Helping others - (week 8) Flashcards
Prosocial behaviours
Actions intended to benefit others
Altruism
Concern, performed without expectation of gain
What is an example of helping others experiment?
“Flat Tyre Experiment” - modelling of helpful behaviours.
Control VS experimental group
Those exposed to a model, (a man who had previously helped woman change a tyre), increased altruism. Those exposed to a model, were 50% more likely to help the woman change her tyre.
Conclusion: we learn through vicarious experiences
THEORY: based on Bandura’s social learning theory
“Epileptic seizure” experiment - % of helping others decreased in the presence of random others. Helping increased when alone.
Describe the factors to helping
Attribution = helpful people, or perceiving self as a helpful person, will increase helping behaviours
Norms = reciprocity norms (expectations), social responsibility norm (help people in need).
Obligation to help = in some cultures, it is expected
What is the role of empathy and arousal in helping others?
We may experience empathy for others, and particularly similar others, which might drive our intentions to help. Having compassion, and understanding the other’s perspective.
Role of arousal = arousal puts us in a state where we become motivated to help + empathy
What is altruism? Describe the theory of empathy-altrusim.
Altruism means to improve another’s welfare VS egoism (to improve own welfare)
EMPATHY-ALTRUISM hypothesis = empathic concern for a person in need, produces an altruistic motive for helping
What factors might influence helping behaviours?
The bystander effect = presence of others might reduce or motivation to help.
Describe the steps in Latane and Darley’s cognitive model to helping (the decision process to helping).
Step 1: must notice something is happening
Step 2: must interpret this as an emergency - ambiguity “is she really sick or just drunk?”
Step 3: must take responsibility to help
Step 4: decide how to help
Step 5: provide help
(Latane & Darley)
Provide an example of another experiment of helping others, by Latane and Darley
“Smoke filled room” experiment = 3 participants in a room completing a questionnaire. Smoke fills into the room. Participants look at others for what to do.
Results found that a much lower % of individuals tried to get help, without the presence of others.
Conclusion = presence of others decreases/ inhibits emergency responses.
What did results find from the “Falling Cabinet” experiment?
Again, a lower % helped in the presence of others. However, a significant finding was that the presence of friends, increased % of helping.