health technology assessment (HTA) Flashcards

1
Q

how does WHO define health technology

A

a health technology is the application of organised knowledge and skills in the form of devices, medicines, vaccines, procedures and systems developed to solve a health problem and improve QoL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are some ways to describe health technology

A
  1. physical nature
    - drugs
    - biologics (vaccines, blood products, CTGTP)
    - devices, equipments, supplies (cardiac pacemaker, MRI scanner, diagnostic test kits)
    - medical and surgical procedures (nutritional counselling, psychotherapy, acupuncture, coronary angiography, gallbladder removal, bariatric surgery)
    - public health programmes (immunisation programme, smoking prevention)
    - support systems (clinic laboratory, blood bank, electronic health record system, telemedicine system, drug formulary)
    - organisational and managerial systems (medication adherence programmes, prospective payment, alternative healthcare delivery configurations)
  2. healthcare purpose
    - prevention
    - screening
    - diagnostic
    - treatment
    - rehabilitation
    - palliation
  3. stage of diffusion or maturity
    - future (conceptual stage, anticipated or earliest stages)
    - experimental (undergoing bench or animal lab testing)
    - investigational (undergoing initial clinical evaluation)
    - established (considered by clinicians to be a standard approach)
    - obsolete, outmoded, abandoned (superseded by other technologies or demonstrated to be ineffective or harmful)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how does ACE define HTA

A

HTA is an established scientific research methodology to inform policy and clinical decision making on relatively new health technologies such as drugs, devices and medical services, compared to existing standard of care.

It is conducted using analytical frameworks drawing on clinical epidemiology and health economic information to determine how best to allocate healthcare resources.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are the dimensions that can be considered in determining value

A

through examining the intended and unintended consequences of using a health technology compared with existing alternatives

depending on the perspective taken, dimensions to examine may include
(i) clinical effectiveness
(ii) safety
(iii) costs
(iv) economic implication
(v) social, ethical, cultural, legal, organisational, environmental

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

in which point of the product lifecycle could HTA be applied

A

HTA can be applied throughout product lifecycle

  • innovation stage for horizon screening or early assessment
  • regulatory approval decisions
  • coverage and reimbursement
  • healthcare provider adoption decisions
  • assessing if ‘optimal’ use to determine need for disinvestment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are the two main questions and how are they used to classify the health technology

A
  1. how well does the new technology work compared to the established practice?
  2. how much does this technology cost?

quadrant A (top left): higher cost, worse outcome = DOMINATED

quadrant B (top right): higher cost, improved outcome = ??

quadrant C (bottom left): lower cost, worse outcome = ??

quadrant D (bottom right): lower cost, improved outcome = DOMINANT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how is HTA done and what are the key characteristics to have

A

no standard approach but accepted characteristics are
- clear formulation of policy qn
- explicit methodology
- wide scope on the technology
- transparency of process and reporting

  1. globalise the evidence
    - clinical assessment of the safety and effectiveness through systematic literature review
    i) comprehensive searches for research to answer policy qn
    ii) pre-specified rules for inclusion and exclusion of studies
    iii) critical appraisal of design and conduct of studies
    iv) data extraction
    v) synthesis of result
  2. localise the decision
    - selection of relevant comparator using PICO
    - cost effectiveness in local context or health system
    - ethical issues
    - access issues
    - consumer preferences
    - workforce planning
    - training or credentialing users of technology
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is PICO

A

P atient/population, condition of interest
I ntervention (technology under evaluation)
C omparator (alternative treatment options to the intervention used in routine clinical practice
O utcome (clinically meaningful outcomes of interest)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are some basic HTA orientations

A
  1. technology-oriented assessment (intended to undermine characteristics or impacts of a particular technology)
  2. problem-oriented assessment (focus on solution or strategies for managing a particular disease or other problem for which other alternative or complementary technologies might be used)
  3. project-oriented assessment (focus on a local placement or use of a technology in a particular institution, programme or other designated projects)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the various areas to be assessed using HTA

A
  1. technical properties
    - performance characteristics and conformity with specifications for design, composition, manufacturing, tolerances, reliability, ease of use, maintenance etc
  2. safety
    - a measure of probability of an adverse outcome and its severity
  3. efficacy and/or effectiveness
  4. economic attributes or impacts
    - cost effectiveness, cost utility, cost benefit
  5. social, ethical, legal and/or political impacts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are some reasons for HTA

A
  • need a tool to guide decision making in healthcare, HTA bridges the research evidence-policy making gap
  • increasing demand within limited resoures
  • healthcare costs are increasing rapidly at an unsustainable pace
  • many new drugs entering the market have no added benefit
  • regulatory approval ≠ clinically proven in HTA (using surrogate outcomes to provide indirect measurements of clinical effects where direct measurements are not feasible or practical (eg. cancer drugs) vs patient-relevant or clinically relevant outcomes are still preferred endpoints in clinical trials)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is the ECHO model

A

a conceptual model relating
1. clinical outcomes (medical events that occur as a a result of disease or treatment)
- efficacy (response rate, duration of response, disease-free survival, overall survival)
- safety (toxicity and s/e, tolerability)

  1. humanistic outcomes (functional status or QoL)
    - physical, social, general health and wellbeing, life satisfaction
  2. economic outcomes (total costs of medical care associated with health technology and treatment alternatives balanced against clinical or humanistic outcomes)
    - direct, indirect and intangible costs

others components of the ECHO model
- clinical indicators (used to infer degree of disease)
- treatment modifiers (factors that alter outcome associated with treatment alternatives)
- external controls (non clinical factors that affect availability or use of treatment alternatives)
- costs (medical, non-medical and indirect costs)
- humanistic intermediaries (effects of disease or treatment on humanistic outcomes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are some types of cost and who pays

A
  1. direct medical costs (medications, supplies, lab tests, HCP time, hospitalisation)
    - patient y/n
    - payer y
    - hospital y
    - society y
  2. direct non-medical costs (transportation, food, family care, home aids)
    - patient y
    - payer n
    - hospital n
    - society y
  3. indirect costs (lost wages due to morbidity, lost income due to mortality)
    - patient y/n
    - payer n
    - hospital n
    - society y
  4. intangible costs (pain, suffering, inconvenience, grief)
    - patient y
    - payer n
    - hospital n
    - society y/n
  5. opportunity costs (lost opportunity, revenue forgone)
    - patient ?
    - payer ?
    - hospital ?
    - society ?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how is singapore’s healthcare system financed

A

through public and private expenditure
- copayment to avoid overservicing and exceeding budget
- public healthcare financed through a system of subsidies by government direct funding through block grants and case-mix funding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what are block grants vs case-mix funding

A

case-mix funding pays hospitals a set amount for each inpatient episode and day surgery cases according to the DRG assigned

diagnostic related group (DRG) is a system used to group patients with similar clinical characteristics and resource utilisation patterns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what are current drug subsidies and schemes in singapore

A
  1. standard drug list
  2. MAF/MAF+
  3. Medisave, Medishield Life, Medifund
  4. CHAS
  5. acute inpatient care at PHI
  6. implants
  7. vaccination and childhood developmental screening
  8. specialist outpatient clinic care at PHI
  9. careshield life
  10. day surgery and day operation at PHI
  11. eldershield
  12. community hospital sub acute and rehabilitative srevices
  13. residential LTC services
  14. non-residential LTC services
  15. enhanced screen for life
  16. community dialysis services
  17. interim disability assistance programme for the elderly (IDAPE)
  18. foreign domestic worker (FDW) levy concession
  19. senior’s mobility and enabling fund (SMF)
  20. caregivers training grant (CTG)
  21. elderfund
  22. home caregiving grant (HCG)
  23. pioneer generation package
  24. merdeka generation package
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what is the subsidy scheme for SDL and MAF/MAF+

A

[SDL]
all PRs get 25%
if SC, look at PCHI
PCHI = 0: AV≤21k gets 75%, AV >21k gets 50%,
0<PCHI≤2000: 75%
PCHI>2000: 50%

[MAF/MAF+]
all PRs get 20% unless PCHI >6500 then get 0%
if SC, look at PCHI
0<PCHI≤2000: 75%
2000<PCHI≤3300: 50%
3300<PCHI≤6500: 40%
PCHI>6500: 0%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what are the fundamental principles regarding cost

A

due to limited resources, need to avoid harsh rationing and ultimately refusal of care thus need to allocate scarce healthcare resources wisely, fairly and efficiently

  • categorise patients into similar population characteristics
    i) not possible for every patient to get maximum effectiveness
    ii) can monitor and adjust accordingly after but initial or empiric treatment based on standardised care as part of cost minimisation technique
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what is the purpose of having a drug formulary

A
  1. gives clarity and reliability in terms of supply (usually ~3-6m worth of stocks in case of disruption)
  2. manage storage space and inventory
  3. helps in clinical decision making and limits choices to what has been proven to be clinically and cost effective (reflects the quality and standard of care)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what does the formulary comprise of vs non-formulary drugs

A
  1. STD (approved for use based on safety efficacy and cost effectiveness)
  2. NSTD (may have restrictions or limitations on use compared to STD, for specific populations, conditions or treatment protocol)
  3. PAP (available through special programmes to assist those with difficulty affording them)
  4. exemption

non-formulary drugs are retail, sample (for trial or promotional purposes), clinical trial being investigated, pending approval), ad-hoc named patient (requires special approval for a use by a specific patient), exemption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what considerations does MOH have for new medications

A
  • efficacy, comparative efficacy
  • safety, comparative safety
  • quality
  • cost
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what is the role and goal of the hospital P&T committee

A

pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) committee’s goal is to ensure patients are provided with the best possible cost-effective and quality of care through determining what medicines will be available, at what cost and how they will be used

responsible for developing, managing, updating and administering the drug formulary within the organisation or institution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

what are the principles of a sound drug formuary

A
  • decisions are based on scientific and economic considerations that achieve appropriate, safe and cost effective drug therapy
  • encompasses drug selection, drug utilisation review and other tools to foster best practices in prescribing, dispensing, administering and monitoring of outcomes
  • P&T committee or equivalent body comprises of actively practicing physicians, pharmacists and other HCPs (multi professional)
  • formulary system must have its own policies or adhere to other organisational policies that addresses conflict of interest or disclosure by P&T committee members
  • should include educational programmes for payers, practitioners and payers concerning their roles and responsibilities (coverage decisions, drug selection etc)
  • well-defined process if medically indicated to use a non-formulary drug by a physician or other prescriber
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

what is a drug formulary and outline the process that goes into forming the drug formulary

A
  • product of P&T committee upon review and evaluation processes to guide physician prescribing through the inclusion of only selected products from various drug classes
  • drugs chosen for the formulary are included based upon an evaluation of published literature
  • a pricing contract is then negotiated with product manufacturer and is factored into the decision
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

what is the hierarchy of evidence from weakest to strongest

A

case reports, opinion papers, letters
–> animal trials, in vitro studies
–> cross sectional studies (observe at a single point in time the prevalence of exposure and outcome, causality CANNOT be determined)
–> case control studies (compare those with outcomes and those w/o outcomes to assess potential risk factors or exposures)
–> cohort studies (follow a group of individuals for a time period to assess association between exposure to a risk factor or intervention and the development of a specific outocme)
–> RCT
–> meta analyses and systematic review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

what are the concerns regarding availability of relevant RCTs

A
  • comparator in trial are not always the comparator in local practice
  • placebo-controlled trials for regulatory approval of new drugs
  • time lag from design of RCT to published result to conduct of HTA = comparator in trial may no longer be relevant
  • near parallel development of new drugs by different companies = RCTs will be compared to SOC
  • single arm studies are increasingly common in selected disease areas like cancer, rare disease
  • even when active comparisons are made, evidence is often limited eg. lack of long term results or outcomes assessed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

how to overcome lack of availability of RCTs

A

through indirect comparisons

indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) uses relative effect of the treatments vs a common comparator to assess the H2H comparison of interest
- trial quality should be subjected to usual assessments eg. Cochrane ROB
- transitivity assumption: assumes no systematic differences between available comparisons (eg. control groups are sufficiently similar)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

what are other types of indirect comparisons if there is a lack of available RCTs

A
  • network meta analysis (NMA) = simultaneously compare multiple interventions
  • matching adjusted indirect comparisons (MAIC) = propensity score matching by matching population of a single arm study to another trial to compare results
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

why is there a need to assess clinical significance

A

what may be a statistically significant difference does not mean that it is a clinically important difference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

what is the MCID

A

minimally clinically important difference (MCID) is defined as the smallest difference in score in the domain of interest which patients perceive as beneficial and would mandate, in the absence of troublesome s/e and excessive cost, a change in the patient’s management

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

what is the usual hypothesis testing hypotheses

A

test for
(i) non-inferiority
f/b (ii) superiority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

what are the considerations for clinical claims regarding non-inferiority and superiority

A
  • timepoints (single or multiple reported?)
  • outcomes assessed (same outcomes, multiple outcomes?)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

what is pharmacoeconomics

A

pharmacoeconomics is a tool designed to provide users and decision makers with information about cost-effectiveness of different pharmacotherapies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

what are the micro to macro applications of pharmacoeconomics

A

from micro to macro
- clinical decision
- justify clinical service
- drug use guideline
- formulary management
- resource allocation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

how to determine which pharmacoeconomic evaluations to use

A

if efficacy = and safety = –> CMA
if efficacy + and safety = –> CEA
if efficacy + and safety + –> CEA

36
Q

what is CMA

A

cost minimisation analysis (CMA) involves determination of the least costly alternative when two or more intervention have equal therapeutic outcome (demonstrated equivalency in safety and efficacy)

  • consider equi-effective doses (weight-based, dose intensity, duration of treatment), direct medical costs and other costs or cost offsets
37
Q

what are some different terminologies relating to cost

A

cost = price at which the PHI procures from the manufacturer or distributor

charge = price which includes any profit margin applied by the PHI; amount reflected on patient’s bill before any deductions for government subsidies, insurance payouts etc

bill size = patient’s OOP

HTA perspective = adopts healthcare system perspective which comprises combination of payers, including the government, insurance providers and patients

38
Q

what is CEA

A

cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) considers both cost and health outcomes

  • measures one dimension of effectiveness at one time
  • cost per unit effect
  • benefit is measured in non-dollar terms
  • hard to compare across diseases and therapeutic areas
39
Q

what is ICER

A

incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) is the incremental change in costs divided by the incremental change in health outcomes of a new technology compared to the current standard of care over a period of time

ICER provides a metric to help decision makers judge the value for money of a new health technology

40
Q

what costs are included in the healthcare system perspective?

A

healthcare system perspective = government + insurers + patient

direct medical costs: y
direct non-medical costs: n
indirect costs: n
intangible costs: n

for societal,
direct medical costs: y
direct non-medical costs: y
indirect costs: y
intangible costs: y

for government and insurers,
direct medical costs: y
direct non-medical costs: n
indirect costs: n
intangible costs: n

for employers,
direct medical costs: y
direct non-medical costs: n
indirect costs: y
intangible costs: n

for patients,
direct medical costs: y
direct non-medical costs: y
indirect costs: y
intangible costs: y

41
Q

illustrate the features of a decision tree

A

decision trees are used more commonly for short time horizon (markov models for longer time horizon)

  • decision nodes (decision) = determining treatment A or treatment B is given
  • chance nodes (circle) = whether cure or no cure with given treatment
  • terminal nodes (triangle)
42
Q

what are the two perspectives to consider when valuing the consequences

A
  1. payoffs (consequences or outcomes associated with each possible decision assigned with value or utility quantified numerically)
  2. rolling back (weighted sum of the different branches of the treatment, weightage based on the probability of the pathway)
43
Q

what is markov modelling

A

is an economic modelling done to map probable clinical outcomes and to assess the economic impacts of the outcomes

an extension of decision trees as decision trees are insufficient for most cases since they
(i) only present events over a short period of time [vs MM models transitions between health states over multiple time periods]
(ii) unable to differentiate when events occur
(iii) when events recur over time, leads to bushy decision trees thus difficult to model chronic diseases to depict complications, recurrence, remission, mortality

44
Q

what are the characteristics of markov modelling

A
  • transition between a finite set of mutually exclusive health states over a series of time intervals
  • time progresses in discrete time intervals (cycles)
  • patients progress through states over cycles, defined by probability
  • costs and health outcomes are associated with health states
  • memoryless assumption
45
Q

outline the steps in constructing a markov model

A
  1. select a finite number of mutually exclusive health states
    - represent clinically or economically important events in disease process
    - separate states to represent any differences in prognosis, utilities or cost
  2. specify cycle length and time (number of cycles in total)
    - discrete time intervals where clinical events may happen (shorter cycle length = more precise but more inefficient)
    - time horizon should be sufficiently long enough to capture all health effects and costs (but long time horizon increases uncertainty)
  3. identify transitions between health states
    - remain, progress, improve, death
  4. specify initial patient distribution
    - spreads of patients across health states at start of model
  5. assigns cost and outcomes to health states and/or transition
    - cost
    - life years
    - QALYs
46
Q

what is the markov trace

A

markov trace is to simulate the movement of cohorts of patients through the model

spread of cohort across health states is determined by transition probabilities

47
Q

what is cost-utility analysis

A

it is a type of CEA, combines quality of a given health status and duration of time in this state
- allows to account for mortality and morbidity
- value (utility) is given to various health states, from 0 to 1
- utility measures can be QALYs, healthy life years etc
- provides consistency across drug groups by expressing the health benefit as a utility value

48
Q

what is QALY

A

quality-adjusted life years (QALY) is a measure of health outcome spanning both quality (each health states are assigned utility scores typically ranging from 0 to 1) and quantity of life (duration of time spent in each health state)

49
Q

what are some types of health outcomes to be measured

A

mortality, morbidity, adverse health events, QoL, functional status, patient satisfaction

50
Q

what are some options to use to measure health outcomes

A
  1. direct preference elicitation
    BUT
    - need a large number of patients
    - expensive
    - cannot observe what they are valuing
    - may be affected by comorbidities, adverse events and other unobserved factors
  2. generic preference-based measures of health
    - descriptive system used to classify health status among different domains
    - does not offer exhaustive account of all potential impacts of a condition but intended to be relevant to most conditions
  3. condition specific preference-based measures of health
    - if a generic measure is not considered appropriate as (i) missing key aspects that impact patients (ii) insufficiently sensitive to changes in health
  4. vignettes or scenarios
    vignettes are
    - qualitative descriptions of health state to be valued
    - requires description to match the experience of patients in the relevant health states
    BUT
    - numerous issues of framing and requires respondent to only value what is described and is subjective
51
Q

what are some examples of generic preference-based measures of health

A

EQ-5D
health utilities index
SF-6D

52
Q

what is cost benefit analysis

A

assigns monetary value to all outcomes to determine willingness to pay

B/C >1 = value
B/C = 1 = benefits equal to cost
B/C <1 = not economically beneficial

53
Q

compare CMA, CEA, CUA, CBA

A

CMA

CEA
- primary outcome measure is typically a health outcome (life years gained, disease free years or specific clinical endpoints)
- effectiveness of intervention is measured in natural units without explicitly considering QoL associated with those outcomes
- ICER = additional cost per unit health outcome gained compared to an alternative intervention

CUA
- a subtype of CEA
- specifically focuses on HRQoL as outcome measure using instruments to assign utility scores to different health states
- primary outcome measure is QALY which accounts for both length of time lived and HRQoL experienced during that time
- ICER = additional cost per QALY gained compared to an alternative intervention

CBA
- evaluates by comparing costs to monetary benefits
- all outcomes, including health outcomes and non-health outcomes are assigned monetary value
- ratio of benefits to cost to determine whether benefit outweighs cost

54
Q

what is ACE’s vision and mission

A

vision is to improve patient outcomes and healthcare value through HTA

mission is to
(i) issue objective and credible healthcare guidance
(ii) enable stakeholders to optimise health benefits within finite resources
(iii) advance the values of evidence based practice and appropriate care

55
Q

what is the process of ACE drug evaluation

A
  1. topic selection (non-cancer or cancer topics)
  2. evaluation
    - clinician engagement to establish local practice
    - review of clinical and cost effectiveness evidence
    - value based pricing negotiations
    - cost effectiveness analysis
    - budget impact assessment
    –> HTA report (that would be (i) critique by independent academic center and (ii) expert clinical advice for cancer topics)
  3. decision making and implementation
    - DAC deliberates the evidence and makes a recommendation
    –> financing approval
56
Q

what is VBP

A

value-based pricing is coupled in the process of HTA to bring drug or medical technology prices to cost-effective levels

  • enables ACE to engage in discussions with companies to determine cost price at which best represents cost-effective use of healthcare resources
  • conducted in parallel with technical evaluations a health technology recommended for subsidy
  • proposed prices are used to inform ACE’s evaluation (including CUA and budget impact assessment) and decision making for subsidy
  • for positive recommendations, ACE also sets a max selling price so that any cost savings frm VBP negotiations are passed on to patients
  • for negative recommendations, companies may consider submitting revised price proposals in the next calendar year
57
Q

what is CET

A

cost effectiveness threshold (CET) refer to the maximum amount society is willing to pay for a healthcare intervention to gain a unit of health benefit (typically measured in QALYs gained)

58
Q

what are some ways in determining CE threshold

A
  1. GDP per capita
    if <1x GDP per capita = very cost effective; if 1-3x GDP per capita = cost effective; if >3x GDP per capita = not cost effective
    BUT (i) no empirical evidence to support such policy (ii) income distribution is also skewed (if mean > median = a small proportion of population is holding a large share of wealth thus not accurate in capturing affordability for majority of the population)
  2. explicit CE threshold
    pricing up to threshold by companies
    BUT
    reduced flexibility to balance other competing decision-making criteria such as budget impact, affordability, feasibility, equity, fairness, ethical concerns
  3. implied or unspecified CE threshold
    allows CE to inform value for money while allowing flexible consideration of other competing decision making criteria
59
Q

what are some limitations if solely rely on CE threshold for decision making

A
  • always a degree of uncertainty using ICER computation due to (i) lack of data esp in longer term (ii) assumptions in model (iii) applicability of data source to model population
  • adopting a max CE threshold tends to ignore budget constraints and can lead to escalating expenditure
  • incorrectly set CE threshold (too low = potentially miss funding cost effective interventions; too high = loss in health outcomes)
60
Q

what are the criterias SG considers during decision making

A
  1. clinical need of patients and nature of condition
    - disease morbidity and patient clinical disability with current SOC
    - impact of disease on patient QoL
    - extent and nature of current treatment options
  2. impact of new technology or overall benefit
    - comparative clinical effectiveness and safety
    - overall magnitude of health benefits to patients
    - heterogeneity of health benefits within the population
    - relevance to current clinical rpactice
    - robustness of current evidence
  3. cost-effectiveness (value for money)
  4. cost of technology and estimated number of patients likely to benefit
    - projected cost to healthcare payer (SG government + insurers + patients), government (for subsidy), patients (OOP)
  5. organisational feasibility
    - potential impact of adopting the technolgoy
  6. additional considerations
    - ethical, societal, political or other issues
61
Q

three main things to look at when doing HTA

A
  1. clinical need
  2. clinical effectiveness
  3. budget impact
62
Q

what happens after there is a decision to subsidise the drug

A
  • drugs included into SDL, MAF, CDL
  • technology guidance from MOH DAC are developed to communicate recommendations on funding status, including rationale for funding and key clinical and economic evidence and appropriate use
  • plain english summaries (PES) to explain technology guidance are available for patients and public
63
Q

compare SDL vs MAF vs CDL

A

SDL: provides subsides for drugs that are used to treat common medical conditions

MAF: provides subsidies for high-cost drugs that are clinically proven and cost effective for specific indications

CDL: medications for OP cancer treatments that are claimable, with corresponding Medishield Life and Medisave limits

64
Q

compare RWD vs RWE

A

real world data: data collected during routine delivery of health care
- clinical
- medication
- claims
- molecular profiling
- family history
- mobile health
- environmental
- patient reported
- social media
- literature

real world evidence: evidence that is derived from the analysis of RWD

65
Q

what are some key healthcare databases or platforms to collect RWD

A
  1. MOH consolidated data repository (MCDR)
    allows MOH and authorised users to gain access to cleaned and concorded healthcare data
  2. business research analytics insight network (BRAIN)
    centralised business intelligence, analytics and AI processing platform
  3. TRUST
    national platform that enables anonymised health related research and RWD to be brought together
66
Q

what are the characteristics of RWD

A
  • observational
  • can be unstructured and inconsistent due to variations in data entry
  • large volume of data, dynamic data
  • may be incomplete and lack key endpoints for analysis
  • subject to bias and measurement errors
67
Q

compare HR vs RR

A

hazards ratio is a measure of the relative risk of experiencing an event over time in one group compared to another group

risk ratio is a measure of the relative risk of experiencing an event at a specific point in time in one group compared to another group

68
Q

what are some other uses of RWD

A

monitor performance or process indicators such as (i) utilisation of generic drugs and biosimilars (ii) adherence to maximum selling price (MSP) for drugs under value based pricing (VBP)

69
Q

why should drug spending be controlled and how can MOH control drug spending

A

controlling drug spending to
- maximise benefits from healthcare spending
- overcome regional variations in access
- contain costs and manage demand
- provide bargaining power with suppliers of healthcare products

done through
1. demand
- by limiting use of drugs to clinical protocols and prescribing controls

  1. supply
    - delaying market entry or not reimbursing their use
  2. price
    - paying less for drugs through (i) VBP (ii) reference pricing (iii) price cuts (iv) generic uptake)
70
Q

what is HEOR

A

health economics and outcomes research (HEOR) conducts studies and develops models to help quantify the differential value the products bring to the customer

aspects of value to be looked at may include
(i) healthcare costs
(ii) productivity gains
(iii) patient outcome benefits
(iv) additional clinical outcomes

71
Q

what are the main HEOR tools

A

[burden of disease: clinical, economic, humanistic burden]
1. systematic literature review
2. targeted literature review
3. RWD studies (data or registry analyses, non-interventional or naturalistic inquiry)

[clinical effectiveness]
1. mixed and indirect treatment comparison
2. pivotal RCTs

[economic modelling or evaluation]
- cost effectiveness = value for money
- budget impact = affordability
- broader impact on society, productivity, HCS, broader economy, government finance, environment etc
- value demonstration = tools to help in communicating economic value

[patient reported outcomes]
to focus on understanding more from patient perspective, outcomes that are also important to be highlighted to payers but not quantified

[other evidence]
- unmet need
- utility or HRQoL studies
- preference studies
- economic prospective and observational studies

72
Q

what are the various HTA market archetypes

A
  1. clinical effectivness
    - demonstration of clinical unmet need and impact on individual patient
    - can be comparative to SOC
  2. cost effectiveness
    - requires both clinical and economic inputs with decisions based on cost
  3. decentralisation and budget optimisation
    - considers clinical benefit of product and budget required to deliver health benefits
  4. free or private market
    - minimal price control
73
Q

what are the components of the company pre-submission form

A
  1. specific qn for ACE to be addressed at pre-submission meeting
    - specific technical issues, process enquiries or qns about the evaluation for ACE
    - anticipated difficulties following submission guidelines or any expected deviations from reference case
  2. proposed evaluation framework and type of submission
    - PICO
    - subgroups
    - clinical claims
    - type of evidence submission (superiority = full evaluation = conduct CEA locally; non-inferiority = expedited evaluation = use CMA)
  3. clinical need and local clinical practice
    - current treatment algorithm
    - how would the medicine impact clinical practice
  4. administrative and cost of intervention
    - details about the treatment regimen
  5. clinical effectiveness
    - details of relevant trials (RCT and non-RCT) that would be included in evidence submission to ACE
  6. economic evaluation and budget impact assessment
    - type of economic evaluation (superior, non-inferiority)
    - estimated patient numbers and budget impact
    - proposed patient assistance programme or other arrangements
    - type of economic model
    - components of economic model (time horizon, cycle length, health states, HRQoL, key model assumptions, key scenario analyses)
  7. regulatory timeline
    - indicate date of submission to HSA for regulatory approval and whether has obtained regulatory approval for indications evaluated or the anticipated timeline to receiving approval
    - indicate date of regulatory approval and approved indication(s) from overseas reference agencies (US FDA, UK MHRA, EMA, TGA, HC)
  8. evaluations conducted by overseas HTA agencies
    - indicate whether intervention has already been evaluated by other overseas HTA agencies (UK NICE, CADTH Canada, PBAC Australia, PHARMAC NZ etc) or the anticipated timeline to a recommendation if a HTA evaluation is ongoing
    - where possible, provide PICO of the evaluations considered by the overseas HTA agencies
74
Q

outline the patient access roadmap

A
  1. cross function strategy
  2. clinical pathway optimisation (CPO) planning
    - local epidemiology
    - burden of disease review (ECH)
    - early economic models
    - payer insights
    - patient research
  3. go-to market and price negotiation
    - local pricing strategy
    - reimbursement dossier writing
    - local value proposition
    - payer engagement and negotiation strategy
  4. reimbursement negotiations
  5. life-cycle management
    - price reviews
    - formulary management
    - tender management
    - new indications
75
Q

what are the challenges in HTA

A
  1. fees for HTA process (~250k per indication for HTA + ~150k for dossier submission)
  2. pricing considerations
    - internal pricing considerations (product tiers, country tiers)
    - external pricing considerations (inter-country ref pricing, intra-country ref pricing)
  3. profitability
    - cost of manufacture
    - royalties
    - R&D cost and return on investment
76
Q

what are internal pricing considerations

A
  1. product tiers
    - companies often offer products at different price points or tiers within their portfolio, may reflect variations in product features, quality or target markets
    - product tiering to optimise brand revenue over time
  2. country tiers
    - based on factors such as market demand, purchasing power, regulatory requirements and competition
    - aims to provide equitable access by setting floor prices based on therapeutic value and accelerate or broaden access where possible
    - defined based on (i) international reference pricing (IRP) (ii) GNI per capita (iii) human development index and GINI coefficient
77
Q

what are external pricing considerations

A
  1. inter-country reference pricing
    - comparing prices of same or similar medical products across different countries
    - use to benchmark prices, identify pricing differentials, adjust pricing strategies accordingly
  2. intra-country reference pricing
    - comparing prices of medical products within the same country, considered therapeutically equivalent or interchangeable
    - can occur within a single market or healthcare system where different products may compete for market share
78
Q

what are some risks of inter-reference pricing (IRP)

A
  1. race to the bottom
    - payers would like to have the floor price for reimbursed medicines
  2. free-rider effect
    - delay pricing decisions in order to start price negotiation based on what has already been achieved by others
    - can lead to pricing discrepancies based on charges in other countries or currency fluctuations, create uncertainty
79
Q

what are some considerations for IRP

A

referencing rules vary between countries
- number of countries referenced and how they are selected (based on similarities in HCS, economic comparability, therapeutic relevance)
- method of calculating price
- exchange rate used
- how prices are obtained (directly from pharma companies or through external sources like regulatory authorities or pricing databases)
- level of price reference
- level of price enforcement (rigid, or used for negotiations)
- extrapolation or estimation to determine reference price if unvailable
- products applied to
- frequency applied (annual, at launch only, in response to significant price changes)

80
Q

what are some programmes to improve patient access

A
  1. managed access programme (MAP)
    phase III trial > market authorisation > commercial launch
    - to provide access to drugs that are not yet fully approved or undergoing evaluation
    - patients with serious or life threatening conditions with no other treatment options
  2. post-trial access (PTA)
    after trial participation > market authorisation > commercial launch > reimbursement
    - continued access for patients who benefitted from clinical trial
  3. patient access programme - early access (PAP-EA)
    market authorisation > commercial launch > reimbursement
    - access available at an earlier stage than it would have been if through standard regulatory pathways
  4. patient access programme - affordability
    commercial launch > reimbursement >
    - address financial gaps (subsidies, discounts, financial assistance programmes etc)
  5. patient access programme - value-added
    commercial launch > reimbursement >
    - beyond access to medication but additional services (education, counseling, monitoring, follow up care etc)
  6. managed entry agreement (MEA)
    reimbursement >
    - contracts between payers and manufacturer
    - enable access in the context of a challenge or uncertainty in clinical or financial performance or budget impact issues
81
Q

what are some challenges that MEA can alleviate

A

access challenges
- evidence scrutinised by payers and having consciously conservative assumptions
- need for customer-centric evidence to obtain fast broad access
- concerns on budget impact and affordability

MEA
- at launch to achieve fast and broad access to market
- help address uncertainty on budget impact and/or outcomes over time
- manage scenarios such as (i) new data (ii) new indications (iii) renegotiation due to market dynamics

82
Q

how to choose when to use MEA

A

while the net price impact of MEA is important in understanding the financial implications of implementing MEAs on the healthcare budget, only assessing this would be too narrow a perspective so must consider how good a specific MEA is at solving the problem which may include considerations for
- improving patient access
- managing budget impact
- ensuring value for money
- addressing clinical or economic uncertainties

83
Q

what are the types of MEA

A

FINANCIAL
1. annuity contract (spread out payment over a defined period)
2. budget cap (100% rebate on incremental sales above threshold)
3. budget neutrality (rebate in case of incremental budget imapct)
4. cost-sharing (free or discounted goods at pre defined time points)
5. portfolio agreement (discount or rebate for a group of products in company’s portfolio)
6. price-volume agreement (increasing rebate on incremental sales above threshold)
7. progressive rebate programme (increasing rebate per patient with increasing duration of treatment)
8. retrospective conditional agreement (rebate conditional on reaching agreed sales volume)
9. subgroup based agreement (varying discount for different patient subgroups)
10. subscription model (fixed cost per patient or cohort regardless of actual patient use)

OUTCOMES
1. outcome-based agreement (rebate if defined outcome is NOT achieved)

EVIDENCE
1. coverage with evidence dev. (coverage contingent on generating further evidence)

84
Q

what are the components for a good MEA design

A

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
- address pain points
- align with company’s objective
- keep as simple as possible
- meet required consolidated profitability levels
- understand key risks and put corresponding risk mitigation strategies
- well defined KPI with tracking and followup plans
- align model with cross-functional groups
- design in accordance with integrity and compliance with policies and guidelines

CONTRACTUAL TERMS
- well defined financial clauses or payment terms
- well defined time extension clauses or exit clauses
- well defined data collection and reconciliation terms
- MEA timeline tailored to market conditions and resources or data required
- well defined confidentiality clauses including price confidentiality

FINANCIAL MODEL
- well defined epidemiology
- integration of local treatment plans into model
- minimise financial risks of MEA
- revenue recognition confirmed with technical accounting team

85
Q

what is the general guide to identifying, selecting and evaluating relevant MEA

A
  1. analyse (payer’s position, identify drivers and potential access challenges)
  2. prioritise (choose the MEA that addresses the specific need and payer’s concern, based on access priorities, assess risks and potential impact on profit and loss)
  3. define (agree on MEA set up, shape contract design, well defined exit clause)
  4. evaluate (regularly re-evaluate whether set objectives are met)
86
Q

categorise the different MEA to the challenge addressed and extent of data requirements (for each is lower to higher)

A

BUDGET AND AFFORDABILITY
1. subscription model (cohort)
2. price volume agreements
3. budget cap
4. annuity contract

MIXED OF BOTH
1. portfolio agreement
2. retrospective conditional rebate
3. progressive rebate programme
4. cost sharing
5. budget neutrality

VALUE FOR MONEY
1. subscription model (patient)
2. outcome-based agreement
3. coverage with evidence dev.
4. subgroup based agreement

87
Q
A