Hiebert 2003 TIMSS Highlights *come back to this* Flashcards
1
Q
When this study was conducted, US, 8th graders, were on average, among the top scoring in MAth in the US
A
False
2
Q
The authors found that if you want your students to perform well on maths tests, you must teach
A
as they do in Japan.
3
Q
What are the key concepts in what we read?
A
4
Q
What question(s) did the author(s) set out to answer?
A
5
Q
How did the author(s) go about studying their research question(s)?
A
6
Q
Major Finding 1
A
- All countries share a number of teaching features
- Most lessons included both whole class and individual work
7
Q
Major finding 2
A
- High-achieving countries teach mathematics in different ways (i.e variation among high-achieving countries)
- for example
- Time Spent per problem: average of 2 (Netherlands) to 15 (Japan) minutes
- % of problems presented in real-life contexts (high in Netherlands, low in Japan)
8
Q
Major finding 3
A
- High-achieving countries share a few, potentially important features
- All the higher-achieving countries (except for Cz) spent more time working on new content than reviewing old content
- When teachers present problem that suggest connections will be made,they rearley follow through wiht that
9
Q
Why should we care?
A
- The US could be doing better than it actually is
- US teaching practices might also profit from improvement
- High achieving countries are a source of ideas
- Spend less time reviewing
- spend more time making connections
- caveat: teaching is a system
10
Q
What do we get out of international studies
A
- Reveal one’s own practices more clearly
- Discover new alternatives
- Stimulate discussion about choices
- Construct more informed hypotheses about teaching and its effects
11
Q
TIMS (Third International Math and Science Study) → (Trends International Math and Science Study)
A
- Monitors:
- Students’ achievement + students home, school, and classroom contexts
- 4th and 8th grades
- continues to be administered every 4 years
12
Q
Coding Goal
A
- Develop a reliable way of analyzing the lessons that would capture both the similarities and differences especially those that might influence students’ mathematics learning
- Focus influenced by
- Prior research [”top down” / deductive ]
- suggestions by math educators and cultural insiders [”top down” / deductive ]
- Observations of the videos, themselves [”bottom up” / inductive ]