoking indicated a positive correlation between smoking and cancer. This means that the studies found that as the rate of smoking increased, so did the occurrence of cancer; smoking goes up, presence of cancer goes up. BUT, this does not demonstrate that smoking causes cancer (does anyone disagree that it does?), only that there is a relationship between the two factors.

28
Q

Correlation Coefficient

A

This is a measure of the direction (positive or negative) and extent (range of a correlation coefficient is from -1 to +1) of the relationship between two sets of scores. Scores with a positive correlation coefficient go up and down together (as with smoking and cancer). A negative correlation coefficient indicates that as one score increases, the other score decreases (as in the relationship between self-esteem and depression; as self-esteem increases, the rate of depression decreases).

29
Q

Positive correlation

A

A Positive Correlation is a steady relationship between two variables in the same direction, meaning that as the value of one variable increases, the value of the other increases as well. (And as the value of one variable decreases, so does the other).

For example, a child’s income level and his or her performance in school are positively correlated; children from wealthier or more financially stable homes tend to do better in school.

30
Q

Negative correlation

A

A negative correlation is an inverse relationship between two variables, meaning that as the value of one variable increases, the value of the other decreases. For example, the number of classes a student misses is negatively correlated with his or her class grade. As Jason skips more classes, his grades will worsen.

31
Q

Scatter plot

A

Also known as scatter diagram or scatter graph, a scatterplot is a visual representation of the relationships or associations between two numerical variables, which are represented as points (or dots), each plotted at a horizontal axis (y-axis) and vertical axis (y-axis). In other words, it looks like a bunch of dots on a graph rather than lines or bars on a graph.

A scatterplot does not identify variables as dependent or independent, as any type of variable can be plotted on either axis.

The scatterplot is used to determine the three most common kinds of relationships: positive or rising, negative or falling, and no relationship. For example, in order to determine the relationship of water consumption and jogging, a researcher could select a group of participants to find out how much water is consumed (first variable plotted on y-axis) and how long has each participant has been jogging (second variable to be plotted on the x-axis). If a participant consumes 50 ounces and jogs for 45 minutes, this would be represented by one dot plotted at coordinates (50, 45).

After all the participants’ dots have been plotted, the researcher can see a visual representation of the kind of relationship or association that exists between the two variables.

32
Q

Illusory correlation

A

Sometimes people believe there is some relationship between events, variables, etc., even though none really exists. This is known as the illusory correlation and it occurs in everyday life as well as science.

example, you may have had some experiences with lawyers, some good, some not so good. It is possible that you only recall the bad experiences (maybe where you felt as though you were lied to by the lawyers) which leads you to formulate the conclusion that all lawyers are liars. Thus, you could come to associate (wrongly?) lawyers with lying, and conclude that all lawyers are liars.

33
Q

Operational definition

A

A statement of the procedures or ways in which a researcher is going to measure behaviors or qualities. For example, let’s say you wanted measure and define “life change”. You could do this by giving people the Social Readjustment Rating Scale and then operationally define “life change” as the score on the social readjustment rating scale.

34
Q

Replication

A

Getting some results in one research study is nice, but as scientists we like to make sure of the findings. To be more sure we replicate studies, which means that the study is conducted again in the same way but using different participants. This allows us to retest the subject matter and also to find out if the results can generalize to other participants and maybe even other situations.

35
Q

Experiment

A

One type of research method in which the investigator manipulates one or more independent variables (IV) to determine the effect(s) on some behavior (the dependent variable) while controlling other relevant factors. There are two types of experiments, the true experiment and the quasi experiment. A true experiment occurs when the investigator does two things: 1) randomly assigns participants to groups (e.g., experimental and control); and 2) manipulates at least one IV. A quasi experiment is almost the same, except now there is no random assignment of participants to groups; only manipulation of the IV. In order to reach “cause and effect” conclusions about the effect of the IV on the DV, you must use a true experiment.

36
Q

Placebo effect

A

A placebo is any substance that is not known to have any pharmacological effects (produces no meaningful changes in an oranism, either chemical, biological, etc.) that is made to look like an active (“real”) drug. Sometimes the act of taking a pill produces an effect if the person believes the pill is active. To compensate for this, scientists often give placebos to determine if an effect is due to the “real” drug or from the act of just taking a pill. For additional information, see Control Condition.

37
Q

Double-blind procedure

A

Double-Blind Procedure (also known as Double Blind Control) This is one type of experimental procedure in which both the patient and the staff are ignorant (blind) as to the condition (or group) that the participant is in. This would make it impossible for the participant or researcher to know if the participant is receiving the treatment (for example a drug) or a placebo. This type of design is commonly used in drug evaluation studies, and is used to prevent the researchers from acting differently to people in one group, or from giving the participant any information that could make them act and/or behave unnaturally.

38
Q

Expirment group

A

During many experiments, researchers often include treatment groups (the groups that are given the treatment/IV)

example, if I am studying the effects of 2 different pain medications of headaches, I may give people who have headaches (the treatment groups) either Tylenol or Bayer (these are the levels of the IV). I can then wait one hour and ask participants to rate the level of pain they are experiencing. If the amount of pain in one group goes down significantly more than the other, I may conclude that one medication is more effective than the other in reducing headache pain. However, I can’t say that either are more effective than giving nothing at all. Maybe there was a placebo effect, and simply getting a pill made people believe their pain was reduced. So, I could include another group - a control group - which is treated and exposed to everything the other groups are except that they are given a placebo (maybe a sugar pill) instead of either Tylenol or Bayer. (Also see Experimental Condition).

39
Q

Control group

A

control group, which is identical to the treatment group in every single way except that the control group does not get the treatment/IV. In this way, the researcher can study effect(s) of the treatment thoroughly.

Application In this experiment two groups of rats are tested on their memory abilities. The control group rats are the ones that are not trained to exercise on the treadmill. The experimenter compares memory retention differences between the trained rats and the non-trained rats (the control group) and their ability to retain information. As it can be observed, both groups of rats are identical and the only difference is the training process

40
Q

Random assignment

A

Random assignment of participants to experimental conditions is a commonly used experimental technique to help ensure that the treatment group and the control group are the same before treatment.

example, let us assume that we’re curious to know the effects of eating an apple a day on your health (measured by blood pressure). One way of designing the study would be to select a sample of people and divide them into a control group (i.e., those who don’t have an apple a day) and a treatment group (i.e., those who do have an apple a day). How do you decide to divide your subjects? The best way is to do it randomly in order to cancel out the idiosyncrasies of your subject pool. Imagine if you decided to choose the groups based on cholesterol intake. You decide to have the low cholesterol group in the control group and the high cholesterol group in the treatment group. Would this bias the results of your study? Yes. Since cholesterol affects blood pressure, you as an experimenter would not know if the changes in health were due to the apple a day or the amount of cholesterol intake.

41
Q

Dependent variable

A

In an experiment there are two variables; the independent variable (IV) and the dependent variable (DV). In the most basic sense, you need two variables because as a researcher, you want to be able to examine if something (a drug, a therapy, a teaching technique, whatever) has an effect on some participant (person, people, animals, etc.). To accomplish this, you not only need something to examine (and manipulate - this is the IV), but also something to measure the effect the IV has (this is the DV). Thus, we can define the DV as the variable that is being measured. It is this variable that we, as the researchers, look at for change. IF there is a change, we may conclude that the IV affected the DV. The ultimate here is to establish that the IV caused the change in the DV (this is the magical “cause-effect” relationship).

42
Q

Independent variable

A

In an experiment there are two variables; the Independent Variable (IV) and the Dependent Variable (DV). In the most basic sense, you need two variables because as a researcher, you want to be able to examine if something (a drug, a therapy, a teaching technique, whatever) has an effect on some participant (person, people, animals, etc.). To accomplish this, you need to have something to examine (and manipulate – this is the IV); some variable of interest, as well as something to measure the effect the IV has (this is the DV). Therefore, we can define the independent variable as the experimental variable or variable that is manipulated by the research and has some effect on the DV. If there is a change or effect, we may conclude that the IV affected the DV. The ultimate here is to establish that the IV caused the change in the DV (this is the magical “cause-effect”). As a quick example, if you want to study the effect of drinking 12 ounces of beer before an exam on exam performance, the beer would be the IV (we may have one treatment group whose participants drink the beer and one control group who does not drink the beer); the performance on the exam would be the DV.

43
Q

Confounding variable

A

A Confounding Variable is an extraneous variable whose presence affects the variables being studied so that the results you get do not reflect the actual relationship between the variables under investigation. When conducting an experiment, the basic question that any experimenter is asking is: “How does A affect B?” where A is the probable cause, and B is the effect. Any manipulation of A is expected to result in a change in the effect.

For example, you want to study whether bottle-feeding (Cause) is related to an increased risk of diarrhea in infants (Effect). It would seem logical that bottle-fed infants are more prone to diarrhea since water and the bottle could get contaminated, milk could go bad, etc. But if you were to conduct this study, you would learn that bottle-fed infants are less likely to develop diarrhea than breast-fed infants. It would seem that bottle-feeding actually protected against the illness. But in truth, you would have missed a very important confounding variable - mother’s education.

If you take mother’s education into account, you would learn that better-educated mothers are more likely to bottle-feed their infants, who are also less likely to develop diarrhea due to better hygienic practices of the mothers. In other words, mother’s education is related to both the Cause and the Effect. Not only did the Confounding Variable suppress the effect of bottle-feeding, it even appeared to reverse it - confounding results, indeed!

This example illustrates the importance of identifying and controlling for possible Confounding Variables in any research study. A thorough review of available literature should help you do this.