Government Intervention and Failure Flashcards

1
Q

Gov failure

A

When the gov intervene to correct one or more market failures leads to a greater net social welfare loss. When the costs of government intervention to correct market failure exceed the benefits. Gov failure can happen if a policy decision fails to create enough of an incentive to change behaviour of agents to meet the aims of policy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Main causes of gov failure

A

Impact on inequality, unintended consequences, conflict with other micro/macro objectives, information failure before a policy is introduced, cost of compliance and implementation, policy may be ineffective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Ad Valorem (Indirect) Taxes

A

VAT. Effect is to cause a pivotal shift in the supply curve, because the tax is a percentage of the unit cost of supplying the product so a good that could be supplied for a cost of £50 will now cost £60 with 20% VAT.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Subsidy

A

money granted by the government to help an industry or business keep the price of a product or service low to help consumers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Nationalism

A

When a government takes over a private sector company so that the business is now wholly or majority state-owned and controlled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Privatisation

A

The sale of state-owned companies to the private sector, normally through a stock market listing, opposite of nationalism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Core arguments for privatisation

A

Power of markets and price mechanism
Private companies have a profit incentive and raise labour productivity
Gov gains significant revenue from sale of assets
Help create a shareholder democracy
Private sector firms more likely to be innovative and increase investment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Core arguments against privatisation

A

Social objectives are given less importance when a business wants private profits
Some are best state ran with a natural monopoly, like water supply
Government lose out on any future profit
Public sector assets often sold too cheaply
State-owned firms can be dynamically efficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Regulation

A

Rule/Law by the government that must be followed by economic agents to encourage a change in behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Benefits to regulations

A

Control, incentive to change behaviour, solves issues in free markets, allocative efficiency and welfare gain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Possible market failure causes from regulation

A

Cost, setting the right regulation, black markets, unintended consequences, equity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Pro-free market economists

A

See a market economy as a calm and orderly place in which the market mechanism achieves a better or more optimal outcome than can be obtained through government intervention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Interventionist economists

A

Believe that all too often, markets are uncompetitively characterised by monopoly power and prone to other forms of market failure and that by intervening, the government ‘knows better’ than unregulated market forces

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Correcting market failure

A

To one extreme the gov can abolish the market, financed from general taxation and at the other extreme the gov can try influence market behaviour by providing info and by ‘nudging’ firms and consumers to behave a certain way. Between these extremes, govs impose regulations to limit people’s freedom of action in the market place.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Gov provision of public and merit goods

A

Gov could change prices of merit goods and other goods that yield external benefits, subsidies can also be used to encourage production and consumption. On the other hand, they can force consumers to consume merit goods, for example setting a vaccination as a requirement or a regulation to wear seatbelts in cars. They can also impose regulations that force firms or consumers to generate positive externalities, like ordering landowners to plant trees. In this case, it is illegal to not provide external benefits for others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Taxes

A

Taxes can be set upon good to disincentivise the use for it, this can be very helpful in reducing the consumption of demerit goods, while also bringing more general revenue towards the government, which allows them more resources

17
Q

Negative of a Price ceiling

A

If set below the free-market equilibrium price, in a free market the market forces would raise the price to eliminate excess demand, however this is illegal, therefore there is no mechanism to remove excess demand. Rather than rationing by price, households are rationed by quantity, so queues and waiting lists occur and possibly bribery and corruption due to the struggles of obtaining a good as only favoured consumers can buy the good. Ceilings prevent prices from rising to attract new firms therefore secondary markets may emerge like black markets. Lower profits lowers capital investments long run which hurts consumers. Incorrect price ceiling can cause a massive gov failure

18
Q

Negative of price floors

A

In order to affect the market it must be set above the free-market price. In a labour market a national minimum wage above the competitive market wage creates an excess in supply of labour, causing unemployment. May also cause rogue employers to break the law and pay poverty wages to vulnerable employees like illegal immigrants. Price floors also intervene with price functions as falling prices cause inefficient or high-cost firms to leave the market but a price floor prevents this, allowing inefficiency in a market

19
Q

Evaluation of state versus private debate

A

Ownership of a business is less important than the extent to which an industry is genuinely contestable
Quality of regulation is also important- a regulator can act as a surrogate consumer
Avoid making ‘lazy assumptions’ such that the private sector is always more efficient
Macroeconomic context is important, a monopoly may face competition overseas

20
Q

When may a subsidy be justifiable

A

Helping to correct market failures, protecting jobs during economic recession, improving export performance, reducing income and consumption inequality, funding innovation and growth, changing patterns of spending. Good example:
Improved nutrition can lift labour productivity and reduce long-term burden on health services

21
Q

Disadvantages of a subsidy

A

Producers can become “subsidy dependent”, can lead to excess production, environmental risks from excessive production, distort resource allocation, can be very expensive and tax-payers bare the costs

22
Q

Costs of black markets

A

Lost tax revenue, enables consumption of de-merit goods, low health and safety standards, takes businesses from law abiding citizens, poor info for gov which can cause more incorrect policies

23
Q

Benefits of a black market

A

Provides more jobs, can provide legal necessities in short supply, people can afford healthcare, help countries survive economic crashes through survival in market which reduces strain on gov

24
Q

Aims of competition policy

A

Prevent excessive pricing, promote competition, ensure quality standards and choice, regulate natural monopolies or effective privatisation of natural monopolies, promote technological innovation. All to protect consumers

25
Q

CMA

A

The regulatory bodies of each market sector such as ORR-railway, CAA-aircraft, OFCOM- communications, OFWAT- water, OFGEM- gas and electricity

26
Q

Positives of a price ceiling

A

Prevent excessive profits at expense of consumers, increase in consumer surplus meaning higher real living standards in long run, help stimulate improvements in productive efficiency, can be used as a tool for controlling consumer price inflation