hacktivism Flashcards

1
Q

history of hacktivism (1)

A
  1. 1975-85 NWICO: new world communication and information order => questioning the monopoly of states on the means of com. like radio/television
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

history of hacktivism (2)

A

called for a new way for com. to be organized. rise of computers => they become connected and start replacing other methods of com.

bulletin board system- uploading and downloading answers/ questions like a forum. first way in which computers started communicating.

Linux: free operating system that goes against the idea that software should be commercialized

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

veletri agreement , history of activism (2)

A

ngo’s and activists agree to use telephone to communicate and recognized the potential of new technology to promote social justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

history of activism (3)

A

the zapatista movement used telecommunication to develop their message outside of mexico. activism becomes electronic and transnational

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

online activism

A

conventional + online (e.g: signing a petition)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

hacktivism

A

transgressive + online (e.g: DDOS, information theft, website redirects) non violent but disruptive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

cyberterrorism

A

violent + online (e.g: hacking into air traffic control systems)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

transnational social movement

A

established networks in different countries to advance their goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
  1. global framing
A

“ideology” - the use of external symbols to orient local claims.
story about why they’re right
Lulz: claiming to be apolitical
“propaganda by deed”: doing things will convince the world that what you’re doing is right.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
  1. repertoires of contention
A

“how you enact it” - the set of various protest related tools or actions available

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

defacing (repertoire)

A

humiliating by hacking a website and putting an image

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

DDOS (repertoire)

A

coordinating lots of people to request info at the same time to slow a website down

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

information theft (repertoire)

A

leaks organized by hacker networks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
  1. transnational mobilizing structures
A

“organization” - resource which allows contentious movement to be sustained as social movements- creation of solidarity together. supporting other movements together

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
  1. political opportunity structures
A

“the right time” - when the political environment has openness, its easier to protest. elite alignment stability, elite allies, coerciveness of the state are important because they limit or empower collective actors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

contention and institutions in IR by sidney tarrow- objectives

A

will states adapt to the system and make a comeback?

will social movements fill in the void?

17
Q

4 things that led ir and social movement theorists to converge?

A
  1. grassroot insurgencies (chiapas)
  2. intl protest events (battle for seattle)
  3. transnatl activist coalitions agaist some nation states ( brazil)
18
Q

transnational activist networks…

A

aren’t alternatives to social movements or IOs, they contain them. they interact and help find resources, and domestic actors gain leverage in their own country.

19
Q

tarrow against the global civil society thesis

A

globalization doesn’t directly create trans activism. networks are rarely transnational-identities are local.
IOs create transnatl reactions and form a cosmopolitan elite

20
Q

conclusions of tarrow

A

II’s are like a coral reef- they are created by states bit they’re the one’s that create transnatl social movements.
However, if this thesis was correct, TANs would not emerge from domestic groups but from IOs and their transnational contention