God’s Way of Salvation (WCF 7-8, WLC 20, 30-56; WSC 12, 20-28) Flashcards
What is a covenant?
“Covenant is a bond in blood sovereignly administered” O. Palmer Robertson
- Bond – “oath bound commitment” (God bound himself to his promises)
- “A Bond in blood” – life and death commitment
- Sovereignly Administered – God sets the terms of the relationship and covenant
A divine covenant (Hebrew, berith; Greek, diatheke) (as distinguished from those made between human parties in the Scriptures) is a God-initiated, binding, living, relationship with blessings and obligations
- Elements: Parties, Promise/Blessings, Conditions, Penalty, Sign(s)
- WCF 7 - “voluntary condescension on God’s part”
What is the covenant of works (life)? Who are its parties?
WSC 12 – When God had created man, he entered into a covenant of life with him, upon condition of perfect obedience, forbidding him to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, upon pain of death.
Scripture: Romans 5, 1 Cor. 15 – Adam and Christ are both federal heads that represent two different covenants (Covenant of Works/Covenant of Grace); Hosea 6:7 – explicit testimony
Parties: God, Adam (and his posterity based on representative covenant headship)
Is there a present validity to the covenant of works? What is it?
Yes: Romans 5, 1 Cor. 15 (Christ is the 2nd Adam)
Christ fulfills the stipulations of the covenant of works, so that we may receive the covenant of grace. Positively, he fulfilled the obligation of covenant of works in obedience. Negatively, he bore the penalty of the covenant of works in death.
What is the covenant of redemption? Who are its parties?
Berkhof: “the agreement between the Father, giving the Son as Head and Redeemer of the elect, and the Son, voluntarily taking the place of those whom the Father had given him
– the Son was granted by the Father, by an eternal arrangement, a people to save and to redeem, to whom the Holy Spirit applies all the benefits of the Son’s covenantal work
Other notes:
- The covenant of grace in time is made possible by the covenant of redemption from all eternity.
- Holds Together: election in Christ, God’s activity in history, and the intra-Trinitarian love of God.
Scripture:
- Promises from the Father to Christ he would be given a people (John 6:38-40, 17:4-12)
- Psalm 2:7, Psalm 110 – decree where the eternal begotten son was given the nations
- Luke 22:29 – the kingdom the Father has assigned to him
Discuss the covenant of grace?
WSC 20: Did God leave all mankind to perish in the estate of sin and misery?
God, having out of his mere good pleasure, from all eternity, elected some to everlasting life, did enter into a covenant of grace to deliver them out of the estate of sin and misery, and to bring them into an estate of salvation by a Redeemer.
WCF 7.3 - God was pleased to make a second covenant wherein he freely offers unto sinners life and salvation by jesus Christ, requiring of them faith in him, that they may be saved, and promising to give unto all those that are ordained unto eternal life his Holy Spirit, to make them willing, and able to believe.
How does the Covenant of Grace relate to the other covenants in the Bible?
The other covenants are extensions and unfolding of God’s one covenant of grace; further established and expanded upon until its fulfillment in Christ.
As the covenant progressed, they are further established and expanded upon; extends and expands.
God does not save his people through an assortment of distinct dispensations or test which successfully fail and are exchanged, but he rather saves his people through a covenant of grace that is administered through an expanding series of connecting covenants from Adam to Noah to Abraham to Moses to David to the New Covenant prophecies to Christ.
How does the Covenant of Grace relate to Abrahamic Covenant?
Extends and expands on the promise of presence (seed), people (nation), and place.
Seed to crush Serpent’s head would come through the line of Abraham; Abraham would become the Father of many nations;
ii. Gen 12 – Call
iii. Gen 15 – Promise
iv. Gen. 17 - Sign
Covenant of grace relates to the Mosaic Covenant?
Mosaic Covenant is an extension and expression of the covenant of grace with Abraham
The Mosaic Covenant is part of the covenant of grace and that the law is not a different way of salvation, or a conditional covenant as opposed to an unconditional covenant with Abraham, but the law is in fact an advancement on the Abrahamic covenant.
What is clear is that the Mosaic covenant itself sees itself as a fulfillment of God’s promises to Abraham and thus in the line of the covenant of grace that God has established with Abraham. And the NT does not see the Mosaic Covenant as another way of salvation. The NT views salvation in the OT as always by faith. Doesn’t Paul make this point in the book of Galatians.
– Exodus 2:23-24 – everything that happens in Exodus is the answer that God gives for his people’s crying out to him, as he remembers his covenant.
Noahic Covenant?
Gen. 9 – confirms the original covenant (9:8-9)
3-fold Promise to Noah, children, and offspring
- Universal – God cares for all
- Permanent – everlasting
- Sign – Rainbow for reassurance
Discuss the relationship between the Old and New Covenants. Defend from Scripture.
Discontinuities (not contradiction, but advancement)
- ) Mediator – Old (moses) & New (Jesus)
- ) Mosaic law forms Israel into a nation
- - Abraham – promises are given to a family
- - Moses – create a nation of families (national)
- - Jesus – create a family of nations (trans-national) - ) Comprehensiveness of its revelation
- ) Jesus abolishes the ceremonial code
- - Mark 7 – Jesus declares all food clean - ) New covenant people are not defined ethnically or nationally
Continuities
God covenants with his same people, operates the same way with those people:
– expanded from israel to the Gentiles
– salvation by grace, through faith (Gen. 15:6)
– promise is to people and their offspring
– presence, people, place (holy spirit dwells)
1.) Blessing continues to come in obedience
2.) Chastening continues to come in disobedience
3.) Jesus will insist that we will be judged on the basis of our obedience (Matthew 25:31-33), but we will not be saved on the basis of our obedience.
Explain and defend (with scripture) the orthodox doctrine of the person of Christ.
WSC 21 – “The only Redeemer of God’s elect is the Lord Jesus Christ, who, being the eternal Son of God, became man, and so was, and continueth to be, God and man in two distinct natures, and one person forever.
Jesus is one divine person, with two natures, who fulfills a threefold office, in four moments of his saving mission. (Hebrews 2:10-18.)
2 Distinct Natures – “very god, very man, yet one Christ”
– two whole, perfect, and distinct natures, the Godhead and manhood, were inseperably joing together in one person, without confusion, without change, without division, without seperation.
Very God, very Man, yet one Christ, the only mediator between God and man.
Briefly discuss the natures of Christ including: (1) Was Christ a human person?; and (2) Does Christ have a soul?
- Was Christ a human person?
- - Yes, John 1:14, Heb. 2:17, – made like his brothers in every way
- - WSC 22 – Christ, the Son of God, became man, by taking to himself a true body, and a reasonable soul, being conceived by the power of the Holy Ghost, in the womb of the virgin Mary, and born of her, yet without sin. - Does Christ have a soul?
- - Yes, Matthew 26:38 – “My soul is exceedingly sorrowful, even unto death”
- - “Reasonable soul”
What is Kenosis? Did Christ lay aside any of His divine attributes at the incarnation?
What is kenosis?
– Philippians 2 – the theory that Jesus emptied some of his divine attributes when he took on flesh.
Did Christ lay aside any of His divine attributes at the incarnation?
- No, “Incarnation happens by addition, not subtraction.”
- Col. 2:9 – all the fullness of deity
- Emptying was laying aside of privileges that his divinity deserved (glory); emptied himself by taking the form of servant; taking on something additional he didn’t have before (flesh).
Briefly explain and defend against the challenges to orthodox Christology posed by Docetism, Nestorious, Eutyches, Arius, Apollinarius?
Docetism (How human was Jesus?) – Jesus was not really human, but only “seemed” to be human.
- 1 Cor. 15 – our resurrection depends on Christ’s really resurrected body.
- Heb. 2:17 - Therefore he had to be made like his brothers in every respect
Nestorious (How was Jesus human and divine?) – Jesus Christ existed as 2 persons – the man and the divine – in one physical body.
– Colossians 2:9 – all the fullness of deity lives in bodily form
Eutyches – Christ had only one nature; human nature was absorbed into the divine.
- Christ had to be fully human to atone for the sins of humanity. Perfect sacrifice.
- Heb. 2:17; Colossians 2:9
Arianism (How Divine was Jesus?) – Jesus was created by the Father and is subordinate to Him as a lesser being. Christ is not eternal.
– John 1:1, Hebrew 1
Apollinarius (How human was Jesus?) – The divine Christ (Logos) takes the place of the human soul of Jesus (the man). In other words, Jesus had a human body in which dwelled a divine soul – but no human nature.
– John 1:14 – word became flesh and dwelt among us
Are any of the early heresies regarding the natures of Christ held today? If so, by whom?
- Mormons/Jehovah’s Witnesses – Christ is created, not eternal
- Muslims – Christ isn’t son of God.
- Eternal Subordination of the Son
Explain and defend the doctrine of the communication of properties?
WCF 8.7 - “what can be said about either nature can be said about the Person of the Son, but cannot be automatically predicated to the other nature.”
For Reformed theology, the communicatio idiomatum means the attributes of each of Christ’s natures are communicated to the person of Christ.
– We can predicate what is true of each nature to Christ’s person. So, the person of Christ is omnipresent, but not according to His human nature. He is omnipresent according to His divine nature because only deity is omnipresent. Likewise, the person of Christ died on the cross, but Jesus experienced death according to His human nature, for the divine nature is not subject to death and decay.
Roman Catholics and Lutherans believe that the divine nature of Christ communicates (or shares) divine attributes such as omnipresence to His human nature; thus, Christ’s physical body can be in several locations at once.
– Reformed theology rejects this view of the communication of attributes as violating historic, orthodox Christology.