Historical Geography of Globalisation Flashcards
How is the Anthropocene (Crutzen) conveyed to the lay public?
Using “statistical picturing”
What are 4 critiques of the Anthropocene?
1) Humanity is not homogenous in causing the Anthropocene
2) Start often viewed as the industrial revolution (by Crutzen himself - date?), not before then
3) Human impacts have been bloodless and only with environmental consequences
4) By focussing on humans, it gives them power and agency. A “Human supremacy complex” - not non-human changes
When is something assetized?
When an object/material is turned into commercial resource
What are some alternatives to the Anthropocene?
- Pyrocene (Pyne 2015) - advent of fire marked the start
- Manthropocene (Raworth 2014) - male dominated
- Capitalocene (Patel and Moore 2018)
- Plantationocene (Haraway)
When did Marx (1854) say capitalism started?
Upon the discovery of gold and silver in America, commercialising natural resources
How does David Harvey view the self-reinforcing nature of capitalism?
The Spatial fix (2001, 2003) of capital, always trying to find cheap things to exploit
How did Karl Polanyi (1944) view land?
- Means different things to different people
- Land a “fictitious commodity” under capitalism
- “Land is another name for nature”
- Bought, sold and used for profit
- Land, labour and money cannot be physically made, yet they become commodities to fulfil the wider mechanism of the market economy
(Polanyi 1944)
Did forced commodification of land and labour only take place in the new world?
No, also happened in Europe, but at a much slower rate (hundreds of years, instead of years or decades)
Polanyi 1944)
What interesting points(/predictions) did Karl Polanyi make in ‘The great transformation’?
- Complete marketisation incompatible with genuine democracy
- Complete marketisation would be socially and environmentally detrimental
What are Polanyi’s 3 fictitious commodities?
1) Labour
2) Land
3) Money
Polanyi 2944
What was a major consequence of land being fictitiously commercialised?
The soil was commercialised too (Polanyi 1944). Link to Marx and the way this commercialisation drained the soil of its nutrients
When was society embedded and dis-embedded?
Embedded first, then dis-embedded under capitalism
Who coined the terms “inner” and “outer commons”? What is the difference?
Alan Greer (2018)
- Inner commons found within the manor, containing arable land
- Outer commons outside land belonging to nobility, on infertile, hostile landscapes. Foraging practices
Were the commons a place?
The commons had a spatial dimension, however, Peter Linebaugh (2018) saw them more as a practice involving the shared distribution of goods in a shared space
What were 3 principles of the commons system?
1) Mutual aid (link to Kropotkin) - Christianity driven
2) “Subsistence first”
3) “Affluence without abundance”
What was the main purpose of enclosures?
To make exchange value for markets and profits, not use value for mutual benefit
What, according John Locke, makes land productive?
- Labour, allows more to be gained per input
- Control over land (property) means control over workers too (extension)
Locke (Analysed extensively in Greer 2018)
What was “the pale” in Ireland?
- The land owned by the King of England
- Area found outside of the pale called “beyond the pale” - uncivilised
How did property influence social relations?
People who owned property became proprietors, leaving an underclass of people without any land
How was land ownership proclaimed in the new world?
- Ceremonies using flags and parades (Columbus)
- Twig and soil for British in Newfoundland. Organic
- Wooden stakes to mark boundaries (continues today), showing that the landscape was materially privatised. Without markers land was unowned and wasted
Was the colonisation of the new world an anthropocentric story?
No, animals also played a part in:
- Columbian exchange (CITATION)
- Animal expansion across the new word (Melville 1994 for USA; Greer 2017 for whole New World
Who has written about war capitalism?
Moore 2010 and Klein 2007
Why is labour geographically important?
Complements land to make it productive (Locke)
What is ‘war capitalism’?
Capitalism based on slavery and plundering
Was empire more important than manufacturing industries during 19th C?
Find info on this
In what ways were factories organised?
- Division of labour
- Workers developed key skills
- Corporeal connections, allowing machines to work
- Discipline and distributions in Foucault 1975
What is an important “take-away message” from E.P. Thompson’s work on time?
- Time no longer passed, but spent. It became currency during the industrial revolution and rise of factory work
- Natures timepiece no longer used, now determined by employers and the marketplace
- Similar points in Foucault 1975
How was nature used by philanthropic factory owners?
- Nature used to socially reproduce labour. One of the few leisure activities allowed, but still time-controlled (E.P. Thompson 1967?)
- Exertion of biopower (Foucault 1971)
Was time the only way of disciplining workers?
No, also space
- Factories became the “Territories of capitalism” (Sack 1986)
- Space was organised in accordance to the division of labour (Foucault, 1975)
- Spatial organisation normalised. Workers made to ignore it
How can factories be described?
The “territories of capitalism”
Is forced labour only present in capitalist systems? Does all of capitalism force labour?
Not really, other systems (authoritarian communism) do the same. Some more socially democratic forms of capitalism have moral benefits
What are affordances?
- The actions made possible by a person and an object
- Objects have an affordance
- A bundle of wood screwed together becomes a chair when a person sits on it
- Human use converts an object into use value
- Objects can have multiple affordances
What is an example of a crop with multiple affordances?
The potato (Nally and Kearns 2020)
How were potatoes viewed differently by natives and Spanish colonisers in Latin America?
- Potatoes part of culture in agrarian lifestyle of Native inhabitants in Latin America. Mutually used
- Spanish viewed land, objects and inhabitants to be put to work to make profit, including potatoes
- Potato cheap food for war capitalism (Patel and Moore, 2018)
(Nally and Kearns 2020)
What two reasons were potatoes brought to Europe during the 16th century?
1) Warfare (specifically 30 years war)
2) Changing politics of land and property (enclosures)
(Nally and Kearns 2020)
Why were potatoes used in the 30 years war as food?
Small plants, occupying a small space, and with the edible root found underground, allowing them to evade detection (also in Ireland during “scorched earth tactics”)
(Nally and Kearns 2020)