Hearsay Flashcards

1
Q

Hearsay Definition

A

An out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Hearsay: Statement

A

An oral or written assertion, or nonverbal conduct intended as an assertion

  • Non-human assertions are not statements (e.g. dog barking, radar gun reading)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Hearsay: Difference Between Exemption and Exception

A

Exemption: Deemed nonhearsay and thus admissible

Exception: Deemed hearsay, but still admitted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Hearsay: Witness’s Own Prior Out-of-Court Statements

A

CAN be hearsay, so an answer that a statement is not hearsay “because it is W’s own statement” is incorrect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Admissible Out-of-Court Statements

A

Statements:

  • of independent legal significance (i.e. that it was said, not whether it was true)
  • offerd to show speaker’s knowledge (i.e. that D knew crime was planned)
  • offered to show their effect on the listener or reader (i.e. notice to a party)
  • offered to show state of mind*
  • Circumstantial; in contrast to state of mind hearsay exception, which allows hearsay statements that reflect diretly on declarant’s state of mind
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Non-Hearsay Exemptions: Statement of a Party Opponent

A

Out-of-court statements by a party are admissible if offered against that party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Non-Hearsay Exemptions: Declarant-Witness’s Prior Statement

A

A prior statement by a declarant who testifies and is subject to cross-examination is admissible where the statement is either:

  • inconsistent with declarant’s testimony and given under oath
  • a prior consistent statement, or
  • a prior statement of identification after perception
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Non-Hearsay Exemptions: Prior Consistent Statement

A

Admissible to rebut charge of fabrication, improper motive or influence, or rehabilitate credibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Non-Hearsay Exemptions: Prior Statement of Identification After Perception

A

Admissible to identify a person as someone declarant perceived earlier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly