1
Q

Theism

A

Aquinas

God exists; both evidence in Nature & Revelation indicated God exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Deism

A

Voltaire

God exists; only evidence in Nature indicated God exists; Reject Revelation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Atheism

A

Hume

God does not exist; evidence indicates God does not exist - suffering in the world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Agnosticism

A

no name

No belief in God exists or does not exist; evidence is tied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Fideism

A

Kierkgard, William James, Pascal

God exists; but religious beliefs can’t be justified with evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define Fideism

A

fide = faith
faith - ism

religious beliefs are a matter of faith

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Religious Pluralism

A

Joseph Campbell

God exists (A transcendent reality exists; all religions are true metaphorically); Evidence indicated God exists (Evidence comes from comparing mythology/religious stories)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Is it legitimate to have religious beliefs without evidence?

A

Yes: Fideists
No: other 5 theories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Argument in favor of Fideism

A

Pascal’s Wager

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Pascal’s Wager?

A

Evidence in support of/against God’s existence doesn’t matter because the potential consequences make belief worth it.
–> Consequences
1. God exists, you believe in him (you go to heaven)
2. God exists, if you don’t believe in him (you go to hell)
3. God doesn’t exist, you believe in him (nothing)
4. God doesn’t exist, you don’t believe in him (nothing)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Objection to Pascal’s Wager

A

Many Religions: Since Fedeism believes there is no evidence of God, and there are many religions, how do you know the one you believe in is the correct one? If you are correct, then you just got lucky.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Are all major religions true, metaphorically?

A

Yes: Religious Pluralism
No: other 5 theories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Correct and Incorrect definition of Agnosticism

A

Correct: no belief
Incorrect: 1) Don’t care 2) Not absolutely certain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define Religious Pluralism

A

the view that all religions are true metaphorically and not literally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How Religious Pluralists respond to “they can’t all be true”

A

Religious stories are metaphorical, like “Love is like a box of chocolates”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Argument for Religious Pluralism

A
  1. Although various religions tell stories with different details, the basic plot & meaning is exactly the same –> Hero’s Journey
  2. All religions tell the same stories because these stories symbolize the truth
17
Q

3 phases of the Hero’s Journey

A
  1. Hero starts off the story at home, safe, riddled with problems
  2. Hero leaves home into the unknown - dangerous, something of great value
  3. Hero returns home, solves great problem
18
Q

Objection to Religious Pluralism

A

Sigmund Freud (athiest): Religious stories are all the same not because they are true, but because these stories help ppl satisfy their psychological needs (God = substitute daddy)

19
Q

Does the evidence observable in nature constitute a preponderance of the evidence showing that God exists?

A

Yes: Theism, Deism
No: Atheism, Agnostic, Fideists

20
Q

Argument for Yes, the evidence observable in nature constitute a preponderance of the evidence showing that God exists

A

Design Argument aka Theological Argument

21
Q

What is the Design Argument?

A

Universe is like a watch. Both have design. A watch has an intelligent designer, so the universe has an intelligent designer

22
Q

Objection to Design Argument

A

Evolution: The design we observe in nature comes from an unintelligent process, not an intelligent designer

23
Q

3 steps of unintelligent process

A
  1. variation: each organism is different
  2. selection: some live, some die
  3. reproduce: a new created species
24
Q

Does revelation constitute evidence indicating that God probably exists?

A

Yes: Theists
No: other 5 theories

25
Q

Do Fideists believe in miracles? Do they think miracles are evidence?

A

Yes, No

26
Q

Argument for miracles constituting evidence

A

We have lots of testimony of miracles & religious experiences. Testimony is evidence, therefore, we have lots of evidence (testimonies) that constitute & prove God’s existence

27
Q

Voltaire’s argument against revelation

A

Since God loves all his children equally, He would never perform miracles for some ppl but not others

28
Q

What is revelation

A

miracles & religious experiences

29
Q

Hume’s essay & argument against belief in miracles

A

It is never reasonable to believe a miracle happened. It is always more likely that a false testimony (lying or confused) happened than a miracle happened and our own sense experience shows this

30
Q

What did Hume’s write

A

On Miracles

31
Q

Is there a preponderance of evidence showing that God does not exist?

A

Yes: Atheist
No: Theists, Deists, Agnostics

32
Q

Argument for Atheism

A

unnecessary suffering, playpen analogy

33
Q

what is the Playpen analogy

A

Playpen: the World
Kids: Humans
Sand: Beach
Saw = Diseases, Natural Disaster
Playpen Designer: World Designer

Does the Playpen Designer love the kids? No because the Saw is hurting/killing kids on the playground.

34
Q

What is the Saw in the Playpen analogy

A

Diseases/Natural Disasters

35
Q

Objection to Unnecessary Suffering Argument

A

Sometimes loving parents allow their children to suffer because they have reasons that justify the suffering but the kids can’t understand the parent’s reasons