Golden Years Of The Weimar Republic, 1924-28 Flashcards

1
Q

Who became Chancellor after the government of Cuno collapsed?

A

In August 1923, at the height of the hyperinflation crisis, the government of Cuno collaped and was replaced by a new coalition government led by Gustav Stresemann.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was unique about Stresemann’s coalition?

A

It included parties from both the right and left. Stresemann’s own party, the DVP, shared power with the Centre Party, the Socialists and the DDP. Stresemann was only Chancellor for 103 days.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How was inflation brought under control by Stresemann?

A
  • The end of passive resistance
  • The issuing of a new currency
  • Balancing the budget
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the end of passive resistance?

A

Passive resistance against the occupation of the Ruhr was called off in September. This was highly unpopular and risky move, which led to unrest and the attempted Beer Hall Putsch but Stresemann believed that there was no alternative. Germany’s economy was beginning to grind to a halt and inflation was completely out of control. Ending passive resistance, which meant that the government stopped paying workers who refused to work for the French, was an essential first step towards reducing government expenditure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What currency did Stresemann issue?

A

In November, a new currency called the Rentenmark was introduced to replaced the old and worthless Reichsmark. The new currency was exchanged for the old on the basis of one Rentenmark for one trillion old marks. Since Germany did not have sufficient gold reserves to back the new currency, it was supported by a mortgage on all industrial and agricultural land. Once the new currency was successfully launched, the government kept tight control over the amount of money in circulation in order to prevent inflation reappearing. The old inflated marks were gradually cashed in and, in August 1924, the Rentenmark became the Reichsmark, backed by the German gold reserve, which had to be maintained at 30% of the value of the Reichsmarks in circulation. All this happened under the direction of Hjalmar Schacht.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How was the budget balanced?

A

Stresemann’s government cut expenditure and raised taxes. The salaries of government employees were cut, 300,000 civil servants lost their jobs and taxes were raised for both individuals and companies. As government debt began to fall, confidence was restored. Well- managed companies that were run prudently and were careful not to build up excessive debt continued to prosper. Weaker companies that were heavily reliant on credit crumbled. The number of companies that went bankrupt in Germany rose from 233 in 1923 to over 6000 in 1924. Moreover, those who had lost their savings in the collapse of the old currency did not gain anything from the introduction of a new currency.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the Dawes plan?

A

Proposed April 1924, agreed July 1924. The USA had a vested interest in getting Germany back to a position where reparations could be made to France, because much of this money was then passed on to the USA to repay loans. Therefore, the American banker Charles Dawes acted as the new committee’s chairman. By the time the Dawes Plan was finalised in April 1924, Stresemann’s government had fallen, but he remained as foreign secretary and took credit for much of what was achieved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was negotiated about reparations in the Dawes Plan?

A

Although the Dawes Plan confirmed the original figure of a total reparations payment of £6.6 billion (132,000 million gold marks) it made the payments more manageable. It recommended that:

  • The amount paid each year by Germany should be reduced until 1929, when the situation would be reappraised. It proposed that Germany should re-start reparations by paying 1000 million marks (a fraction of what had been expected before) and that this sum should be raised by annual increments over 5 years by 2500 million marks per year. After this, the sum paid should be related to German industrial performance.
  • Germany should receive a large loan of 800 million marks from the USA to help get the plan started and to allow for heavy investment in German infrastructure.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How did Stresemann feel about the Dawes Plan?

A

Stresemann did not actually believe in the plan, privately referring to it as ‘no more than an economic armistice’, but he agreed to it as a way of securing foreign loans.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How was the Dawes Plan beneficial?

A
  • The Allies accepted that Germany’s problems with the payment of reparations were real.
  • Loans were granted, with which new machinery, factories, houses and jobs could be provided and the German economy rebuilt.

The French gradually left the Ruhr during 1924-25, once it became clear that Germany was going to restart paying reparations and the occupation could no longer be justified. Such measures contributed to German optimism that their country was once again its own master.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How were foreign affairs dealt with and was the Locarno Pact of 1925?

A

In 1925, Stresemann signed the Locarno Treaty, agreeing to the loss of Alsace-Lorraine. In 1926, Germany was allowed to join the League of Nations. Germany had become a world power again.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How did the industry benefit in 1925?

A

By 1925, Germany appeared more stable and prosperous. American loans helped stimulate the economy. Industrial output grew after 1924 but did not reach 1913 levels until 1929. The extent of this boom should not be exaggerated. Growth rates were unsteady. The years 1924-25 and 1927 were good years, but the economy shrank in 1928 and 1929. Investment in new machinery and factories was failing by 1929.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How many cartels were there by 1925?

A

By 1925, there were around 3000 such cartel arrangements in operation, including 90% of Germany’s coal and steel production. After 1925, Germany was allowed, under the terms of the Versailles Treaty, to protect its industries by introducing tariffs on imported foreign goods. Many firms also received state subsidies to enable them to survive. All of these practices reduced competition and propped up inefficient enterprises.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What advances were made and how was Germany prosperous?

A
  • Advances were made in the chemical industry, such as the large-scale production of artificial fertilisers.
  • The car and aeroplane industries also developed, although cars were still too expensive for the average German.
  • The inflation rate was close to zero and living standards rose as wages began to increase from 1924.
  • Loans helped to finance the building of housing, schools, municipal buildings, road and public works.
  • Massive population growth had created an acute housing shortage in Germany by the early 20th century, and the overcrowding and insanitary conditions of working class city accommodation had been linked to political instability. Consequently, state initiatives to provide affordable homes were of great importance for future stability. In 1925, 178,930 dwellings were built - over 70,000 more than in the previous year - and, in 1926, there were to be 205,793 more new homes.
  • Money was spent on welfare payments and health improvements and, in 1924, new schemes of relief were launched.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How did workers favour during this time?

A

The number of strikes in German industry declined in these years, partly because a new system of compulsory arbitration for settling industrial disputes was issued. However, employers felt that this system was biased in favour of the unions and resented the state’s interference in their affairs. The Weimar Republic had already set a maximum of eight hours for a working day and had given trade unions the right to be part of work councils in factories and mines.

In 1928, a dispute over wages in the iron and steel industry in the Ruhr resulted in the arbitrator granting a small wage increase to the workers. The employers then refused to pay the increase and locked out the workers for four weeks. In this dispute the workers were backed by the government and paid by the state. There were undoubtedly improvements in living standards for ordinary German workers, especially those who were backed by powerful trade unions. They benefitted from increases in the real value of wages in each year after 1924. In 1927, real wages increased by 9% and, in 1928, they rose by a further 12%.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Stresemann warn about the economic situation?

A

In a speech given before his death in 1929, Stresemann warned, ‘The economic position is only flourishing on the surface. Germany is dancing on a volcano. If the short term loans are called in, a large section of our economy would collapse’.

17
Q

Why was unemployment still an issue?

A

By the end of 1925, unemployment had reached one million; by March 1926, it was over three million, although it did fall after that. This was due partly to there being more people seeking work, partly to public spending cuts, but also to companies reducing their workforces in order to make efficiency savings. The mining companies reduced their workforces by 136,000 between 1922 and 1925, and reduced them by another 56,000 between 1925 and 1929.

18
Q

Who lost out from the Weimar ‘economic miracle’?

A

The Mittlestand, the professional middle classes, gained very little in this so called ‘golden age’. Bankrupted by the hyperinflation of 1923, middle class managers, clerks and bureaucrats did not benefit fully from the improved economic climate. White-collar workers did not enjoy the wave rises of the industrial sector. By the late 1920s, industrial sector wages had drawn level with those of the middle class - and in some cases exceeded them.

19
Q

What did farmers gain from the economic recovery?

A

Farmers gained very little benefit benefit from the economic recovery of these years. A worldwide agricultural depression kept food prices low and few farmers were able to make a profit on their land. During the inflation of the early 1920s, large landowners and farmers borrowed money to buy new machinery and improve their farms. Smaller peasant farmers, however, tended to hoard money and their savings were wiped out by inflation.

20
Q

After 1923 what did the government do to sort out agriculture?

A

After 1923, the government made it easier for farmers to borrow money, but this made matters worse. Farmers became overcome with debt at a time when prices were falling and they could not, therefore, keep up the repayments. The increased taxes introduced to pay for the welfare benefits of the unemployed and sick were regarded as an unfair burden on farmers and landowners. The government of these years tried to relieve the farmers’ plight by introducing high import tariffs on food products, import controls and subsidies to farmers, but these measures did not go far enough.

21
Q

How did farmers’ situation worsen?

A

The plight of German farmers worsened due to a global grain surplus and price slump in 1925 and 1926. By the late 1920s, there was an increase in bankruptcies amongst farmers and many of them lost their land as the banks demanded repayment of loans. In 1928, farmers initiated a series of small-scale riots - known as the ‘farmers’ revenge’ - in protest against foreclosures and low market prices. By 1929, German agricultural production was at less than three-quarters of its pre-war levels.

22
Q

What was the reparations issue?

A

The Dawes Plan of 1924 was only ever intended to be a temporary settlement of the reparations issue. Although the French and the Belgians left the Ruhr by 1925, Allied forces remained in occupation of the Rhineland and the French would not agree to withdraw these forces unless and until a final settlement of the reparations issue had been agreed.

23
Q

What plan did Stresemann negotiate concerning the reparations issue after the temporary settlement of the Dawes Plan in 1924?

A

Therefore, Stresemann, who had continued to serve as Foreign Minister after his own coalition government collapsed, agreed that the issue should be considered by an international committee headed by the American businessman Owen Young. This committee met in Paris 1929, with Schacht as one of Germany’s representatives, and produced a report on the final settlement of the reparations issue.

24
Q

What was the Young Plan 1929?

A

The Young Plan obliged Germany to continue paying reparations until 1988. The total reparations bill was considerably reduced, with Germany being required to pay £1.8 billion instead of the original sum of £6.5 billion, but the annual payment Germany was required to make increased. All foreign control over reparations was ended and the responsibility for paying reparations was placed solely on the German government. In return, Britain and France agreed to withdraw all their troops from the Rhineland by June 1930.

25
Q

What were the consequences of the Young Plan?

A

Despite containing a number of concessions to Germany, the Young Plan nevertheless inflamed nationalist opinion in Germany. The new leader of the right-wing DNVP, Alfred Hugenberg, launched a nationwide campaign against the plan, which involved other conservative groups, including Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. This campaign group drew up the so-called ‘freedom law’ - which they demanded should be submitted to a national referendum. This law required the government to repudiate the war-guilt clause of the ToV, to demand immediate evacuation of the occupied areas and declared that any minister who signed a treaty that involved acceptance of war guilt would be tried for treason. Hugenberg’s group launched a petition in support of their ‘freedom law’ and attracted more than 4 million signatures. This was enough to ensure that it would have to be debated by the Reichstag and put to a referendum. In the Reichstag debate, the ‘freedom law’ was decisively defeated and it was also rejected in the referendum. On the other hand, the fact that nearly 6 million, or 13.8% of the electorate, voted for the ‘freedom Law’ was an indication of the depth of support for right wing nationalism. Moreover, Adolf Hitler’s leading role in the campaign, which was financed by Hugenberg, enabled him to make a decisive breakthrough as a national political figure.