Government Policies To Achieve Efficient, Resource Allocation And Correct Market Failure Flashcards
1
Q
Negative production externalities
A
- Indirect tax
> Example, a firm’s production process leads to pollution to the environment.
> An indirect tax will be imposed on firms, this is consistent with the ‘polluter-pays’ principle.
> Tax imposed ideally equal to MEC.
> This tax is therefore added into the cost of production, and the supply curve shifts inwards to S2, which is equal to MPC + Tax. - Regulations
> Rules and laws and other range of legal requirements that come from the government or other organisations.
> Government could set standards that restrict the amount of pollution that can be legally produced.
> Government would then regulate and inspect the firms to ensure those restriction are enforced.
> Government can also set laws that limit carbon emission from automobiles. Example, Europe’s cars. - Pollution permits
> A form of licence given by the government that gives firms the legal right to pollute a certain amount per year.
> A free market solution as it can be bought and sold.
> Issued by the government under Emission Trading Scheme (ETS), European Union (EU).
> The USA has recently introduced a ‘cap and trade’ system for reducing carbon emission.
> Create incentives for businesses to invest in clean technologies.
> Limitation is that in 2005, EU governments allocated too many permits. - Property rights
> Owners have the right to decide how their assets may be used.
» The exclusive authority to determine how a resource is used.
» Individuals, firms, governments and others have the rights to own resources such as housing, factories, farms.
> Gives the owner the legal rights to use the property and can enforce the property rights accordingly.
» Advantage to the owners.
> Bargaining can be undertaken to achieve an optimum level of pollution.
2
Q
Negative consumption externalities
A
- Indirect tax
- Minimum price
> Fiscal device by imposing minimum price on products that generate negative consumption externalities.
> Go more on MPB to MSC.
> This intervention occurs in many countries to limit the consumption of high-sugar energy drinks and tobacco products such as cigaretts.
> The minimum price increases the price to consumers above the point where MPB = MSC.
> The effectiveness of this policy depends upon the price elastcity of demand for the product.
» In the case of demerit goods, demand is invariably price inelastic.
» This will affect the success of a minimum price scheme.
» Elastic is more effective, consumers are very responsive, they will reduce quantity demanded by greater amounts when price increases. When quantity is reduced, it can solve externalities.
» Inelastic is not so effective as the consumers are less responsive, quantity will decrease less. - Production quotas
> Involves limiting the quantity of goods that is produced.
> If the quota is set at a low level, the price of the product is likely to rise, reducing the amount consumed. - Licensing suppliers
> Used to control supply.
> One problem is that they can lead to informal market dealings.
> Example, cigarette production. - Legislation
> To enforce the laws.
> Examples, prohibit smoking in the public, limit the automotive noise. - Provision of information
> Warning and photos in tobacco packets to deter smoking, information provided on food packaging, provide carbon footprint when travelling.
3
Q
Positive production externalities
A
- Subsidy
> Subsidies that equal to external benefit to correct market failure.
> Allocative efficiency is now achieved.
4
Q
Positive consumption externalities
A
- Subsidy
> Provided by the government shifts the supply curve outwards.
> As such, the marginal cost of supplying the product is reduced by the amount of subsidy. - Legislation
> Used in some countries to make state-funded education compulsory up to a certain age. - Information
> Provided by the government to persuade consumers to consume goods that produce positive externalities, example, exercise to reduce health issues.
5
Q
Behavioural insights and ‘Nudge’ theory
A
- Nudge theory argued that by presenting choices better, people make wiser decisions without losing their freedom of choice, and avoid the need of formal government intervention.
- People can be helped to think appropriately and make better decisions by being offered choices that have been designed to reach certain outcomes.
> Design for the improvement of society without the need of regulations. - it is a ‘soft paternalism’ whereby the government or individual interfere with the affairs of people against their will yet with their best interest in mind.
> Example, free vaccination that is available to senior citizens. These people can be targeted by a simple letter that makes them dully aware of the benefits of having vaccination. - Effectiveness of nudge
> Nudge theory can be debated between persuasion and coercion.
> It is not transformative, Choices are influenced by changing the context, not attitude or beliefs.
> Nudge works but to only a limited extent. It is best used and most effective when used alongside other policies that are already dealing with similar market failure.
6
Q
Privatisation
A
- Change in the ownership from public to private sector.
- Reasons for privatisation:
> To break up monopoly power and produce greater allocative and productive efficiency.
> X-inefficiency where the costs are above those experienced in a competitive market.
» Overtime, nationalised company cost levels are higher, leading to average cost and subsequent consumer prices to increase than those under private ownership.
» This relates to property rights issues where there is little or no pressure on firms to be more efficient.
> In a private business, managers have freedom to manage and raise funds for investment without restriction from the government.
> In the case of natural monopoly, it is more practical to have one provider of railway line to avoid duplication and inefficiency. - Disadvantages of privatisation:
> Could lead to private monopoly.
» Firms are still inefficient.
> Regulations and controls are still needed to protect consumers from market power from large companies. - Whether an industry is privatised or retains state control is often a political decision and not solely on economies grounds.
7
Q
Government failure in microeconomic intervention
A
- Government policies to correct market failures (negative externalities) make economic sense.
> They increase economic efficiency in the markets and are judged to be economically desirable. - Causes of government failure
A. Information failure
> Lack of information about the true cost or value of a negative externality.
» It is often very difficult to give an accurate figure for the cost of a negative externality, such as air pollution.
» The problem is that it becomes very difficult to impose the correct value of a tax that attempts to reduce production of a polluting firm.
» The wrong level of tax will lead to the wrong level of production and an even greater inefficiency in the use of resources.
> Lack of information about the consumer demand for a merit good such as free healthcare.
» If the government is providing a product free of charge to the consumers, some estimation of the level of consumer demand is required.
» This is necessary in order to establish the cost of the intervention.
» This problem also occurs with the provision of public goods.
» The government must try to provide the right amount of such goods.
» If it does not estimate the level of demand accurately, then the wrong amount will be produced or funded.
» This is another case of an inefficient allocation of resources.
⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄
B. Unintended consequences
> The imposition of taxes can distort incentives.
» High marginal rates of income tax can create disincentives for people to work harder and so gain more income.
» If this happens, then scarce resources are not being used to their best effect and there is inefficiency.
> The government pays benefits to unemployed workers.
» If the benefits paid are too high, there may be no incentive for the unemployed to look for work.
> Politicians are often seen as being motivated by the desire to remain in government.
» If this is so, then economic policies may be designed by the governments to try to retain power rather than to try to ensure maximum economic efficiency.
» For example, road pricing is a very unpopular tax in the eyes of car users, despite its tremendous potential to reduce congestion and hence correct market failure.
» It is likely to be avoided due to a gvernment’s fears that its introduction could lead to a loss of electoral votes.
⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄⛄
C. Policy conflicts
> Government intervention in the running of the economy is often justified by the need to reduce inequality.
> Government intervention might sometimes increase existing inequality.
» The imposition of any tax will have a distributional impact.
» For example, a tax on energy use that aims to reduce harmful emissions of greenhouse gases will have different effects on different groups of people.
» If the tax is on domestic fuel, then older members of society may bear the greatest effect as they use proportionately more fuel for heating than others in society.
» This could be seen as unfair and increasing inequality in society.
> In the case of subsidies on the costs of fossil fuels.
» These encourage production and their use in coal-fired power stations, both of which contribute increased environmental pollution.
» The subsidies might enhance the competitiveness of manufacturing industries and keep workers in jobs, but they are completely inconsistent with the need for more sustainable development policies.