Growth Of Tsarist Opposition Flashcards
Emergence of opposition to the tsar
- brought on by the hope and latter disappointment of the 70s and 80s.
-Through AII, literature was uncensored, education bred independently minded students, zemstva challenges to tsarist politicies and new défense lawyers had a platform to question autocratic rule. - Equally, the repressive atmosphere which follows reinforced the demands for change from both liberal intelligentsia and socialists and radicals.
Opposition from the liberal intelligentsia
-grown at the end of the 19th century due to the education and economic reforms.
-Had the benefit of education and wealth but also time and interest to discuss topical issues.
-Many were well travelled and so knew the social stagnation of their own country.
-Some sought meaning in nihilism and anarchism- ideas about the barelessness of human value and the downfall of all institution,
-but most were either westernisers and slavophiles,
Westernisers
- those who wanted to catch up with the progress of the west by mimicking their society and abandoning Russian traditions.
Slavophiles
-believers that the unique Russian culture such as peasantry and orthodoxy should be preserved in taking a uniquely Russian path to a modern future.
-dimished in the 90s when it became clear the country was moving towards western like industrialisation
Intellectual liberals (intelligentsia) and the zemstva
-many hoped the local decision making could be made more national, however AII was firmly against a central body to coordinate regional councils and for them to have a part in state laws.
-By the end of the 70s AII was more pro representation through the loris melikov constitution but after his death AIII began the negative zemstva reforms.
-Shortly after this in the early 90s the zemstva was left to relief the famines and this created certainty that the system had to change.
-By the mid 90s there were renews zemstva calls for a national body of advisors.
1890s split of the intellegestia
- now westernisers were the victors of the previous split.
-Some were attracted to Marxist theory of socialism and so wanted a removal of autocracy completely.
-Others had faith in a reform of tsardom rather than an abolition ( more liberal/slavophile)
More radical tsarist opposition in the 60s
-came from younger gen, often children of liberals.
-In 1862 a series of fires in st Petersburg set by young russia destroyed 2000 shops.
-1863 ‘the orgnaisation’ set up at Moscow uni called for reform.
-This determination was heightened by the latter 60s repression and radical socialist writers.
Herzen
-editor of radical journal the bell which was smuggled into Russia.
-He advocated for a peasant based societal structure and urged his followers to ‘go to the people’ this theodicy later morphed into populism
Mikhaïl Bakunin
-began the idea of collective ownership
-he was thus exiled bu translated the communist amnifesto into Russian whilst there in 1869 and latter das kapital in 72.
-He wrote his own manifesto, catechism of a revolutionary which was smuggled into russia and urged people to be merciless and brutal in pursuit of a revolution.
-He in 1871 returned to russia in determination of a revolt but soon fled.
Tchaikovsky circle
-named after their head member Nikolai Tchaikovsky, set up in 1868 in st Petersburg.
-Literary society that organised the publication of revolutionary literature incl das kapital.
-They sought for social rather than political revolution.
-From 1872 they followed the notion of going to the people and organised workers to live amongst the peasentry in the country.
Populism/narodnyism
the idea of going to the people
First working of the narodniks
-1874 championed by Pyotr lavrov.
-2000 young people from the intelligentsia trvalled to the countryside to exploit peasant anger over the emancipation and convince them russias future rested on the peasantry.
-Some dressed and talked like peasants.
-However peasants were too loyal and superstitious so over 1600 were reported to authorities and arrested.
Second working of narodniks
-in 1876 they attempted again
- more were arrested and the following two years they were humiliated in a series of show trials
Impact of narodnysim
-taken radical opposition into the public eye and the countryside.
-Made tsar and government more aware of the opposition from intellensia and even peasantry.
-made it clear due to peasant skepticism that perhaps revolt wasn’t held in the country peasants
Mikhaïl romas
- tried to set up a fruit and vegetable store
- the rich peasants were angry at his cheap prices and the poor were intimiadated and skeptical.
-In the end his populism failed as he had his stand blown up and assistant killed