Harriet-social And Emotional Dev Part 1 Flashcards

1
Q

Aspects of the self

A

See body as diff from world and other people, self esteem, self presentation/reputation management, social groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why sense of self is important

A

Interact w environment, when misunderstand can lead to pain like phantom limb. Allow us to function in the world, if exaggerated get narcissism like trump. Understand why some have low self esteem, and how to help in kids. Need reputation management for interviews

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Early understanding of self

A

Can’t ask infant so need to infer. Piaget said stim of senses allow kids to tell body from word and have agency (not born w it) but in the womb babies can sense world. Rochat : 2m old wiggle foot when attached to mobile- realise they can can world. Also repeat actions when receive positive feedback from caregiver or sounds (self egency)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Infant response to social world - interaction

A

Johnson 91: newborns prefer to track face like stim. (Under 1m), infants respond to diff objects and people, aware have an effect on others. Still face paradigm (tronick) upset if stop having an effect on partner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Infant response to social word- rouge test

A

Pass the rouge test at 15-18m old, Lewis and brooks: add dot, if older they notice they can be perceived. Bischof: only those who pass show empathy (experiment acts sad in response to broken teddy, they show comfort, try to fix), also more likely to feel embarrassment but not basic like fear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Referring to self and TOM

A

At 2 use I or mine, at 3/4 they use comparative like I’m taller than x, understand self in relation to others, TOM: others have diff preferences to you. Rapacholi: kids prefer crackers, experimenter either says yum or broccoli and ew to cracker or other way. Hold out hand and ask infant to give her one, at 18m give the broccoli as have Tom but at 14m give her the cracker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Categorical self - background

A

Seeing yourself as belonging to a certain group and id others as being part of groups (nationality gender) can be important for self esteem but lead to discrimination. At 2 correctly refer to self a boy or girl (gender fastest category in the west) but don’t know if learnt label or truly identify

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Self other confusion paradigm

A

When think of two things as similar categories, more likely to confuse them. Sami and Bennett 2009: kids between 5-10, shown cards w trait adj like funny and asked extent it applies to them, ingroup or outgroup (gender, fam and age). Then later shown the word and asked who they were asked the word about. More likely to confuse one’s rating for self or ingroup compared to out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Self across cultures - adults, older kids

A

Muchos data based on west but not representative, indecent culture-individualist, interdependent-collectivist. Measure w statements - inndeoent describe themselves in relation to traits but interdependent say their relationships like I’m a mother . For young kids use drawing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Self across cultures- infants

A

Keller: ask kids to draw picture w their fam. Interdependent draw smaller relative to parents, indepdent bigger. Over: interdependent kids draw themselves standing closer to their peers. Rumbling: Cameroon or Germany- Germany same size as parents Cameroon smaller - social hierarchy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Parental influence on interdependent or independent - Germany

A

Keller 2016: observed social interactions and asked parents about attitudes towards children (less experimental, more naturalistic). In independent infants have exclusive attention from parents, face to face, spend a lot of time alone. Interview in Germany: need to learn to be along and develop self identity. Praise fosters individuality e,g, you’re the tallest boy, look at your tall legs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Parental influence- Cameroon

A

Infants imbedded into dense social network, in close proximity to caregiver but not centre of attention. From interview: when you don’t share w people, don’t love long but when people encourage you days move faster. Less praise for child, ask about concrete topics w spec answers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Body satisfaction and self potential- manikin

A

Lis and ventuli: asked 18-36m olds to complete puzzle manikins. At 27m can complete but struggle w trunk and get arms and legs confused, but all ages could to face, eyes and mouths. Doesn’t mean understand own body tho

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Children self portraits

A

Cox asks kids to draw self, children can accurately draw faces before body. 3/4 do tadpole stage where detailed head but no or bad body. Asked them to add bellybutton and know where it should be . Brownell: 17-30m olds did body size self awareness and size reasoning task, given tiny clothes and asked if they would fit, parent on the other side of a tiny door, big slide or tiny slide. Kids make more errors when estimating own body size than control, errors decrease w age, but all make at least one error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Social pressure and body image

A

Thompson surveyed 9year old children who saw Disney princesses, almost all wanted to be slimmer than they were. Tiggeman and anesburt : kids attribute + traits to underweight and - to overweight. Birgeneu: anduots - eval fat kids . Smolak: + link between kids view of own body and parent view of kid body. Kelley: kids more likely to have + image when parents talk about health and not weight control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Self esteem

A

Leary : sociometer theory suggests self esteem allows ppl to determine how well they navigate relationships. Esteem linked to well-being. Harter: 5 domains of esteem (scholastic, social,athletic, physical and behavioural). Kids shown child doing well or not at a task and asked which more like them. Attribution theory- low self esteem attribute - events to external and - to internal, high do opposite. Creates cycle so need intervention

17
Q

Self efficacy

A

Dweck: fixed or growth mindset- praising abilities leads to fixed, effort growth. Growth persevere longer on challenging tasks, more willing to tackle hard things

18
Q

Self presentation

A

Public and private self- ppl influence how others think about them/public self
Reputation management: engelmann 2013: asked 5 year olds to play game, had op tp help another child or steal from them, varied whether they wre told the child was watching them or not- more likely to help when being watched and steal when alone

19
Q

Pro social definition and evolution

A

Behaviour that benefits another with a cost to yourself, some do for a career e.g. paramedic. Sensible to help child as carry on genes but doesn’t explain stranger helping. Evol. Psych say reciprocity (will then help you later) or indirect reciprocity (others see you helping and then will help you later). Seen in infants- tomasello from 18m

20
Q

Psych mechanisms that lead to procosical - empathy

A
  1. Empathy: contagious crying as newborns more likely to cry when hear another infant cry- even cry when hear recording of other infant over self crying- simner.
21
Q

Sympathy from emotional cues

A

zahn waxler: mother pretends to be upset due to hurt. Pro social behaviour coded into physical comfort, verbal, verbal advice, helping and sharing. Over half did at least one after age 1, by 2, all but one did 1+. Actions became more diverse w age- youngest mainly used physical only. Not equally pro social as some became distressed.

22
Q

Sympathy wout emotional cues

A

Other study may be due to contagious/become upset themselves. Vaish: 18m watched experimenter losing a ballon, either had a bad day e.g. necklace broke, picture destroyed or normal. Infants more helpful when having a bad day- shows infants show sympathy when not showing emotions

23
Q

Guilt

A

Commonly viewed as a toxic emotion to be avoided by it regulates relationships as adults more likely to be pro social when guilty. Vaish: experimenter knocks over tower and either takes blame or says child knocked it over. 3 year olds more likely to rebuild tower if believed it was thier fsilt but 2 year old had no diff in helping behaviour. Tangney and dearing 2002: children more prone to guilt in 5th grade less likely to be in prison in adulthood and more likely to be pro social e.g. safe sex and no drugs

24
Q

Socialisation of pro sociality

A

Hammond: parents can influence by giving direct instruction to be kind but also by modelling empathetic relationships. Rheingold: promote it by scaffolding children’s participation in household chores zahn: parents who are warm/sensitive more likely to have empathetic children + pro social

25
Socialisation- brownell
Ask parents to look through picture book w child. Found parents use wide emotional and mental state terms e.g. how is she feeling, what does she know and vary in the amounts they use it. More mental state terms have children who are more likely to help in an emotional task e.g give blanket to cold but didn’t predict simple helping English tomasello
26
Aggression
Have intentional/overt which is inflicting pain or relational like ridicule, exclusion. Crick: asked teachers to rate over, relational, pro social and depression. Children asked to list their 3 best and 3 worst ppl to play with. Stable personality diffs: high in both aggression lower in pro social and children marked aggressive as ppl they didn’t like. High depression also high aggression
27
Aggression continuity
Greater continuity over childhood over other facets. Caspi: New Zealand children 3 years old measured on passivity, impulsive and instability, at 12 parents gave ratings of antisocial, delinquency and bullying. Lack of control at 3 more antisocial when older. Followed in adulthood- poor emotional regulation responded w more - emotions to everyday frustration as adults, more stress and anger. - emotions stable. Under controlled at 3 judged to be less pro social at 21
28
How children become aggressive
Dodge and coie: children led into antisocial from peers. Also hostile attribution bias: children interpret ambiguous behaviour as hostile die to being treated badly in past, expect people to be mean so primes the, to act aggressively. Federman 98: 66% children’s tv in us has violence, children who spend more time watching tv more prone to aggression but correlation not causation
29
Risk factors for anti social behaviour -New Zealand sample/dunedin
Moffitt: 7% were boys consistently antisocial in children and adolescence. At age 3 had irritable temperament, impairment in verbal functioning, mental flexibility, low hr (less guilt). Hinshaw- linked to adhd
30
Callous and unemotional traits - essi viding
Children superficially charming but engage in intimidation, bullying, manipulation w no regret, lack of guilt and empathy, shallow affect (trivial emotional response to things)- at risk for severe antisocial in adulthood. Viding: MZ and dz twins: antisocial behaviour w traits had large genetic impact, antisocial behaviour w low traits more environmental - genetic risk for later psychopathy. But respond to warm parenting, training in emotional literacy and recognition
31
Morality
M judgment is ability to tell between right and wrong, m behaviour is tendency to act on diff, bring benefit to others. M emotions is pride in goof acts, shame over bad. Colston was a slave trader but ppl defended as supported schools and hospitals in Bristol. Studies give children ambiguous dilemma. Younger judge - outcome harsher e.g. child who broke more cups as opposed to 1, older judge - intentions worse. Young based on adult rules but via interactions w peers dev morality of cooperation (learn intention matters, roles can be reversed, resolve via compromise and discussion)- age 10
32
Kohlberg
Gave moral dilemmas and created stages. 1-preconvetnional (punishment orientation), 2 is rules for personal gains (benefit from obeying rules),3 is conventions (seen as good girl social approval), 5 is morality of contract and Ind rights (rules obeyed if democratic but not if take away rights of others), 6 is morality of conscience (own rules according to ethical principles) morality becomes more abstract as older- walker 89: lower level reasoning decreases w age. But higher cog linked to reasoning but not always actions, samples not rep as male and western, stage 6 not seen so hyp
33
Hamlin
Kohlberg task needed verbal, knowledge and wm so may underestimate young. Damon- simple and familiar situation may be easier, Hamlin 2007: removed verbal demand by showing circle trying to get up hill, either good shape who helps or bad shape who pushes Down. 6m old infants prefer to touch nice shape- innate moral but w: touch may not represent moral and replication issues
34
Socialisation of morality
Hart- parents in west who are warm and sympathetic have children who regulate emotions more, sympathise w others and show more, judgement. Piaget/kohlberg said negotiating w peers crucial for development as don’t do w parents. Walker- qual of peer interaction age 9 predicted moral judgment later