God's Attributes Flashcards

1
Q

meaning of essential?

A

what makes a thing what it is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

omnipotence?

A

all powerful/ can do anything.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

logically impossible?

A

cant think of it as it breaks the rules of thought.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

logic?

A

rules of thought

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Key thinker: Descartes

A

-God as the supreme being
-no limit to what God can do
-believed in the weakness of human intellect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

arguments that Descartes uses:

A

-three waves of doubt; evil demon and humans’ puny minds.
-ontological argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

examples for Descartes theory?

A

aeroplane and goldfish analogy:
goldfish have limited intellect compared to humans, goldfish cannot think of an aeroplane as it breaks its own rules of thought and they are limited in their intellect whereas humans can. in the same way, we are like goldfish compared to God as what we can comprehend has limits whereas what God can do is limitless.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

logically valid

A

the premises can’t be true without the conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

stone paradox/ omnipotence paradox?

A

can God create a stone that he cannot lift?
If yes, God cannot be omnipotent as He cannot lift the stone and if no, He is also not omnipotent as he cannot create the stone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Descartes response to the stone paradox?

A

Descartes would say this is invalid because humans are limited in what we can comprehend and conceive = therefore even if this doesn’t make sense to us, God can still do both as there is nothing that is logically impossible to God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Aquinas response to the stone paradox

A

Aquinas would disagree with Descartes due to his belief in reason, which is God-given as seen in natural law. If our reason concludes that it is logically impossible then that thing is logically impossible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Aquinas belief on logical impossibilities?

A

they are not real or ‘nonsense’ because they do not describe a thing. The logical impossibilities such as a square circle or unliftable stone are not a thing; therefore, they are nothing as they are not a thing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

korye on descartes

A

who? 20th century philosopher of science and critique of descartes
what?believed that descartes view out too much distance between our minds and reality.
reductio ad absurdum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Augustine argument for God’s Omnipotence

A

1) God is perfect

2) If God is perfect, he will never create the square circle, but he can.

3) So, God will never create the square circle, but he can.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Omnipotence: Augustine

A

St Augustine of Hippo was concerned about the problem of evil (Can God create evil and would he?) and concluded that due to God’s omnipotence, it means He can do anything He wants. God will never want to do evil but still can.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

evaluating Korye

A

Yes: If Descartes was alive to defend himself, he would say that the knowing is the point. God is transcendent +weakness of human intellect.

No: Korye’s view is only absurd if God does this but He loves us so he won’t.

17
Q

Omnipotence: Aquinas 2

A

Aquinas aimed to make both reason and revelation compatible; particularly Hebrews 6:18 which says “God can’t lie”. Therefore he believes God can only do good things.

18
Q

Omnipotence 2 : Aquinas argument

A

1) God is supremely perfect.

2)If God is supremely perfect, then God can only do good things.
This is plausible because of Aquinas’ “like causes, like effects” principle which says like effects come from like causes. For God to be supremely perfect cause, it means he should cause perfect effects. Anything other than good things wouldn’t be considered perfect.

3)So, God can only do good things.