Glaucoma 5 - Management of Glaucoma Flashcards

1
Q

Why do clinicians Targeting IOP?

A

•The IOP that is expected to confer optic nerve stability in a patient with glaucoma
• Damaged optic nerves require greater IOP reduction. le. the worse the initial condition of the eye, the lower the tension needs tolbe to prevent further loss or blindness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How do Clinicians determined to reduce the IOP?

A

Set initial target IOP at 30% and then modify
according to:
• How severe is the existing optic nerve damage?
• How high is the IOP?
• How rapidly has the damage occurred? (Rate of Progression)
•How many additional risk factors are present?
•Life expectancy
•Status of other eye
•Patient preferences
•Adverse consequences of intervention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

General damage reduction IOP values:

A

• Mild damage 30%
• Moderate damage 35%
• Severe damage 35-40%
Once a target IOP is selected it should not be a fixed target but may need to be modified depending on the patients response to treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Aims of treatment in Glaucoma:

A

EGS guidelines:
• In general, the goal of glaucoma treatment can be summarised as follows: preservation of visual function adequate to the individuals needs with minimal or no side effects, for the expected lifetime of the patient without any disruption of his/her normal activities at a sustainable cost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Visual field vs survival:

A

Stage of disease, age ( life expectancy) and rate of progression are really the key to how aggressive we need to be in managing the lowering of IOP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study:

A

• 1636 patients with OHT to observation or treatment to lower IOP less than 24 mmHg or by 20% min (22.5% vs 4%) 7 year follow up.
•At 5 years 4.4% of treatment group progressed vs 9%
- 90% of untreated group did not progress -By 13 years 22% of control gp and 16% of treatment group had progressed to glaucoma

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

OHTS Study IOP and Corneal thickness as risk factors:

A

• Looked at Groups that had progressed and found several significant baseline predictive factors
• Strongest was CCT, IOP, Age, CD ratio and
PSD >2.0
• So for some patients risk was high as 30+%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

European Glaucoma Prevention Study:

A

• Similar findings to OHTS in terms of risk factors to progression from OHT to Glaucoma
• No statistically significant difference between treated group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Collaborative Normal Tension Glaucoma Study (NTGS):

A

• 5 yr study of 140 eyes in NTG (IOP=24) primary outcome measure was disease progression
• Randomised to IOP lowering (30% with any form of Rx vs controls)
- Results - 20% or treated group progressed vs 60% of untreated
• First multi-centre prosp random clinical trial to show IOP reduction is effective in any type of chronic glaucoma
• Summary when IOP lowered by 30% in NTG there was lower incidence of VF progression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS)

A

• 607 patients followed for 4-5 yrs - Newly dx
- OAG randomised to either medication or trabeculectomy to achieve a target IOP
• Primary outcome variables were VF loss and QoL (no sig diff)
• Lower IOPs achieved with surgery (48%) vs medication (35%)
• Increase in cataract in surgery (17% vs meds 6%)
• VF progression similar and not significant over 5 years at these levels of IOP reduction (35% + Some differences when followed up for longer (TAGS)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS)

A

AGIS (Advanced Glaucoma patients)
• 591 over 8 years randomised into TAT or ATT
• Eyes with Avg IOP > 18 mmHg over first 3 6/12 visits showed significantly greater VF deterioration compared to eyes with IOP <14 over same period and amount of deterioration inc with longer f/u

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial
Results(EMGT)

A

• EMGT looked at 316 eyes over 10 years measuring the effectiveness of IOP reduction in early untreated OAG with IOPs < 30
• Patients were randomised to IOP lowering with ALT/B blockers or no Rx
• A 25% reduction of IOP from baseline (20.6mm to15.5mm Hg) resulted in a reduced risk of progression by 50%
• Risk of Progression decreased by 10% with each 1mmHg IOP reduction from baseline to firs F/U visit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

General principles of treatment: In order from common ->uncommon

A

• Topical hypotensives (monotherapy to maximal therapy)
• YAG laser iridotomy if narrow angles (ITC)
• SLT
• Trabeculectomy /Deep Sclerectomy
• oral acetazolamide
• Angle Surgery (Phaco, istent, trabectome, canaloplasty)
• Cyclodiode Laser Ciliary Ablation
• Tube or valve surgery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Order of prescribing drops for glaucoma:

A

• 1st Line: Prostaglandin analogue or Beta-blocker
- Uniocular trials
• 2nd Line: Prostaglandin analogue or Beta-blocker
• 3rd Line: Carbonic anhydrase inhibitor or alpha 2 agonist
• 4th Line: rarely as 3 above or pilocarpine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Prostaglandin Analogues:(1st line)

A
  • All Increased uveoscleral outflow by ciliary muscle relaxation
  • 30-35% reduction in IOP
    •Latanoprost (Xalatan, Generic, Monopost)
    •Travoprost (Travatan) od
    •Bimatoprost 0.01/0.03% (Lumigan) od
    • Tafluprost (Saflutan) od
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Prostaglandin Analogues Side Effects (2nd line)

A

• Mild conjunctival hyperaemia
• Mild punctate keratopathy
• Foreign body sensation
• Ocular irritation
• Increased iris pigmentation (20%)
• Lengthening of eyelashes
• Cystoid macular oedema (pseudo or aphakic)
• Reactivation of herpes simplex keratitis
• Very rarely exacerbation of asthma
• Exacerbation of uveitis

17
Q

Adrenergic Agents : (3rd line)

A

•Propine (dipivefrin) and epinephrine
• Alpha-2 agonists (brimonidine [Alphagan],
apraclonidine [lopidine])
• Beta blockers (timolol, levobunolol, betaxolol, carteolol, metipranolol)

18
Q

Beta-Blockers (2nd line)

A

• Timolol and others
• Decreased aqueous production
• 25-30% reduction in IOP
• Suffer from tachyphylaxis
• No difference with 0.25 or 0.5% or even 0.1%

19
Q

Beta- blockers side effects - Ocular

A

• Corneal hypaesthesia
• Punctate keratopathy
• Dry eye syndromes
• Burning/stinging
• Pseudopemphigoid
All may be due to presence of preservatives

20
Q

Beta-Blockers side effects - Systemic (Main ones)

A

•Severe bradycardia
•Arrhythmia
•Heart failure
•Dyspnoea
• Exacerbation of asthma

21
Q

Carbonic Anhydrase inhibitors: (3rd line)

A

• Dorzolamide (trusopt) tds
• Brinzolamide (azopt) bd
• 18% reduction in IOP
• Possible improved optic nerve perfusion due to local vasodilatation

22
Q

Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors side effects:

A

• Transient burning/stinging (33%)
• Bitter taste (26%)
• Ocular allergy
• Superficial punctate keratitis (10%)
• Blurred vision
• Dryness
• Tearing
• Photophobia (1-5%)
• Hair loss
CAls may affect metabolism of corneal endothelium, so use in caution as may cause corneal thickening and loss of clary in unhealthy endothelium

23
Q

Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors side effects - systemic

A

Only if oral form used:
• Sulphonamide hypersensitivity
• Stevens-Johnson syndrome
• Toxic epidermal necrosis
• Aplastic anaemia
Rare and more relevant to systemic CAls like acetazolamide

24
Q

Alpha-2-Agonists (4th line agent)

A

• Apraclonidine and Brimonidine
• Reduction in aqueous production
• 25% reduction in IOP
• Additive with other hypotensive agents
• Experimental neuroprotective properties
• Apraclonidine (lopidine 0.5%, 1% very useful pre- post laser treatment and in acute pressure rise

25
Q

Alpha-2-Agonist side effects

A

• High rate of allergy (15-25% for brimonidine)
• Conjunctival hyperaemia or blanching
• Follicular conjunctivitis (10%)
• Sub-sensitivity (lopidine)
• Dry mouth
systemic blood pressure reduction (never use in children)
Fatigue and drowsiness
• Avoid with mono amine oxidase inhibitors (depression)

26
Q

Cholinergic Agents arasympathomimetics & miotics) (4th line)

A

• Increase trabecular outflow via ciliary muscle contraction plus some minor decrease in aqueous inflow
• Pilocarpine 1-4% qds
• ~ 20% reduction in IOP from baseline

27
Q

Pilocarpine - Side effects

A

Pilocarpine - Side Effects
• Ciliary muscle spasm
• Brow ache
• Accomodative myopia
• Miosis with constriction of visual fields
• Increased risk of retinal detachment
• Aqueous barrier instability
• Keratopathy
• Hypersensitivity
• Exacerbation of uveitis / cataract formation
• Bradycardia, nausea, sweating, diarrhoea, bronchospasm
• Retinal detachment
•Acute or chronic angle closure

28
Q

Combined preparations for multiple treatments

A

• Cosopt (Timolol and Dorzolamide)
• Xalacom (Timolol and Latanoprost)
• Combigan (Timolol and Brimonidine)
• Duotrav (Timolol and Travoprost)
• Ganfort (Timolol and Bimatoprost)
• Azarga (Timolol and Brinzolamide)
• Simbrinza (Brimonidine and Brinzolamide)
• Taptigom (Timolol and Tafluprost)

29
Q

General principles of compliance with medications:

A

• Simpler treatment regimens
• Least side effects
• Education
• Reinforcement
• Regular review and reassurance
• Realistic expectations of treatment
This is important as Px may not use drops if dont see a point

30
Q

Further side effects and efficacy (use) issues:

A

• Preservative related (Irritation, redness, dryness)
• Idiosyncratic
• Remember nasolacrimal duct occlusion
• Vaseline to lids
• Drops at least 5 mins apart
• Close eyes for 1 to 3 mins after drop
Avoid dabbing eyes with tissue

31
Q

Preservatives in drops:

A

• Good evidence that preservatives in drops like Benzalkonium Chloride are harmful in the long term to the ocular surface
• Intolerance/ irritation
• Allergy
• Exacerbates dryness especially in susceptible patients and those on multiple drops
• Vogue for prescribing preservative free glaucoma medications (long term) in Europe places heavy demand on existing supplies

32
Q

Preservative free preparations

A

• Timolol (MSD and Thea -Tiopex 0. 1%, Eysano-Aspire)
• Monopost (Latanoprost pres free)
• Tafluprost (Saflutan)/Taptiqom (saflutan and timolol)
• Lumigan UD/ Ganfort UD (Bimatoprost/Timolol)
• Eyreida (bimatoprost 0.3%)
• Travatan (BAK free - Polyquad)
•Cosopt and Eylamdo (dorzolamide/timolol) Dorzolamide (Eydelto)
•Pilocarpine 2%
• Apraclonidine (lopidine 0.5% and 1%)

33
Q

New topical Hypotensives:

A

• Latanoprostene Bunod 0.024%
- Acts on increasing outflow through trabecular meshwork and uveoscleral outflow
- Weinreb et al 2015 Voyager study - more efficacious than Latanoprost alone
• Netarsudil 0.02% (Rhopressa)
- Increases outflow with remodelling of trabecular meshwork. As effective as Latanoprost and more effective in combination.
- Side effects of red eye (50%) and iritis

34
Q

Other preparations for glaucoma:

A

Neuroprotective agents:
• (NMDA receptor antagonists like memantine block glutamate mediated toxicity)
• Gingko biloba
• Coenzyme Q10
• Nimodipine (ca channel blockers)
• Magnesium
• Free radical scavengers
• Dark Chocolate, red grapes, L-carnitine, curcumin, Citicoline, alpha lipoic acid

35
Q

Near future developments:

A

• Drug eluting implants -should improve compliance/adherence due to constant slow release drug delivery
- Conjunctival fornix silicone rings
- Punctal plugs
- Sub conjunctival implants
- Intra-ocular implants
- istends of tafluprost in trabec meshwork

36
Q

Generic eye drop problems:

A

• Large number of patients on Xalatan led to concern in 2012 when Xalatan went off label that generics would be inferior in Efficacy. Now several medications are available in generics.

• Main experience is:
- Variability of manufacturer/supplier (bottle design and colour)
- Variability of size and quantity of drops that are released by bottle
- Occasional topical intolerance compared with Xalatan original formulation