Growth and Survival of Firms Flashcards
1
Q
Reasons for different sizes
A
- Small and midsize enterprise (SME) provides an ideal environment that enables entrepreneurs to exercise their talent and attain their goals.
- This is important for economic growth by providing them jobs.
- Low cost and more convenient to quit the industry.
- These small firms are particularly found in the service sector, retail, food production, automotive, personal and business services.
- A recent trend in many developed economies is for small knowledge and research oriented firms to provide services for much larger manufacturing companies.
2
Q
Reasons for small firms to exist
A
- There are economic activities where the size of the market is too small, little profit to support large firms.
- The business may involve specialist skills possessed by very few people.
- For service (accountant, dentist, small shops), firms will be small to offer customers personal attention, which they are willing to pay a higher price.
- Small firms may be the big firms of tomorrow.
- Entrepreneurs may not want to grow the firm as this may create burearcracy which later the original owner will lack of control.
- Recession and rising unemployment may trigger an increase in the number of business start-ups as former employees become self-employed.
- Increase access to technology through the Internet and mobile phones made small business more efficient.
- Small businesses may receive financial assistance under government schemes due to their potential.
⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄
Research showed that there was no difference in growth rates by size of these large firms.
3
Q
Reasons for business growth
A
- The desire to achieve reduction in ATC over time through economies of scale.
> Allow firms to compete more effectively with rivals as they can afford to cut prices without sacrificing profits. - To diversify product range.
> Multiproduct firms have the advantage to spread the risk.
> Economies of scope refers to the reduction in ATC made possible by firms increasing different goods it produces.
> Example, Nestle.
> It is sometimes called ‘asset stripping’ and the cash may be invested back into improving the core business.
4
Q
Ways for firms to grow
A
- Internal growth
> Profits earned are reinvested back into the form of new investment projects, rather than paid out as dividends to shareholders.
> Likely to occur in capital-intensive activities where the market is expanding.
> Investment is also influenced by stage of business cycle.
» During the boom period, profit earned will be used for investment.
» During recession, profit earned will not be used for investment. - External growth
A. Business expands through mergers and acquisition (M&A).
> Acquisition can be done by buying sufficient shares of the firms to get 51% total and have control of the business.
> Mergers often have the same result, a new larger legal entity.
» Temporary. Example, Sony Ericsson.
» Common during recession or where the market is shrinking leaving the firms with excess productive capacity.
> Quicker and cheaper route for firms than internal growth, particularly when there are high fixed costs.
» Example, it may be cheaper for one oil company to buy assets of another than to expand existing operations.
⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄
B. External growth of a conglomerate differs from the two forms of integration in so far as growth comes from the purchase of unrelated business.
> The rationale is to spread risk.
> Losses from poorly performing subsidiaries can be offset by profits from elsewhere in the group.
> If losses persist, the the subsidiary can always be sold.
> Each of the companies in a conglomerate is independent with its own board of directors.
> Many conglomerates are multinational companies, the Indian-owned Tata Group being a long-established example.
> A criticism is that the diversity of a conglomerate means that the group can be difficult to manage strategically. - Diversification
> Where a firm grows through the production or sale of a wide range of different products.
> To spread the risk and to be more aggressive in the market while to exploit an opportunity in the market.
> Can be seen in conglomerates such as Nestle, Unilever, Data Group.
5
Q
Horizontal integration
A
- Where a firm merges or acuqires another firm in the same line of business.
> Process or startegy used by firms to strengthen their position in industry.
> Usually large firms which have different varieties of service and are able to extract raw materials to do integration. - The outcome is one of consolidation.
- Used in oligopoly or monopoly.
- Examples:
> Disney acquisition of PIXAR, ESPN. - Reasons for horizontal integration
> To enjoy the economies of scale.
» R&D and skilled labour can be pooled, production plants can be combined, and reduced marketing costs.
> Access to new markets.
» Increase market power, reduce competition, thereby opportunity to make abnormal profits.
» However, such moves sometimes could be blocked by the government, who are concerned about monopoly abuse.
6
Q
A
7
Q
Reasons for small firms to exist
A
- There are economic activities where the size of the market is too small, little profit to support large firms.
- The business may involve specialist skills possessed by very few people.
- For service (accountant, dentist, small shops), firms will be small to offer customers personal attention, which they are willing to pay a higher price.
- Small firms may be the big firms of tomorrow.
- Entrepreneurs may not want to grow the firm as this may create bureaucracy which later the original owner will lack of control.
- Recession and rising unemployment may trigger an increase in the number of business start-ups as former employees become self-employed.
- Increase access to technology through the Internet and mobile phones made small business more efficient.
- Small businesses may receive financial assistance under government schemes due to their potential.
⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄
> Research showed that there was no difference in growth rates by size of these large firms.
8
Q
Reasons for business growth
A
- The desire to achieve reduction in ATC over time through economies of scale.
> Allow firms to compete more effectively with rivals as they can afford to cut prices without sacrificing profits. - To diversify product range.
> Multiproduct firms have the advantage to spread the risk.
> Economies of scope refers to the reduction in ATC made possible by firms increasing different goods it produces.
> Example, Nestle.
> It is sometimes called ‘asset stripping’ and the cash may be invested back into improving the core business.
9
Q
Ways firms can grow
A
- Internal growth
> The profits earned are reinvested back into the form of new investment projects, rather than paid out as dividends to shareholders.
> This is likely to occur in capital-intensive activities where the market is expanding.
> Investment is also influenced by stage of business cycle.
» During the boom period, profit earned will be used for investment.
» During recession, profit earned will not be used for investment. - External growth
A. Business expands through mergers and acquisition, M&A.
> Acquisition can be done by buying sufficient shares of the firms to get 51% total and have control of the business.
> Mergers often have the same result, a new larger legal entity.
» Temporary. Example, Sony Ericsson.
» Common during recession or where the market is shrinking leaving the firms with excess productive capacity.
> Quicker and cheaper route for firms than internal growth, particularly when there are high fixed costs.
> Example, it may be cheaper for one oil company to buy assets of another than to expand existing operations.
⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄
B. External growth of a conglomerate differs from the two forms of integration in so far as growth comes from the purchase of unrelated businesses.
> The rationale is to spread risk.
> Losses from poorly performing subsidiaries can be offset by profits from elsewhere in the group.
> If losses persist, then the subsidiary can always be sold.
> Each of the companies in a conglomerate is independent with its own board of directors.
> Many conglomerates are multinational companies, the Indian-owned Tata Group being a long-established example.
> A criticism is that the diversity of a conglomerate means that the group can be difficult to manage strategically. - Diversification
> Where a firm grows through the production or sale of a wide range of different products.
> To spread the risk and to be more aggressive in the market while to exploit an opportunity in the market.
> Can be seen in conglomerates such as Nestle, Unilever, Tata Group.
10
Q
Horizontal integration
A
- Where a firm merges or acquires another firm in the same line of business.
> Process or strategy used by firms to strengthen their position in industry.
> Usually large firms which have different varieties of service and are able to extract raw materials to do integration. - The outcome is one of consolidation.
- Used in oligopoly or monopoly.
- Example:
> Disney acquisition of PIXAR, ESPN. - Reasons for horizontal integration:
> To enjoy the economies of scale.
» R&D and skilled labour can be pooled, production plants can be combined, and reduced marketing costs.
> Access to new markets.
» Increase market power, reduce competition, thereby opportunity to make abnormal profits.
» However, such moves sometimes could be blocked by the government, who are concerned about monopoly abuse.
11
Q
Vertical integration
A
- Where a firm grows by producing backwards or forwards in its supply chain.
> It can be where a manufacturer is moving into retail (forward vertical integration), or taking control over some of its suppliers (backward vertical integration). - Examples, BP, Shell, ExxonMobil involved in exploration, fuel production, refining, transport and sales.
- Benefits of vertical integration:
> Reduce average cost
> Increase the profit
> More organised and easier to take control of the entity
> Improve efficiency
> Access to more resources
> Monopolise the raw material (backward vertical integration)
> Ensure higher quality
> Improve the price competitiveness - Disadvantages of vertical integration:
> Creates conflict between the collaborating firms
> Lack of information and knowledge in other sectors
> Difficult for the small firms to grow
> Higher cost to maintain the collaborating firms’ cost
12
Q
Cartel
A
- A formal agreement between member firms in an industry to limit competition.
> Agreement may involve fixing the price or quantity to be produced by each member. - Seeks to maximise profits in the same way as monopolists.
- Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC)
> Currently has 13 members
> Membership is open to any countries that are substantial net exporters of crude petroleum
> The organisation has strengthened its market power by seeking to control the price of oil from non-members such as Russia and Kazakhstan, and is known as OPEC+
> OPEC and OPEC+ clearly have considerable power in the market to determine current and future prices
> OPEC’s power in the market is far less than it was in the 1970s when it had a near monopoly hold over the global supply of oil
> Saudi Arabia was and still is a powerful voice in the organisation
> OPEC’s power has decreased as other countries, especially the USA, have obtained oil from shale and from off-shore drilling
> As the USA is now the world’s biggest oil producer by volume and can clearly use this to offset OPEC’s power
> OPEC’s economic power will also weaken if new suppliers emerge from outside of the cartel or consumers take action that will reduce consumption
> Technology may provide alternatives to oil such as eectric vehicle and solar powered aircraft
> Cartel will weaken if there is disagreement over the target price or the production quotas allocated to each member country
> Total profits are only high because of the large turnover
> Some analysts predict that there will be further horizontal integration between oil companies that are already vertically integrated
> The oil industry will continue to be dominated by a few big players, mainly because of the high fixed cost and risks associated with exploration and drilling
> If their controversial attempts to find oil in areas like the Arctic and Antarctic are successful, then OPEC’s power could diminish - The long-term survival of a cartel depends upon the high barriers to entry.
- Threats to a cartel:
> If some members have higher costs than other, resulting in fewer profits due to the agreed fixed price.
> If there is no dominant member that has the power to control others.
> The possibility of a price war, whereby one firm breaks rank to capture a bigger market share.
> Legal obstacles such as in the EU and USA where cartels are illegal since they restrict competition and do not act in the best interests of consumers.
13
Q
Principal agent problem
A
- In setting the various objectives of firms, it is assumed that those who set the objectives have the authority to control the business operation.
> However, owners usually hire managers to help on the day to day activities.
> Particularly in large firms, there is a divorce between management and ownership, i.e., shareholders are not in a ‘hands on’ position. - Principal agent problem is how the owner always make sure that their managers always listen to them.
> Owner (principal) hires managers (agents) to run the business in return for salary and other bonuses. - Principal cannot be sure that those who act on their behalf (agents) will act in their best interest, as a result of asymmetric information.
> In the case of a firm’s growth, the agent may have plans and a strategy that differ from those of the principal.
> The agents may decide to act in their own interest.
> if successful, the agents stand to gain prestige and enhance their own career development.
> The principal is not fully aware of what the growth plans involve.
> This is called the agency cost. - Principal agent problems can be overcome by giving managers share options and performance related pay, although in some industries, it is difficult to measure the performance.
- Principal-agent problem is an example of market failure that occurs because of information failure.
> The principals should be the ones in the best position to determine a firm’s future growth.
> This is often not so and leads to a misallocation of resources.