Gross Negligence Manslaughter Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Which case says there are 4 parts to GNM

A

Adomako

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 4 parts to GNM

A
  1. D must owe V duty of care
  2. D must breach this duty (involves risk of death)
  3. Ds breach must cause Vs death
  4. D must be grossly negligent (conduct is so bad it amounts to a crime)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Contractual duty

A

Pittwood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Public office

A

Dytham

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Relationship

A

Gibbons & Proctor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Voluntary assumption of care

A

Stone & Dobinson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Assumption of care must be significant and must willingly/actively take over

A

Evans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Creating a dangerous situation

A

Miller

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Damage was RF, there was proximity and it’s fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty on D

A

Caparo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

No ex turpi causa for GNM

A

R v Wacker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Breach - D fails to act as a reasonable person would

A

Blyth v BWW

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

inexperience doesn’t count

A

Nettleship v Weston

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

professionals

A

Bolam

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Holding themselves out as a pro

A

Wells v Cooper

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Age

A

Mullin v Richards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Size of risk

A

Miller v Jackson

17
Q

Seriousness of harm

A

Paris v Stepney

18
Q

Practicability of precautions

A

Paris v Stepney

19
Q

Benefits of taking risk

A

Watt v HCC

20
Q

Must be risk of death

A

Misra

21
Q

Risk of death must be foreseeable to the RP

A

Lewin

22
Q

Factual causation

A

Pagett

23
Q

Legal causation

A

Smith

24
Q

Act of victim

A

Williams

25
Q

Act of third party

A

Jordan

26
Q

Thin skull rule

A

Blaue

27
Q

Self neglect

A

Dear

28
Q

GN is when Ds conduct “is so bad in all circumstances that it should amount to a crime”

A

Adomako