Health Economics Flashcards
Distinguishing characteristics of health care evaluation*
slide 8
1) Are both costs (inputs) and consequences (outputs) of the alternatives examined?
- NO Examines only consequences
Is there comparison of two or more alternatives?
- NO 1A PARTIAL EVALUATION: Outcome
Description
- YES 3A PARTIAL EVALUATION Efficacy or effectiveness evaluation
2) Are both costs (inputs) and consequences (outputs) of the alternatives examined?
- NO Examines only costs
Is there comparison of two or more alternatives?
- NO 1B PARTIAL EVALUATION: Cost
Description
- YES 3B PARTIAL EVALUATION Cost analysis
3) Are both costs (inputs) and consequences (outputs) of the alternatives examined
- YES
Is there comparison of two or more alternatives?
- NO 2 PARTIAL EVALUATION Cost-outcome description
4) Are both costs (inputs) and consequences (outputs) of the alternatives examined
- YES
Is there comparison of two or more alternatives?
- YES 4 FULL ECONOMIC EVALUATION
Cost-minimisation analysis
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Cost-utility analysis
Cost-benefit analysis
Important concepts
Perspective
Incremental cost
Discounting
Sensitivity analysis
Should we use the drugs below?*
- A new drug is equally effective and has similar adverse event profile to the old drug but costs less?
- A new drug is equally effective and has similar adverse event profile to the old drug but costs more?
- “Cost-minimisation analysis”
- A new drug is more effective and has similar adverse event profile to the old drug and costs the same?
- A new drug is less effective and has similar adverse event profile to the old drug and costs the same?
- “Cost-effectiveness analysis”
Comparable units of outcome are required
- If two treatments reduce mortality then Life Years Gained (LYG) can be used to compare across diseases. This does not capture QoL
- If two treatments alter QoL we need to know how important the outcomes are to the patient, i.e. their utility to the patient.
Utility is measured on a scale of 0 (death) to 1 (full health)
-A combined measure is required for treatments that lengthen life and affect the QoL (QALY)
Results: consider*
What unit has been used for the outcome/s? (e.g. life-years, QALYs, natural units of effectiveness e.g. pain relief, monetary)
Has the incremental cost and the incremental benefit over the comparator treatment/s been calculated?
What does this show?
Do the conclusions change with a sensitivity analysis?
Results: sensitivity analysis*
- Data in economic evaluations will contain uncertainties:
- Costs
- Clinical effectiveness
- Utilities
- Probabilities
- Discounting
- Extrapolation beyond existing data
-These can lead to different conclusions and should be tested in a sensitivity analysis