Handout #2 (Terms(ppl v. Watson and ppl v. Whitfield) ) Flashcards
Implied malice murder (CA Penal code S187)
Elements:
1) Unlawful killing
2) of a human or fetus
3) With malice aforethought(premeditated)
Grossly Negligent
A conscious and voluntary disregard of the need to use reasonable care, which is likely to cause foreseeable grave injury or harm to persons, property, or both.
MPC S210.4 - Negligent homicide
1) Criminal homicide constitutes a negligent homicide when it is committed negligently
2) Negligent homicide is a felony of the third degree
Implied Malice
Defendant does an act with a high probability that it will result in death and does it when a base antisocial motive and wanton disregard for human life
-A subjective(in ones own mind) awareness of a higher degree of risk
Express Malice
Intentional killings
CA Penal code 654
Statute that prohibits two or more punishments for the same criminal act or omission.
General Intent
Have NO FUTURE or consequence contemplated, no temporal division between blunt action and its consequence
Specific Intent
Defendant also has intent to do some further act or achieve some further consequence
Horizontal(temporal) SI
One act now (entering a building), done with specific intent of accomplishing some other act in the immediate future (stealing) THUS: burglary
EX: Larceny(theft) -Trespassory -Taking -Of property -Of another(now) -With SI to permanently deprive (later)
Conspiracy
- agreement between 2 or more people (now)
- with SI to commit crime (later)
Attempt:
- Direct, but ineffectual, act performed now
- SI for act to succeed later
Premeditated & deliberate 1st degree murder
- Thinking about the planning, motive, and manner of killing (now)
- Acting with intention to kill another (later)
Express Malice 2nd degree murder
- Act done now
- With an intention to cause the death of the victim soon
Voluntary Intoxication as Defense
Inadmissible to negate general intent crime (it is a defence to SI, but not GI crimes)
-reduces SI crimes to a lower degree
De Novo
Starting from the beginning
- If the facts are not in dispute, the appellate court reviews in the beginning(De Novo)
- Watson (dissent BIRD) The majority only looked at the facts from the De Nova(Red light instead of green light)
Deference
Humble submission and respect
Interlocutory appeal
An appeal of a ruling by a trial court that is made before the trial has concluded
Watson: The Prosecutor appeals the dismissal of the charged
Standard of review
- The appellate court must show deference to the trial court regarding pure factual questions
- Appellate court will not address factual disputes resolved in trial court
Thus:
-If facts are disputed, then appellate court DEFERS to the trial court (master of the facts)
-If not disputed, the Appellate court reviews DE NOVA
Strict Liability
Not all crimes require identical proof - some minor crimes (SL) require proof ONLY that the act was comitted
-Cannot be excused based off of accident, intoxication and mistake
EX: Speeding: You dont have to hurt anyone to be in trouble